Chemical Engineering. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Tennessee. He has nineteen years of industrial experience in industrial process and product development in the detergent, paper, and packaging industries. He teaches capstone design, value engineering and engineering economy at the undergraduate level, and technical innovation and advanced engineering economy in the graduate Engineering Management program. His research interests include product development, technical innovation, entrepreneurship, and design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Comprehensive Approach to Power Sector Workforce DevelopmentAbstractThe University
Paper ID #14939The Bucknell Poetry Path App Experiment: A Collaboration Across CampusProf. Michael S Thompson, Bucknell University Prof. Thompson is an associate professor in the department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Bucknell University, in Lewisburg, PA. While his teaching responsibilities typically include digital design, computer engineering electives, and senior design, his focus in the classroom is to ignite passion in his students for engineering and design through his own enthusiasm, open-ended student-selected projects, and connecting engineering to the world around them. His research interests
elective for industrial engineering majors andis occasionally taken by graduate students. The prerequisite for AdvEngEcon is EngEcon. As such,several students are juniors, but the majority are seniors.As taught for many years, AdvEngEcon typically began with a review of material covered inEngEcon: annual worth, future worth, present worth, and rate of return methods of comparingmutually exclusive investment alternatives, after-tax comparison of investment alternatives underinflationary conditions; and replacement analysis. Additional material in AdvEngEcon included: costestimation; capital planning and budgeting; break-even, sensitivity, and risk analysis; decisionanalysis; analytic hierarchy process; and real options. The textbook adopted for the
career Dr. Dean was Director of Operations and Business De- velopment for Clark-Smith Associates, P.C., and served as an Electrician in the US Navy aboard the USS South Carolina and the USS Enterprise.Mr. Connor Schwalm, Old Dominion University Connor Schwalm earned his B.S. in Physics from Old Dominion University in 2014. Currently, he is an Graduate Student in the Engineering Management and System Engineering Program at Old Dominion University working towards his M.E. in Systems Engineering with an expected graduation of August 2016. Currently, he works as a Graduate Research Assistant for Dr. Tony Dean on Stern2STEM, a pilot program to increase the student veteran population and retention rates in STEM disciplines
recognizing it as an important tool for buildingresilience to climate change impacts such as increased heavy rainfall and heat island effect. Eachagency committed to taking specific action to promote green infrastructure including but notlimited to: creating alliances, providing community assistance, funding, training, development ofmetrics to assess performance of green infrastructure, and promotion best practices. (Federal) The City of Norfolk, the Green Infrastructure Center Inc. and Old Dominion Universityhave collaborated on a National Fish and Wildlife Federation Grant titled “Developing a GreenInfrastructure Plan and Network for the Lafayette River Network”. As part of the project OldDominion University will provide a training program
Paper ID #14567Professional Formation of Engineers’ Conceptions of ”the Public”: Early-Concept Exploratory ResearchDr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech Yanna Lambrinidou is a medical ethnographer and adjunct assistant professor in the Science and Technol- ogy Studies (STS) program at Virginia Tech. For the past 8 years, she has conducted extensive research on the historic 2001-2004 Washington, DC lead-in-drinking-water contamination. This work exposed wrongdoing and unethical behavior on the part of engineers and scientists in local and federal government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-founded the graduate level
problemthe cluster faces is the need for successful approaches for Asia. The reason is that efficientpractices for Europe had poor effect in Asia-Pacific as different intercultural aspects andvarious details had to be considered to ensure success.This paper describes new practices which have been implemented to solve this problem. First,a Russian research university engaged in research for the cluster was selected as a site whichhelps the cluster with challenging process of internationalization. Next, a representative officeof this Russian university was established in Vietnam to balance cultural, linguistic,psychological, and administrative issues. This office employs Vietnamese graduates of thisuniversity and coordinates cooperation between
95.8 Others## Others includes non-white students who are not classified as underrepresented.Survey design and disseminationThe survey described in this paper was distributed to both undergraduate and graduate students.We recruited participants studying civil or architectural engineering at U.S. universities. Thesurvey targeted students with at least junior standing, to ensure that they had substantialengineering-related course experiences. At the graduate level, we targeted solely studentspursuing degrees in the area of structural engineering.The web-based survey was designed according to best practices in survey design, in terms ofvisual arrangement, types, and organization of questions and compatibility with multiple webbrowsers13
). Dr. Leydens won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice—at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C
issues of societal impact having to do with cultural issues, accessibility issues, computing and public policy, the impact of free and opensource software, and so on. The authors argue that one approach for introducing such topics into a curriculum is through capstone projects, e.g., that develop products to serve the 1, 2, 7, 8public good. A number of authors have developed “best practices” for teaching computer science ethics. Best practices typically involve the use of case studies, handson exercises, roleplaying, discussion sessions, written assignments, and project work. 2 Quinn surveyed 50 ABET accredited computerscience departments (out of 200 programs at
Paper ID #15087Year Two: Analysis of 3-D Technology Impact on STEM-based Courses;Specifically, Introduction to Engineering CoursesMr. Oscar Antonio Perez, University of Texas - El Paso Mr. Oscar Perez received his B.S. and Masters in Electrical Engineering from the University of Texas at El Paso with a special focus on data communications. Awarded the Woody Everett award from the American Society for engineering education August 2011 for the research on the impact of mobile de- vices in the classroom. He is currently pursuing a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Mr. Perez has been teaching the Basic Engineering
sponsored by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Lord is a fellow of the ASEE and IEEE and is active in the engineering education community including serving as General Co-Chair of the 2006 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, on the FIE Steering Committee, and as President of the IEEE Education Society for 2009-2010. She is an Associate Editor of the IEEE Transactions on Edu- cation. She and her coauthors were awarded the 2011 Wickenden Award for the best paper in the Journal of Engineering Education and the 2011 Best Paper Award for the IEEE Transactions on Education. In Spring 2012, Dr. Lord spent a sabbatical at Southeast University in Nanjing, China teaching and doing research
, model-based design with a balance between theory and industry best practices. He collaborated extensively with the Xerox Mechanical Engineering Sciences Laboratory (MESL), an offshoot of Xerox PARC, during this time. At Rensselaer, he graduated 37 M.S. students and 20 Ph.D. students, and authored over 30 refereed journal articles and over 50 refereed conference papers. In 2006 at RPI, he received the two highest awards conferred for teaching: the RPI School of Engineering Education Excellence Award and the RPI Trustees’ Outstanding Teacher Award. Over the past 20 years, he has conducted hands-on, integrated, customized, mechatronics workshops for practicing engineers nationally and internationally, e.g., at Xerox
focuses on the analysis of designated andemergent leaders during the project26.Project-based learning is associated with increased student satisfaction, skills development, andlong-term retention of material27. In engineering education, it is an effective mode in which toteach design28 and can closely model engineering practice: in a typical course, teams ideate,design, and prototype an engineering product. The types of skills developed in project-basedcourses, including teamwork, communication, and self-directed research, are congruent withbroader professional goals for graduating engineering students. Finally, current accreditationguidelines for U.S. schools require a capstone design course for all engineering programs26.Therefore major U.S
Paper ID #16754Developments in the Teaching of Engineering Electromagnetics for Improve-ment in Student Interest and UnderstandingMs. Lauren E. Donohoe, Department of Electrical Engineering at The Pennsylvania State University Lauren Donohoe received B.S. Degrees in both Electrical Engineering and Physics from the Pennsylvania State University in 2014. She is currently a M.S. student in Electrical Engineering at the Pennsylvania State University. During her graduate studies in electrical engineering, she researched and implemented teaching meth- ods to stimulate interest in students. She chose to perform education and
course. Students will developa detailed and practical understanding of network system and protocol implementations. Anancillary goal is to reinforce certain software engineering principles in the area of codegeneration (as highlighted section 3 of the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge [4].Lectures provide instruction in 3 main topic areas including (1) A model for Large-scaleNetwork Architecture Design [5]; (2) Network System Architectures and Design [2] [3]; and (3)Software Engineering Topics as they impact the development of the router.The primary goal of the labs is to provide students with an opportunity to begin the week’s workwith the instructor present to answer questions and clarify the week’s development requirements.The three
was primarily based onquantitative questions with the last question asking for student comments and suggestions. Wenote that this is an ongoing project and in order to fully understand its learning impact more datais required. All of the students taking the capstone project attended the workshop. Almost all of thestudents felt IoT, LAMP, and Data Visualization were important concepts that they should befamiliar with before they graduate and seek employment. On average, participating studentsspent 12 hours working on the assigned exercises, as described in Section 3, outside of theworkshop. The majority (81 percent) of students expressed that the introduction to MySQL andPHP Section in the workshop should be expanded by a few more hours
. Recktenwald, Gerald W. and David E. Hall, “Using Arduino as a Platform for Programming, Design and Measurement in a Freshman Engineering Course,” ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Vancouver, BC. June 26-29, 2011. American Society for Engineering Education.6. https://www.raspberrypi.org/7. http://www.cs.uml.edu/~fredm/papers/martin-chanler-blackfin-handy-board-2007.pdf8. http://www.technologyreview.com/view/514036/beaglebone-black-a-makers-dream/9. Lawson, W., Bhattacharyya, S., Gupta, A., Elby, A., and S. Secules, “An application-driven introductory C programming language course for freshman using the Raspberry Pi - methods and results,” NSF Envisioning the Future of Undergraduate STEM Education: Research and Practice
the overall number ofgraduates as shown in Figure 3, with the trend steadily increasing. The aberration in year 2015 iscaused by several students’ decision to stay a semester longer in order to complete a secondmajor. Thus the data from year 2015 should be looked together with the data from year 2016.The overall retention rate (from freshmen to senior) has thus risen to be on par with the nationalaverage for engineering majors.ConclusionsEarly results from retention data and graduation rates have shown that reorganizing first-yearengineering students’ experience and redesigning the first-year introduction to engineeringcourse have had a positive impact on our students’ attitude toward the engineering discipline.Students had more fun with the
engineering technology (E and ET) programs are part of STEM, inmany cases E and ET faculty have different academic backgrounds and job responsibilitiescompared to other branches of STEM. E and ET faculty often require industry experience withthe highest academic degree, and have higher teaching and research loads. Faculty are requiredto do a number of things that graduate school and/or industry practice don’t teach them, such asplanning and delivering courses effectively, designing and starting a research program togetting it funded, attracting and managing graduate students and undergraduate students, findingand working with appropriate faculty or industrial collaborators, writing assignments and teststhat are both rigorous and fair, dealing with
roles awayfrom low-value repetitive tasks towards those having more significant impacts on learningoutcomes. Focusing on the quality of education, skills, and employability of our graduates incomputing-related fields, this work proposes a cost-effective approach to integrate computer-based evaluation with a close-knit review and learning cycle based on directed and open tutoringto collectively form the EPC.3.1 Need for Online EvaluationThe EPC helps maintain and increase the learning quality for current and future CECSenrollments. For example, at the researchers’ institution, undergraduate CECS enrollment hasincreased by 37.4% from 5,375 in Fall 2010 to 7,383 in Fall 2014, with further similar increasesanticipated for the foreseeable future
majors at our university. Studentsparticipated in team-building activities that prompted research into their engineering majors andcareer options. In Week 3, we organized an industry career panel with a diverse mix of recruitersand alumni that currently work as engineers. The students asked questions about the panel’s pastcollege experiences, internships, graduate school, and careers. Students also had the opportunityto practice their “60 second pitches” with the panel members to help prepare for a career fair.Throughout the quarter, we incorporated activities that addressed global perspectives ofengineering, current events, and social justice. In Week 4, we collaborated with an EthnicStudies faculty member and her students from a Gender, Race
). Rank analysis of covariance. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(320), 1187- 1200.32. Lawson, A. (1983). Rank analysis of covariance: alternative approaches. The Statistician, 32(3), 331-337.33. Sullivan, G., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using Effect Size-Or Why the P Value is Not Enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279-282.34. Kotrlik, J., Williams, H., & Jabor, M. (2011). Reporting and Interpreting Effect Size in Quantitative Agricultural Education Research. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(1), 132-142.35. Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 24-27, 40.36. Salkind, N. (ed.), 2010, Encyclopedia of Research
. R. Kelly, "Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-Term Goals," J. of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1087-1101, 2007.[11] A. Duckworth and P. Quinn, "Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale," Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 91, pp. 166-174, 2009.[12] The Key to Success? Grit. [Performance]. 2013.[13] S. A. Sorby, "Educational Research in Developing 3-D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 459-480, February 2009.[14] N. Veurink and A. Hamlin, "Spatial Visualization Skills: Impacts on Confidence and Success in An Engineering Curriculum," Vancouver, B.C., 2011.[15] S. Metz, D. Matt and P
Paper ID #15210The Changing Role of Professional Societies for AcademicsDr. Gretchen L. Hein, Michigan Technological University Gretchen Hein is a senior lecturer in Engineering Fundamentals at Michigan Tech. She have been teaching ENG3200, Thermo-Fluids since 2005. She also teaches first-tear engineering classes. She has been active in incorporating innovative instructional methods into all course she teaches. Her research areas also include why students persist in STEM programs and underrepresented groups in engineering.Dr. Daniela Faas, Harvard University Dr. Faas is currently the Senior Preceptor in Design Instruction
-based practice paper reports on the first trial of two language screening anddiagnostic instruments at two research intensive institutions, the University of Toronto in a largecity and Queens University in a mid-sized city, partly in response to the growing linguisticdiversity of the student body. The universities chose to use the Diagnostic English LanguageNeeds Assessment (DELNA) jointly developed by the University of Auckland and theUniversity of Melbourne, both of which had similar student demographics to the Canadianuniversities. DELNA has two parts, a screening and a diagnostic. The screening comprises avocabulary section and a speed reading section that screen for academic vocabulary knowledgeand academic literacy. The diagnostic is a
Paper ID #15678Developing a Comprehensive Online Transfer Engineering Curriculum: De-signing an Online Introduction to Engineering CourseProf. Nicholas P Langhoff, Skyline College Nicholas Langhoff is an associate professor of engineering and computer science at Skyline College in San Bruno, California. He is also a co-investigator for multiple grant projects at Ca˜nada College in Redwood City, California. He received his M.S. degree from San Francisco State University in embedded electrical engineering and computer systems. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction, online engineering education
include future aspects of Lean Production Systems and Lean Management.Dr. Craig G Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Craig G. Downing is Department Head and Associate Professor of Engineering Management at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology. His teaching responsibilities are focused on delivering graduate-level instruction related to Operations and Quality Systems. His interests are rooted in Academic-Industrial partnerships, Process Improvement, and Action Research in Engineering Management. Further, serves as one of the champions for leading the campus entrepreneurial initiatives. He is a certified Lean Six Sigma Master Black Belt. c American Society for Engineering Education
Paper ID #16670Using the Engineering Design Process to Complement the Teaching and Learn-ing of MathematicsDr. Aaron Brakoniecki, Boston University Dr. Aaron Brakoniecki is a Lecturer at Boston University. His research focuses on preservice teachers’ uses of technology (specifically, the Internet) to support their learning of mathematics. He is also involved with the Noyce BEST project at BU, which focuses on training engineers to become mathematics teachers in high needs classrooms.Mr. Michael Ward, Boston University Michael Ward is currently entering his senior year of Mechanical Engineering while simultaneously earn
. Life Skills Outcomes C.1 This project had an impact on my critical thinking skills? C.2 This project improved my ability to work in teams and resolve conflicts?C. Civic Responsibility Outcomes C.1 This experiential learning project provided benefits to the community? In what capacity? C.2 My appreciation for integrated STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) research grown?Q.1 What did you like best about the experiential learning project?Q.2 What did you like least about the experiential learning project?D. Interpersonal: Mentor Relation Outcomes C.1 The mentor relationship with my graduate supervisor-mentor met my work objectives, needs and expectations? Please explain: C.2 I met regularly with my supervisor-mentor C.3 My