Paper ID #219302018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Leveraging a NSF S-STEM grant to initiate ”PEEPS” (Program for Engi-neering Excellence for Partner Schools) for recruiting and retaining studentsfrom underrepresented groups while covertly transforming ourselves and ouruniversityDr. Katherine Chen, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Katherine C. Chen is the Executive Director of the STEM Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her
Paper ID #242572018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29A Leadership Collaborative Model: Fostering Community Through DiverseStudent Organization CollaborationsMs. Tricia S. Berry, University of Texas, Austin Tricia Berry, Director of the Women in Engineering Program (WEP) at The University of Texas at Austin, is responsible for leading the efforts on recruitment and retention of women in the Cockrell School of Engineering. She concurrently serves as Director of the Texas Girls Collaborative Project, connecting Texas organizations, companies and
Madison University.Dr. Catherine T. Amelink, Virginia Tech Dr. Amelink is Director of Graduate Programs and Assessment in the College of Engineering, Virginia Tech. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Engineering Education and Educa- tional Leadership and Policy Studies at Virginia Tech.Ms. Mayra S Artiles , Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Mayra S. Artiles is a Ph.D. student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She has a B.S. in Mechan- ical Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and an M.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University with a focus on nanotechnology. Before her joining the Ph.D. program, she worked at Ford Motor Company as an
Region D Chair for the National Association for Multicultural Engineering Program Advo- cates (NAMEPA). Enrique graduated from the Cockrell School of Engineering with a Civil Engineering degree and pursued industry experience for seven years where he held positions such as Project Engineer, Lead University Recruiter, Logistics Engineer, Cost Engineer and Project Manager.Ms. Tricia S. Berry, University of Texas, Austin Tricia Berry, Director of the Women in Engineering Program (WEP) at The University of Texas at Austin, is responsible for leading the efforts on recruitment and retention of women in the Cockrell School of Engineering. She concurrently serves as Director of the Texas Girls Collaborative Project, connecting
experiences, and criterion-based course structures.Dr. Robin McCann, Shippensburg UniversityDr. Alice Armstrong, Shippensburg UniversityDr. Bilita S. Mattes, STEM-UP Network at Harrisburg University of Science and Technology Dr. Mattes is the Executive Director (and founding member) of the STEM-UP Network, a social enterprise powered by Harrisburg University of Science and Technology. STEM-UP is a community that supports women in STEM to persist, thrive and advance. She also serves as the Provost and Chief Academic Officer at the Harrisburg University. She has 25 years of experience with leadership roles in higher education to include responsibilities such as program development, faculty development, and academic outreach and
in engineering.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the assistant director for research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. His research interests include co-curricular support, student success and retention, and diversity. Lee received his Ph.D in engineering education from Virginia Tech, his M.S. in industrial & systems engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dr. Jeremi S London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor of Engineering at Arizona State University in the
Paper ID #21493Examining the Computing Identity of High-Achieving Underserved Comput-ing Students on the Basis of Gender, Field, and Year in SchoolMs. Atalie GarciaDr. Monique S. Ross, Florida International University Monique Ross, Assistant Professor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences at Florida In- ternational University, holds a doctoral degree in engineering education from Purdue University. Her research interests are focused on broadening participation in computing and engineering through the ex- ploration of: 1) race, gender, and identity; and 2) discipline-based education research in order to inform
College of Engineering. Dr. Allen believes in a collaborative, student-centered approach to research, education and academic administration and leadership. She currently serves on the ASEE Engineering Deans Council Executive Board, the ABET Academic Affairs Council, and chairs the ABET Task Force on Diversity and Inclusion.Dr. Paul S Nerenberg, California State University, Los Angeles Dr. Paul S. Nerenberg is currently an Assistant Professor in the Departments of Physics & Astronomy and Biological Sciences at California State University, Los Angeles. He received his PhD in Physics from MIT and has a strong interest in improving the quality of introductory physics education, particularly for students who enter
theproportional representation issue does not actually create an inclusive environment supportive ofstudent success [5-7]. Just as equality does not equal equity [8]; parity does not equal inclusion[6, 9]. Hurtado and colleagues (2012) pointed out how compositional diversity is only one factorin creating a diverse learning environment [10]. Efforts designed to increase compositionaldiversity neglect the experiences and different combinations of barriers that individuals mustconfront. "Underrepresented" could also be considered a form of spot-lighting, of continuouslyreminding students that each of them is a "representative" for their social identity group(s) [11].This socially-taxing language reminds individuals that their group is judged by the
/publications/tracking-transfer-institutional-state-effectiveness.html, 2016.6. T. Bailey, “Can community colleges achieve ambitious graduation goals?”, in Getting to Graduation: The Completion Agenda in Higher Education, A. P. Kelly & M. Schneider Eds. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012, pp. 73-101.7. B. L. Yoder, “Engineering by the numbers,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2017.8. Bureau of Labor Statistics: U.S. Department of Labor, “Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity,” 2015. Available: http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.htm.9. National Science Foundation, “How many S&E graduates attended community college?”, 2016. Available: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb
cooperative learningreduction strategies. teams on student achievement and race relations: This review of the literature is the beginning of a larger Treatment by race interactions," Sociology of Education,project focused on creating fairer peer assessments by pp. 174-180, 1981.teaching students techniques to address their own biases. Withthis knowledge of where bias exists and the strategies used to [8] L. Springer, M. E. Stanne, & S. S. Donovan, “Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science,mitigate it, the research team will develop a comprehensive
. 28 References[i]Bennett,J.&Hogarth,S.(2009).Wouldyouwanttotalktoascientistataparty?Highschool students'attitudestoschoolscienceandtoscience.InternationalJournalofScience Education,31(14),1975–1998.[ii]Britner,S.L.(2008).Motivationinhighschoolsciencestudents:acomparisonofgender differencesinlife,physical,andearthscienceclasses.JournalofResearchinScience Teaching,45(8),955–970.[iii]Brotman,J.S.&Moore,F.M.(2008).Girlsandscience:areviewoffourthemesinthe scienceeducationliterature.JournalofResearchinScienceTeaching,45(9),971–1002.[iv]Miller,P.H.,Blessing,J.S.,&Schwarz,S.(2006).Genderdifferencesinhigh-school
stereotypes regarding AfricanAmericans academic capabilities, their numerical majority status within the HBCU context actsas a buffer enabling them to perceive their racial and professional identity as compatible andintegrated. On the contrary, the numerical minority status of African American engineeringstudents in PWI exacerbates their vulnerability to feel threatened by the negative stereotypesabout their group. Even as they struggle to maintain a positive ethnic identity, they question thecompatibility between their ethnic and professional identities. As Du Bois states, it is the tensionthat impedes “fluid participation in Black world(s) and white world(s)”. It is for this reason thatAfrican American engineering students in PWIs may struggle more
experiencescontributed to understanding how we might think to make the teaching of engineering, andspecifically problem definition, in K-12 settings more inclusive. Overall, these findings add tothe growing conversation inclusive classroom environments, that make more explicit connectionbetween youths’ out of school knowledge and practices in school settings.Works Cited[1] S. Sismondo, An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies, 2 edition. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K. ; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.[2] G. Goggin, Cell Phone Culture: Mobile Technology in Everyday Life. Routledge, 2012.[3] B. Latour and S. Woolgar, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage, 1986.[4] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L
communication pedagogy. Communication Education, 61, 80‑88. DOI:10.1080/03634523.2011.632017Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187-1218.Chase, S. E. (2018). Narrative inquiry: Toward theoretical and methodological maturity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. (pp. 546-560). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Dugan, J. P
? race/ethnicity), conference information, and motivation for attending a non-technical conference. Selection of awardees wasB. Data Collection and Assessment Instruments student level-blind (graduate or undergraduate), race/ethnicity- This study presents data collected during a span of two years, blind, and based on responses to three questions: (1) Pleasewith four collection periods: Spring 2016, Fall 2016, Spring indicate why you would like to attend the conference(s), (2)2017, and Fall 2017. For each collection period, participants Please indicate how you plan to fully utilize the conference(s)completed an application form, conference pre-survey, and
measure several factors related to how students felt about their place in the engineeringcommunity, their attitudes towards engineering, and their perceptions about their future inengineering. In this study, we examined survey data for a subset of the population, first-generationcollege students. Students were asked to indicate their parents’ level of education, and those whoreported both parents/guardians obtained “less than a high school diploma,” “high schooldiploma/GED,” or “some college or associate/trade degree” were classified as first-generationcollege students. Students who reported parent(s)/guardian(s) completed a “bachelor’s degree” or“master’s degree or higher” were classified as continuing-generation college students. Of the
, ongoing evaluation and tracking should guide recruitment and retention initiatives, and institutional support is needed to implement significant and sustainable changes in other areas.Below, we first present recent outcome data supporting the effectiveness of ES-UP’s approach.Then, we describe the individual components of the NCWIT ES-UP Systemic Change model andrelevant practices for recruiting and retaining undergraduate women. Specific examples fromsuccessful ES-UP client departments are highlighted.SUPPORT FOR THE ES-UP SYSTEMIC CHANGE MODELES-UP provides client department(s) with a trained consultant who assists with the developmentand implementation of a strategic plan that addresses all components of the systemic changemodel
of articles drawn from a wider array ofdatabases. Additionally, the study should evaluate articles cited by those already in the QSR,incorporating those articles that meet the QSR protocol criterion for inclusion in the study.Finally, the revised study should develop and subsequently incorporate a means to assess therelative degree each article reflects each factor identified in the study (i.e., identification,environment, capitals, processes). References[1] L. status and tre Musu-Gillette, J. Robinson, J. McFarland, A. KewalRamani, A. Zhang, and S. Wilkinson-Flicker, "Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2016," U.S. Department of Education, National Center for
into the teamthat most interested them. Youth thrived on having a specific goal and a set of team members towork with. “The valuable components that were important to me was [sic] having a specificgroup, which was the media team, because that is what I wanted more experience with. I feltmore comfortable being with that team since I already had some experience as a film editor.”This focus did mean, however, that youth had limited opportunities to learn skills not within theirtrack. One said s/he wished they had the chance to work more with the general visiting public atthe Hall while another wished for more time to explore computer programming
,this is not a problem that can be completely written off. Instead, the results presented here point to theneed for further in-depth, multi-institution studies to determine the extent of mental health andwellness issues in engineering programs nation-wide, and how engineering programs can best servetheir students’ mental health and wellness needs. We are in the process of seeking funding to conductsuch a nation-wide study.ReferencesBlanco, C., Okuda, M., Wright, C., Hasin, D. S., Grant, B. F., Liu, S.-M., & Olfson, M. (2008). Mental Health of College Students and Their Non–College-Attending PeersResults From the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Archives of General Psychology, 65(12), 1429
, is beingundertaken in order to provide an `inside out` view of their experience. These interviews will allow usto tell many stories – perhaps more importantly, a story that details the many different things we aredoing in order to produce sustainable change for our many constituents.References[1] C. Hill, C. Corbett, and A. St. Rose, Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: American Association of University Women (AAUW), 2010.[2] S. Ceci, W. Williams, and S. Barnett, “Women’s Underrepresentation in Science: Sociocultural and Biological Considerations,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 218–261, 2009.[3] J. Hyde, S. Lindberg, M. Linn, and C. Williams, “Gender Similarities
support diverse studentsappropriately. Faculty should be engaged in supporting these diverse students beyond theirteaching role, including academic advising, coaching and mentoring, social status checks, andmore. Furthermore, faculty involved in these roles should be supported and rewarded, as theywould be for other important campus initiatives. Nonetheless, there are some challenges with thisapproach since research has shown that women and minority faculty typically already have aheavier service load and more diversity responsibilities than do their peers. Berry & Walter [2] describe an NSF S-STEM a mentoring and professional skills programdeveloped to increase the recruitment, retention and development of URM in STEM fields
Study of Engineering Students' Self-Efficacy by Gender, Ethnicity, Year, and Transfer Status. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2009;18(2):163-72.9. Concannon JP, Barrow LH. Men's and Women's Intentions to Persist in Undergraduate Engineering Degree Programs. Journal of Science Education and Technology. 2010;19(2):133- 45.10. Shull PJ, Weiner M. Thinking inside the box: Self-efficacy of women in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Education. 2002;18(4):438-46.11. Roald Hoffmann, Saundra Y McGuire. Learning and Teaching Strategies. American Scientist. 2010 September 1,;98(5):378.12. McGuire SY, McGuire S, Angelo T. Teach Students How to Learn : Strategies You Can Incorporate Into Any Course to Improve
] A. Pawley, “Learning from small numbers” of underrepresented students’ stories: Discussing a method to learn about institutional structure through narrative,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2013.[6] D. Dutta, “Sustaining the pipeline: Experiences of international female engineers in U.S. graduate programs,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 326–344, 2015.[7] S. Gibson and M. Espino, “ Uncovering black womanhood in engineering,” NASPA Journal About Women in Higher Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 56–73, 2016.[8] S. Davis, S. Nolen, N. Cheon, and E. Moise, “Investigating factors related to disciplinary identification and persistence in
doctorate is in Curriculum and Instruction, focusing on higher education teaching of STEM fields, she also holds B.S. and M.A. degrees in Mathematics. Dr. Hensel has over seven years of experience working in engineer- ing teams and in project management and administration as a Mathematician and Computer Systems Analyst for the U. S. Department of Energy as well as more than 25 years teaching mathematics, statis- tics, computer science, and freshman engineering courses in higher education institutions. Currently, she leads a team of faculty who are dedicated to providing first year engineering students with a high-quality, challenging, and engaging educational experience with the necessary advising, mentoring, and
. Winter has worked with major NSF initiatives (e.g., ADVANCE, HBCU-UP, S STEM) since 2003. KWE is the external evaluator for the AAC&U Project Kaleidoscope (PKAL) initiative, Metacommunity for Broadening Par- ticipation; AAC&U PKAL’s Undergraduate STEM Education Reform (USER) project; and two five-year long consortia-based projects funded by the U.S. Dept. of Education (a FITW and an HSI-STEM). KWE’s areas of evaluation expertise include diversity in STEM, college student access and retention, professional development for faculty, and institutional cultural change. Dr. Winter is a member of the American Evaluation Association (AEA) and the European Evaluation So- ciety (EES), adheres to AEA professional and
)haveworkedcollaborativelytoimproveinstructionmethodsusedinsevengatewaySTEMcoursesidentifiedtohavehighfailureratesacrossthecampuses.Theflippedclassroommodelisbeingphasedinoverthreeyearsonthecampusesthroughcollaborativeeffortsbyfacultytodevelopmaterialstosupportknowledgeacquisitionoutsideofclasstimeandengagestudentsinhigher-orderapplicationssuchasproblemsolvingandpeerinstructionduringclasstime.Resultsshowincreasedpassratesforstudentsinmostflippedclassroomsectionswhencomparedtosectionstaughtwithtraditionalmethods.FirstsemesterresultsforYear2coursesindicatingapositiveimpactonstudentachievement,thoughresultsarepreliminaryandwillbevalidatedwithfurtherdatacollectioninsubsequentsemesters.Grantactivitiesarecurrentlyfocusedondevelopingcoursematerialsfor3additionalgatewaycourses,conductinganextensivestudyontheinfluenceofflippedclassroompedagogyinCalculusIcourses,andcreatingacultureofchangeacrossthecampusesbyprovidingtrainingandfundingforfacultyinsupportoftheirdevelopmentofflippedclassroommaterialsinavarietyofSTEMcourses. This project is supported through the First in the World Program at SJSU which is funded through theU.S. Department of Education (P116F150112) 1 Department of Education. First in the World Program. https://www2.ed.gov/programs/fitw/index.html2 SJSU’s Four Pillars of Student Success. http://www.sjsu.edu/provost/docs/Student_Success_Plan_5-5-16.pdf3 Flumerfelt, S., & Green, G. (2013). Using lean in the flipped
. 2, pp. 172– 209, 2011.[12] E. Litzler, P. N. Mody-Pan, and S. G. Brainard, “Intersections of gender and race in engineering education,” 118th ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. June 26, 2011 - June 29, 2011, 2011.[13] M. J. Bruning, J. Bystydzienski, and M. Eisenhart, “Intersectionality as a Framework for Understanding Diverse Young Women’s Commitment to Engineering,” J. Women Minor. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2015.[14] D. J. Mitchell, C. Y. Simmons, and L. A. Greyerbiehl, Eds., Intersectionality & Higher Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2014.[15] M. A. Armstrong and J. Jovanovic, “Starting at the Crossroads: Intersectional Approaches to Institutionally Supporting Underrepresented Minority Women STEM
outreach programs at WPI including Camp Reach and several other summer and academic year programs for students and parents.Mrs. Ryan Nicole Meadows, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Ryan Meadows holds a B.S. in Mathematics and Business from Fitchburg State University and an M.A. in Teaching from Sacred Heart University. She is currently the Associate Director of Pre-collegiate Outreach Programs at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. Meadows works with K-12 S STEM outreach programs during the summer and academic year. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Comparison of Changes in Science Interest and Identity and 21st Century Learning Skills in a Mixed-Gender and Single-Gender Robotics