Paper ID #242422018 CoNECD - The Collaborative Network for Engineering and ComputingDiversity Conference: Crystal City, Virginia Apr 29Insights on Diversity and Inclusion from Reflective Experiences of DistinctPathways to and through Engineering EducationDr. Ann F. McKenna, Arizona State University Dr. Ann F. McKenna is a Professor of Engineering and Director of the Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Prior to joining ASU, she served as a program director at the National Science Foundation in the Division of Undergraduate Education. She received her B.S. and M.S
year 3Background and Context• STEM Teaching Fellowship: – Teachers apply in school teams of 3-4; typical composition includes both science and mathematics teachers, mostly middle school – Three main strands: STEM Integration, Core Teaching Practices, Schoolwide STEM Strategic Plan 4Background and Context• Approach to STEM Integration Strand – Experience STEM integration as learners – Reflect and unpack as educators – Introduce tools, strategies, and templates to empower teaching fellows to engage their students in STEM Integration• Summer 1: Platform Design• Summer 2: Flint Experience
oppression and encouraged to reflect on their own location withinstructures of power and privilege. Critical pedagogies are particularly useful in challengingparticipants to explore structural inequities within the university, to examine how policies,procedures, and practices have been constructed in ways that reproduce hierarchy anddominance, and to imagine a transformed future in which institutional structures and individualbehaviors are socially just. This paper describes two types of transformative learning practicesthat have been found particularly effective in helping ADVANCE seminar participants meetlearning outcomes: critical imagery and messaging analysis, and the theatre of the oppressed.Specific examples of each type of transformative
Our intent is to explore student reflection and outcomes of service-learning throughqualitative methodology. We utilized narrative inquiry through large descriptive data sets(Denzin & Lincoln, 2018). Qualitative methods allowed us to review student narratives andunderstand reflective processes (Chase, 2018). The goal of this study was to examine studentexperiences and their reflection of material to better communicate outcomes and benefits ofenrolling in a service-learning course.A WiSE approach: Examining how service-learning impacts first-year women in STEM 7 We instituted purposeful random sampling (Light, Singer, & Willett, 1990) to recruitcollege women in STEM, enrolled in a service-learning leadership
Timeline - Teaching Canvas class management system • Weekly attendance required • Group Presentation – What is an REU? • Project Presentations - Beginning of the semester – introduction of project - End of semester – final presentation • Research Poster • Faculty Interview • Reflective Questions • Final PaperManaging Expectations• Introductory program – not curing cancer• Many different forms/types/settings for research work• Important to be flexible & open to the experienceStudent Learning Outcomes Teamwork Presentation Self-confidence Skills Social Flexibility interaction Time
synthesizing results into a theory for climate change. Afternoons arespent in explicit metacognitive reflection, learning about a variety of affective and metacognitiveconcepts that affect learning. By hosting the field school concurrently with the IMPRESS summerexperience, participants could engage in a hands-on experience with logistical and ethical aspectsof classroom video data collection and management, as they pursued research questions ofinterest.Given the distributed nature of the ongoing research after the field school, participation in thismodel is targeted at high autonomy individuals and groups, who are often somewhat isolated attheir home institutions. Over four years, the number of participants has grown each year from sixin 2014 to
. The missionunderpinning all efforts at the United States Coast Guard Academy is to produce officerready Leaders of Character. As defined by our institution, a Leader of Character is “aleader who embodies the Coast Guard values and influences and inspires others toachieve a goal by seeking to discover the truth, deciding what is right, and demonstratingthe courage to act accordingly… always”. During this 200-week experience, cadets learnto lead self and to lead others using the LEAD model. Learn from Theory. Experience through Practice. Analyze using Reflection. Deepen understanding through Mentoring.The LEAD model emphasizes four components that enhance holistic leader developmentand contribute to developing Leaders of Character. LEAD
into ourseminars. Though it was a relatively new practice for Virtus students in the seminars, we sought 4to focus on facilitating class discussion and dialogue around each topic, encouraging students toengage in reflection and critical thinking. Through this piloting process we were able to strengthen our partnerships across campusand our exposure and access to relevant resources. This contributed to our building foundationalresources in the content area of diversity and inclusion in engineering and beginning toimplement this content into our class seminars. Throughout the semester, the instructors of theFlexus and Virtus seminars worked
Office representatives came over to meet with the students and parents to explain them the admission procedure and the financial aid opportunities for eligible students. Program Evaluation, Effectiveness, and Survey Results Daily and program surveys were conducted to assess the effectiveness of miniGEMS 2016. An overall understanding of the skills needed to be an engineer were reflected in the answers on the daily surveys, the lab notebooks, the final essay and presentation, miniGEMS summative survey, and results from the post-survey data. The daily surveys provided quality control daily and allowed immediate corrective actions, if necessary. An interesting outcome from the daily surveys was the importance of having
our institution. We have alsoanalyzed the impacts bias and stereotyping on student learning, student experience and sense ofbelonging, as well as on team productivity. Our findings, consistent with Meadows et al. (2015)and Wolfe et al. (2016), showed that women and students of color experience higher rates ofhaving their ideas ignored or shut down, having their voices silenced, being assigned work tasksdeemed less valuable, having to deal with a domineering teammate, and having their work gounacknowledged or credit stolen by another teammate (Pfeifer and Stoddard, 2018).In the quote below, a white female student at our institution reflects on what Meadows et al(2015) have identified as, ‘task assignment bias’, when students assign themselves
: “You just got [the scholarship] becausethey’re looking for girl engineers.” She responded: “I thought it was my hard work that got methe scholarship. I never thought that it was because I was female until he made that comment. Ithought it was just because ‘oh hey, look at me’ and then he said that and it made me feel badabout it.” While these types of responses were rare for soon-to-be graduating students, they weremore common in focus groups of students entering our programs.High sense of belonging, acknowledgment of privilege, power and oppression. The other half ofresponses from students who identify along social identity categories that are centered in USculture also reflected a strong sense of belonging in CBEE, but this group
well as experienced professionals. A seasoned leader and former high school special education teacher, Meeropol reorganized and restructured NSBE’s Programs Division to reflect strategic priorities and make better use of resources. Through its programming, NSBE strives to increase the number of black engineers graduating from college each year and to make Engineering a mainstream word in homes and communities of color. Prior to NSBE, Meeropol served as Assistant Superintendent for Postsecondary & Career Education for the District of Columbia.c American Society for There he oversaw theEngineering $35M/year Education
ofthe summer training. Although the majority strongly agreed (45.2%) or agreed (45.2%) with thepace, 7.7% thought the training session might have been too long. To address this potentialissue, a preliminary interest survey for the 2018 professional development workshop askedapplicants if they prefer a two-week training with weekends free or a delivery of nine days in arow. The results were split, and therefore the 2018 training will be delivered in the sametimeframe but with additional sessions for reflection. Table 3. ACADEME Fellows perceptions of the quality of the professional development workshop Statement % % Agree % Strongly
) Facilitated Discussion with Attendees – Attendees will have the opportunity to reflect on presented findings. Guided questions will be used to facilitate discussion on how attendees can implement the findings to better understand and support Black women in academic and professional STEM environments. (10 minutes) Debrief and Resources – Presenters will summarize the discussion by highlighting key points and provide resources for content and continued connection.Reference1. U.S. Department of Education National Center of Educational Statistics: National Studyof America: Indicators of Social and Economic well-Being. Retrieved on August, 28, 2014 fromhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cwg/data-on-women.
tenure; and (iii) the professional development of faculty and staff. The intent ofthe first two is to promote more equitable, inclusive, and just advancement of tenured and tenure-track faculty. The intent of the third is to promote a college climate that reflects a shared valuefor equity, inclusion, and justice among all employment sectors. As summarized below, readyaccess to excellent guidance on best practices for search and selection processes and for properapplication of promotion and tenure criteria, suggest a straightforward path toward progress onthose fronts. Progress on the third is achievable, but even with access to very useful resourcesacross campus, we have found that path will likely require considerably more creative
, visualization tools for system administrators, virtualized help desk systems for small busi- nesses, and reflective social media systems. He has served as a Program Director for Human-Centered Computing at the National Science Foundation. He earned his M.S. and Ph.D. in Information and Com- puter Science from the University of California, Irvine and his B.A. in both Cognitive Science and History from Connecticut College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Dr. Susan McDonough, UMBC Susan McDonough is Associate Professor of History at UMBC. She is a historian of gender and her 1Recruiting
andServices Administration funds the Nursing Workforce Diversity (NWD) program with the goalof increasing access to culturally competent nursing that is reflective of the diversity of thecommunities in which they serve; this program assists students from disadvantaged backgroundsto obtain nursing credentials [18]. A successful component of many NWD programs includespairing future nurses with mentors who come from similar backgrounds; the ‘like me’nomenclature is an example of the value of cross-discipline knowledge transfer in terms ofoverall discourse. The nursing field differs in many ways from engineering or computer science,however needs related to underrepresented populations are very similar and knowledge aboutwhat works should be transferred
[30,31] at its core, has commented on how radical it was to see women in the fieldbeen developed for the matching problem. A functional of Computer Science.”prototype has also been designed for a web application. B. Student self-reflection CS knowledge surveyFluotify: The goal of this project is to develop a cell We have surveyed PINC students’ self-reflection ontracking program for 3D images of tissue samples. Such a content knowledge. Even though we observed studentsprogram can drastically improve our understanding of cell
influence – often negatively – their pursuit of careers in engineering and computerscience [2], [5]–[9].While at one time, computer science was seen as a profession that was both welcoming and open todiverse membership [10]–[15], this vision was either never realized or quickly lost [16]–[19]. Culturaland gendered expectations (what everybody `knows` and commonsensically `performs`, but fewactually think about) that have been part of the lived reality of this technological society seem to havefound their way into computer science, and it is not working in everybody’s favor. Faced with claimsthat computer science’s `face` as stereotypically white or Asian, and male, is somehow reflective of asort of evolutionary inevitability – `that’s just the way
/staff partnerships to a) develop more accurate and richer explanations for patterns of student recruitment, retention, and graduation at Cal Poly; b) enact change to better support student success; and c) evaluate and reflect on efforts to enact change.This work was strongly informed by a then-active Cal Poly collaboration [2011-14] with theUSC Center for Urban Education (CUE), which encouraged the institution, as a whole, to shiftfrom a “focus on students” as the problem to “institutional accountability.”In the 6 months following the PLC (prior to 11/1/2012), participants had submitted three grantproposals to address PLC findings and leverage collaborative relationships that were developedvia PLC participation
reflect on the atrocities that led to the racial unrest in 1943, and the deindustrializationthat precipitated the racial tumult during the summer of 1967. Both events are inconspicuousaspects of Detroit’s past, that have direct connections to bringing about its current state. I dowhat I do because unfortunately Detroit is not an anomaly in regard to other predominantly blackurban cities. True democracy depends on individuals collectively toiling to secure justice andequitable living conditions for these resource-forsaken communities. I consider diversity to be a synonym for difference or variety, appearing incharacterizations of opinion, religion, race, or any other classification of something or someone.Given the history of monolithic
active interest in these areas when in high school. For both Tech- and CS-persistergroups, computing interest decreased from high school to college, but tech majors’ interestdecreased less than did non-tech majors. It is somewhat counterintuitive to see lower ratings inInterest for both groups when they reach college. This is most likely a reflection of loss of 9interest in the individual items that make up the composite such as gaming or game design orhardware, for instance. This interest shift coupled with the specialization that takes place in CSor IT majors may account for the overall decreased interest we observed. It makes sense thatstudents who choose a specialized major focused on
discovered that students were not only eager to talk to us, butalso very articulate and self-reflecting about their experiences. The WPI Alliance, astudent organization of LGBTQ people and allies, whose main focus is to discuss andeducate the community about themes related to sexual identity and orientation, averagesabout 25 students at each weekly meeting, with about 50 attending multiple meetingsover the course of the year; at least seven of these, including the past president of theAlliance, are transgender students. Many other openly LGBTQ students are not affiliatedwith the Alliance because they have found a community of other LGBTQ students andallies in other organizations with different focuses. LGBTQ students are heavilyrepresented at some
- orative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), is a dynamic interdisciplinary team that brings together professors, graduate, and undergraduate students from engineering, art, educational psychology, and social work in the context of fundamental educational research. Dr. Walther’s research program spans interpretive research methodologies in engineering edu- cation, the professional formation of engineers, the role of empathy and reflection in engineering learning, and student development in interdisciplinary and interprofessional spaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 New Directions from Theory: Implications for Diversity
combination of the literatureand relevant survey responses. Our future work will involve rigorously evaluating our interventions todetermine which interventions are most effective in supporting female engineers to graduation as wepursue our long-term goal of empowering students to take charge of their own learning and persist tograduation.To support dissemination of the results to our colleagues, we have established a faculty learningcommunity within the College of Engineering to reflect on teaching methodologies, share best practices,and conduct peer observations. As we measure which interventions are most effective in supportingfemale engineers to graduation, we will have an immediate cohort of engineering instructors withwhom we can deploy the
of three major parts: inquiry-based lecturing, in-class activities,and reflection, as is shown in Figure 7.The inquiry-based lecturing time was mainly spent on learning theory. The whole learning process wasguided by a series of logically connected questions to strengthen students’ critical thinking and learningabilities. To raise student’s interest and keep students engaged throughout the class, videos anddemonstrations of real-world applications were used. Figure 7. Basic structure of classThe classes usually started with an animated cartoon, a movie or a problem, and then questions relatedto the scene or problem are posed to students, leading them into thinking about the concepts involved(Figure 8
example,between the years 2000 and 2015, the percentage of engineering bachelor’s degrees earned byHispanics has increased from 5.8% to 10.7%, while the percentage for African Americans hasdeclined from 5.6% to 4.0% (Gibbons, 2009; Yoder, 2016). If the goal is to achieve parity inrepresentation that reflects national demographics, this lack of progress is problematic. For thisreason, African Americans are the minority group that is of most interest in this study.In pursuit of progress, many national and university-based efforts have focused on increasingthe number of African American men and women in STEM, in general, and engineering andcomputer science, specifically. For example, universities with Minority Engineering Programshave an explicit
, negatively impact the instructors [10]. Assessments can foster the development ofway people perceive members of disadvantaged groups. autonomy and maturity, as well as improve social andUnfortunately, biases often extend into the classroom professional skills [11]. The process also encourages self-environment [1], [2]. In one academic year, 38% of professors reflection and deeper understanding of the material, whichsurveyed perceived an act of bias in their classes [2]. In small may lead to improved retention and confidence [12]. Givengroup learning classrooms, these biases have been shown to the increasing prevalence of small group learning and amanifest in many ways
Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Research in SEAD Education at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech Denise R. Simmons, Ph.D., PE, LEED-AP, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Con- struction and in the Department of Civil & Environmental
) I can succeed (earn an A or B) in an advanced engineering 5.66 (1.30) course.C. Participants Participants in the study were students who identified as engineering majors in theirjunior or senior year of study at the urban research institution. The majority of participantsidentified as male (81%) and nearly three-quarters of participants identified as White (74%);these proportions are reflective of the engineering student population at the institution. Transferstudents comprised a little over half of the sample (55%), with a plurality of students reportingthat neither parent had obtained a college degree (38%). Based on lack of racial/ethnic diversityin the sample, researchers did not examine differences in