Session 1359 COMPUTER CONTROL OF MACHINES AND PROCESSES George A. Perdikaris, Ph.D. University of Wisconsin-ParksideAbstractA method is presented for controlling machines and processes by a microcomputer. Examplesof a motor drive plant (machine) and a heating plant (process) are presented. The computercontrolled systems are designed and simulated using the language SIMULINK.1 The motorcontrol system is implemented in the laboratory. Results obtained from computer simulation arecompared with laboratory findings.I. IntroductionIndustrial automation incorporating computers
usually an internal combustion engine (ICE) or fuel cell. Properly designedHEVs synergistically maximize the advantages of their combined power plants while minimizingthe disadvantages. HEVs offer excellent potential for reduced emissions and lower energy usage.Three major objectives have driven the development of the GATE graduate program: First, is theestablishment of a laboratory environment that includes computer workstations for design andanalysis, data acquisition and control hardware, a hybrid powertrain dynamometer test cell and achassis (vehicle) dynamometer. Second, is the development of two new courses (one entitled HEVEnergy Analysis of Hybrid-Electric Vehicles: and the other entitled Modeling, Simulation andControl of Hybrid Electric
approaches to teaching.Lecture, recitation, structured laboratory exercises, and other methods that have been employedby universities for years were not successful with non-traditional students. The faculty at PurdueAnderson has spent considerable resources researching and developing instructional methodsthat produced good results with adult learners. However, instructional methods that have provensuccessful with non-traditional students have been less successful with this new influx oftraditional students. The faculty revisited their initial research and the assumptions theydeveloped about traditional and non-traditional learning in an attempt to identify methods thatwould produce good results for both groups of learners.II. Pedagogy versus
Introduction to Computer Engineering II. CprE 182X wasdesigned with special emphasis on the supporting laboratory experiments and interactive activities.The instructional approach focused on introducing cooperative learning strategies and teamingconcepts in the context of hands-on laboratory experiments. Students designed, implemented andtested computer based projects in an interactive, team oriented approach.CprE 182X met once a week for 2 hours and we spent most of the time working with the robotsand providing support for the other courses the students were taking. Most of the sessionsrevolved around building and programming the robots, however every class started with anopening go round and ended with a closing go round. The two go rounds allowed
Session 3563 Puttering Around -- An Interdisciplinary Manufacturing Project W.L. Scheller II, Ph.D. Kettering University, Flint, MichiganAbstractInnovative, interdisciplinary laboratory exercises are difficult to develop and successfully execute. Thispaper describes a joint manufacturing engineering/mechanical engineering project to design and machinethe head of a golf putter. The project spanned two terms. The project involved two separate courses,one in manufacturing engineering and another in mechanical engineering. Only one student in the firstterm was a member of both
as forinadequate and/or incomplete science literacy.It is our contention that student-centered interaction and engagement is particularlyeffective among students who do not perceive themselves threatened by, or at anintellectual disadvantage to one another. In this paper, we describe an attempt toengage students in the development of science activities for lay science students in twodifferent non-threatening ways within a traditional classroom lecture format. The first isby means of a design project of a science laboratory for lay science students in anengineering graphics design course. The second is by means of student-centeredinteractive-engagement methods in an introductory physical science course to promoteconceptual understanding in
. This is an integrative course that utilizes engineering, all science Page 5.176.2disciplines, mathematics, and technology for creative problem solving as demonstrated throughprocess skills and product outcomes. Attention is paid to apparatus, instructional materials,instructional strategies, NASA’s Strategic Enterprises resources, and laboratory resources thatpromote science learning. Research-based experiences are planned collaboratively withgraduate students and instructors and are evaluated for application to classroom settings.A variety of innovative instructional and assessment strategies are used to accomplish theobjectives of this course
conception to product testing and marketing. Specific topics and how they are implemented into the design process include: economic analysis and time value of money, optimization techniques, statistical methods, and the design of experiments. One or two major design projects are required each semester. Typical activities have included: the construction of a Pitot tube which would mount outside a car window to measure velocity; the design of an orifice plate fluid flow transducer to measure flow velocity in a pipe; the design and implementation of a strain gauge laboratory where strain gauges measure deflections on a golf club, a cantilever beam, and a pressurized can. A team project asked students to specify, estimate
terms of percentage points. This is theinitiation of their professional development plan. The plan represents the student’s choice,and it is expected that the students will feel more comfortable, motivated, and eager to worktowards the realization of their own plan.The lecture is one credit hour and has as co-requisite a one credit hour laboratory listedas: Introduction to Mechanical Engineering Laboratory (ME101L). Page 5.230.2The introductory course in mechanical engineering has been designed to:* Provide a first hand experience about the engineering practice* Provide an opportunity to first time freshman to work directly with the
ofopportunities throughout a standard curriculum to incorporate manufacturing experiences.III. Purdue hammerIncluded in the current paper are two examples of small projects that can be completed in 1-2 hours,yet still provide a valuable introduction to the machining process. A laboratory or machine shopshould have the instrumentation and machines to provide significant hands-on experience for students. Machining is not an observer’s sport [2] and needs the proper amount of supervision to provide a safeenvironment. The Purdue hammer project, which is introduced in a sophomore introduction tomechanical design course, discussed earlier, is a brass hammer with a wood handle. Using hexagonalbrass stock, the students learn drilling and milling, while they
Page 5.285.2cart-tipper, dial calipers, and micrometer calipers were kept in the CAD laboratory to facilitateanswers “from the source” whenever questions might arise.Undergraduates, particularly freshmen, rarely possess the time management skills, organizationalskills, and self-discipline needed to complete an extensive project without regular instructorintervention.5,6 The intervention strategy we adopted was twofold. First, students were givenweekly or bi-weekly project assignments containing portions (usually subassemblies) of the totaldrawing package throughout the semester, rather than the full project at one time. Eachassignment contained recommended intermediate deadlines, objectives and rationale for thatphase of the project, and
the agenda include: proposal goals, projectactivities, size of the college and area high school student body; location; course offerings;instructional needs including teaching staff, materials, equipment and laboratories; possibleprocess/procedures; how to determine priorities; and how the proposed resources would beallocated.The meeting leaders plan an agenda including the following activities: 1. Discussion of the three primary goals; 2. Identify the three most critical activities for each of their colleges, discuss them, and prioritize them; 3. List and discuss the information necessary for each activity; 4. Describe what the activity would need to look like at each site; 5. Identify Summer Programs and develop the concept; 6. Describe
. These have been updated in 1999, but teamwork, communication skills and projectmanagement remain in the list and near the top.During the same time period as reports of these gaps were being developed, the Bradley IEdepartment (now IMET) was developing a course to bring students into the team problemsolving paradigm well prior to the senior capstone project. Plant layout and quality controlcourses came too late in the curriculum (6th or 7th semester) to allow for a series of engagements.A fourth semester course had recently been redesigned to combine work methods and study withmanagerial engineering. The faculty decided to develop this course into an experiential coursewith significant laboratories and projects, all fostering the team approach
mechanisms to teach engineering design across campus borders, utilizingwell-developed case studies. Gay and Lentini (17) further describe the advancedcommunication resources used by students engaged in collaborative design activity.The use of the Internet has enabled both teachers and students to lessen the burden ofdisseminating and acquiring knowledge, according to Young (18). Even laboratoryexperiences can be enhanced through electronic media. Karweit (19) has created a virtualengineering laboratory on the World Wide Web for the students in his introductoryengineering class and others. Experiments in this simulated laboratory include one thatmeasures the rate of a hot object’s heat radiation, and one that enables students to designbridges that
Session 2532 Undergraduate Research Participation: Designing and Building a New Generation Beowulf-Class PC Cluster Nickolas S. Jovanovic, Zachary R. Kaufmann, Lance W. Laettner University of Arkansas at Little RockAbstractMassively parallel processors (MPP) are the laboratories for computational science andengineering. It is important for computational scientists and engineers to have a local platformfor developing, testing, and debugging MPP codes, so that computer time on large national-resource MPPs such as those at the national laboratories and NSF supercomputing centers can besecured and used
Session 2793 Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Production: Enhancing Engineering EducationThrough Team-based Multidisciplinary Projects Michael J. Batchelder, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Daniel F. Dolan, Mechanical Engineering Department Sriniviasa L. Iyer, Civil and Environmental Engineering Department South Dakota School of Mines and TechnologyAbstractThe role of engineers has changed in recent years from solitary designers in the laboratory to membersof teams that have to sell their ideas and work with customers. Engineering
. In particular, our program requires a substantial commitmentof faculty expertise, laboratory resources, and funding. Nonetheless, overcoming these inherentchallenges enables substantial student learning to occur. Our experience is that both grouplearning and independent thinking are enhanced, and that the curriculum provides first-handexperience in the development of aerospace technology.IntroductionAn ongoing challenge in engineering education is to provide students with meaningful design Page 5.533.1projects that help them synthesize what they have learned in the classroom and to better preparethem for their future careers. The United States
interfaces.Mainstream computer science education is well supported by journal articles on variousaspects of re-programmable hardware for educational purposes 6 and assembly language 7.Simulation has proved to be a very useful tool 8, 9, 10. Reid used laboratory workstations toallow undergraduate students to “build a complete, functioning computer - in simulation” 11.Pilgrim 12 took an alternative approach in which a very small computer was designed in classand breadboarded in the laboratory by students using small and medium scale TTL integratedcircuits. Thereby, according to Pilgrim, providing students with the “knowledge andexperience in the design, testing and integration of hardware and software for a smallcomputer system” 12. According to Parker and
Session 3202Learning More From Class Time: Technology Enhancement in the Classroom Marilyn J. Smith, Narayanan Komerath School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of TechnologyAbstractThe traditional classroom lectures in engineering do not permit professors or students to keeppace with technological changes within rapidly changing disciplines. By using technology, theclassroom lecture can be modified so that class time becomes a laboratory of learning andreinforcement through iteration and application. This approach is also very timely since itdirectly develops the engineering attributes set forth in ABET
. Page 5.478.1Our presentation is not intended to be a tutorial in the use of any one particular desktop UNIXenvironment. Rather, we are interested in the ability to accomplish our work on a variety ofsystems with (more-or-less) the same paradigm, with the added benefit that the product of ourwork can be shared easily with others through the use of portable code and architecture-independent file formats.BackgroundWe bring to this presentation a long familiarity of UNIX systems, having nearly 30 yearscombined experience with them between us. Our first exposures to the UNIX system began inthe mid-1980’s when one of us (DWF) went to work for AT&T Bell Laboratories where AT&TUNIX Version 7 ran on a timesharing DEC PDP 11/70; access to this
knowledge of physics.Alternatively it may be possible to introduce and reinforce basic physics concepts as part of theallocated workshop time. The CIM workshops could provide a laboratory space where studentscan gain hands-on practical physics experience of relevant physics concepts and a real lifecontext in which to learn. Approaches, which make use of a real life context, are increasinglybeing included in secondary school physics curricula as these are seen to make physics moreinteresting, relevant, accessible and useful to a wider range of students 14.Depending upon the topic, physics concepts might be taught and applied to the CIM context, orthe CIM context could be used to draw out the physics concepts to be studied. In both scenarios,the
. Page 5.35.2A simulation routine has been developed that uses the model given in equation (1) andintroduces random errors in measuring resistance and temperature. Errors have standarddeviation equal to instrument accuracy and have a zero mean. In the first case it wasassumed that resistance and temperature could be measured with uncertainty of 1miliOhm and 0. 1 °C respectively. To more realistically portray the experiment, tenmeasurements were taken at each temperature point [-30 °, 0 °C, 50 °C, 100°C]. This isthe level of accuracy easily achieved in a student laboratory. The results are plotted infigure 2. The obtained parameters, a, b, d and R0, as well as deviation from the modelsuggest that the equipment used is not adequate for such an
, Soil Mechanics and Foundations Engineering. He is involved in developing multimediacourses and has recently published a textbook on Soil Mechanics and Foundations that is accompanied by a CD-ROM that contains interactive animations of the basics topics, interactive problem solving, virtual laboratories,quizzes, etc. Professor Budhu received his BSc degree in Civil Engineering from the University of the West Indiesand his Ph.D from Cambridge University. Page 5.46.6
College of Engineering at The University of Akron. TheCo-op program at the University of Akron is one of the oldest in the country and has providedstudents with three semesters of hands-on experience and practical training in industry for manyyears. Students will be paired with industrial partners by area of interest and track. Thosestudents planning on continuing their education in graduate school or medical school will alsohave the opportunity to choose hospital or research laboratory internships to prepare them fortheir future endeavors.MARY C. VERSTRAETEMary C. Verstraete is an Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Biomedical Engineering. Dr.Verstraete received her BS, MS and Ph.D. in Engineering Mechanics/Biomechanics from
. Page 5.345.4JAMES C. WOODJames C. Wood has BS and MS degrees in physics from Clemson University and Ph. D. from the University ofVirginia in physics. He has seven year of research experience in laboratories for American Cynamid and TRW. Hehas 25 year teaching experience in physics and engineering technology at Tri-County Technical College. He iscurrent Division Chair of the Industrial and Engineering Technology Division and Co-PI for a statewide curriculumdevelopment grant for engineering technology.ELAINE L. CRAFTElaine L. Craft is Director and Principal Investigator for the SC ATE Center of Excellence as well as Co-PrincipalInvestigator for the SC ATE Exemplary Faculty Project, both National Science Foundation grants awarded to theSouth
, conversion of binary-coded decimal to decimal equivalence,manipulation of matrices, and demonstration of statistical concepts such as finding the mean, thevariance, and the standard deviation.AcknowledgmentsMicrosoft is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corporation.Mathcad is a trademark of Mathsoft incorporated.MAURICE FELIX ABURDENEMaurice F. Aburdene is the T. Jefferson Miers Professor of Electrical Engineering and Professor of ComputerScience at Bucknell University. He has also taught at Swarthmore College, State University of New York atOswego, and the University of Connecticut. Professor Aburdene was a project engineer and project manager at theBristol Company, a visiting research scientist at MIT’s Laboratory for Information and Decision
the University of Iowa and was instrumental in the development of theJohn Pappajohn Entrepreneurial Center. He has been closely associated with the Ewing Marion KauffmanFoundation as Entrepreneur in Residence and currently as Entrepreneurial Consultant. He was the secondrecipient of the Distinguished Owner-Manager Alumnus award from Indiana University. Ed is a PriceBabson Fellow and recipient of the Appel Prize for Entrepreneurial Leadership. His entrepreneurialcompanies cover a broad range of industries ranging from country clubs, equipment leasing, residentialcare, dental laboratories, primary health care, indoor sports facilities, real estate and dozens of other niches.He received an AB degree from Loras College, Dubuque, Iowa; and, a BA
MechanicalEngineering Technology (MET) Program at Central Washington University (CWU) has anumber of course requirements addressing technical writing, presentations and speaking.However, unlike Seat and Lord2, we have no course requirement dedicated to group skills andfurther integration at a program level. In CWU’s MET program almost all of the courses havesome in-situ laboratory work, and therefore an opportunity to build teamwork skills on anactivity level.Class ActivitiesFor a number of years we have known of different teaching and learning styles, in many waysbest defined by personal traits (e.g. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator3). Felder incorporateddifferent educational methods into his chemistry courses at North Carolina State University, andeventually took
program fun and intuitive. Thesecond was that the cost was within our budget limitations. The program is free to UniversityProfessors for use in the laboratory for students. There is a small fee for student to own their owncopy of the program. The program can be downloaded of the web for a free 30 day trial. Unlike somany “free” software packages the software is extremely well done and stable.To give you a small glimpse of the functions, student friendly help and explanations that areavailable to the student the following brief explanation is offered using the Determinate BeamModule. The student is first presented with a dialogue box and asked to select how the beam issupported. ( please refer to figure #2) The student then chooses length of the
. Ramachandran, “Modeling and Analysis of Linear Physical Systems”, Weber Systems Inc., January 1991.AcknowledgementThe authors thank Dr. Rama Bhat for helpful discussions during the preparation of the paper. Page 5.656.6BiographyRavi P. Ramachandran is an Associate Professor in the Department of Electrical and ComputerEngineering at Rowan University. He received his Ph.D. from McGill University in 1990 and hasworked at AT&T Bell Laboratories and Rutgers University prior to joining Rowan.V. Ramachandran is a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering atConcordia University. He received his Ph.D. from the Indian Institute of