enter college intending to major in a STEM fieldcomplete a STEM degree.” In order to remain globally competitive, the U.S. must increase thequantity, quality, and diversity of the STEM workforce.Studies have shown that students who participate in STEM programs before college increasetheir chances to succeed5-13. These programs provide them with important knowledge and skillsto gain a better understanding of science and engineering careers. This paper describes a STEMSummer Enrichment Program (STEM-SEP) designed for high school students. STEM-SEP’sgoal is to improve the recruitment and preparation of students, particularly those fromunderrepresented groups, through participation in a two-week summer enrichment workshop thatincreases students
me much more aware of what is expected and desired in the engineeringfield of new engineers, and has helped me further my opportunities and personal growth.” “It has taught me a lot about what direction I would like to take my career and academiclife to potentially succeed in a professional setting.” “The skills I learned in the program directly applied to my internship and helped me feelmore prepared for my participation in industry.” “It helped me get an internship the summer after my second year which I wouldn’t havegotten otherwise. Greatly increased my professional experience.” “The ISP has made me more ready for the professional world in every sense. I feel moreconfident communicating and navigating the
graduate school. (f) Applying for fellowships. (g) Engineering ethics. (h) Is graduate school right for you? (i) Networking in school and your career. Each IMMERSE student gives a technical presentation during the summer group meeting (see Figure 15), which provides a supportive atmosphere consisting mostly of their peers. These presentations help students improve communications skills and put their specific research into a “big picture” context. After the presentation, audience members give suggestions on what they liked about the presentation and what could be improved. Figure 15. Student presentation during an IMMERSE group meeting.2. Individual Research Meetings: Student research projects are divided
; additive manufacturing; and mechanics education. Dr. Rhoads is a Member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and a Fellow of the American Society of Mechan- ical Engineers (ASME), where he serves on the Design Engineering Division’s Technical Committees on Micro/Nanosystems and Vibration and Sound, as well as the Design, Materials, and Manufacturing (DMM) Segment Leadership Team. Dr. Rhoads is a recipient of numerous research and teaching awards, including the National Science Foundation’s Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award; the Purdue University School of Mechanical Engineering’s Harry L. Solberg Best Teacher Award (twice), Robert W. Fox Outstanding Instructor Award, and B.F.S. Schaefer
students were very interested in the activities and that the unit increasedtheir students’ awareness of neural engineering. Results from surveys of students in 2017 (N =212) indicate that they self-reported on a 5-point Likert scale statistically significant (p < .001)differences before and after enactment of the units in their knowledge of concepts in neuralengineering, engineering, neuroscience, and neuroethics, as well as careers in neural engineering. 1414 North East 42nd Street, Suite 204, Seattle, WA 98105-6271 Telephone: (206) 685-8915 URL: http://www.csne-erc.orgFeatured Unit: Modeling & Designing a Sensory Substitution DeviceTime: 4-5 weeks Lessons: 10 Grades: 6-8 Focus: STEAM
Engineering Entrepreneurship and an Associate Professor of Practice in the Texas A&M University College of Engineering. He has broad industry experiences, including over 35 years in all aspects of the telecommunications industry (sales, marketing, manufacturing, business de- velopment, and technical design), the creation of a telecommunications standard (SONET - Synchronous Optical Network) for the fiber optics industry that is still in use internationally over 30 years later, a wide variety of business experiences in international companies, and startup experiences. This has helped him lead a very successful industry career. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
Electrical Engineering from National Taiwan University, and pursued a career in the tech industry while working on his gradu- ate degrees. Before joining Loyola University Chicago, he worked as a Postdoctoral Research Fellow at Harvard Medical School and conducted clinical research at the Neuromodulation Center of Spaulding Re- habilitation Hospital in Boston. His current research focuses on quantifying the extent of neuroplasticity induced by the application of brain and peripheral nerve stimulation.Mr. Allan Beale I have a BSEE from the University of Maryland, 1967 thus I have 50 years experience divided between 3 different fields: Aerospace, Computer and Medical. For these fields, the work was mostly analog and
Paper ID #22218Work in Progress: Leveraging the Diverse Backgrounds of Community Col-lege Students to Teach Team-based, Multidisciplinary EngineeringDr. David R. Ely, Ivy Tech Community College, Lafayette Dr. David R. Ely is the Engineering Program Chair at Ivy Tech Community College Lafayette since 2013. He enjoys teaching engineering students at Ivy Tech and advising them on the different engineering career paths that best match their interests and skill sets. Dr. Ely received his B.S. in Physics from Houghton College in 2002 followed by his Ph.D. in Pharmaceutics from Purdue University in 2010, where he re- searched
the NGSS is to empower all students to participate inpublic science discourse, be critical consumers of scientific information, and have the skills topursue careers in the 21st century, particularly those in science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) [2]. As an increasing number of states adopt the NGSS, there is mountingpressure to prepare science educators for the impending changes in expectations, curriculum, andassessment.There are significant challenges as states transition their science standards to align with NGSS,such as insufficient professional development and support for teachers, inconsistency ofimplementation, and inadequate time and curricular resources [3]. In this recent reform effort,science teachers are likely
everything which is very important in his orher future professional career advancement.In the following sections, we briefly review the senior design background, report thedesign of effective stress and upward seepage laboratory demonstration budget andschematic design materialization and project schedules. Significance of the project ishighlighted with pertinent concluding remarks and conclusions drawn at the end.BackgroundAny time a structure is being built, it requires an extensive amount of planning byengineers of multiple disciplines and every building project always begins with thefoundation. A structure is only as strong as the foundation upon which it is built, which iswhy it is so important that subsurface investigation of the underlying
., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self- efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education,98(1), 27-38. 21. Ponton, M. K., Edmister, J. H., Ukeiley, L. S., & Seiner, J. M. (2001). Understanding the role of self- efficacy in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 247.22. Huff, J. L., Smith, J. A., Jesiek, B. K., Zoltowski, C. B., & Oakes, W. C. (2018). Identity in engineering adulthood: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of early-career engineers in the United States as they transition to the workplace. Manuscript submitted for publication.23. Downey, G., &
Shannon is Associate Teaching Professor of Biological Sciences at Missouri University of Sci- ence and Technology. She earned her Bachelor of Arts degree in Biology with Honors from the University of North Carolina and her PhD in Cell and Developmental Biology from the Harvard Medical School. She has been active in biology education research since early in her career. She was a fellow in the Seeding Postdoctoral Innovators in Research and Education (SPIRE) as a Postdoc at UNC. In the SPIRE program Dr. Shannon was introduced to the fellowship of teaching and learning. In 2013, she participated in the American Society for Microbiology Biology Scholars Program Research Residency. During her research residency, she
fell into two areas: earning acollege degree or affinity for their major. This finding was surprising given that most earlylearners are uncertain of academic goals [4]. Driven by this evidence, self-reflection shoulddeepen student discipline-specific understandings.Research activities centered on a university-specific electronic portfolio: the PersonalDevelopment Plan (ePDP), enabling students to more effectively map out and navigate theiracademic and co-curricular experiences, as well as their subsequent careers. The ePDP is apersonalized planning process that enables students to understand, implement, and chart progresstoward their degree and college goals. For more than 10 years, the university has integratedpersonal development planning
-step surgical procedure from amanufacturer of similar devices, and video material of a simulated surgery and actual surgeryfrom various websites. In addition, if resources were available, students had an opportunity toobserve for in-class demonstration and to have hands-on experiences with surgical procedureusing artificial bone (SAWBONES. Vashon, WA USA) to obtain a better understanding of therelationship between implant design andsurgical procedures/tools. Instructor hadadequate trainings and experiences in surgicalprocedure for various orthopedic devices duringhis career in medical device industry, and wasable to demonstrate a correct procedure. For thelast three academic years, surgical instrumentof the IM nail, external fixation for long
., 2014). Such experience allows students andinstructors to collaboratively bridge the research and classroom and provide research experiencesfor students relative to traditional individual mentored research. Undergraduates who are involvedin research report cognitive gains such as a) learning to think and analyze, b) affective gains suchas delight, c) psychosocial gains such as belonging to a team, identifying as an effective engineer,and d) behavioral gains such as motivations to pursue graduate education or careers in engineering(Laursen et al., 2010; Lopatto and Tobias, 2010).Studies of undergraduate research experiences have been criticized for some reasons such ascounting on students to convey their own knowledge and skill gains, applying
anandragogical mindset. However the authors cautioned that undergraduate mechanicalengineering students may lack some of the attributes which form the underlying assumptions ofandragogical learning practices. Specifically, young undergraduate mechanical engineeringstudents may be unable to visualize how their education applies to a future career and may lackthe experiences or intrinsic motivation to be an andragogical learner. Correspondingly, Melnykand Novoselich advocated a deliberate and steady increase in self-directed (andragogical)learning practices as students progress along their undergraduate engineering education pathway(Figure 1). Figure 1: Student transition from youth to adult learning over four-year experience. Methods To
University, Polytechnic campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined Arizona State after completing her M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at Stanford University. She also has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Northeastern University. Dr. Brunhaver’s research examines the career decision-making and professional identity formation of engineering students, alumni, and practicing engineers. She also conducts studies of new engineering pedagogy that help to improve student engagement and understanding.Dr. Jeremi S. London, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant
Glen Livesay is a Professor of Biology and Biomedical Engineering; he co-developed and co-teaches the biomedical engineering capstone design sequence at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Glen’s educational research interests include student learning styles, increasing student engagement with hands- on activities, and more recently, creativity & design. He has received an NSF CAREER award and served as a Fellow at the National Effective Teaching Institute.Prof. Jay Patrick McCormack, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Jay McCormack is an associate professor in the mechanical engineering department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Dr. McCormack received his PhD in mechanical engineering from Carnegie
for broadening the participation of African American students inengineering. The central objective of the project is to conduct a comparative study of the factorsaffecting the success and pathways to engineering careers of African American students at aPredominantly White Institution (PWI), the University of Toledo, and a Historically BlackUniversity (Alabama Agricultural and Mechanical University). Through this research we hope togain insight into the factors affecting the social and academic well-being of students at PWIs andHBCUs from a psychological and anthropological perspective.For students from underrepresented groups in STEM at both HBCUs and PWIs it is generallyrecognized that social capital in the form of familial, peer and mentor
Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering (BSEE) degree.The main objective of the ECE Scholars program was to increase the number of electricalengineering students graduating from Seattle University and entering the engineeringworkforce. Seattle ECE scholars received financial, academic, professional development, andcommunity building support to ensure their successful progression toward the BSEE degree.Student support services included peer tutoring, informal study partners, industry mentorshipprogram, professional development seminars, and social activities.In this paper, we discuss both the qualitative and quantitative results of this grant. We reporton the academic achievement of the scholars and their career choices after graduation. We
Engineering: U.S.-Trinidad-Anguilla PartnershipIntroductionAfrican Americans are underrepresented in both the engineering workforce and study abroad.61.7% African Americans students who enter engineering programs do not graduate in thismajor.1 This translates to an engineering workforce that comprise; about 4% AfricanAmericans.2 While African American students account for 15% of the overall U.S.undergraduate population, they only represent 5.6% of the over 300,000 U.S. students studyingabroad.3 There are several reasons for this disparity; finances, faculty leadership, high attritionrates, family support, anxiety resulting from travel inexperience, and lack of insight to thecorrelations between global cultural competence and career goals.4, 5
mind thatleads students to seek additional information beyond what is presented. Students who arecurious go beyond what they need to know for the test, ask “Why?” and are better poised totransfer knowledge between courses and in their ongoing careers. This first of EM’s three C’s isalso recognized more broadly as a key attribute; for example, in “Curious” by Leslie, oncedemographic factors are accounted for, it is curiosity and conscientiousness that are correlatedwith student success [2].Closely linked to curiosity, motivation helps describe students’ intention to realize this curiosity.There are a number of lenses through which to view both curiosity and motivation. One usefultheory for describing situational interest is Self-Determination
Knowledge Dimension: What all High School Students Should Know to be Engineering Literate. (Fundamental)Rationale and Background The importance of engineering for P-12 learners continues to increase1-6. This growinginterest can be attributed to the idea that engineering education can contribute to the generaleducation of all students as well as inspire a more diverse, and workforce ready, populace tomeet the needs of high-demand careers of the 21st century2. Engineering education is uniquelypositioned to support interdisciplinary learning experiences to foster rich connections and furtherknowledge and skills of academic disciplines. The inclusion of engineering into P-12 educationis now seen as an approach to address challenges facing
2017 Best Paper, “MeasuringStudents’ Subjective Task Values Related to the Post-Undergraduate Career Search” [9] reads:“The PEPS study is grounded in Expectancy-Value Theory (EVT), which conceptualizesengagement in a task as a function of four subjective task values: attainment value, intrinsicvalue, utility value, and cost. The focus of this research paper is on the development andvalidation of survey measures to capture students’ subjective task values (STV) related to theirpost-undergraduate career search.” The top 10 keywords from that paper, based on their TFIDF,are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Top 10 Keywords in 2017 ERM Best Paper Word Term Frequency in Paper Document Frequency (n=157) TFIDF
Paper ID #23613Project-based Learning as a Vehicle for Social Responsibility and Social Jus-tice in Engineering EducationDr. Greg Rulifson P.E., Colorado School of Mines Greg currently teaches in Humanitarian Engineering at Mines where he bridges the gaps, so to speak, for the many students who do not quite see how their future engineering careers, design, and humanitarianism can be woven together. Greg earned his bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering with a minor in Global Poverty and Practice from UC Berkeley where he acquired a passion for using engineering to facilitate developing communities’ capacity for success
PolytechnicState University of San Luis Obispo (Cal Poly). The platform is shown below in Figure 1. Thecourse and platform are being developed by students at Cal Poly, in collaboration with aprofessor who has a vision for the course. What follows is a description of how the course willprepare students for careers in industry; a look at similar courses at other universities; anoverview of the course; a summary of the SSIV development; and a plan for evaluating thecourse. Figure 1. The Small Scale Intelligent Vehicle (SSIV) in its current state of development.Tailoring the Course to Meet Industry NeedsAt Cal Poly, we wanted to make sure that our course in intelligent vehicles would effectivelyprepare students for a career in the industry. To better
engineers and other professionals who are awarded conditional certificates toteach subjects such as physics, chemistry, and advanced mathematics due to the lack of educatorswith these skills.Due to the requirement of advanced degrees in higher education, researchers are recruited toteach despite their relatively little experience teaching. This frequently results in discouraged anddisjoined students at a time that is critical to future studies and careers. This leads us to questionhow much pedagogical training is received by STEM educators, especially in relation to varioustechniques and in developing a course.Formal Training in Education. In general, K-12 educators are expected to be trained in bothteaching pedagogy and their subject area. However
Paper ID #22436Teaching Manufacturing Technology through ’Learning by Doing’ ApproachDr. Zareena Gani, ADMC, Higher Colleges of Technology, UAE Dr. Zareena Gani started her career in Engineering with a degree in Mechanical engineering from MK University, India. She has over 20 years of experience in both academia and industry. She has worked as a Design and Manufacturing engineer in Singapore before joining National University of Singapore from which she obtained her M.Eng degree. She also has worked in Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (A*STAR) as a Research Fellow before moving to Canada. She gained exposure
to become more student-centered.Issues 1-4 and 6 are addressed by implementing either a Problem-Based or Project-Based Learningapproach. Issue 5, however, is a challenge we will return to later. The distinction between the twoapproaches was well differentiated by a faculty member at Aalborg University in Denmark which basesapproximately half of their curriculum in a blend of these styles [2]. The difference is in Problem-BasedLearning the faculty member plays a role of “process-oriented supervisor” and in Project-Based Learningthe faculty member plays the role of “product-oriented supervisor”[3]. In order for students to be effectivewhen they go off and apply their knowledge in their careers, they need to have both tools for independentlyand
behind an energy transformation project underway in an undergraduateEngineering Technology program. The goal is a new energy systems curriculum that crossestraditional course boundaries to teach students that similar energy conversion processes occur inmany different disciplines.Figure 1 shows that the courses in the energy system curriculum appear in a progression, fromintroductory first year courses to career-related courses taken by graduating seniors (4th year).The unifying and integrating theme, whether 1st year materials or 3rd year thermodynamics, ismodules highlighting basic energy conversion processes. Another aspect of Figure 1 is an effortto maintain continuity between the energy conversion modules in different courses by creatingan