computer science curriculum is designedsuch that students take 15-17 credits each semester throughout the four years to complete thedegree. Only twice were students not eligible to receive ASPIRE funding in a particularsemester because they registered as part-time student or had a leave of absence (militarycommitment).Data collected for NSF on the scholarship recipients indicated that the overall GPAs of studentsreceiving the scholarship did not significantly change during the time they received ASPIREfunding. Many of the students who received the scholarship were academically strong students asevidenced by an average GPA of the cohorts of 3.0 or above for all five years of the program.Graduation rate of ASPIRE recipients was quite high. To date
nature of theenvironment and train to solve problems under real constraints in a specific context and with scarceresources. These professionals face the challenge of designing solutions for the basic needs ofcommunities in situations of social, environmental or economic vulnerability.All this is possible because of our will to create an engineering curriculum that will teachengineering students how to bring their systemic thinking knowledge and skills, as well as theircultural sensitivity, to bear on real-world problems, which means that it is aimed so that studentscan consider the stakeholders, variables and relations within a system. Some of the systemicmethodologies and topics that contributed with this are Soft Systems Methodologies [7
classes and a job or family orboth. Most of our education system is not built to cater to their needs, and its results areextremely wasteful –30% failure rate year in and year out in fundamental engineering coursescannot simply be tolerated as an unfortunate reality. Active learning should no longer be anoption –it must be treated as the key ingredient in attempting to start solving this failurecatastrophe. The frame of active learning should contain many interactive elements, includingweekly lectures, in-class activities, online activities71, and hands-on lab exercises –all doneduring the 75-minute class time in each lecture, thus not changing any curriculum structure.Each element of the new paradigm is described below –mechanics of materials
modules.Bibliography[1] J. M. &. P. C. &. P. V. C. Papadopoulos, "Philosophy of Integrating FEA Practice Throughout the Undergraduate CE/ME Curriculum," in Proceedings of 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, BC, 2011.[2] N. Smith and J. Davis, "Connecting Theory and Software: Experience with an Undergraduate Finite Element Course," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[3] Q. Ma and L. Yaw, "Finite Element Method as a Useful Modern Engineering Tool to Enhance Learning of Deformation Concepts," in 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Seattle, 2015.[4] H.-H. Lee, Finite Element Simulations with ANSYS Workbench 17, Mission, KS: SDC Publications, 2017.[5] R. Budynas and K. Nisbett, Shigley's
, 53, 107-126.Madhavan, G. (2015). Applied minds: How engineers think. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2007). Collaborative learning through chat discussions and argument diagrams in secondary school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 109-126.Mathis, C.A., Siverling, E.A., Glancy, A.W., & Moore, T.J. (2015). Teachers’ use of argumentation in the development of integrated STEM curricula. ASEE Conference & Exposition, paper ID#12857. Seattle, WA.McNeill, K. L. (2009). Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93, 233-268.Monaghan, J. R. (2015). Scaffolds in a
, April 1998, pp. 81–88. 3. Clark, R. E., “Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media,” Review of Educational Research, Winter, 1983, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 445-459.4. Felder, R. M. and Silverman, L. K., “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education,” Engineering Education 78(7), pp. 674-681, April 1988.5. Jensen, E. (1998). “Teaching with the Brain in Mind,” Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.6. Krauss, R., Ali, A., & Lenz, A., “Teaching Dynamic Systems and Control without Dynamics,” 2017 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio.7. Lee, K.-M., Daley, W., and McKlin, T., “An interactive learning tool for dynamic systems and control,” International
particular. It is a follow up to previous work by the author,on viable strategies to improve the classroom environment of engineering colleges in theArab Gulf Region. At the start, the paper provides an overview of relevant benchmarks ofengineering education in the Region. Then, relates author’s preliminary findings onteaching/learning practices in engineering colleges of the Region, sheds light on the pros andcons of the lecture format, and examines the literature on meanings and substance ofdifferent active learning protocols, focusing on cooperative engagement strategies. Thepaper, also, sheds light on: theoretical roots, research support, current practices, andsuggestions for redesigning classes, if need be, to stimulate interaction and help
you keep in mind that some of the respondents graduated 16 years ago.In order to increase response-rate we took multiple actions that were developed based on pastexperiences and best practices [40]: • The invitations and survey featured clear but appealing design with photos of the course • We ensured concise content without unnecessary details. The content of the three e- mails varied slightly, highlighting various values for the respondent each time: the opportunity to give something back to their alma mater and prospective students by further improving the curriculum; the chance to reflect on their own educational and career goals; and an opportunity to win a prize. • The initial drafts took 20
engineering undergraduate curriculum. They must take and pass both Physicsfor Scientists and Engineers I (covering forces, energy, momentum, and angular momentum) andCalculus for Physical Scientists I (covering limits, continuity, differentiation, and integration ofelementary functions with applications). Statics is a required course for all Civil, Mechanical,Environmental, and Biomedical Engineering students and can be taken as an elective byElectrical and Chemical Engineering students. Section size varies between 100-150 students withthree 50 minute lectures per week with no recitations or labs. During a 16 week semester, weeklyhomework sets and learning activities are completed by all students. The course currently doesnot use any commercial
information, data and science literacy skills that will allow them to succeed in a global economy. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Implementing a Graduate Class in Research Data Management for Science/Engineering StudentsIntroduction: Research data management (RDM) is an integral part of engineering and science graduatestudent life, both during graduate school and in their future occupations. Federal agencies,including NSF[1], NIH[2], and USGS[3], are now requiring the submission of a DataManagement Plan (DMP) when submitting proposals for funding. Carlson et al. further advocatefor RDM by stating “… it is not simply enough to teach students about handling data, they mustknow
learningenvironment [8]. Presently, to design a successful flipped classroom, educators include variousfactors such as a pre-recorded video lecture with pre-class activity, a follow-up quiz on the pre-class work, an in-class activity, and an in-class group activity. Studies [1, 15] show that thefollowing factors have significant impact on the success of a flipped classroom model: 1) out-of-class and in-class elements must be carefully integrated for students to understand the model andbe motivated to prepare for class; 2) shorter, rather than longer videos; and 3) pre-class activitiesmust be coupled with quizzes or follow-up tasks to assess the student's understanding. A successfulflipped classroom design requires significant effort and time on the part of
and S. Acar, “Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential,” Creat. Res. J., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2012.[16] E.-S. Katterfeldt, N. Dittert, and H. Schelhowe, “Designing digital fabrication learning environments for Bildung: Implications from ten years of physical computing workshops,” Int. J. Child-Computer Interact., vol. 5, pp. 3–10, 2015.[17] K. Qiu, L. Buechley, E. Baafi, and W. Dubow, “A curriculum for teaching computer science through computational textiles,” in Proc. of the International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 2013, pp. 20–27.[18] N. O. Ornelas, G. Calderon, and P. Blikstein, “Makers in Residence Mexico: Creating the Conditions for Invention,” in Proc. of the
Paper ID #21287Applied Computing for Behavioral and Social Sciences (ACBSS) MinorDr. Farshid Marbouti, San Jose State University Farshid Marbouti is currently an Assistant Professor of General Engineering at San Jose State University. He completed his Ph.D. in Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has an M.A. in the Educational Technology and Learning Design and an M.S. and B.S. in Computer Engineering. His research interests are engineering design education, feedback, and using learning analytics to improve first-year engineering students’ success.Dr. Valerie A. Carr, San Jose State UniversityProf. Belle Wei
students, but rather a self-selected subset. Whileliterature indicates that EL programming is more effective when integrated into the corecurriculum rather than distributed in optional activities [13], other studies reveal that changingthe engineering core curriculum can be quite difficult [6, 14, 15]. These latter studies, coupledwith the observed trend of optional EL course implementation, suggest that the self-selectivenature of students’ EL course participation will continue to be commonplace – at least in the nearterm.Given the voluntary status of many undergraduate EL courses, it may be appropriate for ELeducators to consider the cross-sectional representativeness of their course cohorts relative totheir university’s overall engineering
assessment, and predictive modeling & machine learning. For more information, please visit his personal blog at https://gokhanegilmez.wordpress.com/Dr. Dusan Sormaz, Ohio University Dr. Dusan N. Sormaz is a Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Ohio University, Athens, USA. Dr. Dusan N. Sormaz’s principal research interests are in Lean manufacturing, Simulation, Addi- tive Manufacturing, Process planning, and application of knowledge-based systems in manufacturing. He teaches Lean manufacturing, Simulation and Computer Integrated Manufacturing courses at Ohio Uni- versity. His student team recently received the 1st place among 220 teams from 11 countries in the Global simulation competition sponsored by
a member of the University Research Council before pursuing doctoral studies. Prior to joining ADDU in 2008, Ms. Soledad was a Senior Team Lead for Accenture, where she worked on and managed systems maintenance and enhancement projects.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Tech Dr. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes
focused on developing aconceptual understanding of electromagnetism “with connected concepts and practical approachand applications that student can relate to”. The second approach represents a moreelectromagnetic literacy approach. By analysing and contrasting these perspectives we try to findappropriate mergers of learning techniques that would be valuable for all students seeking todevelop a strong fundamental understanding of electromagnetism.IntroductionElectromagnetism (EM) courses are historically considered to be one of the most challengingcourses in the electrical engineering curriculum [1-14]. Some students feel the course ischallenging due to a large disconnect between abstract concepts and real-life/engineeringexperiences [2-4
in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology at Arizona State Univer- sity. For the last three years he also held the Elmhurst Energy Chair in STEM education at the University of Birmingham in the UK. Previously, Dr. Middleton was Associate Dean for Research in the Mary Lou Fulton College of Education at Arizona State University, and Director of the Division of Curriculum and Instruction. He received his Ph.D. in Educational Psychology from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1992, where he also served in the National Center for Research on Mathematical Sciences Education as a postdoctoral scholar.Prof. Robert J. Culbertson, Arizona State University Robert J. Culbertson is an Associate Professor of
, as both an accelerated (5 week) study abroadexperience in the United Kingdom and as a standard on-campus course. This course, taught bythe second author, utilizes real world scenarios or “challenges” as a lens through whichbiotransport content is delivered, practiced, and assessed.From a position of curriculum development and education policy, we recognize that inquiry-based learning (IBL) (i.e. challenge based instruction, problem/project based learning) are non-standard in engineering teaching. There are a plethora of rationales provided for this low rate ofadoption, including insufficient faculty-teacher preparation to execute IBL, time constraints onprofessors in their teaching role, and necessity of direct instruction to establish
arepurchased automatically with or without staff mediation or oversight as long as pre-determined funds are still available. Implementation of a DDA program requires specialconsideration of specific criteria, such as the types of access permitted, the ease withwhich DDA title records integrate with the local cataloging and acquisition processes, thenumber and educational level of titles included in the pool, and whether or not interlibraryloan (ILL) is allowed [5]. This complex activity requires collaboration between severallibrary departments [3].The DDA model represents a profound shift from a “just in case” to a “just in time”approach to library collection development where users play an active role in the selectionprocess. The increased users
roboticsprograms on a broader set of educational attitudes that are also related to long-term achievementand success in school.The youth development literature also points to positive impacts from these types of hands-onlearning experiences on a variety of life and workplace-related skills, including teamwork,communications, project management and problem-solving skills [38], [39]. These types of skillsare increasingly considered essential workplace skills and the teaching of these skills is nowconsidered an integral part of engineering education [40], [41],[42], [4].While math and science-related attitudes and those related to educational competence andengagement provide an interim set of outcomes or predictors of interest, this study also focuseson more
President of Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant
improve their technical communication and hands-on skills through introductory physics labs. Dr. Popovic is a member of ASEE and SPIE, and is a reviewer for the Physics in Medicine and Biology journal.Janie Szabo, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Janie Szabo is currently pursuing her PhD in Curriculum and Instruction with an emphasis in Educa- tional Technology from Indiana State University. In her current role as an Instructional Designer at Rose- Hulman Institute of Technology, she collaborates with faculty on developing face-to-face, hybrid, and online courses. Janie also coordinates and provides training and support for the campus Learning Man- agement System, Moodle, and Multimedia System, Panopto
University and has served as a Fulbright Scholar at Kathmandu University it Nepal. At Cal Poly, he teaches an Interdisciplinary senior project class and teaches mechanics and design courses. He also conducts research in the areas of creative design, machine design, fluid power control, and engineering education.Dr. Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Edward Berger is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education and Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University, joining Purdue in August 2014. He has been teaching mechanics for over 20 years, and has worked extensively on the integration and assessment of specific technology interventions in mechanics classes. He was one of the co
introducing new perspectives tohelp spark innovation in how we address important societal issues. In addition to attracting andretaining more students from underrepresented groups, it is important that all students receive thenecessary preparation to work with diverse peers in an effective and inclusive manner. In thisIUSE (Improving Undergraduate STEM Education) project, we are developing, implementing,and assessing curriculum changes that are intended to cultivate inclusive professional identitiesin engineering and computer science students. The key tenants of inclusive profession identitiesas defined by this project are: (a) fluency with the necessary technical knowledge, skills, andabilities for students to work in their chosen field, (b) an
integration is not suitable for processes that do notrequire high temperatures for a reaction step, or (2) students encounter a lack of available timenear project completion because too much time is spent early in the project on correctimplementation of reaction kinetics. In the 2016 offering of Design III, 4 out of 6 groupssuccessfully incorporated heat integration in their process (see Figure 1). In the spring 2017offering of Design III, 7 out of 11 groups successfully incorporated heat integration in theirprocess, while in the summer 2017 offering of Design III, only 1 out of 4 groups successfullyincorporated heat integration in their process. Table 2 below presents an overview of the utilitycost benefit for the 12 senior design groups that chose
accepted academic definition is from Bringle & Hatcher [8, p. 112]: “Course-based, credit bearing educational experience in which students participate in an organized serviceactivity that meets identified community needs, and reflect on the service activity in such a wayas to gain further understanding of course content, a broader appreciation of the discipline, andan enhanced sense of civic responsibility”. In 1995, the Engineering Projects in CommunityService Program (EPICS) became the first service-learning program integrated intoan engineering curriculum, which provided an innovative educational experiencefor engineering undergraduates at Purdue University [9]. Service-learning has since stronglyemerged as an important complement to
, and, sociopolitical consciousness.These tenets can be employed in various contexts with a diverse population through classroominstruction, during teacher education, and as a framework for educational research [7]. Manyscholars have highlighted the role of CRP in facilitating the success of URM students inmathematics and science in K–12 education [8-9]. In this study, CRP is an importantconsideration, because when science and math teachers instruct from a Eurocentric point of view,they fail to include an approach that connects curriculum, instruction, and assessment to theexperiences, cultures, and traditions of URM students [10-11]. Teachers pursuing CRP will needto understand the sense-making practices of communities, the science-related
. We will plan to interview fivepeople from each of the networks for the pilot study.II. Data CollectionA. Learning the Landscape of Global Grand ChallengesWe did an extensive review of global initiatives that hail from a wide range of disciplines,policies, and foundations. We conducted the search through research in international peer-reviewed journals, online forums, foundation websites, and policy white papers. We did initialsearches of “grand challenges” and also of key terms that are integrated in the NAE GrandChallenges and the UN SDG vernacular such as, “sustainability,” “health,” “vulnerability,” and“poverty.” We searched not only for global initiatives but also explored if any of those globalinitiatives included specific academic
linkbetween student motivation and engagement in schoolwork 1,2,3,4 . A PBL curriculum provides thismotivation because the students can see what the end goal of the project is and are activelyengaged in the development 5 . (2) It provides deeper learning. PBL provides for deep learningbecause it requires the student to integrate knowledge gained in several classes into the creation ofa product 6,7 .When students work on a laboratory exercise that is simply following a set of detailed steps, thelearning is similar to what can be attained by listening in a lecture 8 . In order to gain the benefitsof PBL, there are several requirements 6 . • It needs to be a complex and challenging problem. • It needs to be an authentic or real-world problem