Paper ID #23791Estimation of Experimental Errors Using Monte Carlo Analysis in the Intro-ductory Electrical Circuits LaboratoryDr. Shaghayegh Abbasi, University of San Diego Shaghayegh Abbasi received her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from University of Washington in 2011. In her thesis, titled ’Integrating top-down and bottom-up nanomanufacturing: Controlling the growth and composition of seeded nanostructures’, an innovative nanomanufacturing method is explored and optimized. Upon graduation, she started her career as Senior System Design Engineer at Lumedyne Technologies. She worked on design, simulation, and
program.BackgroundInnovation and entrepreneurship have been part of the engineering curriculum for severaldecades [1]. However, students many not encounter these subjects through their requiredengineering courses until their junior or senior year, typically during a capstone design course.While opportunities exist for students to learn about innovation and entrepreneurship throughelective courses, these options are not typically available to first-year students or do not fulfill arequirement for their academic plan.First-year courses are the cornerstone experiences that expose students to foundational conceptsand foster the development of skills necessary for students to succeed in their field of study andultimately their career. For disruptive innovators, those
strategies to address challenges related to the“success, retention, transfer, academic/career pathways, and graduation” (NSF, 2016) of low-income students in STEM disciplines.Based on 2013 data presented in Science and Engineering Indicators 2016, nearly 75% of allundergraduates (all majors, all income levels) enrolled in associate’s colleges, baccalaureatecolleges, and master’s colleges and universities (NSB, 2016), which all fit within the definitionof predominantly undergraduate institutions (PUIs). Associate’s colleges enrolled 43% ofundergraduates, which is the largest fraction among all institution types (NSB, 2016); many ofthese students are from low-income families. Recent data (2013-14) from The CarnegieClassification of Institutions of
to me as a teacher I increased my knowledge of careers that utilize science, mathematics, and/or technologyGroup 5: WE2NG as a Professional Development Program As a professional development program for teachers, how would you rate the RET program?Group 6: Participant Response to MentorshipPlease rate the extent to which your mentor(s) met your expectations in each of the followingareas: Your mentor's preparation for your arrival Your mentor's knowledge and support of the goals of the RET program Your mentor's knowledge of the roles and responsibilities of teachers in your field Your mentor's interest in helping you develop a plan to improve education in science, mathematics and/or
(CLOSING ACTIVITY) Team Career Title/theme of the problem proposed 1 Industrial engineering Determination of optimal routes for dispatches 2 Industrial engineering Improvement of waiting time in pediatric emergency rooms 3 Industrial engineering Characterization of the public transport system of Santiago 4 Geo. / Mining / Metallurgical Eng. Pre-feasibility evaluation of gold deposit 5 Industrial Engineering Challenge of the 500 pesos 6 Automation and robotics Eng. Temperature monitoring in vineyards and early warning system 7 Geology Determination of tectonic plate
. Both outcomesare positive. For someone who is turned off, they aren’t a good match and it is better for thestudent and for the program to find that out sooner rather than later. A student poorly matched tothe program will eventually be turned off and leave, having taken the space of someone whomight be truly interested, and wasting your time and theirs.Our primary target audience at our information session has been existing college students whomay not be completely settled on their direction. We have a large population of students whowant to pursue a career in health care, but come in being only aware of nursing as an option. Butmany do not really know what nursing is truly about. Nursing and other direct care allied healthroles are great for
] for use in helping researchers develop DMPs. Responsesto this study revealed that researchers had varied perspectives on what a DMP entails andwhether it was a formal plan (funding DMP) or may also include procedural workflowsembedded in their current research projects (a project DMP).[20]Discussion: As described above, there have been numerous efforts in the literature to teach graduatestudents how to develop DMPs associated with the student’s research project. DevelopingDMPs will also be required in the student’s future professional careers. However, there is not aclear consensus in these literature RDM courses on what exactly a DMP is and how it is used.As a result, there is not clarity on what to teach graduate students in a RDM
and females in their attitudes. Analysis of the pretest and post-test results of the math and science concepts instrument indicated the effectiveness of theintervention on math concepts.KeywordsAttitudes, STEM, middle school, mathematics, scienceIntroductionThe US currently faces a challenge of educating sufficient number of students with interest inpursuing STEM-related careers. US students continue to perform at levels well below of thosefrom other industrialized nations as demonstrated by the data of 2015 PISA Report1. According tothis report, US students score in science was lower than seventeen industrialized countries. Theperformance of US students was even worse in math, in which they scored lower than thirty-sevenof the countries
the SEMS-Research and Outreach Center that educates students about STEM, and she specifically designed programs to encourage underrepresented groups to be involved in STEM disciplines. Dr. Kalevitch is a full member of the prestigious New York Academy of Sciences (that has Nobel Prize winners among its members), American Society for Microbiology (ASM), and American Mycological Society. Dr. Kalevitch is a life-long learner, and recently participated in a webinar presented by the Harvard In- stitutes for Higher Education (HIHE). The HIHE offers comprehensive leadership development programs designed for administrators at every stage of their careers. c American Society for Engineering
undergraduate engineering educationwhich supports a better understanding of digital signal processing, communication systems, andsenior design for senior students. Therefore, this course is critical for a student to attain bothacademic and practical skills for their future career. However, this course has been facing asignificant D-grade, F-grade, or withdrawals rate (averaged at 18%) during the past years. Thishigh DFW rate is caused partially by three reasons.First, students enrolled in the course have different preparation levels illustrated by the gradedistribution of a prerequisite test. During the past 3 years, prerequisite test covering complexnumbers, logarithm calculation, solving 1st order differential equation, and Laplace transform hasan
networking systems. He has designed several models of high frequency oscilloscopes and other electronic test and measuring instruments as an entrepreneur. He has delivered invited short courses in Penang, Malaysia and Singapore. He is also the author of a textbook in power electronics, published by Prentice-Hall, Inc. His professional career is equally divided in academia and industry. He has authored several research papers in IEEE journals and conferences. His current research is focused on renewable energy technology, smart energy grid.Prof. Omer Farook, Purdue University Northwest Omer Farook is a member of the faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, Nothwest. Farook
successfully achieve this goal, thereare three specific measurable objectives: 1) Develop innovative course modules to use in current undergraduate engineering curriculum to improve students’ career readiness, 2) Develop graduate certificate program to advance students’ professional preparedness, and 3) Create an online based cost-effectiveness structure to enhance education and learning impacts.There are four major components in this project, including 1) manufacturing related materialsstandards course module development, 2) manufacturing related quality control standards coursemodule development, 3) professional/graduate level certificate program development, and 4)industrial experience sharing through webinar. This two-year
in item wording,such as the addition of a neutral response option.6 A Retrospective Pre-Post Test (RPT)methodology [19] was used on six items to reduce rater bias and to increase evaluationefficiency for the classroom. Surveys asked participants to provide ratings of agreement pre-and-post taking the CTL course on statements related to their interest in a career in computerscience, plans to major in computer science, plans to earn a degree in computer science, andfeelings of belonging in both Intro CS and the CTL. Students in the CTL were also asked toprovide ratings of expertise in computer science both pre-and-post CTL. As all wereconcurrently taking Intro CS, ratings on these surveys reflect impact of the combination of IntroCS with the
for the instructor: review teams must be created prior to class, a PeerReview worksheet must be created for each peer response session, and course content must beshifted in the semester to allow dedicated class time for the session.We believe that there is an opportunity for a community of practice for group-based peerresponse activity, so that the engineering education community can continue to develop, assess,and improve this framework.References[1] A. Yousuf, M. Mustafa, and A. De La Cruz, “Project Based Learning,” 2010 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2010. https://peer.asee.org/16081.[2] G. W. Figgess and R. G. Vogt, “Building Career-Ready Students through Multidisciplinary Project-Based Learning Opportunities - A
Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance under- standing of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Dr. Randall Davies, Brigham Young University Dr. Davies is currently an
. The main topics of the course include stress, strain,deformation, and stress/strain transformation. In the three-semester duration of this study, threefaculty members (Instructors A-C) taught lecture sections and one faculty member (Instructor C)taught laboratory sections (Table 1). Instructor C taught one section of CIVL 304 and twosections of CIVL 307 in fall 2017. The syllabi, textbook, and topics covered were identical forall lecture and laboratory sections. For this study, the summer cohorts and fall cohort are treatedas equivalent. It should be noted that Instructor A is an early-career tenure-track assistantprofessor with less than five years of teaching experience, Instructor B is a full professor withapproximately 15 years of
research is to determine the extent to which secondarystudents in team based courses behave similarly when rating their peers compared to First-Year Engineering (FYE) students. In particular, we are interested in the quality of peerevaluations based on the similarity of the variability or lack thereof in the comparison of peerevaluation ratings.A person’s ability to work effectively in a team or group setting is vital to a college career aswell as in a work-life profession and therefore it is often a significant factor in a corporate orgovernment hiring process. Recognizing this need, a number of U.S. undergraduate collegiateSTEM programs as well as many K12 instructors, particularly teachers delivering ProjectLead The Way (PLTW) courses, use team
making under uncertainties. For their professional careers as engineers, we thinkthey are better prepared to address relevant uncertainties. For the graduate and undergraduatestudents who were direct participants in this project, they will have an innovative quantitative toolthat addresses critical decision making under substantial uncertainties for their own future researchand/or teaching.Next, for the course contents on Complex Engineering Projects (CEP’s), we note that bothengineering design and supply chains can be modelled and analyzed as CEP’s. Hence, a wide rangeof disciplines ranging from mechanical engineering to business and economics have new teachingmaterials and learning aids when complex decisions are to be made under substantial
teamproject and to learn more about testing and analyzing data in a multidisciplinary environment.Some of the participants mentioned that they knew very little about UAVs and that their technicalknowledge helped them understand what they needed to learn to solve these complex problems. Itgave confidence to the participants to take a very complex problem and still succeed at the end.The participants also described that they learned transferable skills that they would carry forwardto new projects. They also appreciated the opportunity to learning new skills, team building, andother practical skills that they can now apply to other projects. Many participants did indicate thatthe program led them to feel more certain or clear about their careers plans
-income academically talented students with demonstrated financial needobtaining degrees in STEM and entering the workforce or graduate programs in STEM; 2) toimprove the education of future scientists, engineers, and technicians, with a focus onacademically talented low-income students; and 3) to generate knowledge to advanceunderstanding of how factors or evidence-based curricular and co-curricular activities affect thesuccess, retention, transfer, academic/career pathways, and graduation in STEM of low-incomestudents [5].”Indiana University-Purdue University Fort Wayne (IPFW) was awarded a five-year NSF S-STEM grant in August of 2016. This paper describes this project, presents the sponsoredactivities that were undertaken in the first year
University Marisa K. Orr is an Assistant Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recent recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Mr. Russell Andrew Long, Russell Long, M.Ed. was the Director of Project Assessment at the Purdue University School of Engineer- ing Education (retired) and is Managing Director of The Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development (MIDFIELD). He
engineering should be modified to reflect the growing complexity ofinfrastructure. The One Water module of the CIT-E model introductory infrastructure courseprovides fundamental knowledge of not only components and systems, but also challenges,constraints and potential solutions. With this foundation, first and second year students are betterprepared for upper-level courses and ultimately their careers. The learning outcomes of eachlesson from the One Water module are a vital step in establishing the framework for thenecessity of sustainable infrastructure that supports community needs. This is establishedthrough pre and in-class activities, and discussions involving real-world case-studies.This work is supported by the National Science Foundation
knows how to make EE work fun. A+. My favorite lab course!! This lab was definitely the most enjoyable course I have ever taken. If you don’t have fun in this class, you picked the wrong major!Conclusions:Five examples of design projects incorporating various technologies and off-the-shelf parts werecreated to better prepare students to meet the challenges of the capstone design. The results ofassessment indicate that these projects are very effective at doing this. This combined withanecdotal student feedback show that the introduction of these new projects makes the coursemore fun, more relevant to an engineering career, and better prepares students to meet theexpectations of their senior capstone project.References:[1] B.E. Marino, “One
rhetorical analysis. In aprior paper, we provided a rhetorical analysis of Donald Trump’s twitter feed during three timeperiods: while he was campaigning for the primary nomination, after he received it and wasPresident-elect, and once he became president [5].Using short examples of rhetorical devices can foreground classical rhetoric used in public waysin an attempt to influence policy. Throughout their career at Rose-Hulman (and later during theircareers as engineers, scientists, and mathematicians), students serve on numerous teamsproposing solutions to problems. As part of their analysis, they must also use the same lessonson a larger scale. What change will this project effect? What audiences are you addressing andwhat attitudes, biases, and
the very last semesters during their educational career at the college,despite repeated faculty and advisors’ recommendations to address these deficiencies. Eventualinstructors’ bias is not resulting in lower grades when performance is similar, when compared withdomestic students.Class reports, project reports, and presentations are required as part of some engineeringtechnology courses throughout the curriculum, offering additional opportunities for students toimprove their communication skills.A test instrument was developed to measure the student population’s knowledge levels infundamentals of engineering. This research will continue and the test will be administered to juniorand senior students from the Engineering Technology programs, at
questions, and totrain a new generation of students to meet the challenges of the next century [2]. HES has a set ofcore faculty plus “affiliated” faculty from other units on campus – we refer to the combination asthe “team.” The team is made up of some mid-career and senior faculty in established academicdepartments and a few new hires of junior faculty into the College of Innovation + Design (CID)– a new experimental unit of Boise State.Boise State launched CID in August 2015 with the mission to prototype novel models ofresearch, development, and education (RD&E) – without needing to subscribe to thebureaucracies of a state institution. Unlike other colleges, CID pilots RD&E programs and thendevelops a roadmap to integrate the viable ones
and testing) and the reliability and maintainability of complex systems. Hehas been selected as both a NASA and an ONR Faculty Fellow. He regularly teaches courses in Ma-rine Engineering and in Maintained Systems. Most recently Dr. Dean was on the Headquarters Staffthe American Society of Naval Engineers. He received his Ph.D. from the Department of EngineeringManagement and Systems Engineering, and a B.S. in Nuclear Engineering Technology, from the BattenCollege of Engineering and Technology at Old Dominion University. Additionally, Dr. Dean receivedan MBA from the College of William and Mary. Prior to is academic career Dr. Dean was Director ofOperations and Business Development for Clark-Smith Associates, P.C., and served as an Electrician
Paper ID #22001Design, Development, and Testing of Load Cell AccelerometersDr. Dale H. Litwhiler, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dale H. Litwhiler is an Associate Professor at Penn State, Berks Campus in Reading, PA. He received his B.S. from Penn State University, M.S. from Syracuse University, and Ph.D. from Lehigh University all in electrical engineering. Prior to beginning his academic career, he worked with IBM Federal Systems and Lockheed Martin Commercial Space Systems as a hardware and software design engineer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design
proficiency in these skills upon graduation fromundergraduate programs [4]. This result is supported by commonly cited findings that engineerturnover is partly due to a lack of understanding of the big picture and “boring work” (or a lack ofappreciation for engineering functions beyond hands-on, engineering design). A national,Canadian survey showed similar results [5]. The most common reason for engineer turnover(voluntary and involuntary) were related to conflict with the role itself, including the engineer’sdesire for a career change, job satisfaction and feelings of the role being a poor fit. Accordingly,researchers, educators, industry, government and accreditation bodies all posit the need forsystemic and transformative change in engineering
4 4 0 50% 8 0 0 100%Students develop the capacity to work with the community 4 3 1 50% 8 0 0 100%Students gain experience relevant to professional careers 6 0 1 86% 7 0 1 88%Students learn core engineering skills 8 0 0 100% 8 0 0 100%Students work on projects that are needed in the community 3 3 2 38% 1 0 7 88%Student - CooperativeStudents learn professional skills (i.e. team building, communication