Paper ID #22504Developing an Integrated Curriculum-wide Teamwork Instructional Strat-egyDr. Natasha D. Mallette P.E., Oregon State University Dr. Mallette worked as a design, process and research engineer before obtaining her PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering at Montana State University. She has five years of professional experience and almost four years of chemical engineering instructional experience, including two years at Univer- sity of Wisconsin-Madison. Her current research focus is effective teamwork instruction in engineering curriculum. Her past research explored biofilms and fungal production of fuel
value mapping exercises can influenceengineering student’s appreciation of stakeholder diversity and socio-technical systemcomplexity. While our focus here is on a civil and environmental engineering course, our studyhas implications for engineering curriculum in general. More specifically, though, we discusshere an attempt to use stakeholder value mapping exercises to equally represent all threedimensions of sustainable development in a technical engineering course. The study reported here aims to answer the following two research questions related tousing stakeholder value mapping exercises as short-term instruments for integrating macro-ethical issues into technical course. Does stakeholder value mapping: 1) improve student
nevertheless seemed to miss the mark in terms of what participantsexpected from me. They seemed to have an implicit model for what creativity was (namely, aninternal cognitive act) and how it should be taught (using a traditional didactic approach), butthey felt they lacked the content of what should be conveyed within that model of creativityeducation. In other words, creativity was like statics or circuits, with a handful of orientingprinciples and problem-solving protocols that could be identified, conveyed discretely, practiced,mastered, cumulated, and ultimately integrated with other engineering analytic skills. What Ipresented about what made PDI students creative and successful problem solvers bothmisaligned with what my engineering peers
these codes were written [4, 5]. Yarmus [18] and Russell [17] articulate the first line ofthinking. While there are differences in the tones of their arguments, both argue that engineers’ professional societies should use their members’ technical integrity and exemplary ethics as ameans of raising the status and stature of the profession. Unfortunately, by framing engineers’professional integrity as an unwavering platform upon which enhanced occupational statusshould be advocated, they leave little space for critique or improvement in this realm.Hill et al. and Andrews adopt the second line of reasoning. In contrast to Yarmus and Russell,these authors accept that engineers have room for improvement when it comes to ethicalconduct, but by
Associate Professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering. She has a PhD in English Literature (Science Fiction) from Louisiana State University (2007), an MA in English from Montana State University, and a BA in Creative Writing from the University of Montana. At LSU, Jennifer was part of the Communication Across the Curriculum (CxC) and worked in the Engineering Communication Studio. Jennifer has published articles in The Leading Edge, Carbon, The Journal of Popular Culture, and Foundation.Dr. Alicia Domack, Milwaukee School of Engineering I am associate professor and chair of the Humanities, Social Science, and Communication department at MSOE. I am also the IRB Director at MSOE. My background is in Developmental
University, Whiting School of Engineering bgraham@jhu.edu Tobin Porterfield, Associate Professor, Department of E-Business & Technology Management, Towson University, College of Business & Economics tporterfield@towson.edu The Surprisingly Broad Range of Professional Skills Required for EngineersAbstractEnsuring engineering program graduates possess the skillset sought by employers is critical tothe success of colleges and universities offering these degrees. Accrediting bodies are demandingthat engineering programs better integrate professional skills in their curriculum. The IETAccreditation of Higher Education
(F.RSA) and a Fellow of the Royal Society for Public Health (F.RSPH). c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM) Diplomacy: Preliminary Results from an Initial Pilot CourseAbstractA new course, “Science, Technology, Engineering, Art, and Math (STEAM) Diplomacy,” hasbeen developed at the Missouri University of Science and Technology to introduce engineeringstudents to the field of foreign relations and the tripartite objectives of: 1) science in diplomacy;2) science for diplomacy; and 3) diplomacy for science. The course employs an availablescholarly monograph as a text and integrates materials created by the Center for
maintaining or dismantling that privilege. We hope that these examples willbe helpful to others interested in integrating such content into their courses.Institutional ContextThe history behind the creation of these courses stems from being at the forefront of institution-wide transformation, including the inauguration of a new university president, theimplementation of a new University Core curriculum, the award of an NSF RED grant, and thecreation of a new General Engineering department [11]. The University of San Diego is amajority undergraduate, private four-year [12], faith-based institution that embraces Catholicsocial teaching in its mission. Our new president has enacted a new strategic plan, TheUniversity has identified six pathways through
team workings to broader social impacts, bridging microthrough macro level concerns and stakeholder interests. We are interested in how students mayfeel responsibility to HCD throughout project and design process such that they also learn how tointeract and work for broader social responsibilities. Thus, we expand on CSR by introducingTSR in embedded teams constituted within engineering programs and institutions of highereducation.In the context of teamsThe study of teams, namely those embedded in organizations, continues to receive scholarlyattention from an organizational communication perspective. Previous literature has looked atCSR and leadership, as well as how CSR initiatives are integrated and communicated by those inmanagerial
EWBprojects, with their explicit social justice mission, has already been shown to have a positive effecton students, attitudes towards community service, and career expectations [2–7]. Other work hasdocumented the effects of service learning participation on meeting ABET learning outcomes [6]and providing global engineering competencies [8, 9]. While the benefits of service learning forstudent education are enticing, there is also some evidence that participation in projects with localcommunities, in contrast to internationally-based field work, can achieve the same studentoutcomes in terms of technical and professional skills [10, 11].Integration of service learning into the curriculum also necessitates the consideration of impactson the
approaches” (p. 30), Richter and Parettipropose the term “disciplinary egocentrism” as a label for the “cognitive barriers” that stand inthe way of interdisciplinary collaboration. Disciplinary egocentrism is marked by an inability tothink beyond one’s own perspective, a lack of understanding of the value of multiple approaches,and an “inability to integrate and synthesize differing epistemologies and value systems inaddressing complex problems” (p. 38). At its foundation, disciplinary egocentrism grows out ofboth a “rejection of other viewpoints” and “a failure to recognize differences” (p. 38). Given thisdiagnosis, a logical place to begin treatment would be exposure to different perspectives in acontext that makes them meaningful and relevant (as
Paper ID #23265Satisfaction: Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Engineering Writing Course-workDr. Stephanie Pulford, University of California, Davis Dr. Stephanie Pulford is the Associate Director for Instructional Research & Development of UC Davis’ Center for Educational Effectiveness. Dr. Pulford’s professional background in engineering includes a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics, and a B.S. in Aerospace Engineer- ing as well as industry experience as an aircraft engineer. Her research and professional interests include faculty development, innovations in engineering
language-learning [10], and the adoption of CPthrough humanistic lenses [11] as a means of contributing to the development and well-being oflearners in these contexts [12]. Throughout this paper, we describe our experience building fromprior work and applying CP elements in the curriculum. We also describe student and courseoutcomes as a result of our integration of CP elements. As this is a classroom application study, we have broad objectives (not empirical researchquestions) that we address in this paper. The first objective is: (1) What aspects of theintroductory engineering course (intended outcomes, assessments, and activities) werecontextually aligned to opportunities and constraints in the Azraq refugee camp? The tworemaining
the CU Teach Engineering program. Additionally, she mentors graduate and undergraduate engineering Fellows who teach in local K-12 classrooms through the Integrated Teaching and Learning Program’s TEAMS initiative, is on the development team for the TeachEngineering digital library, and is faculty advisor for CU-Boulder’s Society of Women Engineers (SWE). Her primary research interests include the impacts of project-based service-learning on student identity, pathways and retention to and through K-12 and undergraduate engineering, teacher education and curriculum development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Connecting with first-year engineering students
for institutions courses in Civil & professional practice California State Polytechnic Environmental (genres, language University – Pomona Engineering choices, grammar & Howard University mechanics) Lawrence Technological University Angelo State University Integrated across all Curriculum-wide within Writing for years the engineering program professional practiceTechnical Writing as a Component of Co-op Term: An
consider the opportunities and pitfalls of integrating CSR intoteaching and learning about social responsibility more generally.1. IntroductionCSR is a controversial concept, and interpretations of CSR are deeply informed by one’spersonal and political views [5]. Proponents of CSR, for example, view it as a vehicle fortransforming businesses to create shared economic, social and environmental value forthemselves and their stakeholders. In contrast, some skeptics from inside of the business worldview CSR as an intrusion on free market principles (see [6] for an early and famous example).And critics of capitalism in general argue that CSR allows corporations to capture and reframesocial problems “in such a way as to align with the agendas of
observe their experiences from many perspectives” (p. 30).Similarly, Mezirow theorized that critical reflection of experiences can have a transformationaleffect in learners’ lives [8] [9]. Learning, in this vein, becomes a cyclical process in which newmeanings and perspectives are gained. There have been calls to integrate reflection within theengineering education curriculum, which implicate reflection as an essential skill for helping tocultivate a strong sense of professional identity, increase critical thinking, and deepen learningthroughout the engineering educational experience [10] [11] [12]; however, these calls have notdeveloped rich insights into how to design, embed, and create reflection activities that encouragedifferent perspectives
. Leydens won the James F. Lufkin Award for the best conference paper—on the intersections between professional communication research and social jus- tice— at the 2012 International Professional Communication Conference. In 2015, he won the Ronald S. Blicq Award for Distinction in Technical Communication Education from the Professional Communica- tion Society of the Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE). His current research focuses on rendering visible and integrating the social justice dimensions inherent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences, engineering design, and humanities and social science courses. That research, conducted with co-author Juan C. Lucena
curriculum redesign focused on incorporating content- based writing approaches. In the Department of English, Cat teaches in the Core Writing Program where her pedagogy incorporates creative writing workshops and collaborative writing.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is an Associate Professor in the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of New Mexico. The research in her lab is focused on understanding the dynamics and structures of macromolecular assemblies including proteins, polymers, and lipid membranes. Undergrad- uates, graduate students, and postdoctoral scholars are trained in a multidisciplinary environment, utilizing modern methodologies to address
changing the status quo of higher education.Project-Based Learning (PBL) offers promise for providing engineering students an avenue forbridging this “disconnect” by providing practice solving complex, open-ended problems withsocio-technical contexts. PBL is a pedagogy that centers curriculum around projects that involvestudents in design, problem solving, decision making, and other investigative activities. Studentsengaged in PBL typically work autonomously over extended periods of time to create realisticproducts or presentations4. These assignments provide opportunities for students to solvecomplex, open-ended, socio-technical problems, and to practice serving specific groups ofpeople in our society3-6. In addition, PBL enriches students
Summers earned her PhD in Rhetoric and Composition from Penn State University and joined the RHIT faculty in 2014. Her work focused on writing in the disciplines, particularly at the advanced undergraduate and graduate levels. She teaches courses in writing and engineering communication, in- cluding technical and professional communication, intercultural communication, digital writing, and grant writing.Mary Jane Szabo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Mary Jane (Janie) Szabo is currently pursuing her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Educational Technology from Indiana State University. In her current role as an Instructional Designer at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, she collaborates with
paper draws on a qualitative dataset of student responses to biweekly “reflection questions”integrated into routine course activity in a pilot implementation of a Wright State-likeEngineering Mathematics course. Alongside auto-ethnographic data from the course instructorand coordinator, this dataset illustrates the transformations involved in the scale-making process,and enables tracing the consequences of these transformations for the identities of people andsocial collectives involved in the course.IntroductionThis paper reports on the results of a study of an implementation of the Wright State Model forEngineering Mathematics at one university. Consistent with the LEES call for proposals, weadopt a human science theoretical approach to the
Results of a Spreadsheet Tool,” is the first recorded use of “empathy” in theDesign in Engineering Education Division (DEED) of ASEE [17]. Like many of itspredecessors, Eggert’s paper only mentions “empathy” once when describingprofessionals’ interpersonal style, which includes “empathy, tolerance, honesty, trust, andpersonal integrity” [17]. As part of a person’s “style,” empathy is considered apsychological trait, one that reflects an engineering designer’s personality. The concept “empathic design,” coined by Leonard and Rayport, had gainedprominence prior to its presence in engineering education [18]. The first reference to“empathic design” in DEED appeared in 2011. Titus and colleagues called empathicdesign “the ideal form” of human
and expectations of their discipline.However, with regards to professional training in engineering that was independent of thedisciplines, EC 2000’s architects defined a separate set of “student outcomes” that focusedprimarily on the professional skill sets--teamwork, communication, professional and ethicalresponsibility, designing systems that met social, political, and economic constraints, acommitment to lifelong learning, etc…--that were consistent with the “desired attributes” of anengineering graduate in the post-Cold War era. In its practical implementation, these becameCriterion 3 (student outcomes) and Criterion 4 (in the original version, now Criterion 5(curriculum)).This was an arrangement that recognized that the expansion in
technology and science writer for Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Jared earned a BA in English and creative writing from Colby College, and an MA in literature from Boston College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Prototypes to a Technical and Non-Technical Public AudienceAbstractIn undergraduate technical courses, instructors commonly infuse their teaching with metaphors,analogies, and similes to connect new concepts with students’ existing knowledge base. Thispedagogical approach has been shown to be effective in a variety of fields, includingengineering. Similarly, professional engineers translate complex technical
bring in from their home environments/cultures to recognizing thesystemic ways in which classroom mathematics activities can hinder this “home” mathematicalthinking from becoming integrated into the “school math” students are learning. 5Third, these studies suggest an entanglement between teachers’ noticing of the substance (notjust the correctness) of students’ reasoning and their noticing of equity-related issues ofparticipation and positioning. McDuffie et al. (2014) documented how growth in teachers’attention to the substance of student reasoning was accompanied by growth in their noticing of(in)equitable participation patterns and power
institutional cultureat the school in regards to ESI education. The conversations illuminated a range of perspectivesregarding the most effective ways to educate engineering and computing students about ESI.Emergent, thematic coding of the interview data revealed diverging opinions on whether thetopics should be taught in curricular or co-curricular settings, in required or elective courses, byengineering or non-engineering faculty, and in standalone ethics courses, integrated intotechnical courses, or across the curriculum. The results highlight different approaches suggestingbest practices could be better clarified based on context and setting. Despite the varying opinionson settings and approaches, all of the interviewees expressed the importance of
researchers in both engineering andwriting studies, is an important element of our methodology. Our team includes three members(two faculty and one graduate student research assistant) from the Center for Writing Studies(CSW) and five members from the College of Engineering (three faculty, one academicprofessional, and one graduate student research assistant). CSW is an interdisciplinary academicunit at our university that offers Writing-Across-the-Curriculum (WAC) workshops for facultyand graduate teaching assistants; provides one-to-one writing tutorials for undergraduates,graduates, faculty and staff; and supports a cross-disciplinary graduate concentration in writingstudies.Illinois requires all undergraduates to meet a first-year composition and
Paper ID #21891Exploring Students’ and Instructors’ Perceptions of Engineering: Case Stud-ies of Professionally Focused and Career Exploration CoursesDr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research
strictly “social” or “technical.” In this paper, we briefly reviewapproaches taken to teach energy in engineering. We then examine CSPs and make the case forhow they might be used within engineering. We discuss our preliminary ideas for the course itself.The goal of this paper is to stimulate discussion within the ASEE community to improve courseeffectiveness in enhancing student learning. This project is part of a larger overall effort at theUniversity of San Diego to integrate social justice themes across the curriculum of a new generalengineering department. This paper will present our progress towards instantiating in theclassroom the broader vision laid out for our program. 1IntroductionThere is