Paper ID #16997Hands-On STEM Lesson Plans Developed through Engineering Faculty andSTEM Teacher Collaboration (Evaluation)Sr. Mary Ann Jacobs, Manhattan College Mary Ann Jacobs, scc is an assistant professor in the School of Education. She prepares secondary teacher candidates in all content areas through her courses in secondary pedagogy. Her areas of interest include STEM education, brain compatible strategies, and action research in the classroom.Ms. Kathleen Christal Mancuso , Manhattan College Kathleen Mancuso is a Secondary Education Major with a concentration in Chemistry at Manhattan Col- lege located in Riverdale
willingness to adopt innovation by using teacher createdlesson plans as a source of data.In our prior work, we have empirically documented a number of potential indicators that areassociated with teacher potential to adopt innovations. Our goal for this project was to gainsome foundational understanding of how teachers plan to teach engineering, and their attentionto implementing other educational innovations. To achieve this goal, we analyzed a sample of42 teacher created lesson plans drawn from a larger sample of over 300 STEM related lessonplans. We found that the teachers communicated incomplete understanding of engineeringpractices and design, yet created plans that shared the responsibility for assignment decisionswith the students. We also
camp organized and run by the Autonomous Vehicle Systems (AVS) ResearchLaboratory at the University of the Incarnate Word for middle school girls during the week ofJuly 6 to July 10, 2015. The primary goal of the camp was to introduce more females into thefield of engineering through robotic projects and competitions, guest speakers, and field trips.The camp had an additional emphasis on providing learning and research opportunities for girlsfrom underrepresented communities. miniGEMS was the first free camp in San Antonio, TX formiddle school girls with a special focus on engineering. Despite being held for the first time,there were 25 middle school students from various school districts in San Antonio. The campwas planned, coordinated, and
building to a design challenge in which studentsexperience the arc of the engineering design process and develop a technology. The efficacystudy included four units: • An Alarming Idea: Designing Alarm Circuits: This unit introduces students to the field of electrical engineering as they incorporate their understandings of electricity to design alarm circuits. During the design challenge, groups are tasked with developing a circuit that triggers an alarm when a trough for feeding a baby lamb is empty. Students plan a circuit design, test it themselves, and develop a schematic diagram. They pass it to another group in the class to construct and test. Based on the results, they improve their design10
) have been created in a flexible manner that supports theiradaption to multiple venues and grade levels. The design presented here simplifies the lessoncreation process while supporting a broad dissemination to pre-college teachers and students.The importance of this effort is reflected in the research findings that many young students donot know what engineers do.3 The proposed approach supports faculty and graduate students inmaximizing the potential impact of their outreach efforts, reaching a broader population of youngstudents. Two specific lesson plans are presented, Mining Coal and Bridge Building. These lessonswere selected because they illustrate flexibility in design and our initial efforts at embeddingsuch flexibility
first part, the model development, students are guided (usuallythrough carefully crafted laboratory experiences) to develop concepts and gain familiarity withthe associated representations for those concepts. The students become accustomed to referringto their laboratory data as the authority on scientific relationships. In the deployment phase thatfollows, students apply the model to a variety of situations and test the limits of the model, oftenthrough problem solving and sometimes via lab practica. Incorporating engineering applicationsin the deployment provides the ideal structure for seeing the relationship between fundamentalscientific understanding and well-planned engineering.The Ohio State University has offered a series of Modeling
successfully coordinated with multiple faculty members in the submission of approximately 600 grant proposals, including co-writing, editing and serving as the Program Manager for 5 awarded STEM edu- cation grants totaling more than $12M. She has collaborated with University offices and College faculty and professional staff in the facilitation of recruitment strategies to increase the quality and quantity of undergraduate and graduate enrollment, including supervising the planning and implementation of Open House and other recruitment events. Jessica now manages the day-to-day operations of the DragonsTeach program, including supporting the development of programs of study, student recruitment, fundraising and grant
steps elaborated on below: ● Ask: What is the problem? What have others done to solve this? What are the constraints? ● Imagine: What are possible solutions? What’s the advantage of one over another? Choose the best one. ● Plan: What’s needed to execute the chosen solution? What additional skills, tools or materials are needed? Get the needed skills and materials. ● Create: Build a model according to the plan and test it systematically. ● Improve: How could the design be improved? Redesign and retest. This EDP model is cast as a cyclic process, with progress going in either direction in the cycle and sometimes shortcutting from one step to another, as is consistent with the iterative nature of
integrated through teacher views that produce dynamic project-basedlesson plans. The system encourages an interdisciplinary approach that requires studentsto draw on multiple subject areas simultaneously to solve real world problems.This paper presents the results of the initial evaluation of the DLMS. After providing thedetails regarding its infrastructure, a critical evaluation of the platform and how itsupports both teachers and students in a balanced approach to learning is presented. Thisevaluation draws upon the Felder-Silverman Learning Style Model (FSLM) in thatelements of the DLSM are evaluated within the context of the models four dimensions.The initial results of a pilot project aimed at evaluating its effectiveness in schools
electrical components like DC motors, vibration (8th Grade) motors, LEDs, resistors, and switches to design and build an interactive electronic game. Additionally, they Apply have to develop a business plan for bringing their game to market. Research Topics/Projects – atoms, free electrons, current, voltage, elements, periodic table, proportions, conductors, insulators, build circuits, power sources, LEDs, resistors, switches, motors, games types, game design, develop mind maps, business plan, and cost analysis. Curricula Access All curricula materials are hosted online for ease of distribution to teachers across the country. Teachers and other K12 personnel
, through having students work on tasks that are enjoyable, andsocial persuasion, through instructors’ constant verbal comments that acknowledge students’progress and improvement.The Development of Design ConceptsIn alignment with the societal emphasis on nurturing next generation makers and tinkerers, it isimperative to teach students design concepts from an early age. One of the major design conceptcomponents is design thinking, which is the thinking process generally adopted by engineeringdesigners in approaching design problems11. Effective design thinking has been commonlyqualified as going through the process of planning, building, and testing, or in more details,going through the cycle of identifying problems, building prototypes
sophomores and one first-year student.Administered via Qualtrics® Research Suite online survey software, the full survey consisted of14 items, including multiple choice (e.g., yes/no) and text entry (see all 14 questions inAppendix A). Three survey questions queried strengths of the CU Teach Engineering programand career plans, while five questions probed perceived differences between engineering andeducation programs and barriers to simultaneously navigating both disciplines. Other questionsasked students to briefly describe the use of engineering skills in education courses, as well asthe use of teaching skills from education courses in undergraduate engineering courses.To supplement the quantitative findings with a qualitative perspective
World Council on System Engineering and Information Technology (WCSEIT), Vice President of Safety Health and Environment Research Organization (SHERO) and Vice President of World Council on Communi- cation and Arts (WCCA). He is Chairman of Working Group ”Ingenieurp¨adagogik im Internationalen Kontext” since 2002, Member of International Monitoring Committee in IGIP since 2004, Member of Strategic Planning Committee of Education Society of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engi- neers, Inc (IEEE-EdSoc) since 2009, Board Member of ”Global Council on Manufacturing and Manage- ment” (GCMM) since 2004 and Director of Brazilian Network of Engineering (RBE) since 1998. He is also Member of Board of Governors
, Plan, Implement, Test andEvaluate. Instances identified as EBR were coded based on where they occurred within theProcess of Design. Given that the focus of this study was just the engineering design challengeportion of the unit, instances of EBR that occurred during the Process of Design were given oneof three codes: Plan, Implement & Test, or Evaluate. Implement and Test were combined becausethese steps were difficult to distinguish as they were done concurrently by students due to thenature of the design challenge. The iteration aspect of the design process was also accounted for;these three codes were also noted as occurring in the initial design phase or within the redesignphase.The third step was to take a close look at how students
appearing categories, concepts, and events helped theresearch team construct assertions based on the events leading up to the teachers’ conceptions ofengineering design, plans for integrating engineering design-based tasks, and the actualimplementation of engineering design tasks.Classroom observations. The aim of classroom observations was to observe and characterizedesign-informed pedagogical methods employed by SLED teachers. Initially, members of theresearch team conducted informal classroom observations that included open field notes focusingon the teacher; specifically, his/her instructional practices exhibited during a given lesson. Basedon early field notes and a review of existing classroom observational protocols (e.g., RTOP,STAMM, and
. Over 60 ETKs have been developed to date; about 20 have been widely distributed and used in schools and summer programs. We have adapted ETKs to both elementary and high school audiences. To learn more, please visit our Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/theengineersway/) or contact us at lgr@virginia.edu to gain access to the complete lessons plans. Trash Sliders was
, 95% 107, 88% Yes No Yes No Figure 5: Student Self-Assessment of Project UnderstandingThe response to the second and third questions on the exit survey assessed student interest andconfidence in their ability to major in science or engineering. The percentage of students whoresponded that they plan to study science or engineering, if they go to college, was highest in theMakerspace class. This is shown in Figure 6, and responses for the other courses ranged from59% – 93%. However, the next question on the survey (“did summer change their mind”)impacts the interpretation of those responses and is shown in Figure 7. A
activity stations were successfully included in the Marchworkshop, and the teachers’ self-reported learning CS and engineering content as well as gainingconfidence in CS use. Over half (n=6) of the 11 participants planned to incorporate the NetLogosimulations, and almost as many (n=5) identified the Robot Turtles board game and the What iscoding? post-it activity as new ideas that they planned to use with their K-12 students. Thoseparticipants who offered explanations mentioned that these activities helped make lessons “moremeaningful” for students by connecting ideas with games, engaging students “to visually see andexperience” coding, helping them understand “how a computer works,” and “how and why wewould use code.” Other individuals mentioned
steps which begin with the identification of the problem,followed by postulating and evaluating possible solutions. Engineering is Elementary3 expressesthese steps as Ask, Imagine, Plan, Create, Improve, Figure 1.Figure 1. Engineering Design Process Figure 2. Text of the first Design Challenge.Within the context of the collaborative work of university education and engineering faculty anda local school district on an ongoing grant focused on improving teacher preparation forapplication of common Core standards and Next Generation Science standards, a liberal studiescourse was designed to introduce undergraduate students interested in entering the teachingprofession with engineering design experience. While courses for non-engineering
going offof the track and not having used any parts of a commercially available hovercraft in the design.The hovercraft could only be powered by a battery. For the research component, students wereasked to review the literature on the history of hovercrafts and provide a brief summary of themajor milestones in their evolution.Program ImplementationA total of 16 middle (grades 7-8) and 20 high school (grades 9-12) students participated in theengineering design course over a four month period. The high school class consisted of 70% malesand 30% females while the middle school class was composed of 69% males and 31% females.The course began with an introduction of the five steps (ask, imagine, plan, create and improve)involved in the EDP. Each
participants benefit from education participants’ knowledge in developinglesson plans, teaching techniques and classroom management skills. Engineering and education facultywork together to advise the students from both schools. This collaborative environment creates a mutuallearning atmosphere for both students and faculty.7. Provide opportunity to learn about engineering for education studentsThe release of the Next Generation Science Standards in April 2013 has included engineering in K-12curriculum in NYS [15]. However education majors have no education on engineering topics and are notprepared to teach engineering courses. This program provides a unique opportunity for education studentsto learn about engineering and learn how to incorporate
Paper ID #16895Developing a Questionnaire and Evaluation Methods for a High School RocketProgramMr. Ibrahim Halil Yeter, Texas Tech University Ibrahim H. Yeter is currently a PhD candidate in the Curriculum and Instruction program at the College of Education, and at the same time, he is pursuing his Master’s degree in Petroleum Engineering at Texas Tech University. He is highly interested in conducting research within the Engineering Education frame- work. Mr. Yeter plans to graduate in December 2016 with both degrees and is looking forward to securing a teaching position within a research university and continuing his
instructional component as it relates to the situativeframework; provide an explanation of how AR technology supports the instruction ofengineering concepts; and provide a more tangible view of instructional design using a fourthgrade lesson plan for teaching circuitry.Guidelines to Situating ARTable 1 summarizes the guidelines for integrating an AR application for teaching and learningelectrical engineering concepts. We propose that following this guide, engineering educators canwork with elementary teachers to incorporate AR into lesson plans to provide a more tangibleand engaging environment for the students. First, we will review the three principles thatsummarize situative learning theory and will form the basis for the guide as suggested
standards rich incontent and practice that are coherent across disciplines.3 The NGSS (2013) indicates thatengineering must be a fundamental part of the new framework since students are required todevelop the capability to carry and transfer knowledge across science disciplines throughmodeling, planning, conducting investigations, analyzing and interpreting data, andconstructing explanations to demonstrate understanding of core science ideas. Students “mustbe able to apply scientific ideas to solve a design problem, taking into account possibleunanticipated effects”.3Our approach to broadening participation is based on what we know works to engage girls inengineering. We know that precollege and college design classes have a much higherpercentage
for curriculum, pedagogy, and projects. Middle and high schools have historically facedchallenges introducing engineering into the curriculum in an inclusive and authentic manner.Because these students are still flexible about their career decisions3,4, programs that peakinterest can still influence students’ college and career plans. An inclusive approach could havesignificant impact on the diversity of the engineering workforce.A large public university implemented EPICS (Engineering Projects in Community Service) forundergraduates in 19955,6. The approach has been successful in preparing students professionallyas well as addressing compelling needs locally and globally. The program has also shown that itis an inclusive approach to
school buildings, updating curriculum toeducate students on natural hazards and risk reduction measures, and reviewing the condition ofall existing school buildings and mitigating documented vulnerabilities.As part of its strategic plan the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) has committedto taking a leadership role in promoting earthquake safety in schools. EERI is a multidisciplinarynational society of nearly 3000 engineers, geoscientists, building officials, architects, planners,public officials, social scientists and students dedicated to advancing the science and practice ofearthquake engineering and reducing the impacts of earthquakes on society. EERI’s SchoolEarthquake Safety Initiative (SESI) aims to engage the EERI
to traditional values andtribal elders will improve perceptions of STEM as culturally relevant and supportive of the NativeAmerican community, consequently igniting students’ interest in STEM. Streams, brooks, rivers,and water resources have always been of great traditional and cultural value to Native Americansnot only as a means of subsistence but also for recreation. Therefore, the model presented in thispaper—to develop stormwater management and mitigation plans—is designed to attract studentsin Native American communities into STEM education. Stormwater is runoff water from rain or melting snow that drains across the landscape.Runoff flows off rooftops, pavement, bare soil, and lawns, picking up pollutants along the way. Itgathers
purposes.Tell Us More! What could you do next to Develop a plan to investigate Practice: Planning and Carrying Do_Nextmake sure your design actually works? whether the design idea would Out Investigations work.Do you think that the work you did for this Explain a variety of aspects of Crosscutting Concept: Influence Engineering?activity is engineering? Why or why not? engineering. of Science, Engineering, and Technology on Society and the Natural WorldPilot Testing the InstrumentDuring development of the
implicitlearning.There has been little to no work done to understand how learners learn in Makerspaces, andto find or develop tools to assess this learning. In the recent ASEE conference Morocz et al.11 presented plans of measuring the impacts of a university makerspace “through engineeringdesign self-efficacy, retention in the engineering major; and idea generation ability".A study by the Maker Ed Open Portfolio Project 12 strengthens the promise of our proposal toemploy self-reflection to assess learning in Makerspaces. This work presents self-reporteddata by Makerspaces all over the United States about their alignment with nationaleducational initiatives. Most sites reported themselves as being aligned with STEM (94%)(Science, technology, engineering, and
. Utilizing a three-year Magnet School grant,DLJ established a Center for Mathematics and Engineering to developed and thenimplement its integrated, whole school curriculum with engineering as the core and theconnector. The results of this careful planning and meticulous attention to detailsproduced an elementary school environment that fosters student creative thinking withthe expectation of quantitative metrics to gauge that creativity. The merit of this totalemersion of engineering into an elementary curriculum is reflected in student scores onstandardized test as well as a plethora of awards and acknowledgements for the schoolincluding being named the top elementary STEM program in the nation by the 2015Future of Education Technology Conference