-technical skills, and applications of learned materialto realistic problems (Kirschner, 2004; Litzinger, Lattuca, Hadgraft, & Newstetter, 2011).Despite the recent integration of entrepreneurship into engineering education, the concepts andattitudes of entrepreneurship were not explored as part of an engineering educational experienceat the institution previously. Thus, it was important to find a venue where the implementation ofentrepreneurial content would not be too abrupt for the students and to implement the content insmall quantities that would be palatable to instructors and students. In other words, we felt itimportant to tread lightly and conduct a minimally-invasive study, which, of course, does preventany attempt at extensive
experiences through the lens of one’s own cultural worldview. At the acceptance positioncultural difference is experienced as just one of a number of equally complex worldviews. At theadaption position cultural difference is experienced an appropriate alternative behavior in adifferent cultural context. And at the integration position the experience of the person is onewhich allows for movement in and out of cultural worldviews. Developmental Model of Intercultural Sensitivity Copyright, Milton Bennett, Ph.D., used with permissionOutgrowths of the DMIS include the intercultural development continuum (IDC) and theIntercultural Development Inventory (IDI), a 50-item questionnaire. The IDI instrument has
, Arizona during June, 2016.IntroductionWith graduates well-placed throughout the aerospace industry, and with a nearly a century-longtrack record in the field of aviation. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University continues to lead theway in aviation, aerospace, and engineering. On the Prescott campus, the College ofEngineering specializes in excellence in undergraduate education and strives to provide studentswith opportunities for hands-on learning and intensive interaction with the faculty, both insideand outside of the classroom.Due to the hands-on nature of the engineering curriculum, the College has many well-equippedlaboratories that are available to undergraduate students during the regular school year. Duringthe summer, however, reduced demand
when adoptingcurricular culture. Yet we do see a close approximation to cargo culting as an initial approach bymany faculty members. Comments such as “give me your curriculum,” “tell me what I need todo,” and “never mind the why; just tell me how” are commonplace in our experiences ofcurricular culture change [8]. These requests elide the necessity of context-appropriateadaptation, an integral part of curricular culture change.In contrast, our second frame acknowledges learning and culture transfer as a process ofsupported practice, sensemaking, and growth. Cognitive apprenticeship is scaffoldedparticipation in meaningful work embedded in authentic cultural practice alongside multipleseasoned mentors. Cognitive apprenticeship theory was
). Agrowing body of data supports the conclusion that active learning is indeed superior to thetraditional lecture format, both in terms of student retention and student performance(Natl.Acad.Sci, 2009; AAAS, 2011; PCAST, 2012; Singer, 2012). Recent efforts at ColoradoSchool of Mines to integrate biology into our engineering curriculum have led to a revisedfoundational biology course that has rigor and relevance for our engineering students. The movefrom traditional lecture to an active learning environment was key in our efforts to engage ourstudents, with the intent of improving our students’ comprehension of biology. Our course re-design involved a three-pronged approach in which we: (1) renovated a classroom to create astudio environment with wet
, otheruniversities can adopt and adapt these activities to use in their programs.1. IntroductionChoosing a major is a daunting task for many first-year college students, especially if the choicesspan fields with which students have little exposure and experience. It is estimated that 20 – 50%of first-year college students enter college as “undecided” about their major[7]. In order toprovide first-year engineering students time to discern, a set of resources and course activitieswere created and assessed in an introduction to engineering course. The results of two studies arepresented in this paper.The structure of the remainder of the paper is as follows. The next section describes theeducational theory relevant to this study, models of introduction to
university. In order to understand its context, there will be an explanationof its curriculum as compared to three other Mechanical Engineering programs. The authorexamined the curriculum of four different universities. One of them was his university (BaylorUniversity)1, and he also examined the curriculum of a small, specialized university (ColoradoSchool of Mines)2, a medium sized public university (Louisiana Tech University)3, and a verylarge public university (Texas A & M University)4. There is not a lot of variation in requiredmaterials and required solid mechanics courses in these four Mechanical engineering programs.All of the schools have a required materials course. Three of the four have a required materialslab (including the author’s
Paper ID #18596Development of Automatic Reconfigurable Robotic Arms using Vision-basedControlDr. Mingshao Zhang , Southern Illinois University, Edwardsville Mingshao Zhang is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department. He received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology (2016). Prior to this, He also holds a M.Eng. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Stevens Institute of Technology (2012) and a B.E. in Mechanical Engineering and Automation from University of Science and Technology of China (2010). His research interests include Vision-based Control for Industrial
topic. This paper presents an overview of the development cycle of the portable PLC trainingunits to be used in the engineering technology curriculum. The paper also provides a summary oflab activities developed for the new trainers.MotivationThe assembly and usage of these B&R trainers will be of immense help to students in themechatronics program. Instructors are taught to instruct how to control circuits, using step rationaleand organized content. Programming essentials such as variable revelation, code structure,programming hones, and programmable incitation will be taught to the students. Other importantPLC topics such as inner clocks, outer sensors, CPU, and correspondence modules will be coveredas well.In addition, the new trainers
GoldShirt Program at CU to provide a unique access pathway to engineering for high potential, next tier students not admitted through the standard admissions process; findings are very encouraging, and the program is being adapted at several other engineering colleges. Dr. Sullivan led the 2004 launch of ASEE’s Pre- College Division, was conferred as an ASEE Fellow in 2011 and was awarded NAE’s 2008 Gordon Prize for Innovation in Engineering and Technology Education.Dua Chaker, University of Colorado, Boulder Dua Chaker is a Professional Research Associate and Project Engineer and Editor for the TeachEngineer- ing Digital Library in the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program, College of Engineering and Applied
model for other institutions seeking to assess students’ global and contextual competencies.Overview of the Program and Suite of AssessmentsThe program in which this suite of assessments was used provides first-year students with anopportunity to expand their global competencies through direct experience. It integrates an on-campus, Spring course meeting a general education requirement with a short-term internationalmodule immediately following semester exams in May. The 2016 program enrolled 92 studentswho participated in one of three international modules: Italy, Switzerland, and Germany; China;or the Dominican Republic. Engaging in the program provides students with opportunities toexpand their global competencies while learning about
School to France, Switzerland, Italy, and Ecuador to study different higher education systems around the world. Seyam is also a Fellow of the Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence, and he earned the Graduate Certificate of Preparing Future Professo- riate in 2016.Ms. Chelsea R. Corkins, Virginia Tech Chelsea is currently an Agriculture Extension Specialist at Virginia Tech. She works closely with two extension programs - one adult and one high school level - through program development, curriculum design, and outcome assessment. Chelsea holds a BS and MS degree from Kansas State University both in Biological and Agricultural Engineering and will be rejoining the graduate student world by begin- ning a second
, our Department of Mathematics at The University of Tulsarelocated to newly renovated offices, and I had the task of emptying my office drawers andcabinets after twenty-eight years in the same office. I found all of my calculus notebooks that Ihad saved from the late 1960s, when I was an undergraduate and took my first calculus courses.After more than thirty years of teaching calculus, and in observance of my fiftieth anniversary ofhaving taken my first calculus course, I would like to share some of my experiences in learningand teaching calculus. As an undergraduate at Barnard College, I took a sequence of calculuscourses at Columbia University that was intended for physics and engineering majors. I nowteach in a mathematics department that
Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow.Dr. Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh Dr. Mary Besterfield-Sacre is the Nickolas A. DeCecco Professor in Industrial Engineering at the Uni- versity of Pittsburgh. She is the Director for the Engineering Education Research Center (EERC) in the Swanson
Paper ID #17865Establishing the Impact that Gamified Homework Portals Can Have on Stu-dents’ Academic MotivationBrittany Lynn ButlerDr. Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University Cheryl A. Bodnar, Ph.D., CTDP is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University. Dr. Bodnar’s research interests relate to the incorporation of active learn- ing techniques in undergraduate classes as well as integration of innovation and entrepreneurship into the engineering curriculum. In particular, she is interested in the impact that these tools can have on student perception of the classroom
performance related issues.The IEEE Software Engineering SE2014 document encourages software engineering programsto cover multiple forms of testing, ranging from unit tests through performance tests. Unittesting, at one extreme of this range, is easily taught as it focuses on small scopes and detailedfunctionality. Another type of testing, integration tests, can also be easily expressed based uponsequence diagrams. These two items must have deep coverage per the curriculum guidelines.However, at the other end of this spectrum is performance testing. Performance testing is muchharder to teach, while also needing much less coverage per the IEEE SE2014 guidelines. Thisarticle will define a set of active learning exercises which were developed to aid in
://www.firstinspires.org/robotics/frc). development initiative: Relevance, content, and results—Part I.” IEEE Transactions on Education, 53.2, pp. 194–201, 2010.4. Ruzzenente, Marco, et al. “A review of robotics kits for tertiary education.” Proceedings of the International Workshop Teaching Robotics Teaching with Robotics: Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum, 2012.5. Grandgenett, Neal, et al. “Robotics and Problem-Based Learning in STEM Formal Educational Environments.” Robots in K-12 Education: A New Technology for Learning: A New Technology for Learning, 94, 2012.6. George, Sébastien, and Pascal Leroux. “Project-based learning as a basis for a CSCL environment: An example in educational robotics.” First European Conference on
States of America 111, 8410–5 (2014).4. Daniel, K. L. Impacts of Active Learning on Student Outcomes in Large-Lecture Biology Courses. The American Biology Teacher 78, 651–655 (2016).5. Elgin, G. et al. Insights from a Convocation: Integrating Discovery-Based Research into the Undergraduate Curriculum. Cell Biology Education 15, (2016).6. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. Engage To Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates With Degrees In Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics.7. Marra, R., Rodgers, K., Shen, D. & Bogue, B. Leaving Engineering: A Multi-Year Single Institution Study. Journal of Engineering Education 101, 6–27 (2012).8. Tajfel, H
curriculum offered by programs across the U.S. This is one of few studies thatinvestigate the impact of doing so. Given the inherent characteristics of an EM and the engineering design process, thispaper starts by describing the overlap between the two and reveals how they complement oneanother; then goes into a thematic analysis of the mindsets of twenty-seven students who had justcompleted a design activity accompanied by EM interventions in a first-year engineering course.The purpose of the study is to explore how their mindsets were revealed in their writtenreflections on: the attitudes and behaviors they perceive were necessary for successfullycompleting the design activity; the specified attitudes and behaviors they feel they possess
parameters. The interdisciplinary and intercultural team is more representative ofindustrial design teams, particularly from global companies.Due to the nature and scope required to design an entire chemical process in an intensive three-week period, this course is taught as a more structured design with some room for variation andcreativity in the plant design. The entire design is broken into major tasks, e.g., mass balance,kinetics and reactor design, separation, safety, and economics. The tutors develop specific tasksand goals (daily and overall) corresponding to these major tasks that the teams must meet.Additionally, during the second week, certain teams may be asked for more advanced designs, forexample, incorporating heat integration
, Dr. Spiegel also directed an award winning teacher enhancement program for middle grades science teachers, entitled Science For Early Adolescence Teachers (Science FEAT). His extensive background in science education includes experiences as both a middle school and high school science teacher, teaching science at elementary through graduate level, developing formative as- sessment instruments, teaching undergraduate and graduate courses in science and science education, working with high-risk youth in alternative education centers, working in science museums, designing and facilitating online courses, multimedia curriculum development, and leading and researching profes- sional learning for educators. The
thatengineering programs that wish to retain highly socially motivated students should explore theinfusion of social context into engineering courses beyond the first year, as well as the requiredbalance of technical and non-technical coursework in their curriculum and opportunities forcourse choice.BackgroundEngineering has an important role to play in addressing a number of important challenges facingsociety and the world.1-3 These challenges embrace the interface between humans andtechnology, and addressing these issues will require creative, systems-level thinking. A diversityof engineering students with a range of talents and attributes will be needed to meet the demandsof society.4 This includes students who are motivated toward engineering due to
, Supply Chain Optimization, Change Management, System Integration and LEAN Process Improvement (technical and business), Dr. Wickliff is passionate about Organizational Wellness and the Holistic Well- ness of individuals. She is also a professional Facilitator and Motivational Speaker. Dr. Wickliff earned a PhD in Interdisciplinary Engineering from Texas A&M University where she com- bined Industrial & Systems Engineering with Organizational Development to conduct research in the area of talent management and organizational effectiveness. She also completed an executive MBA from the University of Texas-Dallas and a BS in mechanical engineering from the University of Houston. She is founder of a nationally
work environment, ultimately leading tocost and time savings.Over the last decade, the construction industry has seen an increased use of alternative PDMsthat integrate the roles of both designer and contractors into a single entity, and offer morecollaboration opportunities among the various disciplines. One of these growing alternative PDMis Design Build (DB). DB has experienced increasing popularity in the construction industryultimately for its recognized benefits, including overall reduction of project cost and completiontime, compared to traditional Design Bid Build (DBB) PDM. A quick comparison of the majordifferences between the two PDMs shows that in a traditional DBB, the owner hires an engineerto design the project and develops the
Paper ID #20144Redeveloping a Senior-level Highway Design Course Considering IndustryFeedbackMr. Steven Kurtis Younkin, Iowa State University Steven Younkin is a graduate student in Civil Engineer with a focus in Transportation engineering. He works as a graduate assistant with Dr. Peter Savolainen. His research interests include traffic safety, engineering education, and geographic information systems. He has been a teaching assistant for the highway design class at ISU the last three semesters. His passion is to study and implement integration of design software into civil engineering curriculum as a teaching aid and
Professional Standards Commission/Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation. Her teaching experience spans across secondary, adult, technical and higher education. She has presented at state, regional, national and international conferences and has several publications. She has served on ac- creditation committees, K-12 school committees and local community boards and received and managed over two million dollars in federal grants. In addition, Dr. Mosley serves on state and national committees for teacher education.Dr. Mir M. Hayder, Savannah State University Dr. Hayder is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Technology at Savannah State Uni- versity, GA. He received PhD in Mechanical
Paper ID #19009Professional development workshop to promote writing transfer between first-year composition and introductory engineering laboratory coursesDr. Dave Kim, Washington State University, Vancouver Dr. Dave Kim is an Associate Professor and Coordinator of Mechanical Engineering in the School of Engineering and Computer Science at Washington State University Vancouver. He has 15 years of ex- perience in engineering materials and manufacturing. His research area includes materials processing, structural integrity improvement, and hybrid composite manufacturing. He has been very active in ped- agogical research and
De- partment of Mechanical Engineering. His research interests include engineering education, cognitive task analysis, automation, robotics and control, intelligent manufacturing system design, and micro/nano manufacturing. He is also the Director of the Rockwell Automation laboratory at Texas A&M University, a state-of-the-art facility for education and research in the areas of automation, control, and automated system integration. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 MAKER: A Study of Multi-Robot Systems Recreated for High School StudentsAbstractThis paper describes the engineering design approach to be applied in an
Scholars Program” Award # 1153281AbstractThe National Science Foundation awarded the University of Southern Maine with a grant forSTEM Opportunities for Academically Capable and Financially Needy Students entitled the“University of Southern Maine STEM Scholars Program,” Award # 1153281. At the completionof our fifth year, this poster presentation provides an opportunity to present data on the successof our S-STEM program, as well as share some of the best practices learned and applied. TheUSM STEM Scholars Bridge Program has been a model for blending the elements ofrecruitment, retention, and placement into an integrated, comprehensive but non-intrusiveprogram that promotes student success in transitioning from high schools and communitycolleges
produce answers for engineers.” Carlson thenchallenged engineering educators and librarians to find “three relevant information items” ineach course and assign students the responsibility of finding them. Carlson believed that such anapproach, adopted across an entire curriculum, would develop in students “a fairly sophisticatedknowledge of what the campus has to offer in the way of information resources.” Of course, theidea of integrating library resources with regular engineering courses had been proposed bylibrarians before.[38]Although ASEE President Easton’s vision, which was clearly inspired by the Weinberg Report,may have alarmed some librarians, he apparently had no intention of putting them out ofbusiness. In fact, he needed their help