(2008, 2014), UIC Teaching Recognitions Award (2011), and the COE Best Advisor Award (2009, 2010, 2013). Dr. Darabi has been the Technical Chair for the UIC Annual Engineering Expo for the past 5 years. The Annual Engineering Expo is a COE’s flagship event where all senior students showcase their Design projects and products. More than 600 participants from public, industry and academia attend this event annually. Dr. Darabi is an ABET IDEAL Scholar and has led the MIE Department ABET team in two successful ac- creditations (2008 and 2014) of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial Engineering programs. Dr. Darabi has been the lead developer of several educational software systems as well as the author of multiple ed
cultures. This experience more often helps to handle the specific issues in theteam project.”Cultural intelligence factors - Behavior, Metacognition, Cognition, and MotivationThe most prevalent difficulty that arose was international faculty members’ personaladjustments. They often struggled and felt powerless when working on a culturally diverse team.This was even more evident for international women faculty. After participating in a cross-cultural training, faculty members reported that the main necessary changes in behavior observedwere self-confidence and assertiveness. Therefore, the participants’ responses were examinedfurther to gain more detail about how cross-cultural training plays a valuable role in changing afaculty member’s behavior
Engineering Education from Virginia Tech. Dr. Carrico is a certified project management professional (PMP) and licensed professional engineer (P.E.).Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Matusovich is an Assistant Professor and Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Vir- ginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 8 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using
experiences. Expectations forprofessionalism and leadership are set at an academic orientation, while personal professionaldevelopment and group dynamics are introduced during a cohort workshop. Personality andStrengthsFinder™ results exist for approximately130 incoming juniors in both mechanical andelectrical engineering. Only the mechanical engineering students have been observed throughsenior design class and graduation. Assigning senior design project groups, rather than allowingself-selection, is another tool used to develop leadership within the cohort learning community.Over the span of six senior design courses with a total of 50+ mechanical engineering majors,students have been exposed to leadership development through group dynamics
the three campuses of the School of Engineering (Santiago, Vi˜na del Mar and Con- cepci´on, Chile). She authored several manuscripts in the science education area, joined several research projects, participated in international conferences with oral presentations and key note lectures and serves as referee for journals, funding institutions and associations.Prof. Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico, and Universidad Andres Bello, San-tiago, Chile Angeles Dominguez is a Professor of the Department of Mathematics within the School of Engineering, a researcher at the School of Education, and the Director of the Master of Education Program at the Tec- nologico de Monterrey, Mexico. Also, she is
important factor in persistence to degree completion. For example, somestudies report that the diversity gap in STEM participation may be attributed more to perceptionsand beliefs than to academic preparation or achievement levels [1-5]. To the extent that suchperceptions and beliefs form an inaccurate (or “negative”) vision of a future engineering career,curricular approaches that aim to form a more “positive” vision may be warranted. Theseapproaches can be pedagogical, such as collaborative and project-based learning [6-8], content-based by aiming (for example) to expose the positive contributions of engineering to society [9-12], or both. All other things being equal, curricular features than can foster among students amore positive
. Additionally, the canvas provides a bounded, one-page frameworkfor approaching a design problem. The canvas suggests the instructor’s high-level intent for theclass or project. It enables a student team to take action to collect information with the blankareas highlighting the need for attention. As high-level information appears, it encouragesassociation and alignment across the canvas boxes. Because no fixed process steps are explicitlyencoded in the canvas, it can encourage iteration as new information is added.Objectives of this StudyHaving identified opportunities to add value in design and engineering education, we establishedseveral objectives at the outset of this work. An overarching objective was to develop a designand entrepreneurship
Paper ID #18195GLASS: Group Learning At Significant Scale via WiFi-Enabled Learner De-sign Teams in an ECE Flipped ClassroomDr. Ronald F. DeMara, University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) at the Uni- versity of Central Florida with 24 years of experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering disciplines. His educational research interests focus on classroom and laboratory instructional technology, and the digitization of STEM assessments. He has completed over 200 technical and educational publications, 34 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and
$40 million in projects, is a Fellow ASME and of ASHRAE, is an Honorary International Member of the Society of Heating, Air-conditioning and Sanitary Engineers of Japan in recognition of his contributions to energy efficiency in buildings, and received the Faculty Distinguished Achievement in Research Award from the Texas A&M Association of Former Students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Industry-Aligned Interdisciplinary Program Design: A Case Study for Architectural EngineeringAbstractThe faculty at Texas A&M University anchored the development of a new architecturalengineering program with industry consultation and feedback
present our University’s efforts to contribute to this need by way of a hands-onactivity designed for high school students. The workshop was devised to achieve three primarygoals: 1) Encourage consideration of a career in electrical and computer engineering 2) Buildexcitement about the Internet-of-Things and provide students with a future technical focus and 3)Introduce students to the fundamental building blocks that make up the Internet-of-Things. Duringthis activity, students complete a project in which they first construct a circuit to read data from atemperature sensor using a microcontroller platform. The students then write software to transmitthat data over a short-range wireless network and then eventually to an Internet-connected
Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lab-Integrated Librarians: Engagement with Unreachable ResearchersAbstractSubject liaison librarians are working at the crossroads of the practical and emerging needs ofresearchers, seeking to connect with them throughout the research life-cycle rather than at thebeginning when literature reviews are conducted or at the end when a scholarly publicationemerges. In STEM disciplines, where research is oftentimes conducted in secure lab facilities,engagement is particularly challenging. In 2016, librarians at North Carolina State Universityembarked on a project to overcome this difficulty by joining selected research groups andattending regular lab meetings. This paper’s findings will suggest that lab
post-lab analysis, including asking students to analyze hypothetical results or asking students how the results would have been affected if they had made a hypothetical mistake in the procedure. 3) Students reflect at the end of every lab report on what learned and feel confident about, and also anything that is still unclear. This is an application of the “muddiest point” exercise that has been used extensively in assessment of undergraduate education,6 and was recently implemented in a project-based bioinstrumentation lab at Rice University.7 4) Instructor emphasizes the experimental process rather than results, and makes it clear that mistakes are an inevitable and acceptable part of the learning process
professional goals. While serving as the Associate Director of the Center for Women in Technology at UMBC she was a co-investigator on a number of successful NSF funded research projects related to improving the retention and success of transfer students, underrepresented groups in STEM, and first-year computing majors. Dr. Martin earned her Ed.D. in Higher Education from The George Washington University, a M.A. in College Student Personnel from The University of Maryland, College Park, and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Dr. Gymama Slaughter, University of Maryland Baltimore CountyDr. Carolyn Seaman, UMBC Dr. Seaman is an Associate Professor of Information Systems at the
librarian in the Engineering Library. He was director from 1987-2001 and 2006-2008; from 2002-2005 he went on partial research leave as Director of Collection Development for the NSF-funded National Science Digital Library Project.52 In 2009 he was appointed Associate University Librarian for Scholarly Resourcesand Special Collections. He served as principal investigator on the Kinematic Models for DesignDigital Library (KMODDL)53 involving the Reuleaux Collection of 19th-century kinematicmachines. He led the Task Force to examine library-related needs for the Cornell Tech campus inNew York City
Paper ID #18243Critical Pedagogies and First-year Engineering Students’ Conceptions of ’Whatit Means to be an Engineer’Ms. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral student in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State University, where she also serves as a program assistant for the Center for Enhancement of Engineering Diversity and an advisor for international senior design projects in the Department of Mechanical Engineering. Ashley received her MS in Mechanical Engineering, MPH in Public Health Education, and BS in Mechanical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her research interests include
President of the United States. She has conducted and advised on educational research projects and grants in both the public and private sectors, and served as an external reviewer for doctoral dissertations outside the U.S. She publishes regularly in peer-reviewed journals and books. Dr. Husman was a founding member and first President of the Southwest Consortium for Innovative Psychology in Education and has held both elected and appointed offices in the American Psychological Association (APA) and the Motivation Special Interest Group of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction.Ms. Katherine C. Cheng, Arizona State University Katherine Cheng is a doctoral student at the Sanford School of
the LBJ Institute for STEM Education and Research.Prof. Bahram Asiabanpour, Texas State University, San Marcos Dr. Bahram Asiabanpour is an Associate Professor of Manufacturing Engineering at Texas State Univer- sity and a Certified Manufacturing Engineer (CMfgE). He received his Ph.D. from the Daniel J. Epstein Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering at the University of Southern California. His main research interest is Additive Manufacturing, Product Development, and Renewable Energy. Since joining Texas State, Dr. Asiabanpour has secured 27 externally funded projects from NSF, NASA, Toyota, USDA, DOE, and several local industries. He is currently the PI for the $614K grant from the DOE (2014-17
, of which 3 have been commercialized by the university. This research work is a collaboration with the Children’s Services Council of Broward county in FL.Mr. Francis Xavier McAfee, Florida Atlantic University Francis X. McAfee, Associate Professor in the School of Communication & Multimedia Studies at Florida Atlantic University (FAU) merges his background as a ceramic sculptor and printmaker with new digital technologies. After graduating with a BFA in Art in 1989 he joined the Florida Center for Electronic Communication (CEC) as a lead artist creating animation for applied research projects. These computer animated films were nationally and internationally screened in New York, Chicago, Hollywood, San Fran
considerations. Through his discussion of Lund’s case,Davis argues that an engineer can object to work that would violate the code as anengineer rather than simply as an individual. If one objected to a project without theability to appeal to anything beyond one’s moral conscience, one might easily beconstrued as a moral crusader and may very well be fired and replaced by an engineergreater degree of moral malleability. By invoking one’s code, however, it immediatelybecomes apparent that other engineers are likely to similarly object. In this way, beingable to appeal to one’s profession as grounds for one’s objection carries with it additionalweight. It is less likely that another more opportunistic engineer will take one’s place,and provides something
Paper ID #18449A New Pathway: A Software Engineering Master’s Program for Liberal ArtsGraduatesProf. linda m laird, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Systems & Enterprises) I am an industry professor in software engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Prior to that, I ran large development projects at Bell Labs/Lucent. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A New Pathway: A Software Engineering Master’s Program for Liberal Arts Graduates Linda M. Laird engineers and executives who
participated European Union Projects in which she conducted series of professional development programs for in-service science teachers. Areas of research interest are engineering education, inquiry learning and evolution education.Dr. Hasan Deniz, University of Nevada Hasan Deniz is an Associate Professor of Science Education at University of Nevada Las Vegas. He teaches undergraduate, masters, and doctoral level courses in science education program at University of Nevada Las Vegas. His research agenda includes epistemological beliefs in science and evolution education. He is recently engaged in professional development activities supported by several grants targeting to increase elementary teachers’ knowledge and skills
Representative for USC.Dr. Gabriel Terejanu, University of South Carolina Gabriel Terejanu has been an Assistant Professor in the Department of Computer Science and Engineer- ing at University of South Carolina since 2012. Previously he was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences at University of Texas at Austin. He holds Ph.D. in Com- puter Science and Engineering from University at Buffalo. He is currently working on the development of a comprehensive uncertainty quantification framework to accelerate the scientific discovering process and decision-making under uncertainty. Some projects currently supported by NSF and VP for Research include discovery of novel catalytic materials
traffic and log files. They also practice steganography tools to detect malicious activities.The above modules can enhance existing curriculum, e.g. • Enhance and strengthen existing courses by substituting outdated material with latest technologies to keep pace with technological advances. • Extend and enhance existing content with new topics, concepts, and technologies. • Function as assignments or projects providing hands-on exercises for existing courses. • Concatenate into a mini-course for industrial training of working professionals.4. Game Creator DesignAs we mentioned earlier, our game framework uses XML to decouple the game engine fromcontent. Therefore, creating new games (i.e., the modules/cases) need not modify the game
Station. He received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. He was an Assistant Professor, Associate Professor, and Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. At Rose-Hulman, he co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engineering and Mathematics, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He served as Project Director a Na- tional Science Foundation (NSF) Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized innovative
. Sowells is the lead investigator of the Females in Technology (FiT) summer boot camp grant project for academically gifted low income rising senior and junior high girls for recruitment into the technology degree areas. She is also the co-PI of the Aggie STEM Minority Male Maker grant project focused on early exposure to technology to stimulate interest in technology of middle school minority males. Evelyn is not only outstanding in teaching and research, but also in service. She recently received the 2013 Chair’s Award for Outstanding Service in the Depart- ment of Computer System Technology and is a member of Upsilon Phi Epsilon, Computer Science Honor Society, American Society of Engineering Education’s Electronic
theirstudents holding the same view. Faculty find their students’ ability to use mathematics for thecommunication of precise, intricate ideas inadequate. 4) Faculty observe that students haveexcessive expectations of the certainty of mathematical knowledge. Faculty see students useexcessive decimal digits, react with frustration to rough order-of-magnitude estimation or whenpresented with imperfect models. Faculty state that novice students seem to expect problemsolving to not involve any kind of uncertainty, experimentation, or failure.These results shed more light on the alignment of the current standard mathematics curriculumwith the needs of the engineering students and faculty. This project exists in the context of alarger project examining
, Bucknell University Dr. Nottis is an Educational Psychologist and Professor of Education at Bucknell University. Her research has focused on meaningful learning in science and engineering education, approached from the perspec- tive of Human Constructivism. She has authored several publications and given numerous presentations on the generation of analogies, misconceptions, and facilitating learning in science and engineering educa- tion. She has been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received
that advance learning and teaching in engineering. He is also working on National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects exploring engineering design thinking. His areas of research include engineering design thinking, adult learning cognition, engineering education professional development and technical training. He has extensive international experience working on technical training and engineering educaton projects funded by the Asian Development Bank, World Bank, and U.S. Department of Labor, USAID. Countries where he has worked include Armenia, Bangladesh, Bulgaria, China, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, and Thailand. In addition, he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses for the Department of Engineering
, instructors lecturing to a camera, and power pointstyle presentations with a voice recorded over pictures and texts [10] & [11]. Most of the videosreported in the literature were produced by the course instructor [12], [13], & [7], with a fewmentions of student-produced content [13], [14], & [11]. The task of generating video-basedlecture content for a course can be a huge project that can exceed the time that the instructor hasavailable [15] while also meeting research and service expectations.Students watching a video may be reviewing pre-existing knowledge or they could be introducedto a new topic. Either way, these students are engaged in remembering previous knowledge andthen applying new knowledge, whereby their pre-existing
conversations reported by the faculty indicate that students begin sharing informationthey did not know would help them in their engineering careers. The third course in the sequence being more of a team design course, employs methodsfrom other design courses from FYE institutions in contact with our team (Adams, 2002; Atmanet al., 2007; Crismond & Adams, 2012; Turns et al., 2006). One engagement protocol that mixesbest practices from Adams’ work and is similar to the liberative ones employed by Riley is usedby one faculty member who requires all students to stand while discussing an element of designfrom the project, and the next speaker must amplify the previous student’s statement in terms ofhis own. Students in this scenario must engage