in-class quizzes before working together onassigned class problems.2 For other flipped classes, the students complete pre-class quizzes afterwatching the online lecture at home. This was followed by class activities.3 Another flippedclass adaptation has included adding an on-line discussion before class, which allowedinstructors to formatively assess student learning and to provide in-class review sessions beforethe other classroom activities. In this case, an online quiz was administered toward the end of theonline lecture, for which students earned participation points.4 In this study, the first author usedrecorded class lectures from a previous semester for course content and had students present theirindividual homework solutions in
learning." Understanding adult educationand training. 2 (2000): 225-239.[6] E. F. Crawley, W. A. Lucas, J. Malmqvist, and D. R. Brodeur, “The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An UpdatedStatement of Goals for Engineering Education,”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference,Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 – 23, 2011, [Online]. Available:http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/local_143186.pdf. [Accessed: 25-April-2014].[7] R. J. Schuhmann, “Engineering Leadership Education – The Search for Definition and a CurricularApproach,” Journal of STEM Education: Innovations & Research, vol. 11, no.3 and 4, 2010:61-69.[8] NSPE, “NSPE Position Statement No. 1752 — Engineering Education Outcomes,” National Society
%, and88% for sections 1, 2, and 3, respectively) were Mechanical Engineering students. The threeinstructors of the different sections all had prior experience teaching dynamics within theFreeform framework. Each of the sections had common homework assignments, midterm exams,final exams, and course policies defined in the course syllabus. The three sections also shared acommon blog space for online collaboration and communication. However, each instructor hadthe freedom to use their own pedagogical discretion in planning class activities and assigningquizzes. During the second week of classes, the pre-test of the 11-item aDCI was administered ina pencil-and-paper format during class. The identical aDCI post-test was incorporated into thefinal exam
reports), an underrepresented minority category, or within syllabus errata Category 2 - “Low design”– Disability used as a design constraint or requirement; tags include reference to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)3, assistive technology design projects for “people with disabilities” (sometimes shortened to “PwD”); few to no references to specific client needs, Category 3 - “High design” – Disability included as a facet of the design client (i.e., high design); tags include specific disabilities, meeting with the client, multiple references to client needs in paper Category 4 - “Perceptions and accommodations” – Disability as it relates to engineering student or faculty
in this course section could beconsidered at high-risk of dropping out of the major, having received grades of D, F, or W fromeither ENGR 101 or 190 previously. A minority of students were joining the major late in theirfirst year and had missed the fall calculus class or were non-engineering majors. The syllabus contained a consent statement, notifying students of the study and offeringthem an opportunity to opt out of having their course materials used for research purposes.Students were included for analysis if they completed both a pre- and post-survey and earned afinal grade in the class (N = 18). Completion of the survey was voluntary; no rewards or credittowards grades were offered as incentives. Of the original 35 students
solutions), analysis, software tools [CAD,MatLab, AmeSim, Altair Hyperworks (FEA)], and communication. The class is designed with aone-hour lecture and a two-hour practice session. The lecture takes place in a room called theActive Learning Center (ALC) where each student has access to a computer for use during thelecture. The practice sessions take place in four different rooms during the semester dependingon what equipment is needed for the session. The students work in teams of three during thepractice sessions. The resulting finalized course is structured as follows:One week of safety training, MatLab refresher and writing instructionThe first lecture starts with the syllabus, a MatLab refresher about importing data, plotting andcreating proper
. The fact that the theoretical circuital knowledge of the students in this course does not cover ejwt excitations. It is more useful in basic courses such as Electrical Circuits and Electronics I. Next semester I expect to use it more often since I will be teaching Electronics I. Lack of time allocated to this kind of exercise in the syllabus. Time constraints prevented integrating the device more often. Preparing a class using a new device requires time for preparation. Limited multimeter functions also limited the use of the device. The workshop was given after the courses were designed (mid-semester workshop). Labview by National Instruments and Arduino fill most of the material for experiments but
Laboratory is to develop the students’ writing ability. Historically, this has beenaccomplished by requiring bi-weekly technical memos. The course syllabus described the memorequirement this way: Your memo will most often pertain to your lab experience and lecture experience, although homing in on a particularly interesting aspect of lab or radio design is also fair game. Occasionally there will be specific topics you are to write about. Your one-page typed memo (space and a half, 12 point times font) is due at the beginning of the Monday lecture session, and is to be placed in the folder appropriate for your lab section. The memo will be graded based on spelling, grammar and content.In 2012 Auburn
occurredoutside of the scheduled Friday classroom sessions. These activities included recorded lecturesand instructional videos that could be viewed at a time of the student’s choosing. They alsoincluded participation in specific campus events that were integral to success in the course.Students were generally expected to complete the distributed learning activities before the nextFriday class session.A syllabus for the course that details learning outcomes, and lists all learning activities andassignments, is provided in the Appendix to this paper. A style of problem-based learningpedagogy was utilized consistently throughout the course, in that content and pacing were drivenby the twenty-one (21) assignments listed on the syllabus. These consisted
a design of experiment framework, leadingto statistically significant conclusions. A comparative study between multiple sections in particularbetween traditional and online delivery was reported in Wilck and Kauffmann (2013) 21.This course is scheduled for engineering sophomores (and selected freshmen) instead of seniorsas documented in some literature2. We believe it is advantageous to start learning and sharpeningteamwork and leadership skills as earlier as possible and engineering economics serves as a greatplatform. Such a belief, has been noted a century ago by a renowned engineer John Harford 21 thatengineering and economics “help to develop the very valuable habit of thinking in terms of groupsrather than of individuals”, where the
Paper ID #14512Inquiry-Based Learning to Explore the Design of the Built EnvironmentMs. Anahid Behrouzi, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Anahid Behrouzi is a doctoral student of civil engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. She has been involved with STEM education beginning in 2003 as a volunteer and summer instructor with the North Carolina Museum of Life and Science. She has been engaged with undergraduate/ graduate course delivery in the topic areas of engineering problem-solving, structural engineering, and reinforced concrete design at North Carolina State University (2008-2011), the
national airspace, collision avoidance/deconfliction, and UAS flight operations. He has worked closely with industry partners such as the Boeing Company, Insitu, Aerovel, Hood Technology, and the Washington Joint Center for Aerospace Technology Innovation to implement academic technologies onto deployed platforms. Dr. Lum teaches both undergraduate and graduate course on automatic control, flight mechanics, modeling and simulation, mathematical tools for engineers, sensors and actuators, and other controls related courses. He has been awarded the department’s ”Instructor of the Year” award twice (2012 and 2013). He is also the faculty advisor to the department’s design, build, fly team. He has served as an adjunct
over five years as a Medical Librarian before her present position as a Science and Engineering Librarian at New York University Abu Dhabi. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 “Patenting” a New Engineering Librarian at an American University in the UAEAbstractAs an engineering librarian, my first instruction session consisted of teaching students aboutpatents and how to search the patent literature. I learned a great deal about patents and whatcan and cannot be patented. Of course, a person cannot be patented, let alone a profession.The question still remains as to what if it was a possibility and what would that patent looklike? As a librarian who liaised with the
-dicate that the content of the Safe Zone Workshops has been appropriately tailored to an audi-ence of engineering educators, and that there is a clear call to expand the workshops and nurturethe conversation about LGBTQ inclusion in engineering. Online technology is being used tocreate a scalable and sustainable model for sharing knowledge, tools and resources to promoteLGBTQ inclusion in environments that are traditionally difficult to penetrate. Using a two-tiered, train-the-trainer structure, two experts trained a cohort of twenty leaders to facilitateonline and face-to-face Safe Zone Workshops and lead a Virtual Community of Practice for en-gineering faculty. The workshops and VCP are being launched in early 2016.This project uses a
at three universities received a grant8 to compare the flipped andblended modes of instruction in a Numerical Methods course. As part of the grant, a CI forNumerical Methods14 was to be developed for nationwide use to measure conceptualunderstanding of numerical methods.February 2014 – March 2014: A Concept Inventory Workshop:An engineering professor, who has thirty years of teaching experience and is a chief developer ofconcept inventories of three engineering topics13,15, conducted a holistic workshop on CIdevelopment. Three instructors who are investigators of the grant and two external members ofthe evaluation team attended the workshop. The four-hour workshop was administered via twoonline sessions.In the first online session, a
Engage non-electrical-engineering Majors in a Required CircuitTheory Course,” 2016 American Society for Engineering Education Gulf-Southwest Annual Regional Conference,Fort Worth, TX, March 8-16, 2016.16 Creative Education Foundation, "The Creative Education Foundation," Creative EducationFoundation, January 27, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.creativeeducationfoundation.org.[Accessed January 27, 2016].17 Van Treuren, K. W., Jean, B. R., and Fry, C, 2012, “Teaching Innovation and Creativity in the Classroom”Presented at the ASEE National Conference and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, June 10-13, 201218 http://www.baylor.edu/about/index.php?id=88781 retrieved on 4/01/16
work is aimed at strengthening the security of Operating Systems and the Internet via auditing the existing code with the aid of mathematical verification tools, and redesigning with security as the primary goal. I regularly teach, among others, a course on Security that was developed with funding from NSF. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 CUTE Labs: Low-Cost Open-Source Instructional Laboratories for Cloud Computing Education Abstract Compared to the fast development of cloud-based applications and technology, higher education on cloud computing is seriously lagging behind. Built upon our ex
. For quantitative analysis, some survey questionson both the pre- and post-course surveys as well as weekly post-class surveys distributed online,included Likert-scale questions and an average was calculated from student submissions. Open-ended reflections of journal entries and the weekly post-class surveys were analyzed to identifycommon themes which categorize the students’ experiences with coaching. Excerpts and quoteswhich are representative of the entire class are presented to illustrate these themes and commonexperiences.Additional procedures employed in the class which relate to coaching but the results of which arenot discussed in this particular study include: (1) Examples of questions which are stellar orweak coaching questions
both to applied leadership andacademic foundations, so the intentional composition of an engineering residence hall helps tocultivate the sphere of community responsibility.Recommendations for Future ResearchIn addition to the reflection essays, students built an online e-portfolio where they wrote abouthow current and past experiences help them develop the skills necessary to be an engineer. Werefer to these skills as engineering competencies. An excerpt from the course syllabus describingthe assignment is shown in Appendix A.Future research can focus on analyzing data from students’ e-portfolios. Based on our findingsfrom the analysis of the reflection essays, we anticipate that students’ e-portfolio responses mayreflect their transition
programs, and also for students from other departments who receive aminor in Mechanical Engineering. In the fall 2015 semester, there were 286 students, dividedbetween two sections taught by two instructors. Both instructors followed the same syllabus andused the same assignments. Students from both sections worked on the same big machineproject: all 286 students worked on creating one big machine.In previous semesters, students in this course completed a design project that emphasized user-centered design. Using the design process and user discovery, they designed a product thatwould directly meet users’ needs. This user-centered design project is still part of the course, butin the fall 2015 semester, a new project was incorporated, to be
Paper ID #15375An Academic Library’s Role in Improving Accessibility to 3-D PrintingMr. Daniel P Zuberbier, East Carolina University Dan Zuberbier is the Education & Instructional Technology Librarian at East Carolina University (ECU). He planned for, launched, and currently manages the J.Y. Joyner Library 3D printing service which makes 3D printing accessible to all students, faculty and staff at ECU, and is currently developing a course on 3D printing for the North Carolina Summer Ventures in Math & Science Program. He previously worked as a high school Social Studies teacher in Arizona and Michigan, and holds
well developed syllabus from the previous faculty. This classuses patents from various disciplines as resources, and challenges student teams to research theirstories and discoveries as a basis for teaching design, invention, protection, and litigation alongwith the patent protocols. The learning experience that arises from this narrative case approachexposes students to patent research skills, and inventive discovery, while simultaneously learningthe patent rules, and facilitating the student’s future creative design and engineering practices.The Innovation and Invention course includes the other forms of Intellectual Property and istaught over an academic quarter, which allows sufficient time to build the IP lessons over thirtyclass hours
IntroductionAs a series of assignments in a graduate program run by the Gordon Institute of EngineeringLeadership at Northeastern University, students develop and improve their online social mediaprofiles, meet with subject matter experts within their industry, sign up for newsletters, attendevents and seminars in their discipline and identify other ways to improve their personal andprofessional networks.The objective is to increase awareness of and practice several key skills essential for emergingand successful leaders in the areas of Taking Initiative, Connecting Across Disciplines,Communication and Advocacy, Interpersonal Skills and Inquiry. Assessment, using 360-degreefeedback taken before and after participating in the program, indicates average
. 2.7.2.7 Create and maintain a well-organized electronic file storage system.2.7.3 Using the Internet and email 2.7.3.1 Use the Internet to search for online information and interact with Web sites. 2.7.3.2 Use the Internet and web-based tools to manage basic workplace tasks (e.g., calendar management, contacts management, and timekeeping). 2.7.3.3 Use email to communicate in the workplace. 2.7.3.4 Understand the different types of social media and their appropriate workplace and non-workplace uses, and the impact that various social media activities can have on one’s personal and professional life. 2.7.3.5 Employ collaborative/groupware
explainedwhy she did not decide to utilize the “stop the clock” option:I feel like it [tenure clock extension] will just push me back, and then the [male faculty] advance;the other people advanced a lot faster if I automatically get the clock pushback. If I started at thesame time as a male colleague [but] I’m being pushed back automatically, I’ll be forever behindhim. I don’t like that.Of course, if I need it, I think there should be the flexibility for me to apply for it. A lot of times,I feel like, why are females being slowed down? Because they said, “Oh, you can do this later,you can do that later,” or they automatically push you back. Then just because you had a childand then they feel like you’re not good enough, even if you said, “I don’t want