State Polytechnic University - Pomona Todd Coburn is an Assistant Professor of Aerospace/Mechanical Engineering at California State Poly- technic University Pomona, an FAA DER, and a stress/structures consultant. He joined Cal Poly Pomona in September of 2012 after a 25 year career at the Boeing Company and restarted his consulting work around that time. His work at Boeing included the structural analysis of aircraft and rockets. His last seven years at Boeing he managed the large and expanding commercial aircraft strength analysis team in Long Beach, California. He holds a PhD in Engineering & Applied Industrial Mathematics from Clare- mont Graduate University, MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering and
that each program must demonstrate that their graduates areachieving the stated PEOs, but since 2012 the evaluation of PEOs are no longer required,However, criterion 2 still requires that the PEO,s must be reviewed periodically, to ensure thatthey are still consistent with the institutional mission, and the program’s constituents’ needs. Inthe most recent review, with consultation with various constituencies of that included theIndustrial Advisory Board and students, minor modifications are being made to the PEOs. Therevised PEOs are presented below: The Mechanical Engineering Program prepares students to attain the following program educational objectives a few years after graduation:1. Have engineering or other careers in industry
, employees must haveknowledge, skills and abilities (KSAs) that empower them to communicate and coordinate withtheir colleagues2. The ability to act as an effective team member and leader is critical forengineering graduates entering industry, business or other career paths. Accordingly, theCanadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) has designated teamwork as one of thetwelve attributes engineering students must possess upon graduation3. Similarly, ABET hasincluded the “ability to function on multi-disciplinary skills” in its set of professional skills4.In our experience as engineering educators, based on observations as well as employer andstudent exit surveys, the traditional academic setting cannot give sufficient experiences forreasonable
challenges in multiagent decision controls, human factors, computer security, and power systems will be assessed. Projects range from notional resilience improvement to integration of distributed electric grid simulation to hardware in the loop. One anticipated engagement assessment method was the percentage of students that continue projects beyond the one semester course is reported. Student projects were measured based on completeness of understanding of resilient control systems topics as applied to critical infrastructure. We will also discuss findings from an integrative grid game course project between the Electrical and Computer Engineering and Criminal Justice departments at Temple University. Specifically, we will share lessons learned
students and professors. However, to integrate ethicsmodules more thoroughly across the engineering curriculum a systematic approach is requiredwith proper accounting of teaching load for ethics/philosophy faculty who lecture in multiplecourses. For efficiency, an ethics case-study database with assignment and discussion questionsshould be maintained, and an online module could be explored with in-class facilitateddiscussion.Introduction With the rapid advancement of technology and integration within all aspects of our society,the ethical implications of our engineering decisions are growing in importance. Engineeringprofessionals have a duty to design and manufacture products that are used to improve the livesof others. In the workplace
their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 2015 Outstanding Doctoral Research Award.Jacqueline Doyle, Florida International UniversityDina Verdin, Purdue University, West Lafayette
engineeringidentity30. Often engineering faculty view an individual’s identity as irrelevant to the engineeringworkplace. In such a “color-blind” perspective, individual characteristics should play no role inscientific work. However, significant amounts of research demonstrate that no person is “color-blind”31. Additionally, faculty may not be influenced by the theoretical developments explainingthe importance of students’ identities28. Due to the lack of exploration of social aspects ofengineering, conversations centered around normative and non-normative values are almost non-existent. Limited conversations about students identities and cultural norms allows the dominanttraits of the field's practitioners to perpetuate despite evidence indicating a need for
registered Professional Engineer (PE) in Mississippi and an active member of IIE, HFES, and ASEE.Shuchisnigdha Deb, Mississippi State University SHUCHISNIGDHA DEB is a doctoral student in the Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi. She received her MS in Industrial and Management Engineering from Montana State University. Her research interests include Human Factors, Healthcare Engineering, and Decision Making and Transportation Safety. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Using a service-learning pedagogy to improve student engagementAbstractService-learning is
, tension, and exchange rules governing changes in perceptions andunderstanding” (p. 2). From this perspective, leadership is an emergent outcome that is producedfrom the reality of interactions of decision-makers with each other and with their environment(Bradbury & Lichtenstein, 2000).” According to this theory a single individual might act as aleader in one situation, and as a follower in another, as they “experience tension in the form ofpressures on and challenges to their personal knowledge base (Carley and Hill, 2001)” (p. 5)7.Learning goalsThere are nine learning goals associated with our crisis simulation experience. As a result ofparticipating in the Crisis Simulation, students will: • Understand that many leadership assumptions
reports on three specific themesthat have emerged from our initial analysis of two interviews with a single research subject. Assuch, our account uses a single case approach, following in the footsteps of groundbreakingscholarship such as Foor et al.’s “ethnography of the particular” which recounts the livedexperiences of one female, multi-minority student pursuing an engineering degree.10 Our dataanalysis is ongoing, and in separate publications we will report results more specificallyconcerned with boundary spanning, including types of boundaries, boundary spanning roles andactivities, and competency demands experienced by early career engineers. Our larger objectivefor this paper is to explore the utility of investigating the realities of
Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. She is the recipient of a 2014 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Educational Research and Methods Division Apprentice Faculty Grant. She also was an NSF Graduate Research Fellow for her work on female empowerment in engineering which won the National Association for Research in
climate was a large factor in women’sdecision to either leave or never enter the profession after graduating from college. Previousresearch indicates that women that persist in engineering have developed a strong sense ofengineering identity and have developed skills to navigate the workplace environment. AtVillanova University, the number of women graduating with a Bachelor of Science in CivilEngineering has been 33% over the past three years and the percentage of women faculty isnearly 50%, which are both above the national average. This paper explores whether the womengraduates of this department persist in the profession at higher percentages than what has beenfound nationally and if their persistence in the profession is comparable to the
Engineering Education, 2016 Paper ID #15701Dr. Leidy Klotz, Clemson University Leidy Klotz is an engineering faculty member at Clemson University, where he developed and teaches courses like the one described in this paper. He does research on decision making and education for sustainability.Prof. Amy E. Landis, Clemson University Dr. Landis joined Clemson in June 2015 as the Thomas F. Hash ’69 Endowed Chair in Sustainable Development. Previously she was an Associate Professor at Arizona State University in the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment. She began her career as an Assistant Professor at the
Starling, anengineering educator and curriculum development specialist with over ten years of K-12classroom experience, directed and organized the camp activities and lead the team ofprofessionals. The science teacher provided additional instructional support during theimplementation of the camp. The TVIs and O&M supported the students in daily living andtransitional skills. Additionally, one undergraduate education student and one graduate studentstudying biology provided insight on current strategies helpful to navigating college. Thesynergistic efforts of each team member contributed to being able to meet the needs of thestudents and provide them with an outstanding opportunity to explore engineering practices.Student application and
with engineering colleagues and students”. 10Most recently, a similar approach in the form of career management courses, is recommended forall engineering students, and not just women.3 A course was introduced at the Women inEngineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) 2015 Change Leader Forum entitled “Empower andIgnite Future Women Leaders”.11 Another group of researchers created an extracurricularoffering, entitled “Gender and Engineering” for interested students and faculty. One goal of thisoffering is to provide female students “with a framework to understand their experience has thecapacity to transform their individually internalized messages of personal inadequacy or notbelonging into a larger contextualized experience that they can name
cycling and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions from constructed wetlands. For the past eight years he has been involved with Engineers Without Borders and is one of the current faculty advisors for the Montana State University chapter. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Engineers Without Borders-Montana State University: A Case Study in Student-Directed Engagement in Community ServiceKathryn Plymesser, PhD, PE, Montana State University – BillingsDamon Sheumaker, Montana State UniversityChris Allen, Montana State UniversityAbstractEngineers Without Borders at Montana State University (EWB@MSU) is an organization thathas been successful in generating increased student
graduates pursue professionallicensure, while NCEES data shows that percentages in the mid-teens are more common formechanical and electrical engineering graduates. Civil engineering programs have consistentlyhad a licensed practice focus, because that is where their graduates seek careers. Mechanical andelectrical engineering programs have generally moved much more toward an industry focus asthat is where the vast majority of their graduates seek careers. 2013-14 PE Exam Takers by Discipline 25,000 23,537 20,000 14,700 15,000 10,000 5,000 4,034
, and helped critique pitches during pitchpractice. Each of the outside individuals who served as subject matter experts and/or mentorsdonated their time.The university staff consisted of a managing director, a student program director, a studentintern, an advisor, a media consultant, an assessment specialist, and a faculty mentor. Themanaging director is a staff member in engineering who co-runs the support facility that housesthe program. Her role is dedicated to Catalyze CU on a part-time basis. She works to provideconnection to the other entrepreneurial initiatives on campus, aligns university and communitypartners, sets the program direction, and runs administrative tasks through the university such aspayroll, providing the grant funding
a national NSF innovation center (Epicenter), and leads an NSF program at Stanford on summer research experiences for high school teachers. Her industry experiences includes engineering positions at Detroit’s ”Big Three:” Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Chrysler Corporation. At Stanford she has served a chair of the faculty senate, and recently served as Associate Vice Provost for Graduate Education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Improving Students’ Learning in Statics Skills: Using Homework and Exam Wrappers to Strengthen Self-Regulated LearningAbstractStatics is one of the fundamental courses required for engineering students
. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt’s research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and the role of the public in engineering decisions. Dr. Canney re- ceived bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis on structural
held in January 2012. These two persons were eventually elected, in a very contentious election, and began their terms as representatives of the public on June 2012. Part of that experience is described in a latter section.IV. University Courses ITEAS policy framework (capacity building and policy horizon broadening), and the experiences in the Energy Roundtable enabled the engineering professors (Dr. O’Neill and Dr. Irizarry) to integrate policy into their teaching. A graduate course on renewable energy served as an initialplatform to introduce engineering students to energy policy issues. Although the course mainlydeals with energy sources and technologies, it also includes a discussion of interconnection issues.Interconnecting variable
fortriggering the formulation of an Engineering Ambassador role identity? Analyses reveal students’ substantial personal investment in their role as an engineeringstudent and an emerging ambassador. The decision to participate is often driven by personalinterests and experiences, and is tied to a deep sense of importance for the work. Similarly,choice of presentation topic is also often personal. Presentation skills reveal new courses offuture action; ambassadors describe increases in confidence and many report using the skillsimmediately. Opportunities to meet other ambassadors are singled out as a major benefit, andstudents use newly acquired programmatic knowledge to shape the role expectations at theirinstitution. Although not necessarily
solutions. All these tasks are listed at the higher level of learning inBloom’s taxonomy in the cognitive domain1. They need to understand the importance of criticalthinking as they prepare for real-world experience in their professional careers. Critical thinkinginvolves reasoning, decision making, and problem solving while seeking for effectiveness,novelty, and self-direction2. Critical thinking is effective because it avoids common pitfalls, suchas seeing only one side of an issue, discounting new evidence that disconfirms one’s ideas,reasoning from passion rather than logic, and failing to support statements with evidence. Thereare many methods that can be implemented to encourage students to develop critical reasoning,decisive analysis and
education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Dr. Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette Robin S. Adams is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University and holds a PhD in Education, an MS in Materials Science and Engineering, and a BS in Mechanical Engineering. She researches cross-disciplinarity ways of thinking, acting and being; design learning; and engineering education transformation.Dr. Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is a Professor in the Department of Human Centered Design & Engineering at the Univer- sity of Washington. She is
faculty’s meticuloustutelage and veritable concern with the students under their auspices. They cared about and forus, and that has been shown to be an effective mediator of student learning.51,52 To suggestanything to the contrary about the faculty there or their effect on undergraduates’ level oflearning would be not only a misrepresentation but also an arrant insult to them and their efforts.One could point to this as evidence that Tulane did indeed ultimately offer a nurturingenvironment for its engineering students. That was true at the individual faculty member level,though it may or may not have extended above to the higher administration. Dwelling on this,however, misses the broader point.Initial impressionsThis narrative so far has relied
ABET Evaluators Team site visit in 2013. EEET received excellent comments for the display materials presented by Dr. Subal Sarkar ABET team chair which was managed to completion by Wajid. He is Digital Integrated Quality Management Systems Expert for Automated Academic Student Outcomes based Assessments Methodology He has taught several courses on electronics, microprocessors, electric circuits, digital electronics and instrumentation. He has conducted several workshops at the IU campus and eslewhere on Outcomes Assessment best practices, OBE, EvalTools R 6 for faculty, E learning with EvalTools R 6 for students, ABET accreditation process. He is a member of SAP Community, ISO 9001, Senior Member IEEE, IEEE
Paper ID #16581Understanding the Effects of Transferring In Statics Credit on Performancein Future Mechanics CoursesDr. Jacob R Grohs, Virginia Tech Jacob Grohs is an Assistant Professor in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech with Affiliate Faculty status in Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics and the Learning Sciences and Technologies at Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics (BS, MS) and in Educational Psychology (MAEd, PhD).Ms. Michelle M Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University Michelle Soledad is a doctoral student and graduate research assistant in the Department of Engineering
students who are already in Russian and American institutions.Possibilities and requirements for the education of high school students who would soonbecome adults and employees are explored and it was found that the individuals with highintercultural sensitivity and comfortable in global interactions were in high demand in theinternational labor market and can succeed in any kind of global business 2. Social and cultural Intercultural personality National Identity competencesAdolescence is the most favorable period for the development of an intercultural personalityand the global mind-set for a multicultural environment. Defining the place in the society is avery important factor that indicates personality development: I
administrators in healthcare journals and engineers inengineering journals indicate that the use of industrial engineering methods by interdisciplinaryteams is having a positive effect on the delivery of healthcare.8,9, 10,11This paper documents aspects of our fifteen year history of collaboration between MercerUniversity Department of Industrial Engineering and healthcare facilities in Georgia. It includesboth a summary of the successes and an exploration of the challenges faced as these relationshipswere built and sustained. The resulting lessons learned will, we believe, give valuable insightsand advice to faculty members and programs who are embarking on similar collaborations.Opportunities and SuccessesPartnerships with healthcare providers for
, theauthors will attempt to provide some insight on what worked, as well as what could useimprovement, through contrast of the three projects.Individual Team Member and Group Composition DynamicsProject 1Not surprisingly, Project 1’s team membership might be described as a ‘Dream Team.’Motivated Ph.D. students, with a combination of strong technical expertise, as well aspast, hands-on experience building and flying R/C aircraft, and buttressed by aparticipatory faculty member, created a tested solution that maximized both reliabilityand validity. What do these terms imply? In Martin’s book on Design Thinking, TheDesign of Business, [12] he develops an argument of the difficulty in creating solutionsthat are both reliable – function as intended; and