. However, traditional classroom activities emphasizewell-defined problems and encourage students to manipulate abstract symbols such as physics ormathematical formulas to identify solutions. Such reliance on abstract operation, along withhaving little experience of concrete modeling through embodied and prototyping techniques, hasled students to face great challenges when entering engineering programs2. Therefore, middleschool students need increased exposure to engineering design experiences that transform their“habit of the mind”—from fixating on thinking-before-prototyping towards prototyping-to-think.In this study, we structured a toy design workshop to provide hands on and engaging designactivities for middle school students, to help them
Paper ID #15109Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) Integration throughout aManufacturing Engineering CurriculumDr. Daniel J. Waldorf, California Polytechnic State University Dr. Dan Waldorf, Professor in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, joined the Cal Poly faculty in 1998 after two years in Chicago as a Quality/Manufacturing Engineer at ATF, Inc., a supplier of specialty cold-formed and machined components for automotive applications. At ATF he implemented process control technologies, taught and instituted quality control systems, and designed experiments in a tra- ditional manufacturing environment
graduation. Somestudents also described their enjoyment of the camp, particularly the chance to learn from peersand make social contacts with a group of like-minded students.Concluding Remarks The design of E-GIRL curriculum successfully excited female students about engineeringcareers. The structure and activities provided participants with a unique opportunity toexperience a week as an engineering undergraduate student both academically and socially.Interactive lessons and the group project introduced students to engineering problems and currentproblems engineers (hydraulic fracturing) are working to solve. Since female students tend toprefer problem solving with real world and social connections,5 a project focused on hydraulicfracturing, a
Paper ID #15017Designing a Big Machine: A Description and Assessment of a Mechanical En-gineering Design ProjectIrene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Prof. William W. Clark, University of PittsburghEllen M. Moe c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Designing a Big Machine: A Description and Assessment of a Mechanical
persisted in engineering or 38.4%. The data is shown inFigure 2. These persistence rates were evaluated based on spring 2016 major/degree earned. Ifthese rates seem low, keep in mind that any student enrolling in the EPS course is counted asintending to major in engineering, even though at least one third of the students never declare anengineering major. 0.7 2012 NFS 0.6 non-NFS 0.5 Fraction of Students 0.4 0.3 0.2
., Kisenwether, E. C., Rzasa, S. E. & Wise, J.C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-sets. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(2): 233-243.5. KEEN (2015). Website: http://keennetwork.org/, last retrieved on Oct.11.6. Purzer, S., Nicholas, F. & Natarja, L. (2016). Evaluation of current assessment methods in engineering entrepreneurship education. Adv. Eng. Educ. 6(1): 1-27.7. Fernandez, T.M., Coutinho, G.S., Wilson, M. D. & Hoffmann, S.R. (2015). Development of Entrepreneurial Attitudes Assessment Instrument for First Year Engineering Students. . The 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Seatal, WA.8. Rodriguez, J., Chen, H.L., Sheppard, S., & Jin, Q. (2014). Exploring
Engineering Education to the New Century, by the Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Phase II, Committee on Engineering Education, National Academy of Engineering, 2005.8 Bransford, John D., Brown, Ann L., and Cocking, Rodney R., “How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School,” with additional material from the Committee on Learning Research and Educational Practice, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 2000. Nation Academy of Sciences9 Popovic, Milica, “Giving Life to Teaching Introductory Electromagnetics: A Three-Year Assessment Plan,” 2004 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium, pp. 3361–3364, 2004.10 Carlson, Lawrence E., and Sullivan, Jacqueline F., “Hands-on Engineering: Learning by Doing in the
translates into academic, work, and career self-efficacy particularly for women. Student sections of industry clubs and professionalorganizations such as the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, the AmericanSociety of Mechanical Engineers, the Lunar Lion Team at Penn State, and the National Societyof Black Engineers provided the students interviewed here with a heightened sense of academicand work self-efficacy. These organizations afforded students valuable opportunities to meetlike-minded engineering students, learn about important industry news, and serve as mentorswhile providing outlets to employ technical skills taught in the classroom.Although only the full-time engineer data pool was asked specifically about whether their co
Paper ID #16025Targeted Recruitment of Biomedical Engineering Graduate Students: TheInfluence of Recruitment Event ChangesMs. Brittain Sobey, The University of Texas - Austin Brittain Sobey is the Graduate Program Coordinator for the Department of Biomedical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She earned her Master of Education from Boston University.Ms. Margo Cousins, The University of Texas - Austin Ms. Cousins oversees undergraduate and graduate academic advising at the Department Biomedical Engi- neering at The University of Texas at Austin. She directs the office in strategic academic and professional
engineers, and engage the community as service-minded leaders. Generally, thesestudents came to SPU from low-income households, underrepresented populations, and atypicalbackgrounds. By examining our body of ECASE scholars in this paper, we aim to expandperceptions about who could, who would, and who does succeed in earning the rigorousundergraduate electrical engineering degree.This paper includes a discussion of the lessons learned from interacting closely with 49 ECASEscholarship recipients and supporting them in an adaptive manner to address their individualneeds. The paper provides composite illustrations of the range of their backgrounds and uniquesituations. It highlights the challenges faced by these students during matriculation at SPU
Paper ID #17286Major Observations from a Specialized REU Program for Engineering Stu-dents with ADHDDr. Arash Esmaili Zaghi P.E., University of Connecticut Dr. Arash E. Zaghi received his PhD in Civil Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, where he worked on the seismic behavior of novel bridge column and connection details. After graduating, he stayed with UNR as a Research Scientist to overlook two major research projects involving system-level shake table experiments. In 2011, Dr. Zaghi joined the Department of Civil and Environmental Engi- neering at University of Connecticut as an Assistant Professor. His
technical versus non-technical course choiceallocations. Perhaps an unstated bias exists that choice equates to less “rigor,” and so theunintended message to students of differential choice in technical versus non-technicalcoursework may be that knowledge and courses in non-technical subjects are comparativelyunimportant. Values are inherent in engineering design; so just as the technical content of anengineering program is (hopefully) carefully scaffolded, “the same intentionality and evaluationshould be undertaken for the liberal component of a student’s undergraduate experience.”6Though some choice is necessary, too much choice can be detrimental;29 thus, providing choicein a balanced manner is essential. Engineering educators must be mindful
College of Engineering. Dr. Daher collaborates with engineering faculty to document and research the integration of innovative instructional strategies and technologies in his classroom. His latest collaborative submitted publication discusses Using the Flipped approach in a water resources course.Dr. Stuart Bernstein, University of Nebraska - Lincoln Stuart Bernstein received his Bachelors in Construction Management from Syracuse University, His Mas- ters in Architecture from Virginia Tech, and his PhD in Educational Administration, Leadership in Higher Education from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Dr. Bernstein has taught in the College of Engi- neering for 14 years, teaching classes in construction estimating
Paper ID #17192Utilizing an Innovative Engineering Skills Curriculum and Technology to Ex-pand Classroom Learning in Low-Resource SettingsMr. Dhinesh Balaji Radhakrishnan, Purdue University Dhinesh Radhakrishnan is a doctoralstudent in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research includes utilization of technology in education, and socially constructed education in low- resource settings. His current work is on developing engineering skills curriculum for out-of-school youth in Africa utilizing digital learning materials. He is the Global Student Forum Chair for 2016 in SPEED. He is also the
Paper ID #16169Work in Progress: Developing a Quantitative Instrument for Measuring Un-dergraduate Engineering Students’ Future Time PerspectivesCatherine McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno Adam Kirn is an Assistant Professor of
Paper ID #17216Can a Five-Minute, Three-Question Survey Foretell First-Year EngineeringStudent Performance and Retention?Stephanie M. Gratiano, Roger Williams University Stephanie Gratiano is a Junior Undergraduate Mechanical Engineering student at Roger Williams Uni- versity. She is an officer of both the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) and Engineers Without Borders (EWB) Chapters at the university. Her future career interests include Product Design or Mechanical Design, and she wishes to further her education in Industrial Design after graduating.Dr. William John Palm IV P.E., Roger Williams University
Paper ID #17138Teaching Patents And Design Novelty to Engineering Students A NarrativeCase Study Based ApproachProf. Daniel P Brown, Northwestern University Award winning Designer, Inventor, Entrepreneur & Professor, in the Segal Design Institute – North- western University. Dan Brown is a champion of establishing a design-leadership based culture in our economy & society. ”Design is how humans create value, I believe in the power of design as a discipline of creative based problem solving through enlightened strategic practice.” Dan’s vision is to educate and empower the future design leaders to serve society
. First, the project focuses on faculty community, rather thanexternal communities such as companies or local residential communities. The definition ofcommunity we adopted is not just in a physical location, but in an organizational location, in “thecooperation in labor, order and management,” (Tönnies, 2000, p. 43). This is important in ourconsideration of community of engagement, as we go beyond physical boundaries, such as thosebetween university and its wider locale, to cognitive boundaries, such as those within and amonguniversity colleges and departments. It is with this in mind that we define engagement andengaged communities. Second, it expands the definitions and model of community engagementby highlighting how engineering faculty
Psychol. 2006;20(3):343–352.5. van Merrienboer JJG, Kirschner PA, Kester L. "Taking the Load Off a Learner’s Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning.", Educ Psychol. 2003;38(1):5–13.6. Cheville RA. "Engineering Education Today: Capturing the Afterlife of Sisyphus in Five Snapshots. ", Proc IEEE. 2012;100(Special Centennial Issue):1361–75.7. Ethnography & Evaluation Research | University of Colorado Boulder [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 26]. Available from: http://www.colorado.edu/eer/research/steminquiry.html8. Mason GS, Shuman
Paper ID #14726The Engineering Design Log: A Digital Design Journal Facilitating Learningand Assessment (RTP)Dr. Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology Roxanne Moore is currently a Research Engineer at Georgia Tech with appointments in the school of Mechanical Engineering and the Center for Education Integrating Mathematics, Science, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innovations from K-12 up to the collegiate level. She received her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Tech in 2012.Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Assistant Director
individual experiences (cases) and collaboratively inquiring across them, we hopeto illustrate common ideas that may be central to this type of work, and that should likely be partof an ongoing conversation about the nature and practice of SOI in engineering education research.Though we do not offer definitive answers, using our collective reflection upon and across ourexperiences could support others as they consider if a current project or program might be an SOIeffort, or as they find new directions in on-going projects that could benefit from this form ofscholarship. Our examples and collaborative inquiry can also be potentially used to reflect uponthe common strategy of keeping the user in mind throughout SOI efforts, the challenges
2005, and which has been held annually since that time. The outreachevent takes place in Boise, Idaho, and at the time of its onset was the only outreach or campactivity in the state focused on girls or young women. Across ten years, 510 total girls haveparticipated, with approximately 85% of them coming from the immediate metropolitan area.The program was developed with a mind toward marketing engineering as an exciting, creativeactivity; including activities developed specifically from that perspective.1 The specific topic ofthis paper is an investigation into the motivation for volunteers and students to support thisprogram. Our hypothesis is that, in particular, the women found this an experience that helped tocreate community among like
Paper ID #16891A Two-Step Program for Undergraduate Students to Gain Authentic Experi-ence in the Research ProcessDr. Charles E. Pierce, University of South Carolina Dr. Pierce is a Bell South Teaching Fellow and Associate Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. He is a member of the American Concrete Institute, American Society of Civil Engineers, and American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Nicole Berge, University of South Carolina Dr. Nicole Berge received her B.S. and M.S. in Civil and Environmental Engineering from the University of South
Paper ID #14503Learning about Design from the Lakota NationDr. George D. Catalano, Binghamton University Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Binghamton University Previously member of the faculty at U.S. Military Academy and Louisiana State University. Two time Fullbright Scholar – Italy and Germany. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Learning about Engineering Design from the LakotaAbstractAn engineering design paradigm is developed using an enriched morally deep world-view. Thenew design approach borrows from the wisdom of the Lakota Nation as evidenced through anexamination of
Paper ID #15393Narrating the Experiences of First-year Faculty in the Engineering Educa-tion Research Community: Developing a Qualitative, Collaborative ResearchMethodologyDr. Courtney June Faber, The College of New Jersey Courtney is an Assistant Professor in the Technological Studies Department at The College of New Jersey. She joined The College of New Jersey after completing a Ph.D. in Engineering & Science Education at Clemson University. Prior to her Ph.D. work, she received her B.S. in Bioengineering at Clemson University and her M.S. in Biomedical Engineering at Cornell University. Courtney’s research interests
mode ofreflection constitutes Macmurray’s criticism of the Cartesian emphasis on rationality; that therational mind can exist in isolation but as humans we cannot exist as people without otherpeople.Thus from the perspective offered by Macmurray’s system how assessment and evaluation isperformed, for what purpose, and the mental models developed by this activity have a large rolein the form of the engineering profession that we all contribute to creating. The next sectionprovides several critiques of the existing ABET criteria and the potential impacts the proposedchanges to criteria three and five may have.CritiquesThis section provides several critiques of the EC 2000 process from the perspective ofMaymurray’s philosophy system. These
topossible solution.19 For engineering teams using these, they may start out as just a representationof the problem as described by a customer, then grow features over time as the team movestoward a solution. An advantage of mind mapping is that it enriches verbal descriptions with itspictures and relationship arrows.There are hundreds of different variations on brainstorming and creativity techniques that areuseful in engineering education. All have in common a step where the participants arechallenged to widen their view of the issues to be solved, so as to bring in a solution from awider field. Burnett and Figliotti's book is an example of one targeting the classroom as thedomain for building creativity skills.20A Creative Problem Solving Tool
our uncertainty (tolerance for ambiguity). In this course, students experiencedmultiple levels of uncertainty and instructors offered permission as part of the course design tosafely take risks, fail, and move forward. As a result, final products were much more innovativeand creative in nature than ideas presented at the beginning of the class. Students recognized theimportance of the challenges they faced (group dynamics, work dynamics, distaste for the coursedesign and overwhelming amount of group work, etc.) in moving through the creative designprocess.With that in mind, we look to student reflections, specifically those of the engineering students,to identify strategies that contribute to creative practice and to help students
Paper ID #15120Gender in the Workplace: Peer Coaching to Empower Women in the Class-room and as ProfessionalsDr. Jennifer L. Groh, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Groh joined the Purdue Women in Engineering Program (WIEP) in 2009. She received a B.S. in microbiology from Purdue University, and a Ph.D. in microbiology from the University of Oklahoma. Prior to joining WIEP, she was the Graduate Programs Coordinator in the Purdue Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. As Associate Director of WIEP, Dr. Groh administers the undergraduate Mentee & Mentor Program and the Graduate Mentoring Program, teaches two Women in
Goals and DescriptionsProgram GoalsOur engineering school is committed to creating leaders who thrive at acquiring and applying theknowledge required to solve global challenges. Using a variety of innovative programs andcourses, we teach engineers to tackle large, complex problems using a human-centered designprocess. These programs and courses emphasize real-world experience and outcomes, and ourstudents, from first-year to graduate students, deliver solutions to real clients while consideringsocial context and impact. Our programs teach students how to better serve society, and byoffering such opportunities, we help retain socially-minded students within engineering. Ourcurrent initiatives include efforts to not only add depth to our programs