Fawwaz HabbalPre-Collegiate Program Background and Direct ObjectiveAs new experiments and design-based projects are envisioned, they must be evaluated andassessed before they become part of the curriculum. Initially, we introduced such new items to asmall group of the Harvard College students, but as the demands for new experiments increased,it became difficult to have a thorough evaluation through the small sample of students. Wedecided to engage a different student body of diverse backgrounds by establishing a pre-collegiate program. This program attempts to prototype and develop multiple new activelearning initiatives before integrating them into the full curriculum. Indeed, the program becamea valuable platform to develop, to experiment, and
Face-to-Face Senior (36) Online Senior Research Concepts in HDCS (49) Face-to-Face Senior Project Management & Practice (5) Online/Hybrid Graduate Data Analysis (8)Survey completion was voluntary and students were assured that all responses were anonymousto the instructor and that anonymity would be maintained in any publication of the results aswell. Student responses were downloaded for analysis with each response record by a non-identifying number assigned by the learning management system.The survey began with demographic characteristics including: 1) student classification (freshman
applications for the automotive industry. He has worked in the vibration test and measurement industry helping to drive new technologies to market and working with industry to meet their emerging needs. He is currently a Professor at California Polytechnic State University at San Luis Obispo in the Department of Mechanical Engineering teaching dynamics, vibrations and controls. He is involved in several undergraduate and master’s level multidisciplinary projects and interested in engineer- ing education research. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018“Intelligent Vehicles:” Development of a new course for undergraduate engineering studentsIntroductionThe field of intelligent
. This cycle could be repeated as many times as the student wished, until they werehappy with the quiz score or until the end of the course.The other nine quizzes were taken in class, either in the presence of a proctor or the courseinstructor. Students could retry in-class quizzes, with a different question on the same topic,during a later class period or by scheduling an appointment with the instructor outside of classtime. Students could retry a quiz as often as they liked until the end of the course. Due to theinstructor being away from campus most of the semester, quiz retry appointments were onlyallowed during the last three weeks of the semester.A design project [22] was assigned to groups of 3 students. Group assignments were made by
with a better system rather than being forced to programthese robots via an obsolete programming language. Therefore, in this work, we proposed aframework to interface the existing manipulators with a modern programming environment. The reminder of this paper is organized as follows. Literature review is presented in the nextsection followed by the curricular context. After that, we introduces hardware setup and thensoftware development. The next section describes the evaluation of students’ survey followed bythe conclusions section.Literature Review Throughout engineering education curriculum in general as well as in our institution, thehands-on experiments and laboratory projects play an essential role in the success of the
newstrategies they implement in their course(s). Data to answer these questions is drawn frominterviews with group participants and leaders, as described further in Methods. In the followingsection, we provide a description of the project under which the network of teachingdevelopment groups was established and the structure and intended purpose of the teachingdevelopment groups. Analysis of instructors’ motivations for participating in teachingdevelopment and their choices around implementing research-based teaching strategies providesinsight about what aspects of ongoing teaching development are most valuable to instructors andabout what types of change toward student-centered interactive learning are most attractive.SIMPLE Teaching Development
, University of South Florida Richard Gilbert is a Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering at the University of South Florida’s College of Engineering . Richard is the Co-PI for the grant that supports the NSF designated Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education in Florida, FLATE. FLATE, now in its 10 year of op- eration, addresses curriculum, professional development, and outreach issues to support the creation of Florida’s technical workforce. Richard has over 30 years of experience working with the K-14 education community. Other funded efforts include projects for the NIH and the US Department of Education. The latter was for the development of an engineering curriculum for elementary school
Assistants (UTAs). In order tostrengthen retention of STEM majors, the mutually reinforcing benefits of focusing on thesethree groups simultaneously guide this project. The UTAs are a primary focus of this project’swork.Substantial numbers of STEM-intending students choose to leave STEM degree programs1 aftercompleting only the introductory coursework. The effective implementation of peer learning andother tutorials within the introductory coursework can play a significant role in preventing earlydepartures from STEM programs2,3. To enhance retention of STEM-intending students at theUniversity of Louisville, PRIMES’ focus is centered on select introductory courses for STEMmajors in order to help retain students in the programs.The Colorado Learning
Paper ID #23798Understanding the Expectations of Writing Skills in Engineering Design Coursesand Professional PracticeDr. Veera Gnaneswar Gude P.E., Mississippi State University Veera Gnaneswar Gude is a faculty member of civil and environmental engineering department at Mis- sissippi State University. He has degrees in chemical (B.S.) and environmental engineering (M.S., Ph.D.) disciplines with over 15 years of academic, industrial, and research experiences on various chemical and environmental engineering projects. He is a licensed professional engineer and a board certified environ- mental engineer. His passion for
General Studies (Hons.) from Lethbridge College. He has worked in a variety of Post-Secondary roles while completing his education and since graduating in 2013. Prior to this project he worked as an Academic Strategist for nearly four years, splitting time between the University of Lethbridge and Mount Royal University. Additionally, he has spent time as a Research Assistant for a public school attendance and performance project, Teaching Assistant, Tutor and Academic Aid. All his previous roles have played a crucial part in building qualifications to assist in this Engineering Education research.Prof. Quazi K. Hassan, University of Calgary Dr. Quazi K. Hassan is a professor in the Department of Geomatics Engineering at
courseis currently offered each semester (fall, spring, summer) and reaches 450+ students eachacademic year. The course exists to introduce topics relevant to the technical manager inthe 21st century. Core topics historically covered in the course include: managementpractices, leadership, communications, project management, working in the globalenvironment, risk management, systems engineering, product development,entrepreneurship, ethics, and quality management.As part of a campus-supported course redesign effort, this high-enrollment course wasconverted to an online format in 2014. Prior to the redesign, students participated in atraditional, classroom-based lecture format of the course delivered in a large lecture hallwith capacity of
interpretations of experiences and project forward on possible changestowards a growth mindset. Students understood that growth mindset was not an all or nothingswitch to be flipped.These findings are useful for educators interested in promoting productive beliefs about thenature of intelligence. Future work in this area will include an exploration of how these beliefschange over the undergraduate experience and the development of concrete strategies forstudents to begin to implement growth mindset within an engineering education context.BackgroundThe National Academy of Engineering provides us with a particular vision for the Engineer of2020, and these students will be graduating in just a few short years. As engineering educators,we are called to
aspart of the problem solving process. Parker [15] describes a liaising model of informationfluency instruction in which a librarian participates in teaching six class sessions, assessesstudent assignments, and assists with assignment and curriculum development. For a groupdesign project, Roberts and Bhatt [16] used a combination of online tutorials and a required one-on-one consultation with a librarian. In addition, students were provided with library hostedwebpages about engineering research. Instructors noted general improvement in the quality ofinformation sources. Students responded well to the presence of the library instruction with 75%of students responding that the online tutorial was helpful and 72% of students responding thatthe
developmental psychopathology with underserved populations. She is the co-PI for an NSF grant which provides schol- arships and career counseling to engineering students at Suffolk University. Her role in the project is to assess career development trajectories for the scholarship students, create program evaluations, collect assessment data and disseminate information to the STEM community. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Evaluation of the Suffolk’s Electrical Engineering S-STEM Program at Year 4 Suffolk University’s Electrical Engineering (EE) S-STEM Scholars program aims to givefull scholarships to study electrical engineering at
Paper ID #21117High-Fidelity Digitized Assessment of Heat Transfer Fundamentals using aTiered Delivery StrategyDr. Tian Tian, University of Central Florida Tian Tian is an Associate Lecturer of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Central Florida, which she joined in 2013. She has been frequently teaching undergraduate lecture and laboratory components of Heat Transfer, Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics. Her educational research interests focus on project-based learning, online learning, and the digitization of STEM assessments. She received the Teaching Incentive Award, Excellence in Undergraduate
at SMU. Working across the boundaries of urbanism, landscape mapping, and public engagement, Zarazaga explores ways to connect culture and community to place. Using GIS and participatory community mapping, she explores the impact of civil and environmental choices on the design of the sustainable city. Trained in architecture and urban design, her research spans education and practice, working on the integration of community research into project based learning. Her work overlaps areas of GIS mapping, global sustainable urbanism, design and cre- ativity. She undertook a Fulbright in Valpara´ıso, Chile, to investigate, and map, devices of landscape as inspirations for the orders of community space
attendance ischecked in every class with considerable penalty for unexcused absences. The course was taughtin two separate sections by two instructors.Summary of activitiesThe weekly activities listed in Table 2 are described in more detail in this section.Week 1 - A presentation was given to introduce students to mechanical engineering as adiscipline and the numerous career opportunities in the field. Students were also introduced tothe Department of Mechanical Engineering, including faculty members, research areas, thecurriculum, minors, advising resources, student clubs, and previous Capstone projects. Theassociated assignment asked students to write a short report (using Word) in which they (1)explain their choice of ME as a major, (2) select a
Engineering Education” and ”Engi- neering Mechanics: Statics.” Dr. Goodridge is an engineering councilor for the Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) and serves on ASEE’s project board. Dr. Goodridge actively consults for projects includ- ing the development of an online curriculum style guide for Siemens software instruction, development of engineering activities for blind and visually impaired youth, and the implementation and investigation of a framework of engineering content to incorporate into P-12 engineering education.Mr. Benjamin James Call, Utah State University Benjamin Call graduated with his Masters of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering (Aerospace Em- phasis) in 2006 from Utah State University. After
Ingenieros sin Fronteras Colombia since 2012, and he had worked on several engineering projects with social impact. In addition, he has collaborated with researchers of the Laboratory of Cognition at Universidad de los Andes, particularly in decision-making processes and teamwork. He is co-founder of INTERACT, a research group on complex adaptive systems and social network analysis. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Introducing Changemaking Engineering into an Operations Research Course: Some Unexpected ResultsAbstractWith funding from a National Science Foundation (NSF) IUSE/PFE REvolutionizingengineering and computer science Departments (RED) grant, the Shiley
FrameworksAbstractPreviously, researchers developed and applied a sustainable design rubric, based on the NinePrinciples of Sustainable Engineering, to civil engineering student design projects. The rubric isbeing updated for use across engineering disciplines based on insights from the pilot applicationphase and a three phase validation process. This paper reports on expert validation through asurvey and comparisons with sustainability frameworks. Paper and web-based surveys were usedto gather perspectives from engineering education professionals with different disciplinaryperspectives, including civil, environmental, mechanical, electrical/computer, and otherengineering or related disciplines, from the United States and abroad (N = 55). Specifically,participants
leadership, the Women in Engineering Pro- gram received the 2008 National Engineers Week Introduce a Girl to Engineering Day Award. She is the principal investigator for a National Science Foundation’s Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) grant called the Successful Engineering Education and Development Support (SEEDS) Program. SEEDS extends successful women in engineering retention programs to all first-year and new external transfer students in the Clark School. Paige is the co-lead for the Mid-Atlantic Girls Collaborative (MAGiC), a regional collaborative within the NSF-funded National Girls Collaborative Project which brings together girl-serving organizations across
, novelty, and heavy collaboration [2]. Hackathons have beenused to: Spur interest in computer science fields [3] [4] Create innovations within companies [2] [5], for governments [6], and for research projects [7] Provide applications of learning for undergraduate students both within the STEM fields [3] [8] [9] and in non-technical fields, such as marketing [10]Within an educational context, hackathons are very useful for stirring engagement and forcorrecting student perceptions of their program [3] [4] [10]. There is, however, limited literatureon hackathons being used in-class, with the “Markathon” [10] being one notable exception.Hackathons are usually, but not always, competitions [8]. Most
Paper ID #22784Gender, Motivation, and Pedagogy in the STEM Classroom: A QuantitativeCharacterizationProf. Jonathan D. Stolk, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Jon Stolk strives to design and facilitate extraordinary learning experiences. He creates project-based and interdisciplinary courses and programs that invite students to take control of their learning, grapple with complex systems, engage with each other and the world in new ways, and emerge as confident, agile, self-directed learners. Stolk’s research aims to understand how students experience different classroom settings, particularly with regard to how
Dean of Professional Programs and Academic Computing. She currently acts as co-PI for the CREATE NSF ATE Renewable Energy Support Center and as PI of a NSF ATE targeted research project. Dr. Alfano served as a Program Director at the National Science Foundation and co-lead of the ATE program in 2007-2008. Dr Alfano also was the only community college representative on the National Academy of Sciences Committee on Workforce Trends in the U.S. Energy and Mining Industries which released their report in March 2013. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 NSF ATE CREATE Targeted Research Study A Case Study of Community College Transfer and Success in a 2+2 Program
efficiencies. Since 2004, Professor Scachitti has focused her efforts towards applying Industrial Engineering concepts to improve Healthcare and other non-traditional service environments using Lean and Six Sigma methods.Prof. James B. Higley, Purdue University Northwest JAMES B. HIGLEY, P.E. holds the rank of Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University Northwest. He is responsible for teaching courses in modeling; integrated design, analysis & manufacturing; manufacturing processes; CNC programming; and senior project. He holds Bachelor and Masters Degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Flipped
complexity of engineering systems. Theengineering design process involves knowledge of multiple domains of engineering andcollaborative work among multi-disciplinary teams. The design process is also complicated bythe safety, practicality and cost constraints. In light of these challenges, the engineering educationneeds to maintain its focus on principles of engineering design that can effectively prepareengineering graduates to meet the challenges posed by rapid technological growth in engineeringand manufacturing technologies. The effectiveness of engineering education in modeling anddesign courses, traditionally, is measured through quizzes, exams and course projects that areaimed at measuring level of developed skills. For engineering students
assessment of individual student work in project- based assignments. She received her B.S.E. in Civil Engineering from Duke University (1994) and her M.S. (1995) and Ph.D. (2001) in Civil and Environmental Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University.Prof. H. Scott Matthews, Carnegie Mellon University H. Scott Matthews is a Professor in the Departments of Civil and Environmental Engineering and En- gineering & Public Policy and the Research Director of the Green Design Institute at Carnegie Mellon University. The Green Design Institute is an interdisciplinary research consortium at Carnegie Mellon fo- cused on identifying and assessing the environmental impacts of systems and helping businesses manage their use of
college, they are public; YCP has only had engineeringsince 1995 (the mechanical engineering program was launched in 1995 and civil engineering in2016), West Point is the nation’s first engineering school having taught engineering for over 200years. Unlike West Point, York draws primarily from the local area, not a national pool.Differences in faculty size, student faculty ratio, as well as student body attributes (standardizedtest scores) are summarized in Table 1. At the start of the project one quest that arose waswhether the implementation of this fast-paced redesign could achieve equally good results with agroup of students who are not at a highly selective college and who, on paper at least, seem tohave lesser capabilities (as measured by
Engineers. 2. AmericanSociety for Engineering Education 3. Society of Automotive EngineeringPROPFESSIONAL SERVICE ABET Program Evaluator Member, Board of Advisors, Prince George’sPublic Schools Project Lead the Way U.S. Representative for IJSO (International Junior Science Olympiads) c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Changing Mindsets, Transforming Learning Environments: A Collaborative Approach to Innovation and EntrepreneurshipIntroductionThe national government of the United Arab Emirates has set transitioning to a knowledge-basedeconomy, including the promotion of innovation and entrepreneurship, as a key pillar of itsVision 2021 National Agenda [1]. With this initiative, the country
, practices, and cultures that reflect expandedperspectives on gender, diversity, and intersectional identities. In order to better understand the role(s) of such a course in an engineering student'seducation and how engineering education considers these issues, the instructor team invited twoundergraduate researchers to undertake projects in support of these goals. One of these students(Amber Levine) was tasked with identifying other courses across the U.S. with similar subjectmatter and learning objectives (“EEL Related Courses Study”); she found 13 courses acrosstwelve institutions that connected issues of diversity and culture to engineering and were targetedto engineering students (Levine, 2016). The other student (Chloe Wiggins, who is