Engineering School. There, she directs the DILAB: the engineering design initiative. Apart from developing the educational program in engineering design and innovation (Major IDI), the DILAB partners with forward thinking organizations to assess real life ill-defined issues. Past personal experiences involve work in industry and for consultancies such as Procorp Santiago, Cooper San Francisco and Continuum Milan. On the other hand Constanza is an entrepreneur in medical devices where she is continuously working in the detection of opportunities for innovation and development of new technologies. Her research work is focused mainly in the area of bio design, engineering-design education and design anthropology methods.Dr
engineering design initiative. Apart from developing the educational program in engineering design and innovation (Major IDI), the DILAB partners with forward thinking organizations to assess real life ill-defined issues. Past personal experiences involve work in industry and for consultancies such as Procorp Santiago, Cooper San Francisco and Continuum Milan. On the other hand Constanza is an entrepreneur in medical devices where she is continuously working in the detection of opportunities for innovation and development of new technologies. Her research work is focused mainly in the area of bio design, engineering-design education and design anthropology methods.Mr. David Leal Martinez, Aalto University David holds a
, bankers, and suc- cessful entrepreneurs. Jackson personally does the fundraising for the scholarships for both events. A strong proponent of combining Business and STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math), Jackson was on a team that was recently awarded a $50,000 National Science Foundation grant for the I-CORPS Program that embraces a ”Lean Startup” methodology with STEM new ventures. (LINK) Jackson recently created an innovative class called BUAD 410: ”Starting and Managing a Small Business or Professional Practice.” Unique to this class is a roster of all non-business students from various dis- ciplines including Kinesiology, Communications, Engineering, Earth Science, Art and others. The class was
functional metal additive process. Other work at Sandia included 5 years as Thermal Energy Storage Technical Leader in the Solar Thermal Technologies organization. Dr. Gill earned his Ph.D. from North Carolina State University studying high precision op- tical replication methodologies, his Master’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University developing computer aided fixture planning methods, and a BSME from Texas Tech University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Use of Model-Based Definition to Support Learning of GD&T in a Manufacturing Engineering CurriculumAbstractModel-based definition (MBD) has been attracting significant attention in
Paper ID #19416Sharing Student Learning from Individual Internship ExperiencesDr. Eden Fisher, Carnegie Mellon University Eden Fisher is the Founding Director of the Masters Program in Engineering and Technology Innovation Management (E&TIM) at Carnegie Mellon University. She earned an AB in Chemistry from Princeton University and a Ph.D. in Engineering & Public Policy from Carnegie Mellon. She worked in industrial technology planning and innovation management for over 20 years. For 2016, she served as the William R. Kenan Jr. Visiting Professor for Distinguished Teaching in the Department of Civil and Environmental
Paper ID #17953Examination of Implicit Gender Biases Among Engineering Faculty when As-signing Leadership, Research, and Service RolesDr. Eugene Judson, Arizona State University Eugene Judson is an Associate Professor of for the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University. He also serves as an Extension Services Consultant for the National Center for Women and Information Technology (NCWIT). His past experiences include having been a middle school science teacher, Director of Academic and Instructional Support for the Arizona Department of Education, a research scientist for the Center for Research on
. Amy Hurst, researching the potential uses of 3D printing and modeling in education. Upon graduation in May, she plans to continue pursu- ing research involving children’s interactions with technology and how technology could be designed to continue to enable children’s natural sense of creativity and sociability.Dr. Amy Hurst, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Amy Hurst an associate professor of Human-Centered Computing in the Information Systems Department at UMBC and studies accessibility problems and build assistive technologies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Fabricating Engagement: Benefits and Challenges of Using 3D Printing to Engage
Paper ID #18590Teaching Lean LaunchPad to Transfer Students to Increase Engagement andPersistenceProf. Luke Nogales, New Mexico State University Luke Nogales is passionate about helping innovators reach their potential. Luke is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Technology department at New Mexico State University (NMSU) and an Enterprise Advisor for NMSU’s on-campus incubator, the Arrowhead Center. He teaches courses in mechanical design, innovation, and product development. Luke is co-founder of the Aggie Innovation Space, a space that fosters collaboration and supports innovation in NMSU’s College of Engineering
reports are a very small set of the work that has been conducted in the field, thecomplete set of works indicate the interest in having appropriate materials for improvement ofspatial visualization skills, perhaps given the reports that such skills are a significant factorpredicting success in technological programs [Sorby, 2005]. Visualization skills competency isnowadays being used for career advising, identification of potential success or need for additionalacademic preparation, and even as an admission factor.BackgroundIn most engineering and technology degrees students are required to have a course in technicalgraphics. There is variety of contents and approaches being used nowadays, with the most typicaloffering being a first-year course
Education, 93(4), 293–301.Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010). Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.Robson, C. (2011). Real World Research.Shartrand, A., Weilerstein, P., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Golding, K. (2010). Technology entrepreneurship programs in U.S. engineering schools: Course and program characterstics at the undergradaute level. In American Society for Engineering Education. American Society for Engineering Education.Shartrand, A., Weilerstein, P., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & Olds, B. M. (2008). Assessing student learning in technology entrepreneurship. Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008. FIE 2008. 38th Annual, F4H
, heinbr@gmail.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Learning Physics in the Millennial AgeAbstractPhysics is a subject area that, like many others, requires a specific and rather well-definedskillset. This skillset includes the ability to solve problems which involve, at minimum, anunderstanding of basic algebra. The level of mathematics required often depends upon thepopulation of students a particular physics class is geared for. Non-majors studying physicstypically need to have a working knowledge of basic algebra, while science, technology,engineering and mathematics (STEM) majors need to have some basic calculus under their belts.To promote deeper learning in physics
Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from President Obama in 2017. Dr. Jordan co-developed the STEAM LabsTM program to engage middle and high school students in learning science, technology, engineering, arts, and math concepts through designing and building chain reaction machines. He founded and led teams to two collegiate Rube Goldberg Machine Contest national championships, and has appeared on many TV shows (including Modern Marvels on The History Channel and Jimmy Kimmel Live on ABC) and a movie with his chain reaction machines. He serves on the Board of the i.d.e.a. Museum in Mesa, AZ, and worked as a behind-the scenes engineer for season 3 of the PBS engineering design reality TV show Design Squad. He
., University of Cincinnati Dr. Fred R. Beyette Jr. is a Professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computing Systems at the University of Cincinnati. His research interests include point-of-care and wearable technologies for medical diagnostic and health monitoring applications, hardware development of photonic information processing systems and components that bridge the photonic/electronic interface. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Developing and Assessing Elevator Pitches in Capstone Design Karen C. Davis, Ph.D. and Fred R. Beyette, Jr., Ph.D. Electrical Engineering and Computing Systems Department
Technical Award for Engineering, The Furkert Award for Sustainability. Kpa was promoted to Fellow of IPENZ in 2010 recognising his contribution to enhancing education outcomes for Mori and Pasifika students during his decade long commitment as Associate Dean Mori for the Faculty of Engineering at The University of Auckland. Kpa was the Fulbright Ng Pae O Te Mramatanga Senior Scholar for New Zealand in 2016.Dr. Juan C. Lucena, Colorado School of Mines Juan Lucena is Professor and Director of Humanitarian Engineering at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM). Juan obtained a Ph.D. in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech and a MS in STS and BS in Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering from Rensselaer
socialresponsibility and engineering macro-ethics into the fabric of the engineering curriculum. In thispaper, writing as an engineering design instructor, I present my own successes and challengeswith incorporating notions of social responsibility and macro-ethics in an engineering designlesson. The lesson plan evolved over a period of 10 semesters. I document the process of thatevolution and discuss how students’ responses to activity prompts influenced that evolution.IntroductionWith few exceptions, ethics education within STEM disciplines has mostly remained separatefrom courses that provide instruction in what is perceived as technical knowledge (Leydens &Lucena, 2016). This paradigm tacitly reinforces that science, engineering, and technology
Paper ID #19912Fostering Student Innovators through Small Prototyping Grants - StudentEngagement in the Beta ProgramProf. Antonie J. Jetter, Portland State University Antonie Jetter is an Associate Professor of Engineering & Technology Management and Director of the Innovation Program (2015-2016) in the Maseeh College of Engineering and Computer Science at Port- land State University. While still in college, she was on the founding team of a venture-backed start-up company in equipment manufacturing, an experience that ultimately led her to pursue a PhD in Technol- ogy and Innovation Management from RWTH Technical
departments and their faculty to integrate the collective assets of the Texas A&M Uni- versity System to generate ideas that address critical challenges to the state and nation. He also provides classroom instruction to educate students through lectures and seminars focused on leadership, public administration and emerging transportation technologies. Mr. Barton recently retired as the Deputy Exec- utive Director of the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) where he provided executive control c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #20400 and oversight of all TxDOT
- ing, and has developed several advanced applications of 3D modeling courses. Dr. Steinhauer received her B.S. in Aircraft Engineering and her M.S. in Systems Engineering, and her Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech.Dr. Theodore J. Branoff, Illinois State University Dr. Branoff is a professor and chair of the Department of Technology at Illinois State University. He taught engineering graphics, computer-aided design, descriptive geometry, and instructional design courses in the College of Education at North Carolina State University from 1986-2014. He also worked for Siemens- Switchgear Division and for Measurement Group, Inc. Dr. Branoff’s research interests include constraint- based solid
Paper ID #19868Design-based Research and Soft Robotics to Broaden the STEM Pipeline(Work in Progress)Mr. Andrew Jackson, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Andrew Jackson is currently pursuing a PhD in Technology through Purdue’s Polytechnic Institute, with an emphasis on Engineering and Technology Teacher Education. His research interests are engineering self-efficacy, motivation, and decision making. Andrew is the recipient of a 2015 Ross Fellowship from Purdue University and has been recognized as a 21st Century Fellow by the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. He completed his Master of Science
to this appointment, she worked for several years as a microsensors system expert at SensorDynamics AG. Her research interests include nanofluidic technologies for medical applications, modeling and control of large arrays of MEMS, and educational strategies and programs to increase STEM diversity.Dr. Elizabeth Sciaky, University of California, Santa Barbara, Center for Science and Engineering Partnerships Program Evaluator at the Center for Science and Engineering Partnerships at UC Santa Barbara.Prof. Diana Jaleh Arya, University of California, Santa Barbara Diana Arya is an assistant professor in the Department of Education at the University of California, Santa Barbara. Arya’s research interests focus on science
to aid this mastery. As he has transitioned out of academia and into publishing, he is continuing to apply an iterative, data-driven research methodology to partner with students and instructors in the development of the next generation of educational content and technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 An Analysis of Factors Affecting Students’ Use of Interactive Learning Tools in Engineering Education1. IntroductionIn this age of ever-evolving technology, teachers are finding more advanced ways to helpstudents connect with course content. The process of learning has become increasinglyinteractive to meet current students’ expectations. According
: lessons from challenge-based innovation at CERN. European Journal ofEngineering Education, pp.1-15.Kurikka, J., Utriainen, T. and Repokari, L., 2016. Challenge based innovation: translatingfundamental research into societal applications. International Journal of Learning andChange, 8(3-4), pp.278-297.Kurikka, J. and Utriainen, T.M., 2014. Container Challenge–Prototyping DistributedCollaboration. In DS 78: Proceedings of the 16th International conference on Engineering andProduct Design Education (E&PDE14), Design Education and Human Technology Relations,University of Twente, The Netherlands, 04-05.09. 2014.Kriesi, C., Steinert, M., Aalto-Setaelae, L., Anvik, A., Balters, S., Baracchi, A., Bisballe Jensen,M., Bjørkli, L.E., Buzzaccaro, N
performance computing (HPC) is necessary toscience and engineering disciplines to answer the most basic research questions and to solvetechnical problems of national need. In July of 2016 the White House released a report called theNational Strategic Computing Initiative2 which is a call to “maximize the benefits of highperformance computing (HPC) research, development, and deployment.” These reports andothers indicate the need for increased computational power and technological training for scienceand engineering research and innovation and for national security. The increased use of HPC willrequire training more scientists and engineers to appropriately use HPC in their work and moregenerally in deploying and using cyberinfrastructure (CI
1993-1998 Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland, Baltimore County Mechanical Engineer 1989-1995 EEC Consulting Rockville, MD President, Dome Enterprises 1989 - 1993 Bethesda MD HONORS AND AWARDS Best Presentation Award, ICESEEI 2016 : 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective Educational Instructions. Paris France 2016 Outstanding Service and Commitment to the En- richment of the Science and Technology Program, Eleanor Roosevelt H.S., Greenbelt MD, 05/2003 SELECTED PUBLICATIONS 1. A. Bouabid, B. Bielenberg, S. Ainane, N. Pasha, ”Learning Outcomes Alignment across Engineering Core Courses”, 18th International Conference on Educational Sciences and Effective
ofyoung women’s unique perceptions of K-14 STEM interventions. The questions addressed theexperiences, perceptions, and feelings of self- efficacy behind students’ successful navigation ofthe engineering pipeline.Definition of TermsThe following key terms are utilized throughout this research: STEM (Science, Technology,Engineering, and Mathematics) and STEM identity, which is the formation of one’s personalconnection to the STEM majors and studies (Carlone & Johnson, 2007; Hughes et al., 2013) as itrelates to each young woman’s current reality. For the purposes of this study, the term pre-engineering pipeline represents students’ K-14 STEM and engineering experiences. Self-efficacyrefers to one’s feelings of adequacy in one’s ability (Bandura
Paper ID #18595Women Building the US STEM PipelineDr. Christina L. Carmen, University of Alabama, Huntsville Dr. Carmen obtained a Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering degree as well as a Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology in Atlanta, GA. While at Ga. Tech she worked with Dr. Warren Strahle, researching solid propellants. She obtained a Doctor of Philos- ophy in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) with a focus upon turbulent combustion modeling. Dr. Carmen is the capstone design class coordinator in the Mechanical and Aerospace
engineering, human-centered computing, and software engineering education. He is a recipient of the U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER Award and the best research paper award at the IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2016). He is a member of ASEE and a senior member of IEEE.Mr. Wentao Wang, University of Cincinnati Wentao Wang is a Ph.D. student at the University of Cincinnati, United States. His research interests include software engineering and requirements engineering. Wentao received a Master degree in software engineering from the Beijing Institute of Technology in 2010.Dr. Carla C. Purdy, University of Cincinnati Carla Purdy is an associate professor in the School of Electrical
- Contributing elements to the Movement, and how this Movement drives other sectors.Contributing to the popularity of the Maker Movement are the accessibility of low-costmanufacturing tools like 3D printers and laser cutters, availability of cheap and simple embeddedcontrollers and powerful motors, interest in open hardware as a complement to open software,the emergence of online sharing and exchange of digital designs, and the popularity ofcrowdfunding opportunities [1]. As indicated in Fig. 1, the movement is, in turn, stimulatingSTEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) education, invigorating the U.S.manufacturing sector, feeding device-based markets such as drones and the internet of things,leading to new manufacturing
-Leader for the USDA-AFRI project CenUSA Sustainable Production and Distribution of Biofuels for the Central USA. He is a licensed Professional Engineer who earned his BS in Electrical Engineering from the Rochester Institute of Technology and his PhD in Agricultural and Biological Engineering from Cornell University. Prior to coming to Iowa State in 2006, he was a faculty member at the University of Tennessee for over twelve years. Raman enjoys teaching and has taught courses including freshmen engineering (mechanics and computer programming – to classes ranging in size from 20 to 500+), sophomore and junior level courses on mass and energy balance applications to biological systems engineering, numerical methods
scholarly literature pertaining to women in Science, Technology, Engineering andMathematics (STEM) in the Middle East, and particularly in the Gulf region.This mixed-method study draws on data collected in spring 2017. It includes anonymous onlinesurveys completed by TAMUQ’s female students. Additionally, it draws on a series of focusgroups with female students in order to examine the participants’ perspectives on their academicand social experiences in relation to the university’s institutional strengths and challenges insupporting female students for working in engineering-related careers.Literature ReviewThe topic of female participation, or lack thereof, in STEM fields has been researched mostly inWestern contexts. While there are recurring