Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Jennifer L Bonniwell, Milwaukee School of Engineering; Joshua David Carl, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #21867A Review of Electronic Engineering Logbooks Throughout the Electrical En-gineering CurriculumDr. Steven S Holland, Milwaukee School of Engineering Steven S. Holland (M ’13) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1984. He received the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), Milwaukee, WI, in 2006, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, in 2008 and 2011 respectively. From 2006 to 2011, he was a Research Assistant working in the Antennas and Propagation Laboratory (APLab), Department of Electrical and

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michael Allen Hayden Ph.D., Indiana State University; Randell W. Peters, Indiana State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

otheractivities. By practicing what you teach, you can efficiently accomplish the teaching,scholarship, and service goals necessary for promotion and tenure and have a fruitful andenjoyable career. Reference List[1] R. Brent, R. Felder, S. Rajala, J. Gilligan and G. Lee, "New faculty 101: an orientation to theprofession [engineering teacher training]," 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193),Reno, NV, 2001, pp. S3B-1-3 vol.3. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2001.964046 [Accessed Jan. 11, 2018].[2] C. Lucas, J. Murry, “Teaching: Lectures and Discussion,” in New Faculty. New York:Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 39-63.[3] J. Pedersen, G

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elif Miskioglu, Bucknell University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

for the actors to develop their own contextthrough improvisation.In TPC, Open Scene is used differently. Students are paired up (with an occasional trio, ifnecessary) and given a generic set of instructions explaining that they will perform a ‘scene’ withtheir partner(s) for their peers in approximately ten minutes. These instructions also include somereminders of things to consider that may help them communicate their scene, including tone,volume, body language, and use of relational space (all discussed previously in course content).Students are additionally encouraged to use readily available props as they deem appropriate.Each group is instructed to keep their scene a secret from other groups as they prepare. Then,each group is given

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Peggy C. Boylan-Ashraf, San Jose State University; John R. Haughery, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Conference Session

Scaling class size and technology – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Geoffrey Recktenwald, Michigan State University; Allison Godwin, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Anant Sahai, University of California, Berkeley; Matthew West, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

likecourse is the need to train the staff that aid in the operation of the course(s).Any large pedagogical change made in a course of this size requires careful advancedplanning. A key step in the implementation is training40. Instructions to graders must be clear,instructions to TAs may require practice or guided real-time instruction. Depending on thechange, the TAs may need additional technical training, like running MATLAB or moderatinga discussion board.A key aspect of any team is cohesion. The teaching team must “buy in” to the changes. At aminimum this reduces the risk that TAs will revert back to “easier” or more familiar methods.At worst, the teaching assistants can revolt. Buy-in is also important because changes canrequire more time and

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sara A. Atwood, Elizabethtown College; Arjun Singh, Gradescope

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

sword," Current directions in psychological science, vol. 7, pp. 67-72, 1998.[3] R. Moreno, "Decreasing cognitive load for novice students: Effects of explanatory versus corrective feedback in discovery-based multimedia," Instructional science, vol. 32, pp. 99-113, 2004.[4] E. A. Locke and G. P. Latham, "Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel," Psychological science, vol. 1, pp. 240-246, 1990.[5] S. H. Song and J. M. Keller, "Effectiveness of motivationally adaptive computer-assisted instruction on the dynamic aspects of motivation," Educational technology research and development, vol. 49, pp. 5-22, 2001.[6] S. J. Ashford, R. Blatt, and D. V. Walle, "Reflections on the

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

J. Blake Hylton, Ohio Northern University; Matthew Walker, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

-based grading and reporting will improve education,” Kappan, pp. 64-68, Apr 2015.11. P. J. Parker, B. Bocher, & A. Polebitski, “Assessing Student Writing Competencies in Environmental Engineering Courses,” In Proc. 121st Am. Soc. Eng. Edu. Annu. Conf. & Expo., pp. 24.205.1–12, 2014.12. S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Fluid Mechanics Course,” In Proc. Am. Soc. Eng. Edu. Annu. Conf. & Expo, pp. 24.1099.110, June 2014.13. S. L. Post, “Standards-Based Grading in a Thermodynamics Course,” vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 173–182, 201714. J. B. Hylton & H. Diefes-Dux, “A Standards-based Assessment Strategy for Written Exams,” 2016 ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2016.15. Marbouti, Farshid, "A standards-based

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

] Mott, J., and Peuker, S., "Using team-based learning to ensure student accountability and engagement in flipped classrooms", ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. doi, 2015, pp. 25022.[18] Koretsky, M., Nolen, S., Volet, S., Vauras, M., Gilbuena, D., and Tierney, G., "Productive Disciplinary Engagement in Complex STEM Learning Environ-ments", ASEE Annual Conference, 2015.[19] Solomon, J., Viswanathan, V., Hamilton, E., and Nayak, C., "Improving Student Engagement in Engineering Using Brain-Based Learning Principles as Instructional Delivery Protocols", ASEE Annual Conference, Columbus, OH, 2017.[20] Weiss, R.P.," Brain based learning", Training & Development Vol. 54, No. 7, 2000, pp. 21

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Paper ID #21305Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical WritingDr. Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University B.S. and M.S. in Mechanical Engineering, Marquette University PhD. in Mechanical Engineering, Wash- ington State University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018“Implementation and Assessment of New Techniques in Technical Writing”. Hani S Saad Associate Professor of ME/MET Eastern Washington UniversityAbstractTeaching technical writing to engineering students is a challenging task

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Waddah Akili, Iowa State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

devise equitable system(s) that allow faculty to gain theengineering experience they desperately need, in order to keep up with newdevelopments in their areas of specialization. Thus asserting the view thatengineering faculty “with practical experience under their belt” would, in general,make better teachers. Administrator (deans, chairs, and decision makers in general)should investigate ways for helping new faculty members gain industrial experienceby spending a semester on-site at a cooperating industry, using summer release timeto work within industry, or allow for a dual appointment, say fifty-fifty, i.e., fiftypercent of faculty time at the College and the other fifty percent at an industry nearby.Perhaps the legal and organizational

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ralph Ocon, Purdue University Northwest

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

.  Background information on the problem.  The “Problem Statement” (state the problem as a set of facts).  The “Creative Challenge” (state the problem as a question).  The best creative solution to the problem.  The alternative solution (second best solution) to the problem.  A written description of the physical model representing the problem and solution.  The main idea generation technique(s) used to stimulate the imagination for solving the problem.  A sketch of the physical model.(2) Second, students were required to visualize and create a Physical Model (made primarily ofPopsicle Sticks) representing the problem and solution to that problem. The requirements for theModel: 1. 70%-100% of the Model must be

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington University; Kyle Frederick Larsen P.E., Eastern Washington University; Heechang Bae, Eastern Washington University; N.M. A. Hossain, Eastern Washington University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Education, 2014, Vol. 42(2) 130-140. [4] T. S. Harding, M. J. Mayhew, C. J. Finelli and D. D. Carpenter, ‘The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates’, Ethics & Behavior, 17(3) (2007), pp. 255–279. [5] Widmann J. and Shollenberger K. “Student use of textbook solution manuals: Student and faculty perspectives in a large mechanical engineering department.” In: Proceedingsof the 2006 American society for engineering education annual conference & exposition,Chicago, Illinois, 2006, pp.11.1168.1–11.1168.9. Washington, DC: ASEE.

Conference Session

Classroom Strategies – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University; Jennifer Retherford P.E., University of Tennessee, Knoxville; David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

., Ambrose, S., and Wheeler, D., 2005. “Becoming a Professional Engineering Educator: A New Role for a New Era.” Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 185-194.9. Felder, R.M., Brent, R., and Prince, M.J., 2011. “Engineering Instructional Development: Programs, Best Practices, and Recommendations.” Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 89-122.10. Brent, R. and Felder, R.M., 2003. “A Model for Engineering Faculty Development.” International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(2), 234-240.11. Estes, A.C., Welch, R.W., Ressler, S.J., Dennis, N., Larson, D., Considine, C., Nilsson, T., O’Neill, R.J., O’Brien, J., and Lenox, T., 2010. “Ten Years of ExCEEd: Making a Difference in the Profession.” International Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: Alverno College Institute, 2015.[3] S. L. Post, “Standards-based grading in a fluid mechanics course” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[4] M. W. Roberts, A. M. Jones, and M. K. Thompson, “Work in progress: using outcomes- based assessment in an introductory structural engineering course” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[5] M. T. Siniawski, A. R. Carberry, and J. D. Dionisio, “Standards-based grading: An alternative to score-based assessment” in 2012 PSW ASEE Conference, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, April 19-21, 2012.[6] H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Student reflections on standards-based graded” in 46th