Paper ID #22182Valuing Women’s Contributions: Team Projects and Collaborative WritingDr. Jennifer C Mallette, Boise State University An Assistant Professor of English at Boise State University, Dr. Jenn Mallette teaches technical com- munication at the undergraduate and graduate level. In addition to working with STEM students in her undergraduate technical communication course, she collaborates with faculty in the College of Engineer- ing to focus on enhancing writing education in engineering courses. Her other research focuses on women in engineering, and she has recently published on the results of a case study exploring
confidence, so when ingroup projects later they do not shy away from the design and building portion of team basedengineering projects;c) Improving student skills for increased participation in engineering societies, internships,hands-on outreach projects, and student build teams; andd) Promoting a culture of making within all engineering students.Two groups of students were included in this study to examine female-only versus co-edenvironment; a 20-person group of female students (Building Women in Engineering), and a 20-person group of co-ed students (Building Skills in Engineering). Students from 10 differentengineering majors, and all years of undergraduate studies were represented. Both groups hadthe same female faculty member and female
to serve as teaching assistants. Teaching assistants at Dartmouth are typicallyundergraduate students themselves who have done well in the courses for which they serve asteaching assistants. Responsibilities of the teaching assistants include running problem sessions(optional evening help sessions), grading problem sets, and helping to set up and rundemonstrations and laboratories. Teaching assistants are not responsible for grading quizzes,exams or projects. As shown in Figure 4, the percentage of women serving as teaching assistantsin undergraduate engineering courses for the past six terms has been quite high, ranging from47% to 55%. 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Fall 2017 Spring 2017 Winter 2017
Paper ID #21489Improving Middle-School Girls’ Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, and Interests in’Sustainable Construction Engineering’ through a STEAM ACTIVATED! pro-gramDr. Andrea Nana Ofori-Boadu, North Carolina A&T State University Dr. Ofori-Boadu is an Assistant Professor with the Department of Built Environment at North Carolina A & T State University. Her research interests are in bio-modified cements, sustainable development, and STEM education. Dr. Ofori-Boadu has served in various capacities on research and service projects, including Principal Investigator for two most recent grants from the Engineering Information
. She has been teaching robotics with Lego Mindstorm to ME freshmen for several years. She is actively involved in community services of offering robotics workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests are dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 RAMP: Summer Bridge Program for Female High School StudentsAbstractRAMP is a six-week, summer bridge program at our institute to help students explore STEMcareers and navigate the transition from high school to higher education. Over the past severalyears, RAMP has helped introduce over 150 youth to college life
Women in MississippiAbstractThe NSF INCLUDES Mississippi Alliance for Women in Computing (MSAWC) strives to:generate interest and participation of women in computing; improve recruitment and retentionrates of women in undergraduate computing majors; and help post-secondary women make atransition to the computing workforce. Activities designed to engage girls and young womenwith computing, emphasizing computational thinking and cybersecurity knowledge andawareness, and to illuminate a pathway forward are hosted and facilitated through Alliancepartnerships.The authors will describe a project-based approach to facilitating learning among K-12 students.By engaging students at an early age, we believe we can promote the development of self-efficacy
introduces different Engineering discipline and is taught by SWE officers, SWEmembers, or students from other Engineering clubs. SWE provides lunch, snacks, a theme-oriented t-shirt and a goodie-bag filled with school supplies to all participants, includingvolunteers. All students participate in a closing ceremony to conclude the event. Additionally, the7th-8th group displays their completed robotic projects in a showcase. Figure 3 shows a sample labfrom all age groups, Kinder-3rd, 4th-6th, and 7th-8th. A sample lab activity is provided in the AppendixA. Figure 3: Imagineer Day 2017Results and AnalysisThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact the outreach event has on K-8 graders,particularly girls, as
undergraduate student at the University of Michigan studying materials science and engineering with a minor in chemistry. He is also a member of the engineering honors program, an instructor for a first-year engineering design course, an instructor in a senior-level materials science course, and a researcher in ultrafast optical sciences.Dr. Robin Fowler, University of Michigan Robin Fowler is a lecturer in the Program in Technical Communication at the University of Michigan. She enjoys serving as a ”communication coach” to students throughout the curriculum, and she’s especially excited to work with first year and senior students, as well as engineering project teams, as they navigate the more open-ended communication
, practices, and cultures that reflect expandedperspectives on gender, diversity, and intersectional identities. In order to better understand the role(s) of such a course in an engineering student'seducation and how engineering education considers these issues, the instructor team invited twoundergraduate researchers to undertake projects in support of these goals. One of these students(Amber Levine) was tasked with identifying other courses across the U.S. with similar subjectmatter and learning objectives (“EEL Related Courses Study”); she found 13 courses acrosstwelve institutions that connected issues of diversity and culture to engineering and were targetedto engineering students (Levine, 2016). The other student (Chloe Wiggins, who is
leadership roles, exploringpathways to STEM leadership, and developing a personal plan for professional growth. Thefourth year also culminates with the honors project or thesis, taken over two semesters. Studentsdevelop their own research plans, engineering design projects, or theses, and present their workat the end-of-year symposium. They develop an in-depth understanding of identifying andsolving STEM problems and effectively communicating their work to the general public. TheWISE curriculum and associated timeline are summarized in Table 1.Table 1WISE Curricular Sequence for Undergraduate STEM Majors FALL SPRING ANY SEMESTER FOCUS First Year Introduction to University
can follow.Research QuestionsThe experience of women in undergraduate engineering programs has not been examinedthrough a critical and qualitative lens; nor has the question of university type played a role in theresearch. The hope is that understanding how women experience undergraduate engineeringprograms at public state universities, the broadest impact on participation can be made. The goalof this project is to look at various stages of a woman’s educational journey in engineering toexamine the following: 1. How do women experience undergraduate engineering programs at public universities? 2. What role does classroom discourse play in shaping women’s experience in “gatekeeper” courses
a positive direction from 2016 to 2017 (with the exception of the mixed sex sessiongirls). For example, “I learned a lot,” “I am good at it,” and “I have gotten a lot better at it” aretrending upward while “I didn’t know what I was doing” and “It was frustrating” are trendingdownward. Most of this improvement is due to changes early in the week that better scaffold theprogramming activities and integrate them with small build projects. 100 Girls-single sex 2016 Boys-single sex 2016 Girls-mixed 2017 Boys-mixed 2017 Girls-single sex 2017 90 80 70% of of Times Cited 60 50
Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities of Service-Learning) for approximately ten years. She has incorporated service-learning projects into her classes and laboratories since she started teaching in 2000. Her research interests include community engaged learning and pedagogy, K-12 outreach, biomaterials and materials testing and analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
Margherio, University of Washington Cara Margherio is a Senior Research Associate at the UW Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE). Cara serves as project manager for program evaluation on several NSF- and NIH-funded projects. Her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, peer mentoring, and institutional change.Prof. Eve A. Riskin, University of Washington Eve Riskin received her BS degree in Electrical Engineering from M.I.T. and her graduate degrees in EE from Stanford. Since 1990, she has been in the EE Department at the University of Washington where she is now Associate Dean of Diversity and Access in the College of Engineering, Professor of Electrical
broader societal perceptions of what is “appropriate” for women, or related to otherfactors that have not yet emerged in USA-centric research.Malaysia is one of three cases in our larger project studying women’s participation in engineeringin three predominantly Muslim Countries (PMCs): Malaysia, Tunisia, and Jordan. We chose thesethree countries because they represent three cases with distinct geographical regions, cultures,economies, socio-cultural, legal, political, and education systems in the Muslim world. Moreover,these three countries boast a much higher representation of women in engineering compared toUnited States, with Malaysia having the highest representation. Within each country, we partneredwith the major flagship public university
(see Appendix A for examples).Examples of activities include: Build the tallest tower: Engineers often have constraints that they need to work with. In this project, time and materials were the main constraints. Engineers also solve problems, such as how to construct a tower. Students must decide which materials they would utilize from those given (paper, card stock, different types of tape) to make the tallest tower within a ten minute timeframe. Laser engraving: A laser engraver demonstration was given during which it created acrylic charms. Fun facts were shared about the engraver and students were given a chance to ask questions
in teaching, research and service. She enjoys teaching electrical engineering and power engineering topics to students. In research and graduate studies, she has been very active having graduated 40 MS and 13 PhD students; published 160 papers and 2 book chapters; and brought in over $40 M in external research through individual and collaborative projects including an U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER award. She is an ASEE and an IEEE Fellow. She has been active in the IEEE Power & Energy Society serving on the PES Governing Board for 12 years and President for 2012-2013. Dr. Schulz is a member of Eta Kappa Nu (Electrical Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education
and improving the actual enrollment condition should not bediminished. Using this tool at the beginning of a program, when it needs to be reinvented, or as ascheduled maintenance check for your program’s relevance is beneficial to make sure courses arewell aligned with the interests of the students it serves.Paper authored and researched 4 by Laine Schrewe, engineering instructor for Tolles Career and Technical Centerlocated in Jonathan Alder High School, Plain City, Ohio ; March , 2018.Notes: 1. Source: National Girls Collaborative project; https://ngcproject.org/statistics (15% of engineers are women) 2. Claims extrapolated from sample size guidelines table data from https://www.surveymonkey.com/mp/sample-size/ 3. Female
year (153 of the total61,800 women graduating in the class of 2011 nationwide) [25], it’s no surprise that there arecurrently very few jobs available for women engineers in Saudi Arabia. Nevertheless, literaturenot only shows that Saudi women are interested in engineering, but the fact that segregation isenforced in schools can be a reason why women may succeed more in engineering than in theUS or the UK [4], [36]. Some women who have recently earned engineering degrees fromoutside the country via the “Program of the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques” for foreignscholarships represent the first generation of women engineers to get hired in different privatesector engineering jobs and projects. Fresh graduate Saudi women engineers
Postsecondary Education at Western Michigan University. Recently, Dan has been involved with the Broncos FIRST FITW project and has developed ongoing research with stakeholders from Kalamazoo Promise and the Upjohn Institute. One of Dan’s most recent articles employed ma- chine learning techniques to model sentiments surrounding the previously announced tuition-free college program Americans College Promise - the article can be found in the Journal of Further and Higher Edu- cation. Dan is adept at quantitative and qualitatively methods and is currently finishing up a data scientist certificated fixated on Big Data, Geospatial Data, and Data Visualization. c American Society for Engineering
Paper ID #23831Do Students Believe Girls Belong in Engineering? So What?Ms. Henriette D. Burns, Washington State University, Vancouver Henriette has worked at Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, Baxter Labs, Tenneco, Monsanto, Frucon Con- struction, SC Johnson Wax and HP as a design engineer, a manufacturing engineer and a project manager. She holds an engineering degree from Northwestern University, an MBA from University of Oregon and a MiT from Washington State University where she is currently finishing her Ph.D. in Math/Science Educa- tion. Henriette’s research agenda is unveiling and understanding the identity of non
in order to ensure a higher response rate. Our combined targetpopulation was approximately 1,609 undergraduate students with a gender breakdown of 53%women and 47% men in a broad range of undergraduate majors. 110 responses were received,including 59 STEM majors, 17 arts majors and 23 students who identified as having a major inneither of those categories. The overall response rate was 9.4%. Due to the limited scope of thisproject and the barriers to human subject access, the feasibility of our sample leaves our studysubject to sampling bias, making it difficult to generalize our results beyond the institutionsampled for this project. Variables This study included four dependent variables representing student interest in STEM
in a real negotiation process with professional and financial stakes. Undoubtedly, welearned many lessons throughout the process, including the need to construct a more concisesurvey instrument, and those lessons will inform our ongoing efforts to study this topic.Furthermore, with the complex nature of gender and negotiation, additional data collectionmethods should be explored to help us better understand what happens during negotiationprocesses and how gender factors into those processes.To that end, we have begun a second phase of the [name removed] project that entails collectionof different qualitative data. This phase began with a storytelling circle and methodologydiscussion held at a conference in January 2018 [17]. Analysis of our
, focuses specifically on the person: self-esteem, one’s overall regard of the selfas a person 7 ; and self-efficacy, a confidence in one’s own ability to achieve intended results 8 . Seron,Silbey, Cech, and Rubineau 9 followed cohorts of undergraduate students from four different typesof institutions (elite private college; large, public land-grant institution; engineering-only college;and single-sex college) for four years. Through diaries and interviews, they were able to tease outhow socialization, both during team-based projects in classes and in the workforce throughinternship opportunities, leads women to develop less confidence that they will ’fit’ into the cultureof engineering 9 . Results from comparing climate surveys conducted at a