Paper ID #15214Experiential Learning in the Thermal Sciences: Introducing and ReinforcingFundamental Thermodynamics and Heat Transfer Principles to K-12 andEngineering Undergraduate StudentsDr. Arden Moore, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Moore graduated with his B. S. in mechanical engineering from Louisiana Tech University in 2001, followed by his Master’s and Ph. D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Texas at Austin in 2007 and 2010, respectively. During his time in graduate school he worked in the fields of thermoelectric nanostructures, nanoscale energy transport physics, and advanced thermal
downside to active learning using clickers in large classes.Institutions may need to reconsider large class sizes with clickers to take advantage ofimprovements in exam performance and benefits in terms of cognitive and non-cognitiveoutcomes.References [1] President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012) Fact Sheet: Engage to Excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.[2] U.S. Department of Education: National Center of Education Statistics (2013) Digest of Education Statistics[3] Freeman, S., S.L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M.K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, M.P. Wenderoth (2014) Active learning increases student performance in science
—a specific critique offered by the ABET Engineering AccreditationCommission’s (EAC’s) Criterion 3 Task Force (TF-3). The obdurate habit of over-specification cansimply manifest itself in different ways—although we ought to consider in the same light TF-3’s ownrecommendation to include within Criterion 3 only those outcomes that can be reliably achieved.11As already alluded to above, what stymies effective solutions in engineering education is hardly limited tothe disciplinary habits and boundaries of engineering; the reasons go back to the structure of U.S.educational institutions and the engineering profession itself. With regards to the latter, engineers shouldstop worrying that theirs is somehow an incomplete profession. Sociologists
ideation? Why can person A in agiven situation generate a potential innovation while person B, perhaps even with a substantiallysimilar background, cannot? Consideration of the concepts/principles presented in Figure 4provides engineering and technology education researchers a framework for raising questionsthat might lead to fruitful investigations. The ten speculations listed below are initial examples ofsuch research questions. Perhaps the innovator(’s):1. knowledge representation is more holistic, i.e., established as a system as contrasted to hundreds/thousands of discrete individual facts/ideas?2. has a better memory and a larger/wider store of information to work with , or perhaps the innovator just has a better/quicker way of
National Academies, Washington, DC. 2. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in US engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185-207. 3. Prince, M., Borrego, M., Henderson, C., Cutler, S., & Froyd, J. (2013). Use of research- based instructional strategies in core chemical engineering courses. Chemical Engineering Education, 47(1), 27-37. 4. Froyd, J. E., Wankat, P. C., & Smith, K. A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100(Special Centennial Issue), 1344- 1360. 5. Jesiek, B. K., Borrego, M., and Beddoes, K. (2010
develop andrecognize one’s own self-regulation in learning and teaching.ACKNOWLEDGMENT This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation underGrant No. 1148806. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.Bibliography[1] ABET - Engineering Accreditation Commission, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Reviews During the 2015-2016 Accreditation Cycle. November, 2014[2] Zimmerman, B. J., “Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview.” Theory into Practice, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 64-70, 2002.[3] Zimmerman, B. J. Attaining self
theindividual students’ roles. CATME is a short, web-based survey that collects and analyzes self-and peer-evaluation feedback. A behaviorally-anchored rating scale is utilized to assesscontributions of each team member in five areas based on the team effectiveness literature (Ohlandet al., (2012)23. The grade for each team-based component is multiplied by the CATME factor foreach student and that is the score entered for the student. As such, if a student does not pull his/herweight, s/he is penalized by the rest of the team and gets a lower grade than the rest of the teammembers. Conversely, if a student goes above and beyond the norm, s/he is recognized by theteammates and gets a higher grade than the original team score.It should be noted that
to navigate asimulated Mars surface. Assessment results indicate that by engaging students in project and team basedlearning in the context of real world applications, interest in STEM majors can be increased in highschool students.References [1]. Jeffers, A., Safferman, A., and Safferman, S. (2004). Understanding K–12 Engineering Outreach Programs. J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. 30:2(95), 95-108.[2]. Anderson-Rowland, M.R. (1996). A first year engineering student survey to assist recruitment and retention," Frontiers in Education Conference, 1996. FIE '96. 26th Annual Conference., Proceedings of, Salt Lake City, UT, pp. 372-376 vol.1.[3]. Cantrell, P. and Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009), Exploring STEM career options through
’ motivation in elementary education. Learning Technologies, IEEE Transactions on, 7(4), 333-345.[3] Curto, B., & Moreno, V. (2013). A robot in the classroom. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 295-296). ACM.[4] De Cristoforis, P., Pedre, S., Nitsche, M., Fischer, T., Pessacg, F., & Di Pietro, C. (2013). A Behavior- based approach for educational robotics activities. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 56(1), 61-66.[5] Ganesh, T. G. (2011). Design-based research: A framework for designing novel teaching and learning experiences in middle school engineering education. In IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), (pp. T2F-1).[6] Schweingruber, H. A
the faculty member(s) promptand guide smaller student groups in learning and applying just taught concepts while theycomplete a problem in class. The goal is to attain the benefits of group work while providingjust in time coaching to address any conceptual issues as they occur. Although group orteam-based learning has its advantages, it still has well-known disadvantages. The maindrawback being the student who is not participating may have less effective learning expe-riences as compared to the more gregarious and/or confident students who actually solvethe problem. The purpose of this paper is to discuss this technique in the context of teach-ing undergraduate dynamics, although we believe it can be applied in other undergraduatescience
, magnetometer and gyroscope and putting them on a single die with ahigh speed ARM Cortex-M0 based processor) with BeagleBone Black (BBB) to collect 3Dorientation rotational data. BN0055 communicates with BBB via I2C bus. The BBB based subjectdesigned system further communicates with a remote server Python module (hosted by Adafruit)in controlling a 3D model on a webpage.The BNO055 can output the following sensor data1: Absolute Orientation (Euler Vector, 100Hz) Three axis orientation data based on a 360° sphere Absolute Orientation (Quaterion, 100Hz) Four point quaternion output for more accurate data manipulation Angular Velocity Vector (100Hz) Three axis of 'rotation speed' in rad/s Acceleration Vector
sustainability.Routledge/Taylor & Francis, New York.[11] Driscoll, T. R., J. E. Harrison, et al. (2008). “The role of design issues in work-related fatal injury in Australia.”J. of Safety Research 39(2): 209-214.[12] Gambatese, J. (2000). “Safety in a designer’s hands.” Civil Engineering. June. P. 56-59.[13] Gambatese, J. (2003). “Safety emphasis in university engineering and construction programs.” International e-Journal of Construction. ISBN 1-886431-09-4. May 14, 2003.[14] Gambatese, J. A., Behm, M., and Hinze, J. (2005). “Viability of designing for construction worker safety.” J.Constr. Eng. Manage., 131(9), 1029–1036.[15] Gambatese, J., Behm, M., and Rajendran, S. (2009). “Designer’s role in construction accident causality andprevention: Perspectives
RAND, 1948-1967 (No. RAND/N-2936-RC) (p. 4).Santa Monica, CA: RAND.20 Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., & Gibson, W. F. (2007). How to do systems analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.21 INCOSE. (2011). Systems engineering handbook: A guide for system life cycle processes and activities. (H.Cecilia, Ed.) (3.2 ed.). San Diego, CA: INCOSE.22 Blanchard, B. S., & Fabrycky, W. J. (2006). Systems engineering and analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson - Prentice Hall.23 Churchman, C. W., Ackoff, R. L., & Arnoff, E. (1957). Introduction to operations research. New York, NY:Wiley.24 Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT press Cambridge, MA.25 Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems
& Technology. He is the author of two books, Vaughn College Journal of Engineering and Technology (VCJET), numerous conference papers in the areas of solid mechanics, computational mechanics, vibration analysis, fracture mechanics and reliability analysis. He is also a principle investi- gator for the NSF S-STEM grant and the HIS-STEM grant and a student adviser for a number of technical papers in the areas of mechanics, robotics and industrial automation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 MAKER: An Innovated Braille ClockAbstractTelling time is a fairly simple task for sighted people. However, it poses considerable constraintson the blind and
between operations performed using these tools and equivalent Boolean algebraic manipulations.4 3 The SS Aprille 14 81 (spring Adders - 2's Using combinational Erickson (spring 2015) comp. circuitry, be able to analyze 2015) Subtractors - 2's and design standard 53 (fall comp arithmetic
curriculum—and what this looks like as enactedby K-2 students. As the previous computational thinking definition highlights, the problemsolving strategies and skills used in computational thinking will likely share many things incommon with the STEM disciplines. Thus, even though the prior implementations PictureSTEMfocused on STEM and literacy thinking and learning, there is likely to be aspects ofcomputational thinking also present. This paper provides examples of aspects of computationalthinking (i.e., troubleshooting) that are present without a claim that these are ideal or completeintegrations of computational thinking.MethodsDescription of PictureSTEM unit(s)The PictureSTEM curriculum was developed for grades K-2, with emphasis on the use
. Describe future research directions 7A. Outline ‘next steps’ or future work 7B. Suggest methodological improvements 8. Engage in learning 8A. Appropriately connect/use course concepts in the investigation process 8B. Identify/reflect on “lessons learned” 8C. Manage time and resources effectively to complete the investigationIn problem analysis, the student displays the ability to: 1. Define the problem 1A. State the problem in their own words 1B. Identify primary problem goal(s) 1C. Characterize the type of problem and the type of solution sought 1D. Represent the problem visually (e.g., free body diagram, circuit schematic) 1E. Identify known information 1F. Recognize
. The rubrics can also be used for self-‐assessment as well as for professional development purposes. These rubrics are not content-‐specific, therefore they can be used with a wide range of engineering design-‐based K-‐12 STEM curricula. Providing teachers with Teaching Standards and performance rubrics can guide and improve instruction in technology education settings. 7 References Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V
, however.At this time, the students were not certain that their ideas had changed about graduate school.However, all agreed that they had developed new understanding about the ways that research isdone, and how it might influence the practice of engineering.4. Step Two - Summer Research ExperienceStudents were immersed in a 12-week research-intensive summer experience. The students wereprovided workspace within our departmental senior design room, which contains five partitionedworkstations and a large conference table. The bulk of student time was dedicated to pursuinghis/her research proposal, as each student worked on his/her project with their researchadvisor(s). In addition, there were a number of small group activities conducted throughout
Higher EducationReport No. 1. Washington D.C.: The George Washington University School of Education and Human Development, 1991.[2] Felder, R. and Brent, R. “Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls and Payoffs” ERIC DocumentReproduction Service, ED 377038, 1994.[3] Felder, R. and Brent, R. “Learning by Doing” Chem. Engr. Education 37(4), 282-283, 2003.[4] Prince, M. “Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research” J. Engr. Education, 93(3) 223-231, 2004[5] Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., McDonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N. Jordt, H and Wenderroth, M.P. “Active learningincreases student performance in science, engineering and mathematics” PNAS, 111(23), 8410-8415, 2014.[6] Culmann. Karl, "Die graphisehe Statik" Zürich
according to theteaching procedure. The system interface is shown in Figure 2. The basic functions in mostlearning platforms were also included in the system, such as: schedule reminder, discussionforums (asynchronous), video conferencing (synchronous), assignment submission, feedbackevaluation and so on. Particularly, the project based learning which consists of five stageswas implemented in the learning system: Preparation (P) - Implementation (I) - Presentation(P) - Evaluation (E) - Revision (R), and SCAMPER teaching strategy which includes seventhinking-based dimensions: Substitute (S), Combine (C), Adapt (A), Modify (M), Put to otheruses (P), Eliminate (E) and Rearrange (R). At each stage, students were able to use theactivity module provided
practical projects.Since the publication of those documents, very little has happened in terms of concrete solutions,mainly due to the large number of bureaucratic hurdles and the amount of effort required toimplement the proposed changes. Meanwhile the economy is still increasingly demanding morequalified engineers both for industry and nowadays for so called technological entrepreneurship,which happens when a technological idea is combined with a business opportunity, a way tomarket it and escalate its growth. To support this process, resources in the form of capital andtalent are paramount. Among the talents necessary is engineering, which has been one of its mostimportant driver3.Implementing a new curriculum to develop the student´s abilities
others,10,37 so that they can learn beyond lectures and homework assignments.38 It isonly paramount that we investigate what we can do to improve these web-based scaffolds sostudents would be able to maximize collective outcomes while promoting individual learning.References1. Weber, M. S., & Kim, H. (2015). Virtuality, technology use, and engagement within organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 43(4), 385-407. doi:10.1080/00909882.2015.10836042. Passow, H.J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95-118.3. Prados, J.W., G.D. Peterson, And L.R. Lattuca. (2005). Quality assurance of engineering education through
hisor her research abilities. For example, while a student in Category 1’s reliance on authority andconcrete rules might be less sophisticated than a more self-directed, self-assured approachevident in Category 3, learning from experts in the field and developing a familiarity withfoundational knowledge and skills in engineering is a key step in being able to progress as anindependent engineering researcher. Though students’ responses at a particular point in time maybe best represented by one category, it is possible and likely that students’ level of researchprocess sophistication will change over time as a result of their experiences.Though our process for classifying graduate engineering students’ research processsophistication was an
profession skills in engineering students tobetter prepare them to be effective leaders in workplace.Leadership training for engineering students is delivered in a variety of ways: in a lecture serieswith guest speakers; in a leadership course(s); Bernard M. Gordon Leadership Programs4, 5 and inan Engineering Leadership Minor6,7,8. Universities with a Minor utilize a variety of institutionalresources, including courses within the engineering program and in other departments oncampus, which facilitates a focused interdisciplinary program structure across the university.Often students must go through a rigorous application process, and be selected and accepted intothe leadership program. With regard to the candidature of engineering students for
curves.28This problem can be made more effectual by converting it to a PBL assignment. The followingPBL assignment has been used at Lawrence Technological University in Michigan: You purchased a primitive cabin “up north” situated in the forest near a lake. It has no plumbing and you’d like to upgrade the cabin and turn it into a quaint vacation retreat. Referring to Figure 3, design the water supply system for the cabin meeting the following expectations: Two story cabin approximately 30 ft above the lake. Meet basic water needs for comfortable living (i.e., at least shower, faucet(s), etc.) Each water consumption unit can be controlled independently, and also
for the students to apply and reflect on their developing leadership abilities.Experts in the engineering leadership programs however expressed concern about the ability ofcurrent engineering faculty to deliver effective leadership programs and the difficulties ofidentifying external and suitably qualified staff.Graham et al.’s study also identifies strong themes in engineering leadership education. Theglobal theme was found to be particularly strong within U.S. programs: the ability to workeffectively across cultures in an international sphere was seen by many as an increasingly vitalattribute of an engineer-leader, and is reflected in many of the programs. Another strong themewas student empowerment in their own leadership
benefit for all; ensuring students are ready for industry; accomplishment withExpectations 20 high stakes evaluation (time and/or process); teaching evaluations; ABET assessment andEvaluation 17 requirements mentoring many different disciplines; need for diverse set of projects given student interests; keeping current in the field(s); variety from year to year; Variety/ translating design terminology and language across disciplines; incorporating Breadth 17 entrepreneurship; Course overall coordination with other departments, schools, institutions; Logistics 16 continuous improvement
information and other information for students. They are not content specific.”Program Planning & 53 (30.1) “The STEM advisors stick with our s STEMExecution Support Academy students from the day they arrive until they transfer. They have rapport and relationships with the students. It really helps.”College & Program 51 (29) “We have a host of developmental courses. ThePerformance Support kids need them but they complain about not getting credit for them. Especially when they have to pay