Paper ID #23078Work in Progress: Developing a Multi-dimensional Method for Student As-sessment in Chemical Engineering Laboratory CoursesDr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Dr. Heather Chenette, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Heather Chenette is an
Paper ID #21300Work in Progress: Integrating Process Safety and Ethics in Classroom Dis-cussion through SurveysDr. Reginald E Rogers Jr, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Reginald Rogers is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Rochester In- stitute of Technology. His research focuses on the use of carbon nanomaterials for water treatment and sodium-ion battery applications. Dr. Rogers has been recognized for his teaching, research, and service efforts through numerous invited seminars and awards. Notable awards include the 2015 Partner of the Year Award from RIT’s Multicultural Center for
Paper ID #21146Work in Progress: Content Validation of an Engineering Process Safety Decision-making Instrument (EPSRI)Brittany Lynn ButlerDr. Daniel D. Anastasio, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Daniel Anastasio is an assistant professor at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He received a B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Connecticut in 2009 and 2015, respectively. His primary areas of research are game-based learning in engineering courses and membrane separations for desalination and water purification.Prof. Daniel D. Burkey, University of Connecticut Daniel Burkey is the Associate
Paper ID #23558Assessment of a Global Engineering Outreach CourseDr. Randy S. Lewis, Brigham Young University Dr. Randy S. Lewis is professor at Brigham Young University (BYU). He received his B.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from BYU and Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively. He currently serves as chair of the Education and Accreditation Committee of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and as an ABET commissioner for accrediting engineering programs. He previously served in several national positions of AIChE. His research interests include biomaterials development, engineering
-author Dr. Christina Smith, she now is a Visiting Professor of Mathematics Education at Portland State University.Dr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. His research interests particularly focus on what prevents students from being able to integrate and extend the knowledge
engineering student at the University of Toledo. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Building spreadsheet skills using an interactive textbookAbstractPerforming an Internet search on the term “spreadsheet training” returns over 40,000,000 results.However, most of these training websites include static content or videos demonstrating how touse a certain version of a specific spreadsheet program, usually Microsoft Excel, Google Sheets,or Apple Numbers. Here, a new interactive textbook from zyBooks provides a technology toactively learn how to create and program a spreadsheet. Since many formulas, functions, andfeatures of spreadsheets are common across platforms and versions, spreadsheet
Working Group for the ASEE Chapter at the University of Arizona. In his ”free time” he enjoys rock climbing.Dr. Kasi Kiehlbaugh, University of Arizona Dr. Kasi Kiehlbaugh is primarily interested in incorporating research-based pedagogical techniques into the undergraduate engineering classroom, and she focuses on employing active learning techniques and utilizing collaborative learning space classrooms. More specifically, her work examines how co-teaching, classroom technologies, active learning in the classroom, and various classroom-based affective inter- ventions targeted at fostering self-efficacy, belongingness, metacognitive learning strategies, and growth mindset affect outcomes such as student retention and
Student c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Quantifying self-guided repetition within an interactive textbook for a material and energy balances courseAbstractInteractive technology has quickly integrated into daily lives through handheld electronics and theInternet. Here, an interactive textbook replacement from zyBooks for a material and energybalances course has been used in recent years. While features of the interactive textbook werehighlighted previously, including animations replacing figures and question sets in lieu of largeblocks of text, student usage will be the focus of this contribution. Similarly, reading
has been slow to implement this technology. The core sciences (biologyand chemistry, specifically) seem to be implementing electronic notebooks in both research andacademic laboratories already. One of the more recent publications shows the Chemistrydepartment at Fairfield University successfully implementing a cloud-based and smartphone-based digital electronic notebook using Evernote software [4]. However, very few articles havebeen found implementing an electronic lab notebook in an engineering undergraduate course.Harvey Mudd College compared paper and electronic notebook usage in their undergraduateexperimental engineering course, which covers multiple engineering disciplines [5]. Theirresults did not show any marked improvements using
ethics (50%) and broader impacts (46%). Graduate student ESI education wasperceived to be even weaker; 76% rated ethics education insufficient and 74% rated broaderimpacts education insufficient. At the median, chemical engineering faculty identified threedifferent types of courses where they believed undergraduate students in their program learnedabout ESI, most commonly capstone design (72%). Over half of the chemical engineeringinstructors reported teaching safety, professional practice issues, engineering decisions underuncertainty, environmental protection issues, sustainability, ethical failures, and the societalimpacts of technology in their courses. The survey and follow-up interviews with three chemicalengineering faculty members
it is not equivalent to a four-year degree in chemical engineering, the courseaims to furnish students with sufficient background to successfully undertake graduate classesoffered by a chemical engineering program. This course will also provide a suitable option foremployees in technical fields who desire understanding of core chemical engineering concepts.Using information technology and multimedia tools, short topic modules have been designedwhich use video lectures, worked screencasts of example problems and homework solutions, andconceptual testing instruments. Students will be able to communicate and discuss their ideas andproblems using live and archived group chat-room applications to practice working in aninteractive group work
effective for a time;however, they did not address changes in technology or on-line resources that have more recentlybecome available and widely used. Moreover, the scenario-based videos were limited in scope toa single course in a single engineering discipline which restricted their overall utility across thecurriculum. Recent observations by the authors and input from current undergraduate studentsidentified new scenarios that needed to be addressed, including cheating in laboratory courses,cheating in project-based courses, and cheating on exams. Student Conduct professionals furtheroffered suggestions on the commentary provided by the video’s narrator to establish context forthe scenarios. This work in progress presents the updated set of
October, 2013. He is presently a co PI on the NSF IUSE: Affordable Desktop Learning Modules to Facilitate Transformation in Undergraduate Engineering Classes, High School Recruitment and Retention.Mr. Fanhe Shamus Meng, Washington State University Mr. Fanhe Meng received his B.S in school of materials science and engineering in Nanjing University of Science and Technology. He is working towards a PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering in Washington State University. He has been involved in fabricating low cost fluid experiments combining computer- aided design, 3D printing and vacuum forming since 2014. He speaks both English and Chinese.Dr. Olusola Adesope, Washington State University c American
Minnesota Duluth Dr. Hill is focused on active learning teaching methods and materials research. After receiving her Ph.D. from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Dr. Hill spent several years working industrially.Amy J. Karlsson, University of Maryland - College Park Amy J. Karlsson is an assistant professor in the Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Maryland - College Park. She received her BS in chemical engineering from Iowa State University and her PhD in chemical engineering from the University Wisconsin - Madison. At the University of Maryland, she has taught Separations, Unit Operations, and Protein Engineering and enjoys mentoring students of all levels in research focused
State University,offers the following definition: Flipped learning is a pedagogical approach in which first contact with new concepts moves from the group learning space to the individual learning space in the form of structured activity, and the resulting group space is transformed into a dynamic, interactive learning environment where the educator guides students as they apply concepts and engage creatively in the subject matter (see p. 20 in Ref. 3). a Abbreviations used throughout this paper include: active learning classroom (ALC), Center for Teaching& Learning (CTL), chemical engineering (ChE), information technology (IT), institutional review board(IRB
such as making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. David L. Silverstein P.E., University of Kentucky David L. Silverstein is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at the University of Kentucky. He is also the Director of the College of Engineering’s Extended Campus Programs in Paducah, Kentucky, where he has taught for 19 years. His PhD and MS studies in ChE were completed at Vanderbilt University, and his BSChE at the University of Alabama. Silverstein’s research interests include conceptual learning tools and training, and he has particular interests in faculty development. He is the recipient of several ASEE awards, including the Fahein award for young faculty teaching and educational
making, technology, and games can be used to improve student engagement.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors and corporate trainers. He is actively engaged in presenting workshops on instructional design to both academic and corporate instructors.Dr. Amy Frances Golightly, Bucknell UniversityMs. Carrine Megan Gadoury, Bucknell University Carrine Gadoury
, "What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments?", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 655-675, 2000.[32] B. Hanson et al., "Remote laboratories in the curriculum", IASTED Computers and Advanced Technology in Education, vol. 29 , 2008.[33] M. Prince and R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases", Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 123-138, 2006.[34] J. S. Eccles and A. Wigfield, “Motivational beliefs, values, and goals”, Annual review of psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 109-132, 2002.[35] E. Mayor, “Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning,” in The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia
Paper ID #23324Exploring Mind Maps for Assessment in an Introductory Chemical Engineer-ing CourseProf. Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware Prof. Joshua Enszer is an assistant professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the Uni- versity of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and math- ematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment
, “Flipping the classroom to improve learning with MOOCs technology,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 15–25, Nov. 2016.[8] E. J. Berger and E. Pan, “Video Resources and Peer Collaboration in Engineering Mechanics : Impact and Usage Across Learning Outcomes Video Resources and Peer Collaboration in Engineering,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, p. 26.1700.1-26.1700.17.[9] Y. He, S. Swenson, and N. Lents, “Online Video Tutorials Increase Learning of Difficult Concepts in an Undergraduate Analytical Chemistry Course,” J. Chem. Educ., vol. 89, no. 9, pp. 1128–1132, Aug. 2012.[10] C. Johnson and A. D. Morken, “Asynchronous Use of Engineering (Materials
, and to analysis of present daytensions between the US and North Korea. The multidisciplinary and unique nature of this projectrequired careful preparation and construction of the student assignment. Hence, the primary authorrecruited the help of colleagues with expertise in social science, humanities and arts, andinnovation/entrepreneurship to help design the entire assignment and the assessment. Kris Boudreau isHead of WPI’s Humanities and Arts Department, with a PhD in American Literature and current scholarlyinterests in infusing liberal arts into engineering education including developing our HumanitarianEngineering courses. Leslie Dodson, PhD in Technology, Society and Media, teaches HumanitarianEngineering and is involved with WPI’s
computerengineering elective courses. However, at the very least, exposure to these concepts could helpChE students to better understand and collaborate with other engineers later in their careers. Table 1 – Overview of ModulesExamples of Other 3D Printed Devices Intuitive and disruptive technologies like Arduino, Raspberry Pi, and 3D printing (i.e.,additive manufacturing) have made prototyping and device development easier than ever. Indeed,many scientists have already taken advantage of these technologies to design their own labequipment (see Table 2 for examples), including small centrifuges, syringe pumps, pipettes,thermal cyclers, microscopes that can save images on a smartphone, and many more [1,2].Specialized
reactor engineering, and she has been teaching back at CSM since 2004. She is now a Teaching Associate Professor in (and was also for 5 years the Assistant Department Head of) the Chemical and Biological Engineering Depart- ment at CSM. Her primary research focus is in pedagogy, specifically in utilizing hand-held devices and other technology and different teaching methods to increase student engagement and reduce/eliminate lecturing in the classroom. She likes to play with her kids, play racquetball, run, bike, swim, and play pool in her free time. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 A Framework to Guide Design of Interactive and
done on the job or a tool used. Like the student above whonarrows down to one specific component of the field, another student reaches a more specificidea of what engineering could look like: Pre: “I see chemical engineers as the innovators of the future. They help to create new base substances that are then used to help other disciplines create even more different technology. I think that chemical engineering just seems to affect so many people.” Mid: “I see them as creating useful substances like new compounds that make products more efficient and less wasteful. I think it is a place where you are able to improve products thus improving society.” Post: “One major thing I think of when I think of
Paper ID #21913Students’ Responses to Professionally Contextualized Activities in a StudioClassMr. Ayman M. Alabdullatif, Oregon State UniversityMr. Shane Paul Lorona, Oregon State UniversityDr. Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He received his B.S. and M.S. degrees from UC San Diego and his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley, all in Chemical Engineering. He currently has research activity in areas related engineering education and is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher-level
] C. Kullenberg and D. Kasperowski, “What is citizen science? - A scientometric meta- analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2016.[6] C. Young and A. Butterfield, “Effective Engineering Outreach through an Undergraduate Mentoring Team and Module Database,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 31–36, 2014.[7] K. Le, A. Butterfield, K. Kelly, P.-E. Gaillardon, K. Tingey, and T. Becnel, “Building Air Quality Sensors & Inspiring Citizen Scientists,” Chem. Eng. Educ., vol. in press, 2018.[8] Secure Workshop, “Use of low-cost sensor technology to monitor air quality & engage citizens,” no. March, 2016.[9] M. Isaac, “Regulatory considerations of Lower Cost Air Pollution Sensor Data
, pp. 16-22, 2006/01/01/ 2006.[4] B. Oakley, R. M. Felder, R. Brent, and I. Elhajj, "Turning student groups into effective teams," Journal of student centered learning, vol. 2, pp. 9-34, 2004.[5] D. W. Johnson, Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1991: ERIC, 1991.[6] ABET (Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology) Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. (Accessed on 02/04/2018). Available: http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/accreditation-alerts/[7] Association of American Colleges and Universities (2009), Teamwork Value Rubric Available: https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/teamwork[8] Eberly
, and in the Chemical & Biological Engineering Department. She served as Co-PI on an NSF RET Grant and a USDA NIFA grant, and is currently co-PI on three NSF-funded projects in engineering and computer science education, including a Revolutioniz- ing Engineering Departments project. She was selected as a National Academy of Education / Spencer Postdoctoral Fellow. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two- strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students
the First Year Engineering Faculty with a focus on chemical engineering. She has taught the first year courses, Engineering Design and Engineering Problem Solving, and Chemical Engineering Process Controls and Conservation Principles courses. In the summer of 2013, she developed and ran a faculty led Dialogue of Civilizations program to Brazil where she taught two courses that focused on Sustainable Energy Technologies and Brazilian Culture. This program has successfully ran for 5 years and continuing! She was instrumental in the development of the curriculum redesign of the first year program called the Cornerstones of Engineering. In the fall of 2014, she piloted a section of the Cornerstones of Engineering that