Paper ID #19515Exploring the Relationship between Mindfulness and Innovation in Engineer-ing StudentsBeth Rieken, Stanford University Beth Rieken is a PhD Candidate at Stanford University in the Mechanical Engineering Department. She is in the Designing Education Lab advised by Prof. Sheri Sheppard. Her work focuses on fostering mind- fulness, empathy and curiosity in engineering students. Beth completed a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Virginia in 2010 and a MS in Mechanical Engineering from Stanford in 2012.Dr. Mark Schar, Stanford University The focus of Mark’s research can broadly be described as
Problem-BasedLearning.” Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 2(2):6-28.Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Sheppard, S., A. Colby, K. Macatangay & W. Sullivan (2006). “What is Engineering Practice?”International Journal of Engineering Education, 22(3):429-438.Stevens, R, K. O’Connor, L. Garrison, A. Jocuns & D. Amos (2008). “Becoming an Engineer:Toward a Three Dimensional View of Engineering Learning.” Journal of EngineeringEducation, 97(3):355-368.Stevens, R., A. Johri & K. O’Connor (2013). “Professional Engineering Work.” In A.Johri & B.M. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research.Cambridge: Cambridge
, educators havetried to design curricula that foster this associative learning —which, we know from our ownexperiences, is how we learn best outside of the classroom. Twenty-first century engineeringeducators have been mindful of ABET’s EC2000 student outcomes a-k, including ethicalunderstanding, the ability to communicate effectively, and “the broad education necessary tounderstand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, andsocietal context.”2 Engineering educators who struggle to help students achieve these ABETlearning outcomes might consider working together with liberal arts faculty to integrateengineering with humanities understanding. What the environmental historian William Crononwished for liberal arts
Paper ID #18804Exploring Students’ Perceptions of Complex Problems and StakeholdersIrene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh Irene B. Mena has a B.S. and M.S. in industrial engineering, and a Ph.D. in engineering education. Her research interests include first-year engineering and graduate student professional development.Dr. Alexander T. Dale, Engineers for a Sustainable World Alexander Dale is a AAAS Science & Technology Policy Fellow hosted at the US EPA, and Board Mem- ber at Engineers for a Sustainable World (ESW). His career has included time in academia, nonprofits, and federal policy, focusing on energy, water
encounters with the Other. (This is most obvious in her latest new course, A Global State of Mind.) Whatever the subject, her courses are grounded in accountability–to the text, to oneself, and to one’s fellows.Ms. Robyn Sandekian, University of Colorado, Boulder Robyn Sandekian is the Managing Director of the Mortenson Center in Engineering for Developing Com- munities (MCEDC) at the University of Colorado Boulder (CU Boulder). She joined the Engineering for Developing Communities Program (now known as the Mortenson Center) in spring 2004, just as the first EDC graduate track was approved. With MCEDC, her main duties have included student advising and academic program development. Recently, she co-developed the
effect in students who can see the value of solidknowledge in basic sciences as a start point for their formation and the importance of these asvaluable tools.It is important to remind the students that education is not an abstract term. It is established incultural economic, individual, philosophical, scientific and social advancement. In other words,education is the mean for developing the mind for the betterment of the individual and society.Advances in science and technology mean that the world will continue to change rapidly, so thatthe knowledge learned by students in specific careers will have a short lifespan. In contrast, thosewho achieve a general engineering education will develop adaptive skills, which will serve themwhile their
and real-world, philosophical and practical, etc.Our program aims to prevent this disconnect by contextualizing engineering through the lens ofsocietal and global challenges.As an alternative to content-driven curricula, Baillie et al. propose that adopting a thresholdcapability focus. This curriculum approach cultivates students’ ways of thinking and being andcan help develop more independent and critically thoughtful engineers.10 To design such acurriculum, the first step is to define overall program goals. With these in mind, specific coursegoals, learning experiences, and then teaching plans are developed. By focusing on graduates’abilities, this approach to curricular design provides a framework seemingly built forphilosophical
critically minded engineering educators. Next, we build on this literatureby inserting a question into the discussion: What do engineers need to know about the enactmentand resistance of violence in engineering? Here we pay specific attention to defining theintersections of interpersonal violence (intentional violence between people) and structuralviolence (the violence of social structures and institutions). Finally, we use interview data fromengineering undergraduates enrolled in Programs in Design and Innovation at the RensselaerPolytechnic Institute to make suggestions for curricular reform.Literature ReviewIn 2016, social scientists Diego Gambetta and Steffen Hertog published the controversial book,Engineers of Jihad: The Curious Connection
professional society they represent foremost in their minds. Theinformation different entities within this organization have access to, and the pressures they feel,inevitably influences their actions and reactions in a time of reevaluation such as the one beforeus now.At the same time, ABET operates within a broader ecosystem of engineering educationorganizations in Washington, including the professional societies, the National Academies,government agencies like the National Science Foundation (NSF), and other coalition-basedengineering organizations such as the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE), theNational Council of Examiners for Engineering and Surveying (NCEES), and the AmericanAssociation of Engineering Societies (AAES). The
Paper ID #18551Learning to Anticipate the User in Professional Engineering WorkDr. Alexandra Vinson, Northwestern University Alexandra H. Vinson is a Postdoctoral Fellow in the School of Education and Social Policy at Northwest- ern University. She received her Ph.D. in Sociology & Science Studies from the University of California, San Diego. Her research interests include professional education in medicine and STEM fields.Dr. Pryce Davis, University of Nottingham Pryce Davis is an Assistant Professor of Learning Sciences at the University of Nottingham. He received his Ph.D. in Learning Sciences from Northwestern
reflection depends on the instructor’smotivation for introducing reflection in the first place. While assessment seems appropriate forreflections geared towards understanding of course content, integration of bodies of objectiveknowledge, and application of foreign bodies of objective knowledge to the field of engineering,it could be argued, as sources indicate above, that with other purposes – such as personaldevelopment or self-assessment – students would be more truthful if they did not anticipate beingassessed or even needing to turn in their reflections. However, one must keep in mind the pointalready cited: assessment, even of subjective reflections, may help students improve theirreflection skills.c) Factors in Successful ReflectionA number
Paper ID #19972A Case-Study Approach to Interlink Humanities with Engineering EducationDr. Ravi T. Shankar, Florida Atlantic University Ravi Shankar has a PhD in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Wisconsin, Madi- son, WI, and an MBA from Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL. He is currently a senior professor with the Computer and Electrical Engineering and Computer Science department at Florida Atlantic Uni- versity. His current research interests are on K-12 education, engineering learning theories, and education data mining. He has been well funded by the high tech industry over the
Paper ID #18325Engineers’ Imaginaries of ”the Public”: Content Analysis of FoundationalProfessional DocumentsDr. Yanna Lambrinidou, Virginia Tech Yanna Lambrinidou is a medical ethnographer and affiliate faculty in the Department of Science and Technology in Society (STS) at Virginia Tech. For the past 10 years, she has conducted extensive research on the historic 2001-2004 Washington, DC lead-in-drinking-water contamination. This work exposed wrongdoing and unethical behavior on the part of engineers and scientists in local and federal government agencies. In 2010, Dr. Lambrinidou co-conceived and co-developed the
therefore significantly underestimates the total value being generated in unlicensed usage over this time period.’ A market of which 15% is $25 billion would be a $166 billion market.85In analyzing how Lamarr and Antheil moved from disconnected knowledge of weapons, radios,and pianos to the emergent notions of frequency hopping and synchronization, one of theconsultant’s to the author of the Hedy Lamarr story, an inventor and engineer, explains what ittakes to connect unrelated concepts for invention: “‘the inventive process follows a cascade ofideas and thoughts interconnected from previous concepts that for the most part lie separate,unconnected and unrelated. It takes a clear state of mind, which is usually someone thinking`outside
pedagogical goals in mind. One goal is to provide an opportunity for students todeepen their learning of science and engineering concepts. Another goal is to experienceactivities that mimic those of an engineer. In both cases, ambassadors seem to be refining theircapacity to convey technical content in ways that appeal to specific (non-technical) audiences,which is very much aligned with the overall goals of the ambassador program. The activity design process demonstrated the potential for this aspect of ambassadortraining to further undergraduates’ thinking as subject matter experts and communicators to non-technical audiences. Most of the ambassadors gave specific examples of how the content of theirpresentation was manifest in the hands-on
- quantitative analysis used in design majors and non-majors and-societyWellesley Historical context of Students to understand “to engage critically with content related Technology Studies and apply engineering’s to engineering and technology” with the Program and its courses “big ideas,” engineers’ grounding principle of “engineering as a “habits of mind” humanitarian profession”Stony Two courses that satisfy How engineers Apply tools from any field to investigateBrook the general education think/analyze vs how relationship between sci/tech and “tech” requirement
study were able to secure a full-time employment with their co-opplacements.was only remotely relevant to his current job, which was partly due to the nature of the work: “Wespec products. All the heavy engineering … the calculations, the circuits … is done by the vendor ormanufacturer … [I] take disparate pieces and put them together.” He also criticized his courses fortheir emphasis on linear, simple problems that failed to prepare him for dealing with the complex,open-ended, multiple-solution technical problems he has encountered on the job: “In school, everymath problem has one answer. Here, there are no right answers … the right answer is what youdesign … you design [something] but then the client changes their mind. It is constantly a
learning activities in their professional positions. This study of IRE graduates in theworkforce provides evidence of the value of this approach showing that these engineers see thevalue of these skills, continue to practice them (albeit in modified ways from when at IRE), andshow evidence of being at an advantage in the “learning to learn” activities that are necessary intheir jobs.ReferencesABET, Inc., (2016). Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2016-2017. Retrieved from http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2016-2017/.Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R., eds. (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington
interacting points of view) alongside discussions of“objectivity.” Integrating conversation architectures that value and develop intersubjectivestatements allows multiple perspectives to come out so teams can take advantage of them in theirwork. Open Sentences also allow students to share their personal interests and values; connectingwith these inner interests can increase their intrinsic motivation [15].Open Sentences can lead to emotionally vulnerable spaces when students share their values,motivations, and fears. In our experiences, engineering curricula do not typically provide manyspaces for the development of affective skills, and facilitators should keep this in mind. Forinstance, it may be helpful to use a progression of Open Sentences that
workshops thathighlight exemplary academic planning within our institution. Another external factor, marketforces, pointed to the need for interdisciplinary, “well-rounded,” and “T-shaped” students.17, 18 In addition to these external factors, internal factors also played a significant role in thedesign of the minor. For example, pre-existing faculty relationships influenced which classes weselected as core classes and student characteristics influenced logistical decisions related to theminor (e.g., prerequisites, capstone requirements, marketing strategies).Interdisciplinarity and General Education While the Innovation Pathways Minor is housed in the College of Engineering, it isimportant to keep in mind that it is a general
Paper ID #19359The Assertion-Evidence Approach to Technical Presentations: OvercomingResistance in Professional SettingsElizabeth L. Miller, Pennsylvania State University Elizabeth Miller is a rising senior studying mechanical engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is a student in the Schreyer Honors College and an Engineering Ambassador. Last summer she had an internship in Siemens’ Energy Management Division, and this summer she will be working in Capital One’s Management Rotation Program.Mr. Michael Alley, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Michael Alley is an associate professor of engineering
perceived divisions between STEM andthe liberal arts by linking those perspectives and assignments to broader habits of mind that arenecessary for engineers and designers. We then describe our strategies for integrating a richdesign experience into the course and consider how that integration alters typical approaches todesign projects. Finally, we discuss our plan to implement assessments that account for bothstudents’ technical abilities and their application of course theories and concepts.Course development was supported at the Institution by a summer course development grant thatencouraged faculty to partner across disciplines to create unique course offerings. Thepartnership between the Humanities & Social Sciences (HSS) and the
Paper ID #19305Systematically Integrating Liberal Education in a Transdisciplinary DesignStudio EnvironmentDr. Marisa Exter, Purdue University Marisa Exter is an Assistant Professor of Learning Design and Technology in the College of Education at Purdue University. Dr. Exter’s research aims to provide recommendations to improve or enhance university-level design and technology programs (such as Instructional Design, Computer Science, and Engineering). Some of her previous research has focused on software designers’ formal and non-formal educational experiences and use of precedent materials, and experienced instructional
., & Potvin, G. (2010, 2013). GSE/RES:Sustainability topics as a route to female recruitment in engineering (#1036617). Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1036617Klotz, L., Potvin, G., Godwin, A., Cribbs, J., Hazari, Z., & Barclay, N. (2014). Sustainability as a Route to Broadening Participation in Engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(1), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20034Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401Krogstad, J. (2015, February 27). Hispanics more
Paper ID #20026The Whole as the Sum of More Than the Parts: Developing Qualitative As-sessment Tools to Track the Contribution of the Humanities and Social Sci-ences to an Engineering CurriculumDr. Caitlin Donahue Wylie, University of Virginia Caitlin Wylie is an assistant professor of Science, Technology and Society in the University of Virginia’s School of Engineering and Applied Science.Dr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & Society Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the
Paper ID #18091Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes and ABET Accreditation: A Pi-lot Study of Fourth-Year Engineering Students using Longitudinal ConceptMapsDr. Sean Ferguson, University of Virginia Sean Ferguson is a Lecturer in the Department of Engineering and Society at UVA since 2014. He specializes in sustainable technology and policy making from a background in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, working on energy and environmental policy in New York State, and a former life in cellular biology.Dr. Rider W. Foley, University of Virginia Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant
Paper ID #18789Self Authorship and Reflective Practice in an Innovation MinorChris Gewirtz, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Chris Gewirtz is PhD student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. His research interests start with how culture, history and identity influence assumptions made by engineers in their practice, and how to change assumptions to form innovative and socially conscious engineers. He is particularly interested in humanitarian engineering, where American engineering assumptions tend to fall apart or reproduce injustice.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
Paper ID #18713Implementing a Single Holistic Rubric to Address Both Communication andTechnical Criteria in a First Year Design-Build-Test-Communicate ClassDr. Stephanie Sheffield, University of Michigan Dr. Sheffield is a Lecturer in Technical Communication in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as