Paper ID #23327Evaluating the Quality of Project Summaries for S-STEM ProposalsDr. Yvette E. Pearson P.E., Rice University Dr. Yvette E. Pearson holds a B.S. in Civil Engineering and M.S. in Chemistry from Southern University and A&M College and a Ph.D. in Engineering and Applied Science from the University of New Orleans. She is Associate Dean for Accreditation and Assessment in the George R. Brown School of Engineering at Rice University, a Program Evaluator for the Engineering Accreditation Commission of ABET, a reg- istered Professional Engineer in Louisiana, a former Program Director in the Division of
TechnologyAbstractThis paper introduces two scholarship projects funded by the National Science Foundation thatfocus on students who transfer at the 3rd year level from 2-year schools to the engineering andengineering technology BS programs at our university. The objectives of both the projects are:(i) to expand and diversify the engineering/technology workforce of the future, (ii) to developlinkages and articulations with 2-year schools and their S-STEM programs, (iii) to provideincreased career opportunities and job placement rates through mandatory paid co-opexperiences, and (iv) to serve as a model for other universities to provide vertical transferstudents access to the baccalaureate degree.The Transfer Pipeline (TiPi) project awarded 25 new scholarships
University. He may be contacted at s merriweather@tamu.edu for research collaborations or other information.Dr. Karen L. Butler-Purry, Texas A&M University Karen Butler-Purry is the Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies as well as a Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas. Her research interests include computer and intelligent systems applications to power distribution systems and engineering education. She can be reached by e-mail at klbutler@tamu.edu.Dr. Shannon Walton, Texas A&M University Shannon D. Walton, PhD, is the Director of Recruiting for the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies and the Director of
support from peers with similar interests and characteristics. In addition,engineering programs should consider the development of learning communities centered aroundtransfer students that would offer opportunities for mentorship and foster relationship andcommunity building.References[1] S. Olson and D. G. Riordan, "Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President," Executive Office of the President, 2012.[2] J. Fredrickson, "Today's transfer students: Who are they?," Community College Review, vol. 26, pp. 43-54, 1998.[3] L. E. Malcom, "Charting the pathways to STEM for Latina/o students: The role of
transferring in the fall semester following participation in theprogram. Students in the program work with researchers from San Francisco State University,UC Merced, and NASA Ames Research Center.Implementation of the Summer Group and Individual Research Internship Programs showssuccess in helping students in solidify their choice of major, improving preparation for transfer,enhancing student self-efficacy in pursuing careers in engineering, and acquiring knowledge andskills needed to succeed in a four-year engineering program. As a result of their researchexperience, the participants have also expressed that they are now more likely to apply for otherinternships and consider pursuing advanced degrees in engineering [27].F. NSF S-STEM Scholarship
socialsupport to my students, as well as enrichment and research or practical experienceopportunities. I have been the PI and Co-PI for grants received from NSF, NASA and theDepartment of Education amounting to over $5 million to develop the engineeringprogram and award CSEMS/S- STEM (Science, Technology Engineering and Math)scholarships to students at San Antonio College. An NSF discretionary grant from EngineeringEducation I obtained in 2003 allowed me to initiate the EDGE (Early Development ofGeneral Engineering) 13 a summer program, designed to attract and retain high schoolstudents into the engineering field. The program continued through 2015 with help fromDepartment of Education MSEIP funding. A majority of my mentees have participated in
. National Academy of Engineering and American Society for Engineering Education, (2014). Surmounting the barriers: Ethnic diversity in engineering education: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2014.14. National Academy of Engineering; Grand Challenges for Engineering: Imperatives, Prospects, and Priorities. Washington: National Academies Press, 201615. Woolsey, S. A. & Shepler, D. K.; Understanding the early integration experiences of first- generation college students. College Student Journal. 45, 4, 700-714, 2011.16. Antonio, A.L., Chang, M.J., Hakuta, K, Kenny, D.A., Levin, S. & Milem, J.F. , Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students. Psychological Science. 15, 8
-engineering Success?” Journal of Engineering Education,vol.97, no.4, pp. 467–479, 2008.[10] B.F. French, J.C. Immekus, and W.C. Oakes, “An Examination of Indicators ofEngineering Students’ Success and Persistence.”, Journal of Engineering Education, vol.94,no.4, pp. 419–425, 2005.[11] M. Pinxten, C. Van Soom, C. Peeters, T. De Laet, and G. Langie, “At-Risk at the Gate : Prediction of Study Success of First-Year Science and Engineering Students in an Open- Admission University in Flanders- any incremental validity of study strategies?” European Journal of Psychology of Education, vol.145, no.3, pp. 229–45, 2017.[12] L. Moses, C. Hall, K. Wuensch, K. De Urquidi, P. Kauffmann, W. Swart, S. Duncan, and G. Dixon, “Are Math Readiness and
4.33 based applications that emphasize societal benefits. I currently use context-based approaches in my teaching that utilize technology 3.80 based applications that emphasize societal benefits. I think using context-based approaches in my teaching that utilize technology based applications that emphasize societal benefits will help my students learn content 4.56 covered in my course(s). I am currently engaged in research on current engineering topics. 3.62 I am aware of how to apply my research topics/projects to teaching that I am doing. 4.38 I connect the lessons and content that I teach to STEM careers
ChulalongkornUniversity/Thailand. Cynthia holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Chemical Engineering from the Uni-versity of California, Davis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Avenue-E: An Innovative Student Transfer Pathway Program Jennifer S. Curtis1, Beth Broome2, and Cynthia Murphy-Ortega3 1 College of Engineering, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 2Office of the Provost, UC Davis, Davis, CA; 3Chevron Corporation, Richmond, CAAbstractOver 68% of students in the California Community College system come from minoritybackgrounds, representing an opportunity to accelerate the diversification of STEM industries.However, according to a September 2017 report by the
.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 123rd Annual Conference and Exposition.[9] S. Brown, (2005), “Student Social Capital And Retention In The College Of Engineering.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 112th Annual Conference and Exposition.[10] A. Prewitt, W. Eugene, and S. Daily, (2007) “Minority Retention And Success In Engineering: Diversifying The Pipeline Through The Development Of Social Capital.” Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education’s 114th Annual Conference and Exposition.[11] J.M. Trenor, (2011) “CAREER: Influence of Social Capital on Under-Represented Engineering Students’ Academic and Career Decisions.” Proceedings
. The non-profit team providedgrant management and oversight for the colleges’ funded STEM programs, requiring quarterlyreporting of their financial expenditures and budget balances, progress against their proposedtimelines, and narratives describing program status, outcomes, and challenges. The SFAz PIresponded to these reports with emails, phone calls and site visits when appropriate, providingongoing support and guidance to the college PIs to ensure their program’s success.STEM Metrics Development ApproachFrom its onset, the SFAz+8 program was designed to generate evidence to validate achievementof the program goals. Objectivity was ensured through the use of an external evaluator. Eachprogram goal had associated measurable outcome(s) and
ScienceFoundation through the Advanced Technological Education Program,Grant No. 1400433Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressedin this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflectthe views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] Department of Labor, Occupational Outlook Handbook, https://www.bls.gov/ooh/installation-maintenance-and-repair/medical-equipment- repairers.htm#tab-2, accessed 4/6/18[2] Suzanne Schwartz, Aftin Ross, Seth Carmody, Penny Chase, Steve Christey Coley, Julie Connolly, Cathy Petrozzino, and Margie Zuk (2018) The Evolving State of Medical Device Cybersecurity. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology: March/April 2018, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 103-111.[3
. Replicating such amodel of collaboration at other colleges and universities, especially in rural contexts such as thatsurrounding Bay College and Michigan Tech, is highly recommended. Bibliography1 Ratcliffe, M., Burd, C., Holder, K., & Fields, A. (2016, December). Defining rural at the U.S. Census Bureau: American community survey and geography brief. Retrieved from https://www2.census.gov/geo/pdfs/reference/ua/Defining_Rural.pdf2 National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Rural education in America: Definitions. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/definitions.asp3 Vilsack, T., Donovan, S., Munoz, C., & Zients, J. (2016, October 5). Rural