M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global agility and leadership. His research and teaching interests in- clude developing global agility, globalization, leadership, project management, ethics, and manufacturing processes. Gregg has lived in numerous locations within the USA and Europe and has worked in many places
concepts or implied by the infrastructure components, 3. The number of correct links between technical concepts (infrastructure components, in- frastructure sectors, or engineering concepts), 4. The number of concepts for non-technical aspects of infrastructure (e.g., economic growth, ethics, pollution, etc.), 5. The number of correct links between a non-technical concept to any other concept, and 6. The number of engineering concepts (e.g., constructability, design, resilience, etc.).The six numeric scores from each category can then be compared between the pre- and post-testto determine student learning gains. Detailed instructions for scoring the concept maps are in-cluded in Appendix 1. Further details on the development and
engineering ethics, researchin an academic setting, and graduate education opportunities and application process. Thefreshman year programs implemented showed success in recruiting students for the S-STEMprogram, and can serve as a model for other undergraduate programs looking to enrich theexperiences of their undergraduates by providing a comprehensive, supportive, and career-relevant environment inside and outside of the classroom.1. IntroductionEngineering education is constantly evolving and changing to meet the current and projectedneeds of the engineering profession. In 2010 1 the National Society of Professional Engineers(NSPE) released a position statement proposing additional undergraduate engineering outcomes:Leadership, Risk and
Introduction to Engineering class are:- (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering:The students are required to provide technical analysis of their proposed solution using math andscience skills they learned prior to the course (usually high school).- (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realisticconstraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety,manufacturability and sustainability:The RFP and BAA provides a list of constraints with which the student proposal must be incompliance.- (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility:Although this was covered in class, it was not explicitly part of the PrBL framework used
to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. • (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context.2Some of the ABET criteria are proposed for revision in 2016-2017, but the following draftdefinition of “Engineering Design” shows ABET continues the connection between engineeringand public policy: Engineering Design – Engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, or process to meet desired needs, specifications, codes, and
cultures; have had a chance to practice engineering in a global context, whether through an international internship, a servicelearning opportunity, a virtual global engineering project or some other form of experience; and can effectively deal with ethical issues arising from cultural or national differences. We present evidence of the efficacy of the peertopeer collaboration model at achieving these competencies. The most important aspect of global competency for engineers as ranked by the Parkinson survey was that engineering graduates can appreciate other cultures. In the university setting this is often achieved by language and culture classes or through other exchanges [8]. One of the ways the program achieved it was by housing all
, as Marley said, “Itchanged my view as I said earlier even about like the moral aspect and the ethical aspect becauseI didn’t really think it [engineering] was just about designing and building stuff, but that waswhat I kind of anticipated as like the main part.” Design and construction, for Marley, were notthe main part of engineering; rather, the moral and ethical considerations that accompany designand construction were a primary concern of engineering. Additionally, Reness saw that CitizenEngineering “exceeded my expectations on just learning about kind of, like, world issues.” The role of non-engineers in engineering projects was prominent in student responses.Milburn acknowledged their contribution to engineering literacy: “The
delivery system thatemphasizes efficient materials handling to eliminate waste on construction projects.The top five other, not included in the construction BOK are: 1. Written communication (M = 4.72 SD = 0.57) 2. Ethics (M = 4.67 SD = 0.59) 3. Interpersonal skills (M = 4.61 SD = 0.70) 4. Verbal communication (M = 4.61 SD = 0.61) 5. Leadership (M = 4.56 SD = 0.62)Of the top five, none are explicitly BIM specific skills. Rather, they are skills related to being aconstruction manager in five years using BIM. Due to the teamwork required of a true BIMproject, ethics, interpersonal abilities, verbal facility and leadership skills will be very important,as recognized by this Delphi panel. A true BIM project places all members of the team on
Research in Science Teach- ing) to attend the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) summer research confer- ˇ e Budˇejovice, Czech Republic in August 2016. In addition, he has been named as one of 14 ence in Cesk´ Jhumki Basu Scholars by the NARST’s Equity and Ethics Committee in 2014. He is the first and only individual from his native country and Texas Tech University to have received this prestigious award. Fur- thermore, he was a recipient of the Texas Tech University President’s Excellence in Diversity & Equity award in 2014 and was the only graduate student to have received the award, which was granted based on outstanding activities and projects that contribute to a better
about the place of humanities and social sciences (HSS). This debate historically, andto some degree, currently, occurs between some HSS faculty who seek to develop students’understanding of cultural, ethical, and political contexts, and some engineering faculty who seethe study of language primarily as a tool for service within the profession and a method toimprove WOV communication skills. This debate has become known as the culture/utility debateand the engineering curriculum has seen many shifts in the past 100 years, with each side gainingand losing traction according to different historical drivers (ranging from shifts in educationalemphasis resulting from political events such as the cold war, to new accreditation standards
Anthropogenic Environmental Impacts, Sustainability Rating Schemes (e.g. inclusion) LEED), Resilience, Urbanization/urban sprawl, Sustainability economics, Governance for sustainability, Sustainable Innovation, Sustainability Ethics, Other 1- recycling, Other 2- water reuse, Other 3- energy reduction, Other 4- Urban heat island effect, Other 5- alternative transportation, Other 6- consider needs of people/ stakeholder engagement, NoneConclusion & Future DirectionOngoing integration of both stand-alone courses and modules have shown to be necessary forsustainability to reach 'appropriate' levels of mastery in engineering education, from a practicalimplementation
, andprofessional skills. The courses are distributed in the curriculum in order to permit the studentsgradual learning and application of the concepts: In Engineering Design 1 and 2, in addition to learning the elements of design, students are exposed to a variety of soft skills such as communication, teamwork, and ethics in support of program outcomes which are derived from ABET student outcomes. In Graduation Project I, student prepare a comprehensive proposal ending with design specifications and in Graduation Project II, students build the corresponding physical device (the product). Both projects required a comprehensive written report as well as a final public oral presentation as well as demonstration of the product. The design
of Engineering Education 26 (2010).10 Adams, R. S., Turns, J. & Atman, C. J. Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design studies 24, 275-294 (2003).11 Pavelich, M. J., Olds, B. M. & Miller, R. L. Real‐world problem solving in freshman‐sophomore engineering. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1995, 45-54 (1995).12 Bucciarelli, L. L. Designing engineers. (MIT press, 1994).13 Downey, G. & Lucena, J. When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education 19, 168-176 (2003).14 Perry, W. G. Forms of intellectual and ethical development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and
immensenumber of activities and university ethics regulations, only a few case study examples aredescribed here.Leadership in Cross-Disciplinary GroupsUndergraduate Music Society: In 2008, a group of like-minded undergraduate students withclassical music training sought to establish a music society specifically for engineering studentsto support the education and awareness around acoustical and noise engineering. This grouprequested financial support to purchase musical instruments that could be used by anyengineering student without access to their own instruments, either due to residence livingarrangements or cost, which would also be used in scientific demonstrations and related lecturesregarding the physics of music. After being successfully funded
, are sought as students are called on to select topics from their own experiences(internalization), provide positive examples (inspiration) and get their classmates involved in anexchange of idea (involvement). 11Process for Evaluating the Risk Assessment Memo AssignmentThe department’s self-assessment of ABET 12 Outcome C: "an ability to design a system,component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability"uses the following measurement tools: • ChE 4502 Design Reports and Presentation • ChE 4111 Separations and ChE 4301 Chemical Reaction Engineering Exams • ChE 4402 Process Control Final Exam
the developmental efforts presented in our paper.A representative design spine-like curriculum in our department is shown inFigure 1.In summary, from past efforts in the arena of capstone design curriculum development, thefollowing general aspects are noteworthy: 1. Importance of student working in teams, formed through a mix of knowledge and interest. 2. Project topics that represent real-world situations. 3. Division of the design course into a more theory learning phase the project execution phase. 4. Systematic structure with an emphasis on professionalism and ethics. 5. Analysis of student learning through surveys. 6. Application of pedagogic strategies such as team-based, collaborative and competitive learning
elements to besuccessful. These have to be based on realistic constraints imposed by each team as prescribed inABET student outcome c – where students design a system, component, or process to meet desiredneeds within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical,health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. The open-ended construction toyprojects used in this Rapid Prototyping and Reverse Engineering course accomplishes thisstudent outcome by incorporating the realistic constraints including the ones on economic,manufacturability, safety, environmental and sustainability. In these projects, ABET studentoutcomes a, b, d, e, g, h, and k are also addressed strongly. These open-ended constructionFigure
over to view these competitions and discuss onvarious ethical issues on privacy and security and give their valuable advises to the youngcompetitors. CTF competitions are conducted at college as well as high school level. CTFs are ofdifferent types. The most common types of CTFs are:Jeopardy: In this type of contest, teams have to solve a set of challenges from diverse areas suchas Cryptography, Forensics Reverse engineering etc.Attack-Defense: As the name suggests, this is an attack, Defense game meaning some teams tryto attack and the other teams try to defend from attacks.Mixed Competitions: Change formats.CTF competitions train the participants to protect their systems from cyber attacks. Thechallenges are mainly on fixing vulnerabilities
Paper ID #15646Sustainability-Infused CurriulumMs. Diana Lynne Ibarra, ISF Academy Shuyuan Science and SustainabilityPrograms Manager. BS degrees in Chemistry and Chemical Engineer- ing MS degrees in Management and Environmental Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Sustainability Infused Curriculum (WIP)AbstractA recently established school-wide sustainability policy in 2015, explicitly states, “an experimentally integrated,environmentally and ethically sustainable system of science education and conservation practices based on the 2012 JejuDeclaration of the
Leadership Excellence. Editor of three books and author of over 160 journal articles and chapters, her research centers on the intersections of career, gender communication, leadership, and resilience. Fellow and past president of the International Communication Association, she has received numerous awards for her research, teaching/mentoring, and engagement. She is working on Purdue-ADVANCE initiatives for institutional change, the Transforming Lives Building Global Commu- nities (TLBGC) team in Ghana through EPICS, and individual engineering ethical development and team ethical climate scales as well as everyday negotiations of ethics in design through NSF funding as Co-PI. [Email: buzzanel@purdue.edu
like a rigid cylinder” (FG 1, student 1)Senior-level students (i.e., final year engineering/graduating students): “…you have to respect the machinists and respect your trades… having a little bit more of that experience just seeing the depth of what they have to know is very useful in just being an engineer.” (FG 4, student 2) “I don’t think as students we’re taught enough about how important it is to be a professional faculty and what that means to you and what that means is your responsibilities…a lot of it is in regard to ethics. As a professional you have the ethics code to stand by… Also about understanding your role and the potential for you to do harm to the public and also your role and
the information that can be gleaned from these data is in directtension with the significant potential for negative impact on individuals from the associated lossof privacy and a diminishing “right to be forgotten.” 16 This tension is itself an area of newscholarship as legal, ethical and social scholars explore the nature, value, and ownership ofpersonal digital information.Disruptive Innovation A disruptive innovation is one that changes the value proposition in an existing market tosuch an extent that existing market leaders are displaced by newcomers who have been earlyadopters of the disrupting innovation. Interestingly, case studies of disruptive innovation showthat the existing market leaders are typically aware of the
engineering students to work at the overlap with public policy, business, law, ethics, human behavior, risk, and the arts, as well as medicine and the sciences Entrepreneurship • Preparing students to translate invention to innovation; to develop market ventures that scale to global solutions in the public interest Global Dimension • Developing the students’ global perspective necessary to address challenges that are inherently global as well as to lead innovation in a global economy Service Learning • Developing and deepening students’ social consciousness and their motivation to bring their technical expertise to bear on societal problems through mentored experiential
Project courses for all majors. The importance of understanding risk andliability, of continuous professional development including licensure, and of ethics inengineering practice, all of which are relevant concepts for an entrepreneurial approach toengineering, have been stressed. Historically, senior projects that have led to longer-termstudent-private sector collaborations or even student-initiated business have been rare.Recently, entrepreneurship at Pitt-Johnstown has experienced a revitalization. A renewed pushto create an Entrepreneurial Studies program came from Pitt-Johnstown President Jem Spectar in2011. This led first to an agreement with Johnstown Area Regional Industries (JARI) to supportentrepreneurial internships for Pitt-Johnstown
A – Model Introductory Infrastructure Course Outline# Module Topic Level1 Fundamentals What is infrastructure and why do we care?2 Fundamentals Basic infrastructure functions3 Fundamentals Systems/network analysis4 Fundamentals TBL/Sustainability5 Fundamentals Social Impacts of Infrastructure6 Fundamentals Teamwork7 Fundamentals Ethics I8 Fundamentals Ethics II9 Fundamentals Traits of effective written and oral communication10 Fundamentals Financing public works11 Fundamentals Safety/licensure12 Fundamentals Land Use and Planning/Growth/Forecasting13 Fundamentals Resilience and risk14 One
demographic attributes (e.g., gender and ethnicity)and incoming metrics (e.g., standardized test scores, high school grade point average). Althoughhigh school GPAs and standardized scores are considered as part of the application, the decisionfor acceptance into SB is a combination of a student’s expressed work ethic, letters ofrecommendations from high school counselors and teacher, and overall transcript courseevaluation. All incoming URM students are encouraged to apply for the program; however, withan average acceptance rate around 90%, not all applicants are accepted.Summer Bridge StructureThe SB program runs for five weeks and coincides with the second summer session. Students areadmitted into the program at no cost as part of the funding
, personnel, existing processes,stakeholders, mission, values and culture), as well as from outside the company (e.g. legal,regulatory, macroeconomic, ethical, and market dynamics). In using the Product ArchaeologyCanvas, students must “excavate” public information on all of these factors for an over-the-counter medical device. Like an archaeologist, they needed to create a plausible and coherentnarrative of the decisions the company made in moving that product idea to the customer. Withthis background they become forward-thinking intrapreneurs – proposing a way to increase thevalue of their product but in a way that balanced all of the various constraints and perspectives. Figure 3 – Product Archeology CanvasInnovation
#11 27-31 Loops, Arrays and 4 File I/O Ch 10: Pgs 275-280 Games Simulation and #12 3-7 Design, Project 5, File I/O, User Forms Ch 12: Pgs 299-338 Spring 2013 Project 5 Ethics, Business and Quiz #3 Workbook & Ch 12: Pgs 338-366 Project #5 November #13 10-14
geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests broadly include the professional formation of engineers and diversity and inclusion in engineering, with specific interests in human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, assistive-technology, and
. Engineering Economics 7. Engineering Science 8. Engineering Tools 9. Experiments 10. Problem Recognition and Solving 11. Quality Control and Quality Assurance 12. Risk, Reliability, and Uncertainty 13. Safety 14. Societal Impact 15. Systems Engineering 16. Operations and Maintenance 17. Sustainability and Environmental Impact 18. Technical Breadth 19. Technical Depth Professional Practice Capabilities: 20. Business Aspects of Engineering 21. Communication 22. Ethical Responsibility 23. Global Knowledge and Awareness 24. Leadership 25. Legal Aspects of Engineering 26. Lifelong Learning 27. Professional Attitudes 28