equipment are being used.The Woodshop consists of mostly low-level equipment, however there is a band-sawwhich requires support from faculty.The Outlet is slated to be open 24 hours a day, seven days a week to students who haveaccess through their student identification card. Access is given to students who sign auser agreement which contains the guidelines for use of the lab. Guests can be broughtinto the lab if they are accompanied by a Teslab user (someone who has ID card access)and sign in to a guest binder; the user has the ultimate responsibility for any guest theybring into the lab. Installation of a security camera is planned, due to the fact that the labwill be largely unsupervised.A different policy has been created for a student group
students in aninterdisciplinary course with students in various departments to design and consult with a ruralHonduran community in need of a safe drinking water supply. During the course students workclosely with the community, a Honduran non-government organization, and professionaladvisors from various disciplines including civil engineering, water system operations, technicalcommunications, and political governance. The course focuses on wrestling with the challengesof defining a need, evaluating alternative solutions, and devising a plan for system construction,operation, and financing. Results of the first two efforts are discussed from the perspectives ofthe student participants, the community recipient, the NGO, and professional partners
differencesemerging from the traditional and alternative course student populations. An example of the fullstudent post-survey protocol can be found in the Appendix, however the survey protocol alsoshifted slightly from term to term.In each term that the course was offered (Spring 2014, Fall 2014, and Fall 2015), weadministered these surveys to compare student responses in the alternative and traditionalcourses. In most terms, students were surveyed at the beginning of the semester, at the end ofthe semester, and in the subsequent semester after students took the class. (In Spring 2014, only apost-semester survey was conducted, and for the most recent cohort a subsequent-semestersurvey is planned for May 2016).In Fall 2014 and Fall 2015 semesters, interviews
instructors and likely designed and maintained by an instructional team1–4. In many ofthese cases, it could be argued that the most significant factors influencing student performancein, and perception of, a large format class come not from the students, nor the instructors, butfrom the curricular decisions of the cross-disciplinary course planning team charged with thedesign of the content, assessment and pedagogy employed within the classroom. Literature concerning methods for high-quality engineering course design is wellestablished, and should form the foundation of any initial course design, or major redesign, in anengineering curriculum. Experts advise that this practice begin with a thorough review of thelearning objectives
, the team members introduced other faculty members toEPSA, who then independently implemented the EPSA method in their courses.Implementation of the EPSA MethodThe faculty members responsible for the “Professional Issues” course at Norwich Universityhave been using the EPSA scenarios for the past four years. The detailed facilitation plan forimplementing the EPSA method in a course was presented in a previous ASEE paper.1The students in each class were divided into teams. Some members of the team were assignedthe role of discussant and others assigned the role of observer. The discussants were responsiblefor conducting the discussion. The observers were each assigned one or two dimensions of theEPSA rubric to use to assess the discussions. All
links. 3. Testing reveals problems and changes propagate to other components. This learning objective emphasizes the iterative process sometimes required in systems design to resolve communication interdependencies between designers. It highlights how incorrect or incomplete requirements can cause problems in systems design, testing as a part of a larger verification and validation plan can uncover problems, and how design changes have a tendency to propagate between subsystems.These topics expose fundamental parts of the SE process26 but also align with broader objectivesin engineering education27 to view design as a multidisciplinary activity where designers musteffectively work in teams to meet conflicting
merely for individual students. This establishes whether the project isclear to move forward, needs intervention by organizational staff, or should end soon. Onecritical criterion for continuation is an ongoing relationship with an identified client. Policiesregarding implications of the green, yellow, red status are made known to the students.Project Course Grade Component BreakdownIn our revised and simplified approach, engineering project students are graded in three maincategories: progress against plans (30%), reporting & documentation (40%) and contribution toproject progress (30%). Progress against plans represents the same score of 0-30 assigned to allmembers of a project team by the responsible faculty member based upon MVP panel
, & Golding, 2010) and take many forms including cross-campus programswhich leverage multidisciplinary collaboration, to efforts specifically targeting engineering andSTEM students and social or non-profit ventures.At the graduate level, entrepreneurship courses open to non business students typicallyemphasize technology transfer and pair scientific teams with MBA students to developcommercialization plans for specific technologies. A long-established example is Georgia Tech’sTechnological Innovation: Generating Economic Results (TI:GER) Program, which createsteams of two MBA students and two law students who focus on the commercialization of a PhDstudent’s research (Thursby, Fuller, & Thursby, 2009). Another example is Ohio
ofconstraints.”2 In essence, to design is to solve a problem. It is an inherently creative process thatis carried out every day, whether it’s for building a rocket ship or planning a date for Fridaynight. With the rise of technology and globalization, the engineering design environment has avariety of challenges including: increased complexity, shorter lifecycles, constrained budgets, anincreased demand for partnerships, in addition to other considerations such as environmentalimpacts, performance, regulations, and legal ramifications.The ways in which to approach the design process are varied. For instance, gate-based design(sometimes referred to as algorithmic design) is used on well-defined design processes like thoseseen in the pharmaceutical
) enablingof transfer credits and experiential credits; b) taking a community-based approach withcomprehensive programs and services for student veterans and their families which includehousing, health care, employment during the college; c) enabling veterans’ voice to be heardthrough roundtables, veteran associations, etc; d) have strong web presence easily accessible to theveterans; e) establish a specific point of contact; e) expand housing options; and f) implementtuition deferment plan to accommodate the GI Bill (Servicemen’s Readjustment Act of 1944)payment schedules; g) provide veteran focused orientations; h) provide faculty training related toveterans (ACE, 2008; Heineman, 2016; Olin Earl & Committee on Veterans' Affairs, 1949).Veterans
notstatistically significant to success in the quality control course. However, the student’s priorsemester GPA, incoming cumulative GPA, and performance in the prerequisite course aresignificant to success in the quality control course.Background and MotivationThe quality control course at East Carolina University is a graduation requirement for allstudents majoring in engineering. For the majority of these students it is a terminating course inthe area of statistics within their curriculum plan since it is not a prerequisite for any othercourse. For a small minority, an elective course in lean six sigma is taken that requires qualitycontrol as a prerequisite. The quality control course prerequisite is a calculus-based probabilityand statistics course in
teams towork independently in the required labs depending on their product selection; however, severalcourse sessions and meetings with the course instructor were planned in order to promotecreativity including lessons and selected exercises that provided a number of techniques to helpthem generate innovative solutions to the correctly defined problem. These techniques includebrainstorming, vertical and lateral thinking, analogies, TRIZ (Russian acronym for ResheniyaTeoriya Izobretatelskikh Zadach, that translated literally is “theory of the resolution of invention-related tasks”), and SCAMPER (acronym for Substitute, Combine, Adapt, Modify, Put toanother use, Eliminate, and Reverse) 2.In this context, a creativity test at the beginning and end
valuable part of the scientific community Entrepreneurship • Knowledge about • Self-Awareness (ability to management methods, how to reflect) write business plans and get • Accountability (take financing, instruments to responsibility) protect intellectual properties • Emotional coping (cope with • Knowledge about product problems) design and development, • Risk taking (tolerance for
participants found this experience emotionallyrewarding as well. Participant 4 felt, “everything coming together, it’s nice, you finally,everything, I don’t want to sound tacky but everything you’ve read about and dreamed about, itactually exists, it’s a real thing.” While sometimes frustrating, participants also mentionedtroubleshooting and learning how to deal with problems as valuable outcomes of their summerresearch experiences. Participant 6 explained: There was a lot of trial and error and it got me to think outside the box. I was running samples and they weren’t really working out as planned and I didn’t know what was going on so I had to rule out multiple things. I added a third bar to make sure solution was equally
Paper ID #16992Mixed Method Study of the Evolution of Leadership Traits during a Leader-ship ExperienceMs. Luisa Ruiz Mendoza, University of Texas - El Paso Luisa is a recipient of the Gates Millennium Scholarship since 2009. In May 2013, Luisa graduated from Texas A&M University with a degree in Business Management. Then, in December 2014 she received a master’s degree in Higher Education Administration from the University of Texas at El Paso (UTEP). Ms. Ruiz plans to pursue a doctorate degree in Educational Leadership and Foundations with a concentration in Engineering Leadership at UTEP. She would like to work on a
Biomedical engineeringstudents follow the “Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies” by Paul Yocket. al.16 LTU requires 3 and 2 credits, while UDM requires 2 and 3 credits (respectively). Table 1: Approximate milestones and project timeline TABLE 1: COURSE MILESTONES Pre-Semester Nursing students self-select and register for directed study Week 1 Introduce all students to the program plan. BME students self-select Week 2 Form teams via CATME tool, conduct all-hands kick-off meeting Week 4 Introduction to clients, students plan project Week 6 Complete project plan Week 12 Complete product definition Week 16: Complete
editorial thatsuggested that the creation of an association of engineering libraries would help to promotecooperation and standardization.44 In May of the same year, representatives from twentyengineering and scientific societies, including F. L Bishop, the secretary of SPEE, met at theEngineering Societies Library in New York City to discuss plans to create a universalclassification system for technical literature.45A handful of engineering librarians joined SPEE in the 1910s. One of them was Ellwood H.McClelland, who succeeded Harrison Craver as head of the Technology Department in theCarnegie Library of Pittsburgh. McClelland joined SPEE in 1912 and would remain a memberthrough 1950. He was an active contributor to SPEE and helped to index
municipal wharf, the re-design of the shipping crates used totransport all-electric Zero Motorcycles (http://www.zeromotorcycles.com/) overseas, the designand installation of a linked rainwater catchment and smart irrigation system that uses a data- driven sensor network to deliver water on demand and most recently, a net energy analysis of arecently commissioned plastic-to-fuel conversion machine. Interdisciplinary teams of undergraduates lead the projects while working closely withlocal experts including university researchers, elected municipal officials and staff, industry andnon-profit professionals, activists, entrepreneurs, and philanthropists to define project topics anddevelop detailed project plans. As undergraduate teams move
ethics in research. Several case studies were introduced to help studentsunderstand the importance of ethical research practices including falsifying data and plagiarism.Students continued working in their groups to develop their study. All of the projects thestudents in this section developed involved collecting data either through observation or survey,so they began to develop their submission for approval of their studies to the InstitutionalReview Board. Students also worked on an assignment that required them to describe in detailtheir plan for data collection and management, clearly identifying who their study participantswould be, how they would be recruited, what methodology would be used to collect data, howthe data would be stored, and
. In addition to developing their sensor circuit, students must also create andpopulate a PCB to hold their electronics. The PCBs are fabricated through an off-site vendor,which means that students must account for production delays when planning their projecttimeline. In addition to the on-campus electronics lab used to develop and test their circuits,students also had access to temperature and pressure chambers at the University of Washingtonin order to simulate conditions in the upper atmosphere. Due to inclement weather the proposedhigh-altitude launch was postponed until the summer, and most students collected data from atethered launch instead that took place near the end of the spring semester. A video summary ofthe high-altitude
more likely they are able topersist to transfer status. Figure 2 illustrates our theoretically grounded logic model, the nature ofits interrelatedness, its multidimensionality, and ultimately, its connection to persistence. Thismodel informs and guides our research design and provides grounding for our analytical choicesand associated results. The research plan that follows articulates this.Over the course of three years, our research employs a mixed-method design using arandomization procedure in which in which students are randomly selected from each CC schoolsite within the majors of engineering and science to participate with randomization of selectionoccurring at the school site level within each targeted academic program. During the
made during each sub-phase were compared with the PFRs and MSRs, to ensure thatthe developed product family remained relevant to the RMS.The Preliminary Design sub-phase for the product family was very similar to that of traditionalproduct design17. It consisted of the definition of design objectives, development of a plan forachieving these objectives, and the definition of target design specifications and constraints,Fig. 2. As the research team was not familiar with the design of lamps, research was conductedin order to learn about the various types of lamps, their performance characteristics, and the lampmarket33. This need to determine the characteristics of the lamp market such as the varioussegments, annual demand for each segment and
break thetraditional lecture dominant pattern when cooperative learning protocols are deployed. Thepaper will illustrate how cooperative learning can advance academic success, quality ofrelationships, psychological adjustments, and attitudes toward the college experience. Whatneeds to be done to move the process forward? What are the key components of successfuldeployment of active learning in general and cooperative learning in particular? How tofoster and expand the community of engineering faculty who use cooperative learning in theGulf States? What plans, efforts, and resources need to be mobilized to institutionalizepedagogies of engagement including cooperative learning at the department or college level?Next, it identifies barriers to
, but could,if properly planned, shed funds that could be used to support other academicendeavors.I believe there are feasible action plans that should be adopted to pave the way forpotential collaboration between industry and academe. These would include:i) First, seeding and propagating the idea, that gaining practical experience enhancesyoung instructors’ teaching competence without adversely affecting his/her researchcapability. A faculty member should strive to do both!(be a good teacher and aresearcher at the same time).Simply stated, the prevailing perception that time andeffort should be spent mostly pursuing research and research funds, and that time andeffort spent enhancing one’s teaching competence does not count toward promotionand
students in public universities is around 50%, while the graduation rates at private universities are around 69%1.This paper aims to broadly explore and discuss how student and professor expectations mayinfluence students’ conceptions of engineering identity, their acquisition of knowledge andskills, as well as their plans for navigation through the “engineering pipeline” by analyzing theinterview responses of two freshman engineering students and one engineering faculty member.MotivationsAs stated earlier, it is important to acknowledge that engineering identity is not necessarily asconcrete or fixed as research might suggest13,14,19. It is likely that each individual studentpossesses a different understanding of the engineering profession, as
information on how lessons we learned in the FundamentalsSeries has enabled us to modify our E&M Fields coursework from a traditional math-heavycourse to one that includes an interactive laboratory based component.Classroom resources and software Our studio space is shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3 below. Currently we have sufficientclassroom space for 60 students, although plans are in place to expand the space to accommodate75. Students work in 3 person teams and each table "pod" accommodates 3 teams; we rotate teammembership throughout the semester, and require that team members rotate responsibilities. Thecentral part of each table has power outlets for student laptops and the instrumentation. One ofour objectives was to maintain clear sight
financingoptions through university grants and partnerships with local environmental groups and firms.Their hope was to roll this system out in our university, then to other universities in the area, andeventually to universities nation-wide. The goal was to change the social norm of a disposablesociety, divert thousands of pounds of waste from landfills, and generate conversation about foodpackaging and alternatives.As one of the groups that ranked in the top five, they met with advisors from the start upincubator to assess next steps for actualizing their plan. The advisors helped the students clarifytheir goals, what they would consider for profit margins, and what resources they may haveaccess to as they move forward towards implementation. To
Themes, Definitions, and Participant Examples Evaluation Criteria: Intellectual Merit Theme Definition ExampleConferences Mention conferences “Once I have determined the effectiveness of my improvements, I generally or specifically plan to continue presenting the results of my research at conferences such as the International Workshop on MPI. This will allow others with an interest in the field to learn about or incorporate my ideas and further their own research
of change that will make future iterations of the BOKand CEPC both systematic and predictable.3 As such, a Body of Knowledge Task Committee(BOKTC) is scheduled to be formed in October 2016. The BOKTC could recommend norevisions, minor revisions, or extensive revisions to BOK2. If substantive changes arerecommended to BOK2, the master plan calls for the completion of the third edition of the CivilEngineering Body of Knowledge for the 21st Century (BOK3) by October 2018 with publicationin March 2019.Because the CEPC was created to be compatible with the BOK2 outcomes, the CEPCTC studiedthe BOK2 in depth. The BOK2 is an aspirational and visionary document that only partiallyaccounts for the real-world constraints faced by engineering programs
overseas issues. Although they are easy to plan, manage, require less funding, andrequire less curriculum changes to incorporate, they have low educational impacts. By increasingthe time that students are involved, and requiring them to engage in different stages of the projectsuch as data acquiring, design, and assessment of alternative solutions, they can create deeperimpacts [7]. Students require time to absorb important components of their service learning.Therefore, longer exposure and involvement helps them acquire more aspects of the designprocess.Another factor in designing an international service learning program is to determine if studentsare going to be required to travel to the site project or can they stay connected remotely too