lost value of the three truss-based demonstrationclass sequence in the ETW that the ETW veteran was so concerned about was replaced with theadded value of the teaching model demonstrated exquisitely by another faculty member. Itcannot be overstated how valuable this modification was in nurturing a robust culture of teachingand learning at our institution. The sense of shared investment as we delivered the workshop in anew and exciting way with a more diverse team to a more diverse classroom of our owncolleagues was incredibly powerful.The ScheduleThe schedule of our institutional workshop was modified from the ETW schedule based on threeprimary considerations:1) our faculty generally live where the workshop is conducted, so the ETW van travel
thisintegrated active learning approach for teaching fatigue theory. 100 percent of students agreedthat they had a much better basic understanding of fatigue theory through this multi-facetedapproach. This paper will present and explain in detail the integrated active learning approachfor teaching fatigue theory. The class survey data analysis is also presented and analyzed.1. IntroductionFatigue is defined as failure under a repeated or varying load. This load never reaches a levelsufficient to cause failure in a single load application. Fatigue damage or failure is initiated andinduced through some defects on the surfaces and/or inside components. The defects could bemanufacturing process induced scratches on the surfaces or dislocations, impurities
within the college and university,but also have potential for a broader societal impact by increasing and diversifying the pool ofpotential engineering talent that is needed in the United States’ workforce. Recommendations toinclude long-term studies of the participants are discussed.1.0 Introduction & BackgroundThe inability of academic institutions in the United States to attract and retain URM populationsin STEM fields has long been associated with the lack of workforce diversity [1]. URM retentionin STEM is an accepted urgent national priority and has attracted increasing attention from manystakeholders in academia. This focus is evident from the many successful programs that havebeen implemented nationally, dedicated to attracting
potential impact of this study in light of existing ethics education research within STEM.Keywords: Philosophical Ethics; Community-Engaged Learning; Faculty Development1. Introduction To support the development of an exemplary generation of STEM professionals, currentundergraduate STEM instruction must draw on students’ dispositions towards ethical thoughtand action. Yet, there is currently no consensus on the most appropriate or effective model forSTEM ethics instruction [1, 2]. This project seeks to increase the role that community-basedlearning, faculty engagement, and institutional intentionality play in the formation of ethicalSTEM undergraduates. The primary goal of this project is to develop interdisciplinarypartnerships to build and
design project were piloted by co-author VanderGheynst. Asummary of the course lecture plan is provided in Table 1. The course was hugely successful interms of student engagement and viability of the learning content. Adjustments were madeduring winter 2017 implementation, particularly with the inclusion of two mid-term prototypetesting assessments in a competition-like setting (Table 2). 3Table 1. Lecture topics for ENG 3 in winter 2017 Week Communication topics Design topics Listening skills, and individual and group Engineering defined and the role of social 1 values and their importance in problem
, often within the context of activities that fall underthe maker movement [1]. Such opportunities take myriad forms, including required classprojects, optional after school clubs, and school and state level competitions. Students mayinvent alone or in groups, their choice of what to invent may be constrained or wide open, theymay share their inventions with classmates and teachers only, or with industry professionals anda wider audience outside their schools. Their inventions may be a physical product, an onlinetool or website, or something else entirely. A formal invention-focused curriculum may or maynot be used. Underlying these widely varying educational efforts is the assumption that studentsbenefit in some way by going through the
, and reinforced concrete behavior. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Peer Mentoring for All: Investigating the Feasibility of a Curricular-Embedded Peer Mentoring StructureIntroductionThe benefits of peer mentoring in undergraduate STEM courses are well documented, and theliterature suggests even more significant benefits to the mentors, compared to the mentees [1-3].The School of Engineering at the University of Kansas has developed a peer-mentoring modelcalled the Undergraduate Teaching Fellows Program, based on the Learning Assistant model [2].Students who participate as mentors in this program reported an improved understanding ofcourse content, more confidence in their academic
that motivate students to devote extra hours fortechnology study; thus leading students to successfully design products through managing a teamproject with little budget and scarce teaching resources.Workshop Objectives and General Description:The two-week camp was part of a larger program that includes research, education and outreach.Specifically, this program has multiple goals: 1) Train the students to use Inventor™ 3D CAD computer program to create engineering designs and teach them how to 3D print the designs using advanced 3D printers. 2) Improve students’ math skills 3) Introduce the students to applications of advanced manufacturing (AM) to enhance their interest in pursuing college degrees that would prepare them for
videos.IntroductionAn increasing number of engineering courses are being taught in a flipped (or inverted) format[1], [2], [3] and improving learning in flipped classes is a timely need. In its most general sense,a flipped class is a class where activities that normally occur in the classroom are swapped withthose that normally occur outside the classroom [4]. Traditionally, classroom activities in manyengineering classes involve lectures and instructor-led problem-solving sessions. Since theseactivities can be presented outside the classroom most effectively through online videos (ratherthan through readings), watching videos has become an integral part of learning in flippedengineering classes [5]. Given this, improving learning in flipped classes requires
develop safety, skill, and professional competencies.The center connects and provides value to several other campus offices including admissions,career services, and institutional advancement. The BIC is a regular and popular stop foradmissions campus visitors. We communicate regularly with admissions staff and student tourguides so they are able to provide a detailed and exciting introduction to the center. The center isalso a connection point for corporate partners and these relationships are cultivated through thecareer services and institutional advancement offices.Analysis of Team MembershipsTable 1 and Figure 1 summarize team and group memberships for the center from inception tothe current year. At the current time, the center is reaching
thatserve a function, rather than just rapid prototyping and modeling. There are many differentmethods to use to additively manufacture a part [1]. One of the holdbacks of additivemanufacturing processes is that they can be time-consuming. Particularly, Fused DepositionModeling (FDM) machines can take hours [2], or days to complete a large load-bearing part, justbecause the part requires a sizeable amount of plastic to complete a higher percentage infillcomponent with additional perimeters around the part to achieve strong enough mechanicalproperties for the part to sustain the loads required [3],[4]. Some solutions have been fastermachines, that can extrude material quicker at the cost of print quality, multi-extruder systemsthat have multiple
portrays a desire tocreate graduates with an andragogical mindset, despite the relative absence of the use of the termandragogy in engineering education literature. Pembridge developed a pilot instrument tomeasure andragogical constructs utilizing different instruments directly measuring the theoreticalframeworks supporting assumptions of adult learning, while also comparing responses from first-year and fourth-year engineering students.1 He found significant differences between the twoyear groups of engineering students, with fourth-year students having improved ability at self-directed learning and a stronger sense of adulthood. It is unknown how these results apply to acadet population, where increased structure and additional military training
valuable insightsinto current campus information needs, and raise the level of library efficiency in collectiondevelopment and technical services processing.IntroductionThe development and maintenance of relevant library collections that support engineeringeducation and research experience many challenges. Foremost, the subscription costsof science, technology, engineering and medicine (STEM) journals and databases hadreached an unsustainable level, with the annual inflation rate being much higher than inother disciplines [1]. Moreover, the number of publications supporting traditionalengineering disciplines and new and/or interdisciplinary research is on the rise.Furthermore, the overall expansion of digital content availability lead to an
academically and professionally than those who aredisengaged or distracted in class. There is ample evidence that the academic achievement oftoday’s students falls below desired levels and that the lack of academic engagement is a majorcontributor [1, 2]. Devising effective solutions to the lack of engagement can be challenging, duethe multiplicity and complexity of the factors affecting it. Such factors include studentpreparation, socioeconomic background and teaching style effectiveness [3-5]. In this study, weextend our previous work that proposes a solution to this problem by specifically addressing twosignificant contributors to disengagement: the inadequate preparation of students for theircourses and the traditional teaching style. Although our
inthis study is RapidMiner, and different subsets of data are utilized in the machine learning phase,thus reaching more robust predictive conclusions.IntroductionIt is almost ubiquitous nowadays to read or hear about trends or conclusion(s) that have beenestablished with the application of data analytics techniques to consumers’ information, frompreference in terms of flavor or color, to behavioral trends in terms of purchasing online ortendency to walk short distances [1]. The field of data analytics has received substantial attentionin the past years due in part to the competition level in a globalized economy, which has resultedin the almost imperative need for focused or personalized services, thus resulting in this globaltrend of collecting
provides advancededucation to the Air Force and other military and government organizations. This case exampleprovides a structured approach that can be followed to design, evaluate, justify, and integrateelements of any new work design, such as developing and executing a faculty mentoringprogram in an unconventional educational environment.IntroductionFormal mentoring is defined as a program established by an organization that purposely matchesmentors and mentees so the employees can share their knowledge and expertise [1]. “Mentoringis traditionally a process in which an experienced person (the mentor) guides another person (thementee or protégé) in the development of his or her own ideas, learning, andpersonal/professional competence” [2
could also be used for trainingpurposes. The goal of this paper is to outline the history of virtual reality (VR), the use of VR ineducation and training, the reasons why VR is the best option for this project, and the creativeprocess behind the photolithography simulation that has been created. This paper will also usedata gathered from user testing to showcase the benefits and disadvantages of using a VRsimulation for photolithography training purposes.IntroductionNanotechnology is the science, engineering, and application of submicron matters that tietogether unique biological, physical, chemical properties of nanoscale materials in essentiallynew and useful ways. [1] Nanoscience involves the ability to see and control individual atomsand
connections. In previous terms, students have said it was difficult for them tounderstand how to apply control systems topics in their field. Based on this feedback, Iconsidered course improvements to address this deficiency. I identified two possible causes forlearning difficulties: lack of connections to prior knowledge and lack of motivation for the topic.According to Ambrose, Bridges, DiPietro, Lovett, and Norman [1], sufficient and accurateconnections to prior knowledge can support learning. Therefore, helping students accuratelyidentify interactions with courses topics in everyday life should aid learning. Additionally, basedon the expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation, it follows that a student will likely beless motivated to learn
subjects. These results show that ACBSS, aninterdisciplinary computing education program, offers a promising model in providingcomputing education to more diverse students for the 21st-century digital workplace.1. IntroductionAs the technology-based economy grows, so does its demand for technology professionals. TheU.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics projects a growth of 1.1 million American jobs in computing andinformation technology by 2024—with only 450,000 graduates available to fill them [1]. Inaddition to technology professionals, more technology-capable workers are needed in theincreasingly digitized workplace [1]. In all, the gap between the demand and supply oftechnology-educated workers slows economic growth while raising income inequality
the systems engineering tools to define the system concept and requirements,including a system project charter; risk, stakeholder, external, SWOT, internal, and value gapanalyses; customer and systems requirements; and a process scenario template.Teaching Methods and Instructional Strategies:Teaching methods are techniques that help motivate students to do what they need to do to learncourse material. Gentile (2016) categorized teaching methods into the following types: 1)information-providing, 2) inquiry-oriented, 3) active or performance-based, 4) cooperative, 5)mastery-based and 6) creativity-inducing. Information–providing type of learning typically useslecture and demonstrations to convey information (Gentile, 2016). Inquiry-oriented
interactions between all differentparties involved in the project into a process that collaboratively integrates the abilities andperspectives of all participants. This would ultimately lead to enhancing project results andmaximizing efficiency throughout all phases of design and construction [1]. DB, specifically, hasexperienced increasing popularity in the construction industry ultimately for its recognizedbenefits, including overall reduction of project cost and completion time, compared to traditionalDesign Bid Build (DBB) Project Delivery Methods (PDMs). The major differences between DBand DBB is that in a traditional DBB, owner first hires an architect to develop the architecturaldesign, and engineers to develop structural, electrical
include a small number of time points, a lack of a control group, minimalcollection of open-ended data, and software limitations.IntroductionThe addition of both engineering design and practices in the Next Generation Science Standards(NGSS) [1] has provided an opportunity for the development of curricula and new instructionalframeworks that integrates engineering into science classrooms. The development of suchcurricula and frameworks has been the call of many K-12 science education panels andcommittees [2], [3], including the Teachers Advisory Council, who proposed five benefits ofadding engineering in K-12 classrooms: 1) an increased learning in math and science, 2) anawareness of the work of engineers, 3) the ability to engage in engineering
Acosta Feliz, Utah State UniversitySandra Weingart c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 1 Argumentation in K-12 Engineering Education: A Review of the Literature Amy Wilson-Lopez, Christina M. Sias, Ashley Strong, Jared Garlick, Sandra Weingart, Angela Minichiello, and Jorge Acosta FelizWhile individual engineers address problems differently, one trait all engineers share is relianceon argumentation skills to make claims about their designs and solutions. Engineers understandthe need to persuasively communicate the attributes of their designs and solutions to a
. Entering the 2015-2016 academic year,program faculty envisioned a capstone design experience that would engage student teams in ayear-long, professional level design project sponsored by an industry client. The first two yearsof the capstone design program have been inarguably successful, and in this paper we identifyand reflect on the keys to our success. The intention for writing this paper is to ensure thesuccess of the program is repeatable, and to assist other programs, especially those residing insmall liberal arts universities, in starting or revising their own senior design experience.Our key factors in assembling a successful industry-sponsored capstone design program havebeen: (1) faculty buy-in and involvement, (2) engaged industry
), its first mixed-gender university [1]; its firstpublic women-only and the world's largest university for women, Princess Nora bintAbdulrahman University (PNU) [2]; and its first private women-only university, EffatUniversity [3]. In view of these initiatives, this paper serves as an extension of a previous study thathighlights the need in the kingdom for the participation of females in engineering highereducation [4]. The authors here present and justify engineering specializations where females areexpected to be most successful from both academic and career perspectives. First, an overview ispresented regarding the involvement of women in engineering higher education and the jobmarket in select countries. This is subsequently followed
faculty change andorganizational change toward innovation through use of EBIS in teaching and learning.IntroductionTo achieve more effective teaching and learning in undergraduate engineering educationprofessional development needs to promote change toward innovation of use of evidence-basedinstructional strategies (EBIS) in faculty beliefs and practice as well as change in organizationalattitudes and norms [1-4]. To develop an effective program, strategies for change need to beutilized and assessed at the individual level and the organizational level. Rogers Diffusion ofInnovation (DOI) is an individual change model which consist of five step of a progression towardsadoption of change such as sports, business or teaching [5]. The steps necessary
understanding of NOE aspects or improved them.Keywords: NOE, engineering design process, nature of engineering, secondary science teachers,NGSS, engineering design challenge, professional development, cognitive apprenticeshipIntroductionTo meet the demand of an increasing science and engineering workforce, teachers must beprepared to integrate engineering in their instruction. There are some attempts at policies andeducational reforms aimed at changing science and engineering education to improve students’understanding of engineering and to influence more students to study those degrees [1], [2].Teacher training programs in the US do not adequately prepare secondary science teachers tointegrate engineering in their curriculum and, in turn, to increase
, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives” [page 42, 1]. Our teamof instructors exposes students to project management techniques at multiple levels within ourundergraduate ECE program. By learning project management early and practicing it often,students improve their teamwork efficacy in projects, courses, and in their future careers. Scrumis a cyclical project management technique commonly used in high-tech industries. Scrumprovides a framework that facilitates teamwork and project management through an adaptable,incremental process. We have tailored our variant of Scrum for students working on engineeringprojects in a higher-education environment. We intend to better understand student learning ofproject management and teamwork so that
that, materials development is often too slowin providing practical solutions for the current needs of technological advancement [1, 2, 3, 4].Given this, the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) was announced by the White House in 2011;this initiative posed that the synergistic combination of experiments and simulations through aninformatics framework would speed up advancements in materials discovery and developmentutilizing big data [1]. Unfortunately, current materials science and engineering students oftenreceive minimal training in statistical principles and methods, computational analysis, andsophisticated programming. Likewise, students with stronger informatics-related skills arefamiliar with concepts and methods of engineering systems
the BOPPPSinstruction has produced. The assessment process for the BOPPPS Survey involves five different phases in thispaper: item generation, environment design, emotion analysis, validity testing and piloting of our protocol.During the environment design phase, we have adopted SunVote Classroom Response System (CRS), which isa kind of system capable of providing real-time classroom feedback. This stable wireless transmission system isshort and portable, thus is specifically suitable for active learning assessment. The keypad, radio transmitter anddrive software can be seen in Figures 1. This paper has evaluated the impact of using CRS on student-involvement from perspectives of both the instructor and students. Student participation with