program, Academy for Co-creativeEducation of Environment and Energy Science (ACEEES), in 2012 with a 7 year grant awardedby the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) Program for Leading Graduate Schools15.ACEEES' mission is to educate next generation doctoral students to become global energyscientist and engineers by developing their leadership qualities as well technical expertise inenergy and environmental science through coursework, interdisciplinary projects, research andother activities with international industry-government-university oversight (Fig. 1). JSPScreated the Leading Graduate Program to support doctoral student education, provide financialsupport to students, raise doctoral education quality and increase the number of
launching thebadge to a national audience.1. Introduction and BackgroundAccording to the analysis of US Census Data over the past 50 years performed by the AmericanAssociation of University Women, there has been a steady increase in the number of femalesentering the workforce in STEM fields. In the life sciences, female representation in the USworkforce has increased 25-31% since 1960; but there has only been an 11% increase in femalesin engineering fields in the same period [1]. In 2014, only 7% of all mechanical engineers in theUS workforce were females [2]. It is evident that the representation of females in engineering islow, and that the gender gap is persistent.What are the strategies for closing this gender gap? Research has shown that
atop a wood fire. Although the syrup-making effortwas only begun in 2015, it has brought together people from many different parts of the college,monastery, and greater community. Students assist with the tapping of trees and the collection ofthe sap, and through a nature reserve associated with the college, community outreach isprovided in the form of demonstrations and tastings. Additionally, community members areinvited to tap their own trees and contribute the sap to the syrup making efforts.Community engagement programs in higher education have grown significantly in popularity inrecent years[1]. Practitioners of successful programs report numerous benefits the students,including a more engaging learning experience, practice working on
their STEM stories” with diverse groups. Theseoutreach and community engagement activities provide “cradle to career” service to students andtheir mentors; training for teachers who implement new practices in K-12 classes, and access toeducational and career opportunities for learners across the state.IntroductionIndustries in the United States (U.S.) are not finding enough people trained in science,technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) fields to fill their growing needs.1 Jobs incomputer science, information technology and selected engineering, science, and mathematicsareas are expected to grow faster than those in other sectors through 2024.2 To address thesechallenges, business and professional organizations as well as K-12 and
of materials during the construction of rain gardens and dealing with "mission creep." Success The program began with a week of teambuilding and orientation. Interns engaged in leadership training, getting to know their teammates, interactions with the community, and learning about specifics of the job. This acclimation period emphasized the program’s twin goals: 1) To achieve something tangible for the community; and 2 ) To educationally benefit the students involved, with attention paid to interdisciplinarity and skills for application
the three groups utilized Chemation. Test group 1 used Chemation todesign, understand, and assess animations. Test group 2 utilized Chemation to design andunderstand animations only. Test group 3 used the tool to only examine and understandanimations created by teachers. The students in Group 1 performed better than students inGroups 2 and 3. Results of this study showed that the design method combined with peerevaluation of animation by students was a successful way to use animations for teachingpurposes (Chang et al., 2010).In our previous research paper, we reported our intention to develop a prototype for anadaptive learning system (ALS) to raise STEM interest in middle school students (Islam,Shankar, Freytag, and Serrano, 2015). We
enrollment? An analysis of the time path of racial differences in GPA and major choice. IZA Journal of Labor Economics, 1(1), 5. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?. Strategic management journal, 10(S1), 107-124. Bassett‐Jones, N. (2005). The paradox of diversity management, creativity and innovation. Creativity and innovation management, 14(2), 169-175. Bennett, J., & Hogarth, S. (2009). Would you want to talk to a scientist at a party? High school students’ attitudes to school science and to science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(14), 1975-1998. Bybee, R. (2015). Scientific literacy
development program, and a local technology training company. It details thegeneralized struggles and successes of the students, the lessons learned, and a second curriculumand class structure based on those findings. Finally it presents unanswered questions and presentsrecommendations for future courses presented by University/community/businesspartnerships.1 IntroductionAccording to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, between 2014 and 2024, the job market for SoftwareDevelopers will grow by 17% 1 which is ”much faster than average”. In Florida, Application andSystem Software Developers will grow by approximately 31% and 24%, respectively 2 . Theserates are 1.8 and 1.3 times the national projection. In order to fill these job openings, recruiters
experience of the volunteers to strengthen gaps in their own knowledge and toprovide needed support for students. We expected volunteers to work in the classroom at leasttwo days a week for 1-2 sessions per day for 6-8 weeks.4. Research Study Design The descriptive study reported in this paper aims to explore the roles universityvolunteers can play in robotics classrooms with teachers of varying technological backgrounds.This study describes the initial findings from our integration of the VEX Volunteers into threeschool in the Alachua robotics initiative. This study is part of a larger evaluation of the VEXVolunteer Program pilot and will help us form an initial set of roles that volunteers can play inthe Alachua robotics initiative. These
. ”Establishing a Women’s Mentorship Network in a STEM Learning Com- munity.” Dieker, L., Grillo, K., & Ramlakhan, N. (2012). The use of virtual and simulated teaching and learning environments: Inviting gifted students into science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers (STEM) through summer partnerships. Gifted Education International, 28(1), 96-106. Ramlakhan, N., (2012). A comparative investigation of career readiness and decidedness in first year STEM majoring students participating in a stem mentoring program imbedded in a living-learning com- munity with focused data on female STEM students. (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. Selected Papers
published a report detailing the implementation of an initiative that would address the growing rate of abandoned housing throughout the city 1 . The 1000 Homes in 1000 Days initiative resulted in 1,122 homes being repaired, deconstructed, or contracted for demolition in the one thousand day deadline. Although the issue of abandoned housing began to improve, vacant land, also referred to as vacant lots or parcels, became a rising concern without a clear path for remediation. With the increasing volume of vacant lots throughout the City, a collective desire between City officials and
Analog Discovery board into the freshman curriculum. Survey resultsindicate that students are benefiting from the use of the (ADB). A high percentage of studentsindicated that the use of the (ADB) was suited to their learning needs, and that the (ADB)motivated them to learn the course content. In addition, the students' base knowledge increasedas the result of use of the (ADB). Furthermore, through the integration of the ElectricalEngineering Practicum and the (ADB), the students developed interest in the course, developedskills in working collaboratively with fellow students, developed confidence in the content area.Moreover, the students developed attitudes of self-direction and self-responsibility.1 INTRODUCTIONIt has been reported
biases and to foster a more inclusive campus,specifically in engineering fields. We present preliminary data from a novel method developedduring ACC research. The method, called Articulating a Succinct Description, uses ethnographicdata to create case study interventions facilitated with undergraduate students to disseminateresearch findings; address problems presented in the case; and collect more data for furtheranalysis. Emerging findings show how bias and discrimination shape the culture of engineeringand how discussions around these incidents vary depending on the demographic makeup of thefacilitation groups (race, gender, and major field of study). Preliminary analysis of data raisestwo critical questions: (1) how can the Articulating a
difficultto creatively apply to practical engineering problems. Felder and Brent confirm this intuitionwith several studies that show students need repetitive practice with consistent feedback todevelop new skills (1). Simply showing students how to solve a particular problem doesn’tguarantee they can apply these concepts on their own. With these ideas in mind, the lab morphedfrom a traditional recitation to weekly programming challenges solved in a group setting. Thelaboratory and lecture now focus on the C++ and MATLAB languages with plans to alsoincorporate Python in future semesters. This paper details the changes to the laboratory portion of the course to use problem-based learning (PBL) and just-in-time teaching (JiTT) in a collaborative
. Kenneth A. Bright, University of Delaware, College of EngineeringDr. Rachel Davidson, University of Delaware Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Associate Dean for Diversity, College of Engi- neering Core Faculty Member, Disaster Research Center University of Delaware Newark, DE c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering (verb) Diversity: Using the Engineering Design Process to Develop and Implement a Strategic Plan of Action for Undergraduate Diversity at the Institution LevelJenni M. Buckley, PhD1; Amy Trauth-Nare, PhD2; Kenneth Bright, BA1; Michael Vaughan, PhD1; Rachel Davidson, PhD1 1
(e.g., genderqueer, agender)1. In typical use, a female-born individual who currently identifies asfemale would label herself as a “cisgender woman,” often shortened to a “cis woman.” The useof cisgender as a descriptive label avoids the marked-unmarked dynamic in discussions ofgender by preventing the classification of a portion of the population as normal and treatingtransgender or nonconforming gender identities as “Other” or aberrant2. A fitting analogy isheterosexual and homosexual identities describing sexual orientation. Although linguisticallypositioned as direct opposites, heterosexual and homosexual identities are but two orientations ina spectrum that includes asexual, bisexual, and pansexual, among others. Similarly, cisgenderand
evaluatereplacement street lighting for municipalities. Of course, the analysis suggested is slanted1ftp://ftp02.portlandoregon.gov/PBOT/Chi/COP%20Signal%20&%20St%20Lighting%20Reference/COP%20St%20Lighting%20Reference/LED%20Lights/Leotek.LED.Streetlight.Guide.V7-101613.pdftoward their LED product but the analysis steps are a fair representation of how one mightanalyze the decision at the city engineer level.The basic decision is, do we spend money now to put a more expensive (purchase price) cobrastyle street light head with LEDs on the existing poles? As part of the process the problem wasdivided into four parts; 1) gathering data on representative costs of purchasing commercial streetlight heads (both sodium vapor and LED), 2) determining the
Education, Information Retrieval, Machine Learning,Master Theses1. IntroductionEngineering education is a broad area that includes all the resources, tools, strategies,methodologies and practices aligned to improve the quality of the education in engineering. Theresearch in this area has grown during the last decades and some of the problems identified by theresearch are: The lack of motivation of people to study careers in engineering and other areas ofScience, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (), the high dropout rates of students fromengineering programs around the world, the misalignment between the curriculum and theassessment, and the gap between the skills of graduates and the needs of the industry, among others[1].The current
and the school of peace studies. The course will be co-taught, with GDHrepresenting engineering and ACF representing peace studies. The semester will be spent on asingle project, designing a drone for social good. Drones come with an ideal combination oftechnical and ethical challenges that will force students from both schools to wrestle togetherwith unfamiliar questions. One of our primary learning outcomes will be for this struggle tocultivate individual empathy across disciplinary boundaries. Put more practically, we want thestudents to understand how using alternative disciplinary frameworks changes theirunderstanding of problems. During the semester small teams (4-6 students) will each 1) build aquadcopter drone using the open source
prevalent contemporary approaches to engineering ethics in global context.More specifically, this paper first argues that discrepancies in efforts to situate engineering ethicsin global context often derive from different understandings of what constitutes the global.Second, this paper argues that these different understandings have led to four partially distinctapproaches to engineering ethics in global context, namely: (1) global ethical codes, ordeveloping a code of ethics that is expected to be applied across cultures; (2) functionalist theory,which posits some fundamental, shared characteristics internal to the engineering profession thatapply globally and might prove foundational for creating ethical codes; (3) cultural studies,which
classroom. Few studies have explored faculty perceptions of theirrole in promoting diversity and a single study identified factors that contribute to facultyapplying strategies to promote diversity concepts within the course content. Additionally,previous research has highlighted the need for departmental and institutional support for facultyinterested in adopting teaching practices that promote diversity and inclusion. Therefore, it isimportant that we understand the motivations and supports needed for STEM faculty to includediversity concepts in the classroom to promote inclusivity. The guiding research questions for thecurrent study are: 1) What perceptions do faculty hold about diversity and inclusion? 2) How dofaculty’s personal experience
varying degrees at different institutions. Based on theexperiences of people in the TELPhE Division who push to teach non-engineers aboutengineering, here are some reasons why this has not become widespread at the college anduniversity level. Starting with the most difficult issue, the major issues are 1) Getting a Place for Technological and Engineering Literacy in the Curriculum, 2) Faculty to teach the course, and 3) Rewards for faculty who teach and administrators who support these courses.In addition, there is a need for 4) Resources and 5) Materials for teaching the course.Items 1-4 are related to institutional support; with sufficient support from higher levels, thesehurdles can be overcome. As noted earlier, item 5 has been
completing design tasks to be the same. Additionally, it was found thatstudents had a significant increase in their development of this combined confidence-success factorover the course of a semester (p-value = .002). Based on extensive research by Godwin et al.13,measures of self-efficacy (presented as performance-competence), alongside subject interest andrecognition by others, have shown to be an important factor to students’ development ofengineering identity. It is suggested then that active learning may allow students to develop anengineering identity11.Initial qualitative work from Major & Kirn11 found five emerging themes: 1) students discovereddesign tasks they were competent in or not competent in, which lead to motivation to complete
Page 1 Engineering Leadership Development using an Interdisciplinary Competition-based ApproachAbstractUse of experiential learning has been demonstrated to be an effective tool for engineeringleadership development. However, experiential learning involving the integration of disciplinesoutside of engineering, specifically leadership development experiences including businessmajors, seems to be an untapped area. This educational gap could be problematic, as anabundance of anecdotal evidence, documented by Rogers and Freuler, and calls by professionalengineering organizations, including ASEE and NAE, suggesting that engineers must learn towork with accounting, marketing, communications, and
implementation of leadership training programs anddeepen our current understanding of engineering leadership in different culturalcontexts.Keywords: Engineering leadership; Chinese Industrial Context; Four CapabilitiesModelIntroduction Future engineers should not only serve as technical experts in their respectivefields, but also take the leading roles in the age of knowledge economy by possessingmultiple skills and attributes, in particular leadership [1]. Accordingly, new criteria forcompetent engineers have been proposed in recent years. For instance, The Engineer of2020-Visions of Engineering in the New Century in the U.S. indicated that futureengineers need to develop analytical skills, practical ingenuity, creative capability,communication
teacher and developed in conjunction with members of the EngTEAMS. The design projects in each unit vary in context and in terms of the mathematics and science concepts needed to create an adequate solution. Yet, within all the variation, each unit is an authentic engineering design challenge. The common design elements that cut across curriculum were specified in three overarching design competencies (Douglas, Moore, & Adams, 2016), each with specific objectives concerning the knowledge and practices that comprise the competency. Design Competencies Competencies Objective Students… 1:Studentsdefinethe A Gatherinformationtoexaminetheproblem(askquestionstoclient) problemfromthe
abroad experience was added. Interventions were appliedaddressing four known variables that increase retention: financial support, math and academicpreparation, the learning community/cohort building, and international education. Threeobjectives or expected outcomes of this project were: 1. Increased retention and graduation rates of participating students in STEM fields. 2. Improved programs and strategies for sustaining diversity in STEM fields. 3. Improved access to engineering educational opportunities.The quantitative measure of success for the NSF Pathways project is determined by the retentionand graduation rate of the students in STEM fields at the end of five years. The current four-yearretention rate for these students in 2017
learn.Winne provides an approach to measuring self-regulated learning. Self-regulated learning isdependent on context, and it is also expected that context changes as learners redefine it uponapproaching problems.1 Self-regulated learning is composed of “metacognition, motivation, andstrategic action.” 1MLH hackathons promote small teams to coordinate with each other in order to develop and/orinnovate a project by the end of the hackathon. In focusing on teams and how they learn witheach other, a process theory helps to solidify a framework developed from Winne’s approach.Applying “how knowledge emerges from the individual to the team-level” is important for thespread of information, and in seeing how one’s actions of self-regulated learning can
Massachusetts at Amherst, an MBA from Babson College, and MS and PhD degrees from Purdue University. She currently serves on the board of the United States Association for Small Business and Entrepreneurship in the role of Vice President for Research. She is also a Senior Research Advisor to the Stanford University Epicenter.Connor Rene Couetil, Purdue University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering Students' Misuse of Business Concepts: Understanding Problematic Precursors to EntrepreneurshipIntroduction and BackgroundThe increased focus on entrepreneurship in engineering education 1 has led to more attentionbeing paid to what should be taught 2 during these