, University of Wyoming. He is a senior member of IEEE and chief faculty advisor of Tau Beta Pi. His research interests include digital and analog image processing, computer-assisted laser surgery, and embedded control systems. He is a registered professional engineer in Wyoming and Colorado. He authored/co-authored several textbooks on microcontrollers and embedded systems. His book, ”A Little Book on Teaching,” was published by Morgan and Claypool Publishers in 2012. In 2004, Barrett was named ”Wyoming Professor of the Year” by the Carnegie Foundation for Advancement of Teaching and in 2008 was the recipient of the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) Professional Engineers in Higher Education, Engineering
Paper ID #21527The Third Edition of the Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge: An Updateand OverviewDr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the Department of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering at the University of Alabama. Dr. Fridley has been recognized as a dedicated educator throughout his career and has received several awards for his teaching efforts, including the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education
thestudents. By design, CMs also offer flexibility for students to explore the relationships betweencourse and lived experiences, offering assessment opportunities to determine what students bringinto a course and what they take with them as they progress through the curriculum. Further,concept mapping is widely accepted as encouraging improved learning experiences incomparison to, or in conjunction with, traditional teaching methods [2]. However, concept maps are less well understood as an approach to understandknowledge acquisition and competency for representing complex and dynamic interactionsbetween socio-cultural and technological systems. . a static body of knowledge from a textbook.Learning assessments are confounded by such ambiguity
Paper ID #22728Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Use of Metaphor in Presenting Proto-types to a Technical and Non-technical Public AudienceMr. Jared David Berezin, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jared Berezin is a Lecturer in the Writing, Rhetoric, and Professional Communication (WRAP) program within the Comparative Media Studies/Writing Department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Jared teaches in a range of communication-intensive courses at MIT, including Communicating Science to the Public, Product Design, Flight Vehicle Design, Environmental Engineering, and Nuclear Science. He has also been a
coursemodel traverses from one location in time and space to another.Background: Replication vs. Mutation of the Wright State Model for EngineeringMathematics EducationThe Wright State Model (WSM) is a semester-long math course that teaches fundamentalconcepts of Calculus 1, 2, 3, and Differential Equations in an engineering context through hands-on laboratory experiences and application-rich problems. The WSM is designed to disrupt thetraditional rigid sequencing of undergraduate engineering curricula by decoupling mathematicsprerequisites from engineering coursework—introducing undergraduates to sufficientmathematical tools in the one-semester course to enable them to get started and make progress intechnical engineering coursework, regardless of
then, she has been a professor of electrical engineering at Ecole de technologie sup´erieure ´ (ETS), where she teaches undergraduate courses in algorithms, biomedical instrumentation and medical imaging. Her research focuses on medical ultrasound image analysis, and aims to address problems re- lating to image acquisition, image segmentation and registration, 3D reconstruction, tracking and shape analysis using statistical methods. As an adjunct researcher at Sainte-Justine Hospital Research Cen- tre, she is currently developing applications of ultrasound image analysis for non-invasive follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the analysis of tongue motion for the study of speech production
(Pearson’scorrelation = 0.31, n = 42) correlation was found between the exam 1 score and the in-class“transfer quiz.” It should be noted that exam 1 in EELE 201 contains little if any content relatedto calculus and thus any correlation between exam 1 and either calculus grades or the transferproblem quiz would speak more to a student’s general ability to handle abstract concepts ratherthan to their ability to demonstrate a particular math skill. Certainly, students are required todemonstrate an understanding of basic calculus and the ability to manipulate complex numberslater in the course.The laboratory activity required students to explain through words, sketches and simplecalculation why a proposed measurement of current would yield a perhaps unexpected
smart materials. Ms. Matin has over 4 years of experience of teaching in architecture and interior design field at Azad Islamic University and Eastern Michigan University. She has been LEED Green Associate since 2016.Dr. Ali Eydgahi, Eastern Michigan University Ali Eydgahi started his career in higher education as a faculty member at the Rensselaer Polytechnic In- stitute in 1985. Since then, he has been with the State University of New York, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, and Eastern Michigan University. During 2006-2010, he was Chair of the Department of Engineering and Aviation Sciences, Founder and Director of the Center for 3-D Visualization and Virtual Reality Applications, and Technical Director of the
how to engageand learn from it. During the first semester, students had 24/7 access to a student-run design studio space, andthe opportunity to work closely with project mentors in small settings, and collaborate with motivated peers. Inaddition, mentors tried to make students apply knowledge that they were acquiring in the second-year classes(structures, environmental, and transport). Hence, there was an intentional overlap of learning outcomes.Students, through the research projects, were acquiring the learning desired for the courses. The program was developed to complement academic’s teaching and research effort and students’curricular and extracurricular time. The program allows students and academic to spend more time
Management (2010). In 2002, he becomes Dr. Eng. (Ph.D degree) of Pet- rosani University, Romania and now he is professor at ”Lucian Blaga” University of Sibiu - Romania, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Romania. His teaching subjects are Ergonomics, Management, Human Resources Management, Occupational Health and Safety Management, Production Systems Engineering. His research fields of interest are linked with the impact of the knowledge based society upon the social / human dynamics / evolution and the production systems. He regularly publishes and participates on international scientific conferences. Lucian Cioca is the Ad- ministrator of the LBUS Department of Consulting
conceptualize the relationship between research and the creative process after participating in the REU program? 3. How do faculty members incorporate concepts of the creative process into the laboratory experiences of the REU students? Do the approaches used by faculty influence how students’ conceptualize research and the creative process?This study builds on the previous work by Huffstickler, et al. (2017) by focusing more closely onstudents’ understanding of research and its relationship to the creative process. In addition,changes were made in the 2017 program to better train supervising faculty on the relationshipbetween the creative process and the scientific method. In addition, because graduate students areprimarily
Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. She teaches undergraduate and graduate materials related courses including Introduction to Ma- terials, Materials Laboratory, Engineering Innovation, Biomaterials and Engineering Design and Appro- priate Technology (ETHOS). She was director of the (Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities of Service-Learning) for approximately ten years. She has incorporated service-learning projects into her classes and laboratories since she started teaching in 2000. Her research interests include community engaged learning and pedagogy, K-12 outreach, biomaterials and materials testing and analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018
relation to environments, technologies, and human lives.Dr. Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego Bre Przestrzelski, PhD, is a post-doctoral research associate in the General Engineering department in the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering, where she seeks to innovatively integrate social justice, humani- tarian advancement, and peace into the traditional engineering canon. Before joining USD in August 2017, Bre spent 9 years at Clemson University, where she was a three-time graduate of the bioengineering program (BS, MS, and PhD), founder of The Design & Entrepreneurship Network (DEN), and Division I rower. In her spare time, Bre teaches design thinking workshops for higher education faculty
Engineers’ Committee on Sustainability subcommittee on Formal Engineering Education.Dr. Anusha Sathyanarayanan Rao, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Anusha Sathyanarayanan Rao is an assistant director at the IUPUI Center for Teaching and Learning. She manages the center’s graduate student and postdoc development program, assists faculty with instruc- tional design and assessment for course and curriculum development. Anusha is also an adjunct assistant professor in electrical engineering at IUPUI. She received her Ph.D. in electrical engineering and post- doctoral training in educational psychology from Vanderbilt University. Her research focused on tracking and quantifying movement disorders using signal
-Principal Investigator) Associate Professor and Head of Assessment, J. Murrey Atkins Library The authors are grateful for the collaborative support of UNC Charlotte’s William States LeeCollege of Engineering Office of Student Development and Success instructors: Don Blackmon,Chris McDaniel, Gwen Gill, Meg Harkins, Dan Latta, Kevin Lindsay, Bill Lindsey, and Sherman Mumford. This work was supported by funds provided by the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Program at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. 1 AbstractThis study
did you learn that you didn’t know before? Discuss the session that you attended following the morning Florida 2016 plenary, e.g., sustainability, teaching engineering. What did you learn that was new?The questions in Table 4 are covered generally by the SDGs and GCs, including references inspecific activities such as “La Paz” and the connection of SDG 15: Life on Land, and the “EthicalHacking” activity which connected to GC 8: Secure Cyberspace.While the Florida LACCEI 2017 conference yielded the least amount of data, we learned thatnetworking was a major part of the students’ experience. In particular, Florida participantsdiscussed having “male champions for women (inclusion).” They had conversations aboutgendered social and
Paper ID #23231Prevalent Mathematical Pathways to Engineering in South CarolinaDr. Eliza Gallagher, Clemson University Dr. Gallagher is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with joint appointments to Mathematical Sciences and Education & Human Development. Her research inter- ests include student cognition in mathematics, development of teacher identity among graduate teaching assistants, curricular reform to foster diversity and inclusion in STEM fields, and development of mathe- matical knowledge for teaching.Dr. Christy BrownDr. D. Andrew Brown, Clemson UniversityDr
CSR modules. Finally, weconclude by laying out future directions for research and tying our research back to the existingwork on engineering students’ attitudes and learning about social responsibility to consider theopportunities and pitfalls of integrating CSR into teaching and learning about socialresponsibility more generally.2. The coursesThe three universities selected for the project—Colorado School of Mines, Virginia Tech, andMarietta College—all have long-standing and large undergraduate programs in mining and/orpetroleum engineering, but are located in different regions of the country (West, Midwest andEast), have different overall student population sizes (31,000 at VT, 5500 at Mines, and 1200 atMarietta), and place students in
Engineering and MS in Environmental Engineering from the University of Arkansas. She previously served as a project manager at a water resources center, but returned to the University of Arkansas to teach general introduction to engineering and to coordinate the Freshman Honors Innovation Experience.Mr. Clint E Johnson, University of Arkansas Clint Johnson is the Director of the Supply Chain Management Research Center and the Director of the McMillon Innovation Studio as well as an instructor at the University of Arkansas. Clint’s back ground focuses mainly on developing strategies for innovating and implementing large scale retail focused initiatives, specifically as it relates to the blending of the online and brick and
Ph.D. and M.S. degrees are in materials science and engineering from Stanford University and her B.S. degree in metallurgical engineering from the Michigan Technological University.Dr. Carol J. Thurman, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Carol Thurman serves as the Academic Assessment Manager for Georgia Tech’s Center for Serve- Learn-Sustain. She holds a doctorate in Educational Policy Studies with a concentration in Research, Measurement, and Statistics. Dr. Thurman’s professional experience includes higher education academic and program assessment, program evaluation, project management, teaching K-12 both in the U.S. and internationally, teaching university research and statistics courses, and serving as a K-12
EngineeringAbstractHow can we impart the excitement of biomedical engineering to our freshmen from the momentthey step on campus? We have found great success with “Modeling and Design” an innovative,required course which engages our students as biomedical engineers from their first day at JohnsHopkins. Small groups, guided by upperclassmen lab managers, teaching assistants, and faculty,work through five modules including modeling human efficiency, the arm, and thecardiovascular system, as well as a foam core design project. By the conclusion of the fifthmodule, an independent modeling project, 96% of the students appreciate the value of working inteams to tackle complex challenges. They have become adept at developing and testing theirhypotheses, and presenting
as part of her work at the University of Alabama. She is currently the Assistant Director of the Alabama Innovation and Mentoring of Entrepreneurs cen- ter on campus. She teaches entrepreneurship, assists faculty with building and testing minimum viable products, and mentors STEM faculty and student teams through customer discovery, technology com- mercialization, and starting a company. In addition, Rachel started a performance materials company that serves the automotive and coating industries, and she actively encourages and supports women startups. Rachel has a B.S. in Physics (2001) and a Ph.D. (2005) in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Florida, and was an ASEE sponsored postdoc at the
of Enterprise Servers. Prior to this, he led advanced develop- ment of supercomputer systems at Thinking Machines Corporation. Dr. Wade received his SB, SM, EE and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Automated Assessment of Systems Engineering CompetenciesabstractSystems engineering and technical leadership (SETL) is a multidisciplinary practice that is asmuch an art as a science. While a traditional model of education can teach the fundamental bodyof knowledge, it is not until this knowledge is put into practice in an integrated, real worldenvironment that a systems
programs are morepopular at the graduate level for a number of reasons. First, online graduate programs are moreaccessible and flexible for the needs of the audience.10 Secondly, graduate courses typically arenot as heavily laboratory-based as undergraduate programs, requiring less in-personeducation.11-12 Third, while undergraduate education is typically accredited by organizations suchas ABET, master’s programs are typically not accredited, allowing universities more flexibilityin offering some graduate courses online.12Additionally, looking at online enrollment by degree program reveals some interesting trends. A2013 study by Pontes and Pontes indicated that students enrolled in engineering are significantlyless likely to be enrolled in
Paper ID #22127Where Should We Begin? Establishing a Baseline for First-year StudentAwareness of Engineering EthicsMs. Natalie C.T. Van Tyne, Virginia Tech Natalie Van Tyne is an Associate Professor of Practice at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Univer- sity, where she teaches first year engineering design as a foundation courses for Virginia Tech’s under- graduate engineering degree programs. She holds bachelors and masters degrees from Rutgers University, Lehigh University and Colorado School of Mines, and studies best practices in pedagogy, reflective learn- ing and critical thinking to inform enhanced student
Paper ID #23580Work in Progress: Connections Between First-Order and Second-Order Dy-namic Systems – Lessons in Limit BehaviorDr. Vincent C. Prantil, Milwaukee School of Engineering Dr. Vincent Prantil earned his BS, MS, and PhD degrees in Mechanical And Aerospace Engineering at Cornell University. He has worked as a senior member of technical staff in the Applied Mechanics and Materials Modeling Directorates at Sandia National Laboratories in Livermore, California where he was a co-recipient of the R&D100 Award for development of Microstructure-Property Model Software in 2000. He has published 31 peer-reviewed journal
Paper ID #21689Enhancing Core Chemical Engineering Courses with Computationally-IntenseCourse ModulesDr. Kevin D. Dahm, Rowan University Kevin Dahm is a Professor of Chemical Engineering at Rowan University. He earned his BS from Worces- ter Polytechnic Institute (92) and his PhD from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (98). He has pub- lished two books, ”Fundamentals of Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” and ”Interpreting Diffuse Reflectance and Transmittance.” He has also published papers on effective use of simulation in engineer- ing, teaching design and engineering economics, and assessment of student
Paper ID #23098Investigation of Factors Promoting Competitive Candidates for Entry-levelBioengineering PositionsDr. Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Marcia Pool is a Teaching Associate Professor and Director of Undergraduate Programs in Bio- engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. In her career, Marcia has been active in improving undergraduate education through developing problem-based laboratories to enhance ex- perimental design skills; developing a preliminary design course focused on problem identification and market space (based on an industry partner’s protocol); and
and high-rise projects. His current research interests mainly focus on Smart Structures Technology, Structural Control and Health Monitoring and Innovative Engineering Education.Dr. Juan M. Caicedo, University of South Carolina Dr. Caicedo is a Professor at the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of South Carolina. His research interests are in structural dynamics, model updating and engineering education. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering from the Universidad del Valle in Colombia, South America, and his M.Sc. and D.Sc. from Washington University in St. Louis. Dr. Caicedo’s teaching interests include the development of critical thinking in undergraduate and graduate education
Paper ID #23586Implementing Graphene and Graphene Oxide in a Proton Exchange Mem-brane Fuel CellDr. Hazem Tawfik, State University of New York, Farmingdale Prof. Tawfik obtained his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering, from University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. He has held a number of industrial & academic positions and affiliations with organizations that included Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI), Stony Brook University (SBU), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Atomic Energy of Canada Inc., Ontario Hydro, NASA Kennedy, NASA Marshall Space Flight Centers, and the U.S