course must cater to students from a wide range ofeducational backgrounds. To attend the summer program, students simply need to be fluent inspoken and written English, and enrolled in an undergraduate engineering program in their homecountry: there are no set requirements for academic level or achievement. Additionally, admittedstudents are eligible to take any set of short courses, regardless of their engineering specialty. Asa result, our robotics short course had to be accessible to students who had never worked withembedded systems before while at the same time it needed to engage and challenge thosestudents who already had robotics project experience.The second major challenge we faced is that all of the presented material had to be
Paper ID #19457Learner-centered Design of a Web-based Teaching Tool for Circuit Analysiswith Embedded Assessment FeaturesDr. Fred W. DePiero, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Dr. Fred DePiero received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Michigan State Uni- versity in 1985 and 1987. He then worked as a Development Associate at Oak Ridge National Laboratory until 1993. While there he was involved in a variety of real-time image processing projects and several laser-based ranging systems. Fred began working on his Ph.D. at the University of Tennessee while still at ORNL, and
gender-inclusive term used to describe people in the United States of Latin Americandescent, are the largest ethnic group in the United States (U.S.). Its percentage of representationin the U.S. population is projected to increase to 29% by 2050 (Passel & Cohn, 2008). Inengineering, Latinxs continue to be underrepresented and while interventions and programmaticefforts have helped to increase the number of Latinx engineers in the United States, the increaseof this population in the United States is not proportionate with the current representation ofLatinxs in the field. Many research papers have been published on the efforts to addressrecruitment and retention of Latinx students in engineering, yet there still remains a lack ofunderstanding
preliminary success in moving project-basedintroductory engineering courses to the online environment (James-Byrnes and Holdhusen 2012).There is also preliminary success in delivering first-year engineering courses in a hybrid flippedformat (Everett et al. 2014). A study of lecture capture of a first-year engineering course showedclass attendance was not affected and uploaded material was accessed by students as a mechanismof preparing for examinations (Bazylak, McCahan, and Weiss 2012). There is also a growing areaof research examining how homework behaviors in high school affect performance in highereducation. A two-part study found a positive correlation between homework completion rates inhigh school and first semester performance of engineering
refer back to if conflicts arise.33 Mentor-mentee contracts should be reviewed andupdated regularly; in an academic environment, revising once per year at a minimum – or even atthe start of a new semester – helps to ensure that mentors and mentees remain focused on theircommon goals. Specific elements that may be helpful within a mentor-mentee contract include: Goals. The goals statement should identify (1) the overarching goals for the project or timeframe (e.g., what is the purpose of the research, or what are the key goals to accomplish during the upcoming semester?); (2) the mentee’s personal and/or professional goals for the project/timeframe (e.g., to complete certain experiments, to submit a journal
Professor of Mechanical Engineering at CU-Boulder. She teaches graduate and undergraduate courses in measurement techniques, thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, heat transfer, design and computer tools. She has pioneered a spectacular course on the art and physics of flow visualization, and is conducting research on the impact of the course with respect to visual perception and educational outcomes. Her disciplinary research centers around pulsatile, vortex dominated flows with applications in both combustion and bio-fluid dynamics. She is also interested in a variety of flow field measurement techniques. Current projects include electrospray atomization of jet fuel and velocity and vorticity in human cardiac ventricles and
University, Erie, PA(8/12 - 8/14) Associate Professor, Engineering Tech. Department Com. College of Allegheny County, Pittsburgh, PA (8/10 - 8/12) Visiting Research Assistant Professor, Research on concrete structures retrofitting, Univer- sity of Pittsburgh, PA, USA (1/12 - 8/12) Part Time Professor, Research Assistant, Teaching Assistant, University of Ottawa, Canada (1/04 - 8/10) Part-Time Lecturer, University of Water and power technology, Tehran, Iran (8/99 - 8/01) Engineering Experience Consulting engineer, Structural, concrete & Geotechnical, Achievement Eng. Corp., CA (PT 04/10- Current) Professional Structural Building Design, in collaboration with R. Muhammad, Tallahassee, FL (PT Since 9/15) Project
concentrates on demand response technologies and the application of novel teaching and learning methods to power engineering education.Dr. Rustin Webster, Purdue Polytechnic Institute, New Albany Dr. Rustin Webster is an assistant professor at Purdue University. He teaches within the Purdue Poly- technic Institute and the department of engineering technology. He specializes in mechanical engineering and computer graphics technology. Prior to joining Purdue, Dr. Webster worked in the Department of Defense field as an engineer, project manager, and researcher. His specialization was in mechanical de- sign, research and development, and business development. He studied at Murray State University and the University of Alabama
Paper ID #18208Progress toward Lofty Goals: A Meta-synthesis of the State of Research onK-12 Engineering Education (Fundamental)Dr. Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico Dr. Vanessa Svihla is a learning scientist and assistant professor at the University of New Mexico in the Organization, Information & Learning Sciences program, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project
vague, researchers will often develop a codebook thatdescribes each code with a concrete definition and example quote from the data (Creswell,2014). This codebook can then be used by multiple researchers within the project or futureresearchers conducting similar studies. It is common to have multiple coders code the same dataset or split large data sets between multiple coders. Walther et al. (2013) suggested IRR as ameans to “mitigate interpretative bias” and ensure a “continuous dialogue between researchers tomaintain consistency of the coding” (p. 650). Miles and Huberman (1994) suggest that an IRR of80% agreement between coders on 95% of the codes is sufficient agreement among multiplecoders(Miles & Huberman, 1994)(Miles & Huberman
studies investigat- ing the design and equity of large-scale assessments, admissions processes, and other evaluation systems. Her most recent large research projects investigated how elementary students deal with uncertainty when answering multiple-choice questions and what Ontario’s universities are doing to improve access for un- derrepresented groups.Prof. Aimy Bazylak, University of Toronto Prof. Aimy Bazylak is an Associate Professor in Mechanical & Industrial Engineering at the University of Toronto. She is the Tier II Canada Research Chair in Thermofluidics for Clean Energy and the Director of the University of Toronto Institute for Sustainable Energy (ISE). In 2008, she received the inaugural Bullitt
engineers do.IntroductionEngineering students often have difficulty explaining their chosen profession to non-engineeringstudents. Their motivation to finish an engineering degree and to fit within their socialenvironment can be enhanced by doing something interesting yet useful for the community. Withthis in mind, mechatronics engineering students approached the Humans vs. Robots WorkoutChallenge lab. The main justification for the lab was to use various pedagogical learninginstruments such as project-based learning, peer learning, and increased student engagement, allin the function of learning basic robotic concepts and robot programming, as well as developingcommunication skills. Student engagement was directed towards increasing awareness
to real-life scenarios inschool project, at work, and in teaching.Peer-Presentation ReviewTo specifically enhance the presentation skills of the engineering ambassadors, the studentspractice the presentation portion of the lesson their group designed to their fellow ambassadorsand faculty. During the presentation, the audience took note on the presentation skills such asposture, filler words, body language verbal tone, volume, and eye contact are ranked on anexcellent to needs improvement scale. This provided the ambassadors with a list of requiredimprovements in their presentations. The presenting ambassadors received a similar sheet withthe combined results as shown in table 3. Table 3: Sample of
safety in a formal manner.Figure 1. The red arrows show a plastic cover on the cylinders and the motor.In this paper, the authors report the result of their investigation on identifying a gap between thecurrent safety related issues that are being taught in a fluid power course and what should betaught. This gap can then be fulfilled by creating new components to enhance MET laboratoryexperience. The core item in this paper will be to use of survey to identity this gap and processtaken to reduce the margin of this gap. This process can be applied to ET related disciplines aswell as other disciplines in the higher education, where program improvements are needed.Goals and ScopeThe present project has two phases. The first phase is a preliminary
report; comments on peer presentationsTo support course development, we have leveraged institutional technologies to increase thequality of education, as well as affordability and accessibility. This includes: Blackboard course management software to coordinate activities, and provide assignments as well as background readings and videos (recorded as part of the proposed project as well as some gathered from other sources, including archival news footage). Blackboard is also used for moderated discussion forums (for specific topic discussion as well as open forums acting as peer-to-peer help sites and collaboration tools), as well as to distribute links to assessment
how to provide “higher qualityhealthcare to more people at lower cost” andtrain bioengineering leaders of tomorrow todrive “Moore’s law for health care14.”Change TheorySince a core goal of our effort is to execute asignificant change to our department’scurriculum and norms, we briefly discuss ourtheory of change to explain how we plan toredefine our curriculum. Organizationalresearch amply demonstrates that “howchanges are made and communicated” mattersmore than “what changes are made15.”Members of a community undergoing changeare keenly attuned to just treatment16. To foster Figure 1: Symbiosis between project objectives.a sense of just practices during a changeinitiative, administrators must engage stakeholders (faculty and students) in
, herjob place allowed her live online attendance in classes, and exams.Senior construction engineering technology courses were taught using the distancelearning. The educator used PowerPoint and the white board conventional learning aswell as the document camera for the lecture. The course material was posted onBlackboard. The student contacted the educator using emails and phone calls. Thecourses assessed by assignments, quizzes, projects, and exams. A presentation of the longdistance student about her construction experience was memorable for the class students.The continuous support of the university Information Technology services was the key tothe successful offering of the courses.This presentation describes how the instructor, program
Paper ID #17989Assessing Students’ Researcher Identity and Epistemic CognitionDr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student motivation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incorporat
Paper ID #19605Capturing the Computational Thinking of Families with Young Children inOut-of-School EnvironmentsMs. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in
include discipline-specific elements of arguments, such as weighing and justifyingtrade-offs based on prioritized criteria and constraints, which are features of argumentation inengineering.21 Thus, more discipline-specific instruments are needed to assess students’argumentation in engineering.Some existing instruments can be used to determine the quality of students’ writing inengineering. Most notably, Abts and colleagues developed the Engineering Design ProcessPortfolio Scoring Rubric,22 which includes the following two elements: “evaluation, reflection,and recommendations” and “presenting the project.” These elements might be related toargumentation, in the sense that students are expected to present the project “for the audiencesand purposes
on their interest during the welcoming session.Students interested in Physics and Engineering are encouraged to attend the special sessionprepared by the department of Physics, Engineering, and Astronomy. Details about the sessionare presented in the following section.Engineering Physics Special Laboratory SessionsThe Engineering Physics laboratory session changes every year. The goal is to keep the contentfresh, and interesting for the campers. “Find a solution to a real-world problem” is the themeused while selecting the project for the summer camp. For the 2016 summer camp, the problemwas decided to be: How do you deliver a payload from a high-altitude, and track it so it will notbe lost? In order to simulate this problem the students
of data are part of the integrated scholarly workflow, and are notnecessarily wholly separate processes.Building on these interviews, the authors have developed an instructional and training programthat better focuses on integrating data management activities focusing on research and scholarlycommunication processes. The goal of our project was to examine data management practices inthe context of researcher scholarly workflow needs and behaviors and develop and implement aninstructional program that addresses researcher data needs. The development and assessment ofthis program is underway.INTRODUCTIONIn response to federal grant agency and publisher mandates for data sharing, science andtechnology libraries have become actively involved in
(summarized, by priority, in Table 1, below) include innovation;engineering education best practices; preparing students using a hands-on, project-based approach; integrating the traditional lecture format and laboratoryexperiences into a seamless “class-lab” format; strong professional developmentand service learning components; and an emphasis on a broad base of core skills,complemented with depth in focused concentrations: mechanical engineering(manufacturing focus) and chemical engineering (pharmaceutical focus). The initialconcentrations reflect regional and state engineering employment opportunities,the university’s historic strength in the health sciences, a forward-looking view ofengineering in the 21st century, and a desire to attract a
multiple teaching and advising awards including the COE Excellence in Teaching Award (2008, 2014), UIC Teaching Recognitions Award (2011), and the COE Best Advisor Award (2009, 2010, 2013). Dr. Darabi has been the Technical Chair for the UIC Annual Engineering Expo for the past 5 years. The Annual Engineering Expo is a COE’s flagship event where all senior students showcase their Design projects and products. More than 600 participants from public, industry and academia attend this event annually. Dr. Darabi is an ABET IDEAL Scholar and has led the MIE Department ABET team in two successful ac- creditations (2008 and 2014) of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Engineering programs. Dr. Darabi has been the
engage and attract individuals towards STEAM and STEM fields by showcasing how those skills impact the current project in real-world ways that people can understand and be involved in. As part of a university that is focused on supporting c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Paper ID #18676the 21st century student demographic he continues to innovate and research on how we can design newmethods of learning to educate both our students and communities on how STEM and STEAM make upa large part of that vision and our future. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 WORK
University’s Engineering Education program, which strives to prepare engineering educators for the 7-12 grade levels. Dr. France is also heavily involved in de- veloping and facilitating the Introduction to Engineering course sequence at ONU. He earned his PhD from the University of Colorado Boulder where his research focused on pre-engineering education and project-based learning.Dr. Louis A. DiBerardino III, Ohio Northern University Dr. DiBerardino is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Ohio Northern University. His teaching and research interests are in first-year engineering, dynamic systems, and musculoskeletal biome- chanics. c American Society for Engineering Education
on engaging students of all ages in hands-on, innovative engineering education, especially focusing on several outreach projects reaching groups otherwise underrepresented within the STEM fields. Jenna is also leading the University’s STEPS (Science, Technology, and Engineering Preview Summer) Program, developing the curriculum, leading the staff, and working as the primary researcher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017The Effect of Gender Groupings at an Engineering Summer Camp on Increasing Engineering Knowledge and Confidence The Effect of Gender Groupings at an Engineering Summer Camp on Increasing Engineering Knowledge and ConfidenceIntroductionThis paper
engineering projects, multiphase flow, well testing, in situ stress measure-ments, SCA, hydraulic fracturing and other assigned research programs. In addition, as a group directorhave been responsible for all management and administrative duties, budgeting, and marketing of theservices, codes and products.Standard oil Co. (Sohio Petroleum Company), San Francisco, California, 1983-85; Senior ReservoirEngineer; Performed various tasks related to Lisburne reservoir project; reservoir simulation (3 phaseflow), budgeting, proposal review and recommendation, fund authorizations (AFE) and supporting doc-uments, computer usage forecasting, equipment purchase/lease justification (PC, IBM-XT, Printer, etc.),selection/justification and award of contract to
, North Carolina State University Heather entered the Applied Social and Community Psychology program in the fall of 2014, after com- pleting her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from the University of Cincinnati. She has participated in various research projects examining the interaction between stereotypes and science interest and confi- dence, their influence upon womens’ performance in school and the workplace, and their presence in the media and consequences for viewers. Her primary research interest is science identity, STEM education, and participation in online communities.Blanca Miller, University of Nevada, Reno Blanca Miller is a Computer Science & Engineering Graduate Student at the University of
total number of students and thenumber of women students enrolled as engineering majors – “184 students enrolled in the classof 1972 Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science, including six girls”.That the number of women enrolled is miniscule comes as no surprise. But what caught theauthor’s attention is that the phrasing was the number of girls enrolled as engineering majors.4.2 The University of Tulsa Academic Years 2000-2016: The Author’s Calculus I, II, and III StudentCourse Evaluation CommentsThere are student course evaluation comments suggesting changes in how the author teachescalculus. In Calculus II, Mathematica (http://www.wolfram.com) was introduced and used forsome homework problems and projects. In some