users. The Disabilities, Opportunities, Internetworking, and Technology (DO-IT) center at the University of Washington [6] provides an extensive repository of resources related to accessibility and universal design, in particular guidelines for both engineering labs [7] and makerspaces [8]. The Accessible Biomedical Immersion Laboratory (ABIL) at Purdue University [9] and the Seattle Lighthouse for the Blind [10] also provide excellent recommendations and models. Recommendations are broken down into guidelines for physical environments, tools and hardware, and instructional and support resources. Open floor plans with clearly marked and accessible routes of travel are a priority in accessible work spaces, with reconfigurable and height
. Cross, Morgan State University Hello my name is Kalah Cross and I attend Morgan State University and plan to graduate May 2019. I am originally from St. Louis, Missouri and I came to Baltimore, Maryland to pursue my dreams of going to college. I love robotics and space science. I have always interested in learning about the stars and the creations we send out of space. One day I hope to work for a great company that will allow me to pursue my passion.Dr. Matt Collinge, Johns Hopkins University Matt Collinge received his Ph.D. in Astrophysics from Princeton University in 2010. He taught interdis- ciplinary science for four years as a Science Fellow at Columbia University. His celestial interests range from modern
gender identity, race, national origin, ethnicity, religion, age, sexual orientation, disability, political affiliation, or family, marital, or economic status. a. Engineers shall conduct themselves in a manner in which all persons are treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. b. Engineers shall not engage in discrimination or harassment in connection with their professional activities. c. Engineers shall consider the diversity of the community, and shall endeavor in good faith to include diverse perspectives, in the planning and performance of their professional services [1].Prior to Canon 8's adoption
essential skills for becoming an impactful, well-rounded engineer [14], educators arejust beginning to experiment with and share their techniques and frameworks for better educatingstudents in this skill to help fill the gap.Empathy is very much a learnable skill, so the lack of educational frameworks may be due morein part to the newness of the concept, rather than the difficulty in teaching it. In fact, teachingempathy has been a key aspect of educating social workers for many years [15].When specifically looking to implement empathy-building exercises into design and engineeringeducation, Reimer recommends a variety of techniques, including implementing elements ofself- and context-awareness, decision-making and action planning, research and
Paper ID #21837Measuring Broader Impact of NSF-funded Project on Software EngineeringEducationDr. Sushil Acharya, Robert Morris University Sushil Acharya, D.Eng. (Asian Institute of Technology) is the Assistant Provost for Research and Gradu- ate Studies. A Professor of Software Engineering, Dr. Acharya joined Robert Morris University in Spring 2005 after serving 15 years in the Software Industry. His teaching involvement and research interest are in the area of Software Engineering education, Software Verification & Validation, Software Security, Data Mining, Neural Networks, and Enterprise Resource Planning. He also
advocating ashift from a sole focus on student outcomes, we call attention to outcomes 4 and 5, which reflectsystem-level abilities, “An ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities inengineering situations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact ofengineering solutions in global, economic, environmental, and societal contexts; An ability tofunction effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership, create a collaborativeand inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.” Transdisciplinarylearning mirrors an authentic setting of “real world” engineering practice.Table 1. New Accreditation Board on Engineering and Technology (ABET) student outcomes. An ability
98% Leadership meetings—electronic Weekly --on-site retreat for planning Year One, Three --conferences (i.e., ASEE, NSF, Department Heads) Annually Materials and Resources: Number of sites contributing 100% Google portal curriculum units 80% On-site demonstrations/Posters of Use at on-site
of institutional support. Below, we outlineour progress-to-date on the survey development and plans for future deployment. 1 Table 1 - Elements of Institutional Support Construct Definition Academic Support Institutional support geared towards disseminating information related to improving academic performance or circumstances, providing access to resources that support academic performance, monitoring academic performance or development, or contributing to the development of content-independent and
faculty member for tenure and promotion.While planning our most recent research collaboration, we were aware of a new NSFEngineering Research Center (ERC) with an overarching mission directly related to the researchwe wanted to conduct – the Center for Bio-mediated and Bio-inspired Geotechnics (CBBG). Asstated on their website (https://cbbg.engineering.asu.edu/about/), the “CBBG appliesbiogeotechnical techniques to create sustainable, resilient, and environmentally compatiblesolutions for construction, repair, and rehabilitation of civil infrastructure systems.”We realized that a collaboration with the ERC could have significant benefits. First, acollaboration would allow us to integrate our research with that of the investigators at the CBBGin
a nineday period. Each day’s lesson lasted 2 hours, with a total of 18 hours for the entire unit. Fortyseven students participated in the STEAM project over two years. The unit consisted of lessons in neuroscience, sensory impairment, ethics, circuitry, programming Arduino microcontrollers, and the engineering design process. Students then spent the last three days of the unit engaging in the creative process of planning, building, and testing a model of a device that substituted one sense with another (see Appendix A for an outline of the lessons). Two neuroscience lessons involved the discussion of sensory inputs, processing through the central nervous system, and motor outputs. Since the class was multigrade, 7th and 8th grade
one’s own skills and knowledge in determining career choice for engineeringstudents [2]. Because engineering education provides graduates with complex problem solvingskills and reasoning ability in addition to their discipline-specific knowledge, these individualshave a wide range of possible careers. Many engineering students do not limit their post-graduation plans to an engineering job, and a quarter of them never planned to enter anengineering career [3]. For example, some graduates feel that a non-STEM occupation fits betterwith their professional and personal values, goals, and interests and willingly choose a non-STEM career [4]. For those working in a career that is unrelated to their degree 2 to 3 years aftergraduation, over half
designcourses.Table 2: New Design Track. New Design Track Course 1 (1 credit) – Spring Term, Year 3 • Outcome: assignment of teams and projects, market research, project plan • Topics: design controls, project management, literature research, FDA regulation, codes and standards, intellectual property, user needs, design specifications. Course 2 (2 credits) – Fall Term, Year 4 • Outcome: design specifications, system design and simulations • Topics: system diagrams, interface specifications, hazard analysis, university resources Course 3 (2 credits) – Winter Term, Year 4 • Outcome: subsystem design, system integration, prototype building and bench testing • Topics: power budgets, electrical noise and interference Course 4 (2 credits) – Spring Term, Year 4
composed of two parts: assessment of tangible engineering/electronics skills and disabilityawareness. We also plan to pilot a lab practicum that assesses the student’s ability to solder on a circuitboard and on a toy, diagnose and fix common issues with broken toys, develop “outside-the-box”solutions to fix toys with limited resources, explain the usage and theory behind a battery interrupter, andconfidence in their proficiency in the above categories to teach someone else the skills necessary to fix atoy. Additionally, the lab practicum will include a conversation with the students discussing theirincreased awareness of challenges faced by children with disabilities, confidence when faced with anunknown circuit and/or situation, confidence in
of the course, students learn in a blended way by first doing off-lineDigiScope design and analysis prior to coming to the lab followed by the in-lab programming ofthe algorithms for real-time signal processing using a microcontroller. We plan to assess whetherthis new approach for learning has helped the students to better understand the material through aconcept inventory and their ability to do independent design projects.At the beginning of the course, we will assess the knowledge and skills of the students byadministering a concept inventory. This inventory consists of multiple choice questions thatfocus on fundamental concepts taught in previous versions of the course. Since the studentpopulation is a mixture of ECE and BME majors that
providedwith a list of needs, such as logos and branding information, from the vendor. One advantage toworking with the vendor was the ease of use; the vendor offers full customer service by workingdirectly with the employers to set up the event including payments and building the virtualbooths.Once the VCF was established, marketing plans to recruit employers and students wereestablished by the committee. In addition to contacting alumni, the committee also used anestablished database of employers from the CPDO. Many of these employers already attend thetraditional career fair and have an understanding of the enrolled students. Regardless of campusaffiliation, students enrolled in a STEM degree and alumni of those programs were invited toparticipate
consisting of a cover letter, formal application approval by the school principal,scholastic record, personal essay, recommendation letters, vita, etc. Post-selection, the finalistsmeet the project personnel to plan and prepare for the summer program and accommodate teacher-mentor matching. For the 2017 summer PD program originally 10 teachers were selected of whomone teacher discontinued participation after two days due to personal scheduling conflicts.3.1. Introductory phase: The summer PD program began by providing teachers a welcomeorientation to NYU SoE and socializing with the faculty and engineering researchers. Thewelcome orientation was followed by lab tours, introduction to the participating researchpersonnel, and a lab safety session. The
the Ozobot and then the hardware,the participants developed an appreciation of the importance of planning in problem solving. Whilepreparing for the maze-running, most of the students soon realized to calibrate their Ozobots’responses to the commands such as ‘move 5cm’. Similar planning was observed during theplanning/training phase of the quadcopter obstacle course competition. Participants started lookingat the response of the quadcopter to the commands to identify optimal speeds to drop the ‘aid © American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 2018 ASEE National Conferencepackage’ at the target location. Thus, the camp participants were exercising the components of‘computational
. There are also several open source computer codes to analyzethe images. Following the lead of Ryerson and Schwenk [7], this paper will outline the setup of acost-effective PIV system suitable for use in undergraduate laboratories. Major components ofthe system will be described and sample results provided. Plans for inclusion into undergraduatecourses and expected learning outcomes are also given.II. PIV System DescriptionA low-cost PIV system can allow students to observe the dynamics of steady and even unsteadyflows. Particles with a density similar to the fluid are selected in order to achieve a homogenousdistribution within a controlled system. A laser produces the high intensity, collimated lightsource necessary for image capturing. The
hires resulted in the bulk of strategic planning for the year-long capstoneexperience taking place in Spring 2015. Preparations began in earnest with the on-boarding oftwo new faculty hires in August 2015.Early defining decisions for the capstone experience included: • Projects are, whenever possible, industry sponsored • Program director is responsible for sourcing capstone projects • Two engineering faculty members co-direct the capstone program • Each project is required to have a dedicated industry liaison willing and able to have weekly interaction with student project teamThe first engineering capstone cohort consisted of 16 students; 4 of these students were physicsmajors fulfilling degree requirements by completing
of problems per eachassignment. Another interesting observation was that in each single week of the class, fewer thanhalf of the students watched the tutorials. However, those who used this learning tool, used themrather frequently. For example, as shown in Fig. 3, in the third week of the class fewer than 20students watched the videos but the total number of the views was more than 110 times.In our opinion using video tutorials for this hands-on class can improve students’ learningexperience and we plan to continue this study in the future semester. In our future studies wewould like to identify whether mandatory viewing of the video tutorials prior to each class couldfurther improve the performance of our students. There exist certain
part of their research experiences. From thislist of potential codes, codes were identified based on what was found in Phase II interviewtranscripts. These include activities such as constructing knowledge that is new to participant ornew to field, collaboration, testing ideas, and dissemination. Some codes reflect students’attitudes and beliefs, such as career goals or plans; challenges they faced when doing research;and aspects of mentoring or supervision. Other codes reflect aspects of students’ experiences,such as recognition, failure, gaining skills, or feeling a sense of gratification. These codes will beparticularly important for Phase III of this project, in which we will identify ways to transfer ourfindings to instructional practice
exemplar prototype; the third, to brainstorm engineering designproblems and topics relevant to students, plan instruction around one chosen engineeringproblem, and produce an exemplar prototype. The goals and activities of the professionallearning institute can be found in Table 1.Table 1. Professional learning goals and associated activities. Professional Learning Goals Professional Learning Activities 1. Develop working Used a three-phase design process (see Figure 1) to engage knowledge of engineering teachers in three design challenges design processes 2. Differentiate between Reviewed examples of engineering and making, identified engineering design and criteria for engineering design to clarify its
has an Ed.D. in Academic Leadership/Higher Education and an MS degree in Applied Technology/Instructional Design. She has over 10 years of experience teaching, designing instruction, and doing qualitative research both in and outside of a library context. Her research interests focus on library and technology-based instructional planning and course design, assessment and evaluation topics, as well as online teaching and learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Evidence-Based Practice: Student-Centered and Teacher-Friendly Formative Assessment in EngineeringAbstractStudent-centered teaching employs active
authorshad to find a way to film the videos so that they were of high quality. Fortunately, the College ofEngineering (COE) at LSU has a Communication Across the Curriculum (CXC) program whichis housed in a digitalmedia centersponsored byChevron. This wasfortuitous becausethe authors hadaccess to staff andstudents withexpertise in filmingand editing video.The authorscollaborated with Figure 1. Undergraduate students from LSU filming scenes for the new set ofthe staff advisor of videosthe CXC programand student leaders to organize a film crew of six undergraduate students in the COE. Thesestudents then storyboarded every scene and planned out the shots and camera angles that neededto be performed. Next, the
service environments.The course covers the following topics: Introduction to modern manufacturing Basics of manufacturing systems Manufacturing strategies Demand planning and forecasting Material Requirements Planning (MRP) Factory dynamics and variability laws Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma methodologyStudent learning is assessed through homework assignments, lab reports, a course project, andexams. Students work in groups for both the lab reports and the course project.In order to investigate how learning soft skills impacts students on solving technical problems inmanufacturing systems, we brought in the teaching of soft skills to the course as students wentthrough the physical simulations. Student soft skills
, with 29 participants (47%) identifying as female. Weekly surveys were used to collectquantitative data on what types of workplace activities participants engaged in (e.g., teammeetings, project budgeting, CAD modeling, engineering calculations) and qualitative data onwhat challenges they experience in their early work experience.In this paper, we present a descriptive analysis of the data to identify patterns across participants.Preliminary analysis of the quantitative data suggests that the most common activities for ourparticipants were team meetings and project planning (mentioned by >70% of participants)compared to formal presentations and project budgeting (mentioned by <30% of participants).Preliminary analysis of the qualitative
experience. Additionally, the planning of the sessions and exercises inspired thefacilitators to become metacognitively aware of their own research methods and processes.Reflections and Future WorkThe diversity of research areas, career goals, and personalities among the three facilitatorscontributed greatly to the intellectual merit of the workshop. Inclusion of these multipleperspectives ensured that the workshop topics were broadly applicable. Admittedly, some of ouradvice was a matter of personal opinion; therefore, further exemplifying the value of includingseveral experienced viewpoints in the sessions.The peer-led aspect of this workshop was likely a significant portion of its success; however, weacknowledge the potential benefits of
itis open source, relatively easy to use, and can be implemented on different platforms. Thedeliverable of the project is a real-time image classifier that can work as a PC program oran android App.2.2. Proposal Phase: Since TensorFlow is mostly written in Python, a brief introductionof Python is presented in the classroom, followed by the introduction to deep learning andCNN. The instructor then demonstrates how to install TensorFlow on Windows. Eachstudent is asked to submit a proposal to identify the classes he or she plans to work on. Thestudent also need to justify why the chosen classes are important and a software applicationshould be created to automatically classify them. The proposal is reviewed by acomprehensive face-to-face
philosophy implored in the program is based on self-awareness, intention, andchoice. Observation and the natural skills and abilities that helped get the faculty members tothis point in their careers are emphasized in the coaching process. Meeting them “where they areat” is a common principle. Initially, there was no planned structure for each person; the coachallowed each individual faculty member to choose the agenda and topic to work on for thesession. The essence of the coaching perspective is that other people are full of potential. Theyare naturally talented, innately resourceful, and destined for greater things. They are also fullycapable of making their own decisions, solving their own problems, and seizing their ownopportunities and are
conversations around student retention with different groups. Faculty developmentoften is engaged in disseminating pedagogy through workshops, programs, and consultationswith the CTL. How else might the CTL be involved through additional change strategies and bepart of the process and conversation?This work in progress describes the approach the CETL at USI is taking to be part of theconversations and working groups that contribute to retention and academic success of ourengineering students. A systematic plan has been developed to proactively involve CETL inprocesses with faculty and academic units to gain deeper understanding of student successchallenges, develop buy-in, articulate retention goals, and help faculty identify the need andopportunities