technology that did notpreviously exist in the curriculum. He reported that local industry has found the course valuable and hebelieves the new course is uniquely preparing his students for careers in that branch of engineering.Greg had a career in manufacturing and brings advanced manufacturing techniques into the department,allowing students to build systems that were not previously possible and collaborating with researchers inthe department.Capstone and introductory courses seem to be particularly well-suited for teaching faculty. Capstone is aparticularly good fit for participants like Alan and Greg who had engineering management experience andso could model the type of design processes and skills that are necessary in a product development
Paper ID #21392Measuring Engineering Students’ Metacognition with a Think-Aloud Proto-colDr. Carolyn Plumb, Montana State University Carolyn Plumb is the recently retired Director of Educational Innovation and Strategic Projects in the College of Engineering at Montana State University (MSU). Plumb has been involved in engineering education and program evaluation for 30 years, and she continues to work on externally funded projects relating to engineering education.Rose M. Marra, University of Missouri Rose M. Marra is a Professor of Learning Technologies at the University of Missouri. She is PI of the NSF-funded
, but as Tang and Nieusma’s articlepoints out, their society was not immediately supportive of the whistleblowers’ plight. Rather, ittook the advocacy of two, short-lived, dissident committees—the Committee for SocialResponsibility in Engineering (CSRE) and the Committee on Social Implications of Technology(CSIT)—with membership overlap in IEEE to codify ethical principles in 1977. The archivalresearch conducted for these two articles demonstrates that the inclusion of ethical principles inat least two professional codes was a fairly recent addition driven by the need to protectengineers and their professional societies from damaging public relations events. Given theirorigins, it is important that engineering ethics educators view professional
STEM program to prepare pre-service teachers to become K-12 technology and engineering educators. His research involves engaging college students in human centered design and improving creativity. He also develops nanotechnology based lessons that integrate the STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Design through empathy: how low vision simulators can be used to engage students in better design solutions (Academic Practice/Design Interventions) INTRODUCTION: One of the objectives of a first-‐year engineering design course is to engage students in a real engineering design project. The team project typically
demographics and engineering identity.References[1] ASEE. (n.d.) “Going the distance: Best practices and strategies for retaining engineering, engineering technology and computing students”. Washington DC: ASEE.[2] LSU BIOS, www.lsu.edu/science/bios/. Accessed 5 Feb. 2018.[3] Gillock, K. L., and Reyes, O. (1999). “Stress, support, and academic performance of urban, low income, Mexican–American adolescents”. Journal of Youth and Adolescence 28(2): 259–282[4] Murtaugh, P. A., Burns, L. D., and Schuster, J. (1999). “Predicting the retention of university students.” Research in Higher Education 40(3): 355–371.[5] Perrine, R. M. (1999). “Stress and college persistence as a function of attachment style.” Journal of the First Year Experience
Research Triangle Educational Consultants. She received her Ph.D.in Educational Research and Policy Analysis from NC State University in 1996. She also has an MBA from Indiana University (Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in evaluation and research in engineering education, computer science education, teacher education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an American Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the Amer- ican Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Extension Services Consultant for the
chair of the Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering at Texas A&M University-Kingsville. His teaching interests include structural engineering and mechanics, the design of timber and steel structures, structural dynamics, and earthquake engineering. Professor Estrada received his B.S. (with honors), M.S., and Ph.D. in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 1993, 1994, and 1997, respectively.Dr. Mehdi Khazaeli, University of the Pacific c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Student and Instructor Perceptions of Online Engineering Education VideosAbstractWith increasing technological development and wide accessibility of online video
Paper ID #21325Differences and Similarities in Student, Instructor, and Professional Percep-tions of ”Good Engineering Design” through Adaptive Comparative Judg-mentDr. Scott R. Bartholomew, Purdue Polytechnic Institute Scott R. Bartholomew, PhD. is an assistant professor of Engineering/Technology Teacher Education at Purdue University. Previously he taught Technology and Engineering classes at the middle school and university level. Dr. Bartholomew’s current work revolves around Adaptive Comparative Judgment (ACJ) assessment techniques, student design portfolios, and Technology & Engineering teacher preparation.Dr. Greg J
students, as well as perspective WVU students and their families. Dr. Morris was selected as a Statler College Outstanding Teacher for 2012, the WVU Honors College John R. Williams Outstanding Teacher for 2012, and the 2012 Statler College Teacher of the Year.Mr. Joseph Dygert, West Virginia University Ph.D student in aerospace engineering at West Virginia University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018An Integrated Supplemental Program to Enhance the First-Year ExperienceAbstractStudent retention in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) disciplines,especially engineering, continues to be a challenge for higher education institutions. Engineeringretention has attracted
Paper ID #21286Development and Implementation of a MOOC Introduction to EngineeringCourseDr. Benjamin Emery Mertz, Arizona State University Dr. Benjamin Mertz received his Ph. D. in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Notre Dame in 2010 and B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology in 2005. He is currently a part of a lecturer team at Arizona State University that focuses on the first-year engineering experience, including developing and teaching the Introduction to Engineering course. He also teaches Thermo-Fluids and High Speed Aerodynamics for the Mechanical and Aerospace
Paper ID #24129Development of Creativity of Engineering Students: A Cause for Concern?Mr. Andrew Valentine, RMIT University Andrew is a PhD candidate at RMIT University in Melbourne, Australia. His research interests include development of creativity and problem solving skills within engineering curricula, educational technology, and transitioning of learning material from a traditional classroom environment to an online, digital based setting.Dr. Iouri Belski, RMIT University Iouri Belski is a professor of engineering problem-solving at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technol- ogy, Australia. His areas of research
engineering education can use the standard positive/negativedichotomy. Positive externalities from engineering education could include the general spillovereffects associated with public education such as a more highly educated population [33]. In aneconomic sense, another positive externality could be the increased technological innovation andeconomic growth in a society associated with having more engineers [34], [35], which generallyimproves standards of living in a society. The basic idea here suggests that engineering studentswould incur the costs (and benefits) of deciding to study engineering, which eventually translatesinto a country having more engineers. Negative externalities from engineering education mightarise from having more
experience in curriculum development in K-12 and creates material for the Technology Student Association’s annual TEAMS competition. David has co-authored two texts related to engineering, Principles of Applied Engineering for Pearson-Prentice Hall and Introductory Engineering Mathematics for Momentum Press. His research interests include: model/method transferability, threshold concepts to inform curriculum development, information asymmetry in higher education processes (e.g., course articulation), and issues in first year engineering.Ms. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech Ashley Taylor is a doctoral candidate in engineering education at Virginia Polytechnic and State Univer- sity, where she also serves as a program
also teaches courses in the Computer Network Systems and Security degree. Mark holds a Master’s in Career and Technical Education (Highest Distinction) from Ferris State University, and a Bachelor’s in Workforce Education and Development (Summa Cum Laude) from Southern Illinois University. Mark is a retired Chief Electronics Technician (Submarines) and served and taught as part of the Navy’s Nuclear Power Program. Mark is active with SkillsUSA and has been on the National Education Team for Mechatronics since 2004.Prof. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan
Paper ID #23398Work In Progress: A PLC Trainer With Hands-on WiringDr. Hugh Jack P.E., Western Carolina University Dr. Jack is the Cass Ballenger Distinguished Professor of Engineering and Department Head of the School of Engineering and Technology within Western Carolina University. His interests include robotics, automation, and product design.Dr. Paul M Yanik, Western Carolina University Dr. Paul Yanik is an Assistant Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Western Carolina University. His research interests include human-robot interactions, assistive devices, pattern recognition, machine
Paper ID #21967Field Investigations: An Overlooked Form of Laboratory ExperienceProf. David F. Radcliffe, Swinburne University of Technology Dr. Radcliffe’s research focuses on the nature of engineering; engineering habits of mind, how engineering knowledge is created and shared and how it is learned especially outside the classroom. Over the past 30 years, he has conducted field research on the practice of engineering design, new product development and innovation in variety of industries, in large and small firms with an emphasis on design thinking, most recently in relation to sustainability. He also studies
Paper ID #21466Library and Student Innovation Center: Makerspace!Dr. Steven F. Barrett, University of Wyoming Dr. Steven F. Barrett, P.E., received the B.S. in Electronic Engineering Technology from the University of Nebraska at Omaha in 1979, the M.E.E.E. from the University of Idaho at Moscow in 1986, and the Ph.D. from the University of Texas at Austin in 1993. He was formally an active duty faculty member and professor at the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado and is now professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering and associate dean for Academic Programs, College of Engineering and Applied Science
Professor, National Research University Higher School of Economics and SAPNext-Genyury.kupriyanov@sap.comDr. Chris Welch, Full Professor, International Space Universitychris.welch@isunet.eduValentina Anikushina, PhD-Candidate, Heidelberg University, SAP Next-Genvalentina.anikushina@sap.comAbstract: This paper elaborates on the formats of situational and project-oriented education which, beingembedded into university programs, enable senior technology and engineering students to develop design,project and entrepreneurial skills while working on real-life innovation challenges formulated by an industrypartner. A non-exhaustive list of the mentioned formats is set out in the form of a conceptual model thatdescribes an enterprise innovation process
product engineer for 2 years.Mr. Senbao Lin, Sichuan University - Pittsburgh Institute 2017.7 - Present Lab Engineer in Sichuan University - Pittsburgh Institute, China 2015.10 - 2017.3 Au- tomation Engineer in TP Orthodontics, Inc., the US 2013.8 - 2015.5 Master in Mechanical Engineering of Illinois Institute of Technology, the US 2009.9 - 2013.6 Bachelor in Engineering of Sichuan University, ChinaMiss Lurao Liu, Sichuan University 2017.9 - Present Laboratory Engineer in Sichuan University-Pittsburgh Institute 2015.8 - 2017.8 M.S., Ohio State University in America, Electrical and Computer Science Engineering 2011.9 - 2015.6 B.S., Sichuan University in China. Electrical engineering and AutomationMrs. Wei Chen, Sichuan
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (2003). His research interests and expertise include Instructional Design and De- velopment of Computer Based Instructions, Active Learning Environment through Technology, Social Networking Tools in Education and Argumentative Knowledge Construction through Online Learning. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Methods to study Elements of the Instructional Scaffolding Strategy Model for Enhancing Engineering Students' Knowledge Construction in an Online Social Collaborative Learning Environment AbstractEngineering students face low levels of knowledge construction when developing competenceand
help of VR technology, we are able to not only model and simulate behaviors ofphysical systems or any real life scenarios in a virtual environment, but also make the virtualenvironment interactive by implementing it on various VR platforms or devices (e.g. a personalcomputer, a head-mounted device (HMD) or a mobile device). This will allow users to havedirect interaction with those virtual systems and scenarios, and thus, learning can be moreengaging, fun and interactive in contrast to traditional classroom or online education.This paper presents the design of a physical–to–virtual transformation of an undergraduatemechanical engineering laboratory experiment - Jet Impact Force on Vanes (Jet-force Lab) on anAndroid-based mobile device using
received his BS and PhD in Mechan- ical Engineering from Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology and National University of Singapore respectively. He has published more than 60 papers in refereed journals and international conferences and contributed to books, and been involved in several internal and external funded research projects in these areas. He has received numerous research awards including ’Best Paper Award - ICAMT 2016’, ’Best Paper Award - ATMAE 2014’, ’Outstanding Paper Award – NAMRC 2012,’ ’A.M. Stickland Best Paper Award – IMechE, 2010,’ and ’Most Downloaded Paper – Elsevier, 2010.’ c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engaging undergraduate students
? 1 2 3 4 5SURVEY QUESTION 3On a scale from 1 to 5, 5 being ‘Very Comfortable’ and 1 being ‘Not Comfortable At All,’ howcomfortable are you around peers of other cultures from your own? 1 2 3 4 5Part 2: Technical Project Methods:To implement the following project three main technologies must be intertwined in order to beable to have a successful project. Mainly, vertical farming, hydroponic watering, and making thegrowing process smart through embedded systems, and machine learning. Because of these 3diverse technologies civil, mechanical, and electrical engineers can work together, withmechanical and civil focusing on the vertical structures and the hydroponic
Industry. As she has plans to remain and be an active member in SWE as a Professional Member, upon graduation in May of 2019. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Impact of "Imagineer Day," an Outreach Program, on K-8 girls and Women in EngineeringAbstractThe Society of Women Engineers at California State University, Chico developed an educationaloutreach program to promote Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) to K-8 girlsin 2012. Since then, every year over 200 local K-8th grade students are invited to participate inmultiple hands-on labs that demonstrate basic science and Engineering concepts. The goal of theoutreach program is to get young girls interested in
personnel. These partnerships should extend beyond colleges ofscience, engineering, and technology to include representatives from colleges of education,business, and a few others. Additionally, representatives from the pK-12 sector should beincluded to provide perspective on foundational education preparation. These partnershipsexemplify the essence of a P-20 model [6]. The model addresses the development of the studentfrom pK-12 through higher education to participate in the workforce. Recent decisions for bringing back manufacturing sent overseas have been based on therealization that manufacturing in the U.S. is only slightly more than the cost of manufacturing inChina, and less than the cost of manufacturing in eastern Europe [7
Paper ID #23756Intervention designed to increase interest in engineering for low-interest, K-12 girls did so for boys and girls ˜ University of Wisconsin - MadisonSamuel Alberto Acuna, Samuel Acu˜na is Ph.D. candidate in the Mechanical Engineering department at the University of Wis- consin–Madison, where he studies neuromuscular biomechanics. He aims to improve gait and balance in older adults by developing technology that influences the nervous system. Samuel received his BS in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University in 2012, and his MS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of
andabilities may have increased importance. We conducted a study using cognitive interviews andclassroom data to compare student responses and performance in scaffolded and unscaffoldedversions of two tasks that integrate engineering practices with science. The two versions eliciteddifferent types of information about students’ abilities that may inform assessment design anddevelopment. We also found significant differences between overall performance on the twoversions and between the two settings in which the instrument was administered.Background Aspects of technology and engineering have appeared in some K-12 science classroomsand, to a limited extent, in prior national science standards, but the Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS
, objectives andteaching methods in the syllabi, it can be seen that ENGR1282 emphasizes project-basedlearning and focuses on cultivating students’ engineering fundamentals, hands-on skills,creativity, practical ability and thinking ability. This is also reflected in the teaching goal ofENGR1281 and its weekly experimental class project.In the EEC curriculum, the topics of Introduction of Life Science include outline of lifescience, cells and cell engineering, gene engineering, synthetic biology, protein structure andfunction, microbial and virus, regenerative medicine, cancer, the bible and brain science,biological chips and high-throughput sequencing technologies, evolution and bionics. Thecourse study helps students to understand and grasp the
S-STEM grant to recruit rural stu- dents from Iowa and Illinois into STEM. Dr. Prosise mentors the collegiate chapter of SWE and organizes many outreach events encourage girls to go into STEM. She leads a study-abroad trip for engineering students to Brazil every-other-year, where students design, build, and implement assistive technologies for people with disabilities. Her research focus is to develop affordable upper limb prosthetics.Dr. R R Romatoski, Saint Ambrose UniversityDr. Susa H Stonedahl, St. Ambrose University Susa Hardwick Stonedahl is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at St. Ambrose University. She received her BA in Mathematics and Physics from Carleton College and her
Christian College. Her research interest revolves around technology innovations in education, software estimation, software design and curriculum design of software engineering course(s).Dr. Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette Muhsin Menekse is an Assistant Professor at Purdue University with a joint appointment in the School of Engineering Education and the Department of Curriculum & Instruction. Dr. Menekse’s primary research investigates how classroom activities affect conceptual understanding in engineering and science for all students. His second research focus is on verbal interactions that can enhance productive discussions in collaborative learning settings. And his third research focus is on