, Chile and Argentina and 26 workshops in Mex- ico, Chile and Argentina. He has participated obtaining projects funded by the European Consortium of Innovative Universities, HP Development Company, Agencia Espa˜nola de Cooperaci´on Internacional para el Desarrollo and the University of Arizona. He is a member of the Mexican Council of Educa- tional Research, Vicepresident of the Latin American Physics Education Network (LAPEN), coordinator of the Evaluation of Learning and Instruction Topical Group within the International Research Group on Physics Teaching (GIREP for French); member of the American Association of Physics Teachers (AAPT) in which he was member and president of the International Committee (2006-2008
of the semester was applied. The test isa self-assessment that consists of 16 questions that are grouped into 5 categories of analysis thatare related to the five steps that are part of the effective creative process proposed byCsikszentmihalyi3: 1) Finding problems (preparation), 2) Gathering and reflecting oninformation (incubation), 3) Problem exploration (insight), 4) Generating and evaluating ideas(evaluation), and 5) Implementation (elaboration). Furthermore, a group of experts in the fieldwere invited to evaluate final projects and developed food products by means of the CreativeThinking VALUE Rubric, which is made up of a set of attributes that are common to creativethinking across disciplines4. Instructor-, peer-, and self
Paper ID #15277Work in Progress: Measuring Dispositions Toward Teaching Strategies andTheir Reported UseDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Aca- demic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on Education in Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology (CRESMET), and an evaluator for several NSF projects. His first research strand
licensed patent and is a licensed Professional Engineer in Florida.Dr. Richard Gilbert, University of South Florida Richard Gilbert is a Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida’s College of Engineering . Richard is the Co-PI for the grant that supports the NSF designated Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education in Florida, FLATE. FLATE, now in its 12 year of op- eration, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The
mentors grad- uate and undergraduate engineering Fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s TEAMS initiative, is on the development team for the TeachEngineer- ing digital library, and is faculty advisor for CU-Boulder’s Society of Women Engineers (SWE). Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, path- ways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education and curriculum development.Maia Lisa Vadeen, University of Colorado - Boulder Maia Vadeen is a Discovery Learning Apprentice at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engi- neering and Applied Science. She
Paper ID #16917Understanding How a Culture of Collaboration Develops Among STEM Fac-ultyDr. Kelly J. Cross, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cross completed her doctoral program in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2015 and is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students at UIUC. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion, teamwork skills, assessment, and identity construction.Dr. Natasha Aniceto Mamaril, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
research Interests are globalized engineering/technology education, engineering technology innovative curriculum development, outcome assessments, and refining program accreditation procedures. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Implementation of a Bachelor of Science in Mechatronics Engineering Technology ProgramAbstractThe purpose of this paper is to provide an account of a project to develop and implement amultidisciplinary B.S. in Mechatronics Engineering Technology curriculum based on the needs ofindustry in Northern Kentucky / Southern Ohio regional areas. The main source of information forthe assessment of region’s industry needs for mechatronics
, respectively in 2008 and 2009. Before joining the University of Illinois, she has held a post-doctoral position in INRIA at Nancy (France), and she was an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and at the City College of New York (CUNY).Dr. Kelly J. Cross, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Cross completed her doctoral program in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech in 2015 and is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She is involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students at UIUC. Her research interests include diversity and inclusion, teamwork skills, assessment, and identity
analyses should be performed: As to when real-options analysesshould be performed, Eschenbach, et al pointed out, “Real options have their application only inthose projects where the NPV is close to zero, where there is uncertainty, and where managementhas the ability to exercise [its] managerial options.” [2, p. 401]When deciding if an individual investment should be pursued in the future, students have nodifficulty accepting the decision rule: pursue if the present worth is positive-valued; otherwise, donot pursue the investment. However, they do not readily accept a decision to pursue a futureinvestment having a negative-valued present worth because of the intrinsic value of the flexibilityto pursue (or not pursue). Realizing such decisions are
. The underlying theories are then taught after thestudent has established a need for the subsequent theory.13 Use of an inductive approach mayprovide opportunities to introduce more creative thinking into engineering courses. Examples ofinductive teaching methods with growing popularity include: inquiry learning, problem basedlearning, project based learning, and discovery learning. 13 One of the most common inductivetechniques employed by engineering instructors is project based learning.Project based learning is an inductive technique that is widely used in engineering courses withprojects such as lab experiments. There are three types of projects based on the degree ofautonomy which as student is allowed: Task Project, in which the scope
and Col- leges; ”Building Learning Communities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District” , and ”Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University” Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She is also the PI on both ”Syracuse City School District Title II B Mathematics and Science Partnership: Science Project and Mathematics MSP Grant initiatives.Dr. Abdelnasser A. Eldek, Jackson State University Dr. Abdelnasser A. Eldek obtained B.Sc, M.Sc and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Zagazig Uni- versity - Egypt (1993), Eindhoven University - Netherlands (1999), and the University of Mississippi - USA (2004), respectively. In addition, he has high diploma in Technical Education
a responsive teaching approach looks like in engineering and how teachers might enter intothis approach. Our study is also intended to highlight some of the challenges that teachers face inresponsive teaching in engineering.In this research study we analyze interviews with six elementary teachers who had at least twoyears of experience with Novel Engineering, an approach to teaching engineering designdeveloped at Tufts University that uses narrative texts as the basis for design problems.14 In thesesemi-structured interviews we discussed the implementation of Novel Engineering in theirclassroom and showed them a short video of some of their students working on the project. Weasked teachers to reflect on these students’ work, drawing on the
AMPS/CBSI fellow at NYU through the NSF G-K12 program. Henry is primarily interested in using robotics to help people with disabilities and promoting STEM education in underrepresented demographics.Ms. Allison Graham Brown, New York University Allison Graham Brown, MAEd, is the Director of Professional Development for The ASD Nest Support Project at New York University. After receiving her B.A. in Psychology at The Ohio State University she received a M.A. and dual certification in Childhood and Special Education from NYU. Ms. Brown has been an adjunct professor at Hunter College and New York University, teaching courses on instructional methods for students with disabilities, and behavior theory and interventions
and the analytical solutions and methods to make good FEMpre-processing decisions. An exposure to analytical methods also allows students to designexperiments/technology and to analyse and interpret results and data obtained effectively. To dothis, a project is introduced in designing an orifice plate (standard flow measuring device) throughthe use of a commercial FEM package (the Hyperworks suite) with result validation obtainedfrom analytical solutions from the Theory of Elasticity (the Biharmonic equation is used).Our university is an ABET accredited university. The exercise described in this paper is inaccordance with ABET’s 2015-2016 criteria for accrediting engineering programs. ABET’scriteria states “The curriculum must require
Vikram Kapila is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering (NYU Tandon), where he directs a Mechatronics and Control Laboratory, a Research Experience for Teachers Site in Mechatronics and Entrepreneurship, a GK-12 Fellows project, and a DR K-12 research project, all funded by NSF. He has held visiting positions with the Air Force Research Laboratories in Dayton, OH. His research interests include K-12 STEM education, mechatronics, robotics, and control system technology. Under Research Experience for Teachers Site and GK-12 Fellows programs, funded by NSF, and the Central Brooklyn STEM Initiative (CBSI), funded by six philanthropic foundations, he has con- ducted significant K-12
the University of Virginia. Rachel received her Masters Degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at the University of South Carolina and her Bachelors Degree in Biology from Bowling Green State University.Dr. Jan Upton, Institutional Research Consultants, Ltd. Jan Upton is the Founder and President of Institutional Research Consultants, Ltd., a program evaluation research firm located in Columbus, Ohio that provides services primarily to grant-funded projects in the following areas: STEM, reading, at-risk students, and teacher professional development. Dr. Upton completed Ph.D. and M.A. degrees in sociology at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill where her area of specialization was social
complex problems that arose in the process of forming a product. The systems applied typically start with a new team or an already existent team brainstorming for a possible idea to solve complex problems. Then the groups splits into specialized teams such as engineers or designers and then work on systems to make the idea reality. Winning at New Products gives a “game plan” on how to form the master strategy for new products using systems. In other words the perfect system for industries in order to have new successful products. The book starts with finding ideas, and then picking the right idea, next specifies the idea into a project, then moves on to picking the right project, further defines the product, tests the product and then
students’ development as learners.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty
to providing information on upcoming events, we also keep archives of all of our pastevents, including photos and descriptions as well as tutorials and other resources that allowstudents to work through educational projects on their own time.The CyberCenter was developed in PHP using the ModX framework, which providesfunctionality such as user accounts and authentication, as well as a full-featured back-endgraphical user interface which allows the administration of critical site functionality and thesimple management of website resources.Tech FridaysEvery semester, the mentors offer technical workshops known as Tech Fridays. At these events,students are introduced to new technologies, new techniques, and, to some, new areas of interest.BSC
grading. This first-year course for engineering and technology students at acommunity college emphasizes working in teams to complete hands-on activities using EXCELand structured programming with MATLAB.Initial assignments involve using EXCEL to display and analyze data from Ohm’s Law and thespeed of sound in air. The next assignment requires distance measuring with ultrasound anddesigning an ultrasonic range-finder. In the remainder of the assignments over the final three-quarters of the semester, MATLAB is used as a structured programming language to first controlthe movement of a stepper-motor rotor and then to identify different translucent materials fromtheir visible light spectra as measured by a spectrometer. A final project combines the
Paper ID #16323The Doctorate Journey: Mapping Perceptions of the Ph.D. ProcessDr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Stephanie Cutler has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Her dissertation explored faculty adoption of research-based instructional strategies in the statics classroom. Currently, Dr. Cutler works as an assessment and instructional support specialist with the Leonhard Center for the Enhance- ment of Engineering Education at Penn State. She aids in the educational assessment of faculty-led projects while also supporting instructors to improve their teaching in
: jose.fontan1@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.eduDr. Omar I. Molina-Bas, University of Puerto Rico - Mayaguez Campus Omar I. Molina Bas, Ph.D. Associate Professor and Unit Coordinator Construction Engineering and Man- agement Department of Civil Engineering and Surveying University of Puerto Rico, Mayag¨uez Campus email: omar.molina1@upr.edu http://cem.uprm.edu/molina.htmlProf. Tim L. Mrozowski, Michigan State University Tim Mrozowski A.I.A., LEED R AP BDC, is the Program Leader and a Professor of Construction Man- agement, in the School of Planning, Design and Construction at Michigan State University. He conducts research on construction management, sustainability and energy. Recent research and outreach projects include
Closing Picnic Research Report #9, #10Figure 2: Slide projected to introduce students to research competition. Figure 3: Research question slide displayed to start the competition. Figure 4: Discussion prompts for post-activity debriefing.Results92 total students participated in this ethics exercise during the 2015 EnSURE(EngineeringSummer Undergraduate Research Experience) program at MSU. The students were divided into24 teams, which were randomly formed on the first day of the summer research program andworked together throughout the professional development seminar series. Each of the 24 teamsturned in a written report (sample in Appendix A) of the activities they completed
first-time student enrollment in the College of Engineering for cohort years 2010-2013, theoverall percentage of African American students declined each year as the first-time studentenrollment for White American students increased over the same period.Summer Bridge Program Overview/ GoalsIn existence for more than twenty years, the MSU Summer Bridge Program is designed to provideincoming URM engineering students five weeks of intensive coursework in Pre-Calculus/CollegeAlgebra, Chemistry and Physics. Students also receive instruction in technical communication,personal development, and real world engineering projects, teambuilding, and study skillsdevelopment. The program is held the summer prior to students’ first semester enrollment
and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by a fellowship from the National Endowment for the Humanities. Her current research project, ”The Ethics of Extraction: Integrating Corporate So- cial Responsibility into Engineering Education,” investigates the sociotechnical dimensions of CSR for engineers in the mining, oil and gas industries and is funded by the National Science Foundation.Dr. Carrie J. McClelland P.E., Colorado School of Mines Carrie J McClelland is an Associate Teaching Professor at Colorado School of Mines. Carrie is a regis- tered professional engineer with a passion for teaching the next generation of engineers to be well-rounded professionals who consider
identification (BID) systems identifya person among a set of people whereas biometric verification (BV) systems accept orreject a person’s claimed identity. Five biometric systems are considered in this project,namely, face, speech, iris, signature and fingerprint. Although fingerprint recognitionforms the largest share of today’s market [15], there are practical tradeoffs with othersystems as given in Table 1 [15]. This exemplifies the need for further research andeducational activities pertaining to a variety of biometric systems. Face-based andspeech-based recognition systems are particularly promising as their accuracy isimproved. Ease of User Ease of System Accuracy Use
generation IP protocol. Wemeasure IPv6 adoption through eight adoption metrics gleaned from eleven datasets. Datacollection covers a two year period from January 2014 through December 2015.In addition, we address the implications of the sudden uptick in IPv6 adoption, as it continues ona path of accelerated expansion. The long awaited transition from IPv4 to IPv6 has implicationsfor all organizations who will soon be making the change; many of which may not be preparedfor how to systematically approach such an undertaking. Factors such as project planning, IPv6saturation, infrastructure assessment, policy redesign, and network continuity are discussed askey areas that will need to be addressed as organizations begin to adopt IPv6.Key words: IPv6
organizations such as the Institute of Industrial Engineers (IIE), Society for Engineering Management (SEM), Project Management Institute (PMI), Society for Health Systems (SHS) and Association of Technology Man- agement and Applied Engineering (ATMAE). He is also a member of Alpha Pi Mu and Phi Kappa Phi Honors society.Dr. Coray Davis, Virginia State University Chair and Associate Professor for Engineering TechnologyDr. Ben U. Nwoke, Virginia State University Dr. Ben U. Nwoke is a certified manufacturing engineer and a certified project manager. He is a professor at Virginia State University in the Department of Technology, Petersburg, Virginia. c American Society for Engineering Education
students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related
evaluations, resource CSP mentors and peersresearchdesign requirements, and initial design process, Participate in a summer industrial, including requirement and verification clinical, or research internshipcapabilities development. Students develop project (student’s choice) proposals suitable for either their senior Year Course Description (credit hour) Activities and Development capstone course. Continue research throughout yearYear 4: BIOE 435 (2 credit hours) and 436 (2 credit Interact with