this technology Provide any additional feedback you Free response haveIn this initial module deployment, collection of student feedback was somewhat limited in aneffort to keep the module similar in workload and structure to the other software options. Notwanting to deter interested students during the pilot test of this module, the feedback wasrestricted to a single online survey at the conclusion of the module. In future semesters,instructors plan to survey students both before and after completing the module (weeks 1 and 4)to investigate changes in perceived knowledge and attitudes about the technology. In addition,students will be asked to complete a short reflection about their experience during the module,whether they consulted
, integrating knowledge, collaborating, and synthesizing learning into one’s own narrative as a portfolio [9]. Figure 5. Entangled Learning Design EL principles guided program design decisions, such c2017 Paul Treuer & Clemson University as planning for initial community-development and workshop programming during an initial Early FallMove-In period, as well as the structure and assignments of the study skills course.Our analysis involved a mixed methods approach to understanding students’ success. We usedquantitative data to evaluate utilization of services to support academic
?Project Documents and ArtifactsProgram documents and artifacts were used to help inform evaluation efforts and to ensure thedata collection instruments developed were closely tied to the program design and goals. Theywere also used to assess whether it was aligned to the priorities of the funding agency.Research Course Development and Implementation, Summer Research Experience ObservationsNon-intrusive site observations occurred during the research course development process. Theseobservations were conducted during select planning meetings. Informal visits were made duringthe research course and summer research experience. Detailed field notes were gathered andanalyzed to provide requisite answers for the evaluation questions.Focus Groups and
. IMEET Prize Challenge Field Layout and students testing their robots on the playfieldFigure 2. 3D CAD wheel model (left) and the robot with 3D printed wheel(right) in action on“rocky” terrain during the prize challengeSimilarly, a drone is required to fly for scouting and beacon-dropping mission. To complete thismission, students need to design and 3D print the drone frame and drop-off mechanism that theycan attach to the drone. On Day 9, the student teams compete in the judging round. On the lastday of the camp, student teams present their work before their parents, instructors, and otherguests.Evaluation Plan & Preliminary ResultsThe main goal of the IMEET Program is to educate and inspire the next generation of STEMstudents and educators
, huge advantage for where we are geographically, even within our own county. Kids are institution of naturally advantaged because of our proximity to [university 1], and even kids in this region higher are advantaged by their proximity to [university 1] and [university 2]. Having a community education college that's 20 minutes away is another huge benefit. (HSB Principal) Funding or Where I see barriers is not so much in the policies but in the physical plan of the building. program (HSC Principal) availability But there's some students that don't want to travel because they enjoy being here with their friends all day. Losing those two credits can be a powerful thing because a lot of
like engineers.AcknowledgementsSupport for this work is provided by the National Science Foundation under Award No. EEC1664228. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] National Science Board. (2016). Science and engineering indicators 2016. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB-2016-1).[2] Tai, R. T., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. T. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143-1144.[3] Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation, and aspirations in science
under Grant No.DRL-1657519. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions are recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation .References[1] E. Iversen, “Engineering Outreach on Campus,” Washington, DC, 2015.[2] C. Gartland, “Student ambassadors: ‘role-models’, learning practices and identities,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., no. September, pp. 1–20, 2014.[3] A. V. Maltese and R. H. Tai, “Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science,” Int. J. Sci. Educ., 2010.[4] R. H. Tai, C. Q. Liu, A. V. Maltese, and X. Fan, “Planning early for careers in science,” Science. 2006.[5] M. B. Ormerod and D. Duckworth, “Pupils
Success program funded by the National Science Foundation, Grant # DUE-1217285. She teaches undergraduate Computer Science courses and serves as department chair . She is currently involved in developing effective retention strategies for computer science and engineering students in the first two years. Her research interests include mobile and web technologies.Ms. Maureen Walsh Sakakeeny PE P.E., Merrimack College Ms. Sakakeeny is an experienced civil engineer and higher education administrator. Her engineering expertise spans transportation infrastructure design, construction management, environmental planning, and sustainability consulting. She supports the Dean of Science and Engineering with student recruitment
management system and the second to the introductionof peer mentors through the project. There were more items where 50 percent or more reported“moderate” change. These were all items that had been introduced or reinforced through theproject. Finally, there were many items where half or more reported that they planned to change.These were all related to the use of undergraduate peer mentors, introduced through the project,and the recognition that both graduate TAs and undergradute peer mentors were an essentialcomponent of the ecology of learning, a recognition that had come to the fore during the year.The 50 percent who expected to use peer mentors in the future might have done so earlier—ashad the 50 percent who reported this as a major change—but
increase students’ interest in STEM and expand theiraccess to opportunities to experience integrated STEM activities. Our work focused on middleschool students as research shows that interest in STEM decreases through middle school [1].The planned intervention is based on existing theory and research on motivation, as well as theemerging body of literature on integrated STEM instruction. Research shows that relevance isessential to student engagement in science and mathematics [2]. Research also indicates thatthere is a link between students’ interest and experiences in school and their future educationalcareer choices [3,4] . Therefore, engaging students in engineering activities where they solve realworld problems motivates them to learn science
. Theresearcher described key highlights from the research about developing strategic partnerships,and the practitioner translated those highlights into actionable strategies for session attendees.This give-and-take presentation style highlighted our focus on connecting research and practice.The partnership’s orientation toward outreach and dissemination had a positive impact on onemember’s professional advancement. In total, we produced more than 20 professional productsin less than three years.The impact of the work of the partnership has been amplified because of the collaboration. Fromthe research side, one of the recent findings is that many teams utilized informationalcommunication, in which change leaders provide details about plans and goals
undergraduate student at North Carolina State University pursing a Bachelor of Arts degree in Psychology. She plans to attend Graduate School to obtain a Doctorate in Clinical Psychology upon graduating from NC State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Doctoral Students’ Motivations and Identities: Findings and ImplicationsProject OverviewThe goal of this project is to improve the understanding of how graduate student experiencesinfluence engineering identity formation and goal setting processes. Engineering identity andmotivational goal setting processes have been shown to be important factors for undergraduatestudent participation in engineering
Conference Proceedings, vol. 1413, no. 1, pp. 163–166, 2012.[3] C. J. Finelli, S. R. Daly, and K. M. Richardon, "Bridging the research-to-practice gap: Designing an institutional change plan using local evidence," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 331-361, Apr. 2014.[4] S. E. Shadle, A. Marker, and B. Earl, "Faculty drivers and barriers: laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments," International Journal of STEM Education, vol.4, no. 8, pp. 1-13, Dec. 2017.[5] R. Thorpe and R. Holt, The SAGE Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. London: SAGE Publications, 2008.[6] M. Borrego, M.J. Foster, and J.E. Froyd, "Systematic literature reviews in engineering education
Paper ID #21832Defining and Assessing Competencies in an Undergraduate Reinforced Con-crete Design CourseDr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic Change Happen (MACH) program. He received his Ph.D. from Purdue University, and he holds his PE license in Indiana. Matt is very active with respect to experimentation in the
visibility has impacted the way in which the CEEDepartment approaches diversity. The poster will also illustrate how the RevED team has madechanges since the first year and what future plans are being made.IntroductionThe College of Engineering at Rowan University was established in 1992 through a multimilliondollar gift by an engineering entrepreneur [1]. The engineering college is divided into thefollowing departments: Civil and Environmental, Electrical and Computer, Chemical,Mechanical, Biomedical Engineering and the Engineering Entrepreneurship Program. Throughthe National Science Foundation’s Revolutionizing Engineering and computer scienceDepartments (RED) grant, the Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) Department isattempting to change
everything which is very important in his orher future professional career advancement.In the following sections, we briefly review the senior design background, report thedesign of effective stress and upward seepage laboratory demonstration budget andschematic design materialization and project schedules. Significance of the project ishighlighted with pertinent concluding remarks and conclusions drawn at the end.BackgroundAny time a structure is being built, it requires an extensive amount of planning byengineers of multiple disciplines and every building project always begins with thefoundation. A structure is only as strong as the foundation upon which it is built, which iswhy it is so important that subsurface investigation of the underlying
college at a rate of nearly 100%.ConclusionsWe have had strong participation in faculty development programming offered through our NSFECliPSE grant and this work has supported continuous improvement in teaching, learning, andstudent success within our College. We are continuing this work with the development of a new,comprehensive academic and career advising program in our College and incorporation ofdiversity and inclusion themes in our work. We continue to work to identify the most impactfulfaculty development activities and develop a plan to institutionalize these beyond the support ofthis grant. Above all, we have made great strides towards developing a culture that supportsinnovative teaching, student-active pedagogies, and support of
similar jobs in aviation industry.References [1] United States Government Accountability Office. Air force training: Further analysis and planning needed to improve effectiveness, 9 2016. URL https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/679849.pdf. Report to Congressional Committees. [2] Guo-Feng Liang, Jhih-Tsong Lin, Sheue-Ling Hwang, Eric Min yang Wang, and Patrick Patterson. Preventing human errors in aviation maintenance using an on-line maintenance assistance platform. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40(3):356 – 367, 2010. [3] Sajay Sadasivan and Anand K. Gramopadhye. Technology to support inspection training in the general aviation industry: Specification and design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39
,engineering, and mathematics (STEM) research capabilities. The model developed through thisprogram may help to exemplify the establishment of a sustainable collaboration model betweenacademia and industry that helps address the nation's need for mature, independent, informed,and globally competitive STEM professionals and is adapted to other disciplines.In this poster, the details of the program will be described. The challenges and lesson-learned onthe collaboration between the two participating universities, communications with industrialpartners, recruitment of the students, set up of the evaluation plans, and development of theprogram will be discussed.MotivationTo match the demand forecast for skilled STEM professionals, graduating sufficient
discuss preliminary results fromstudents using the virtual reality system and the activities we have developed.IntroductionThis paper will discuss a current work in progress of implementing a learning module that usesvirtual reality and a game environment to teach students professional development skills. We willuse Game Based Learning (GBL) as our framework for this research and as a base for ourapproach in teaching these skills to our students. We will begin by doing an overview of ourresearch including our motivation for this research, our theoretical framework and the use ofvirtual reality as a teaching tool. We will then discuss our current progress in developing both thelesson plan, hardware and software used for this learning module
environment, develop appropriate behavioral approaches,help students make interdisciplinary connections, and improve learning outcomes.Learning System Figure 1. Interface of Moodle learning systemThis study built upon past research and used action research methods to identifyappropriate adjustments to activity planning and guidance methods, with the objectiveof developing cooperative interaction and creative thinking abilities in students overone academic year [12]. The Moodle learning platform was employed to enablestudents to interact regarding class projects. A modular structure, divided into a coremodule and a plug-in module, was adopted to establish the platform. The plug-inmodule was interfaced with the core module to add or
provides a laboratory ofcommon experience for development of language, logic, and problem-solving skills in theclassroom; 3. A democracy demands that its citizens make personal and community decisionsabout issues in which scientific information plays a fundamental role, and they hence need aknowledge of science as well as an understanding of scientific methodology; 4. For somestudents, it will become a lifelong vocation or avocation; and 5. The nation is dependent on thetechnical and scientific abilities of its citizens for its economic competitiveness and nationalneeds [12].Upon graduation from undergraduate construction programs, graduates are engaged in thedesign, planning, engineering, construction, estimating/budgeting, management
problem couldpartly be solved by allowing students to choose their own teammate, but this may have adverseeffects on the learning of students who do not enter the class knowing a study partner. In ongoing work, we plan to study (a) the quality of interactivity of students conductinghomework this way, (b) the possible benefits to students who enter the course with lower priorknowledge, and (c) conduct repeated measures using the same homework assignments but with anew cohort of students. As a part of this study, we have asked students to record themselves doing the homeworktogether so that we can assess the quality of their interactions. Although we tried to avoid bias bymaking it clear to students that their self-recorded video would have
this cohort to those reported for CU students, itis worth noting several substantial differences between the courses and students being assessed.The first difference is the course at CU is a semester-long course dedicated to electrostaticscontent [8]. Whereas, this course can dedicate only two weeks to electrostatics content. It is alsoworth noting the relative preparation of students in this course versus the CU students. Thedifferences in the relative preparation of the two groups is illuminated in Table 2, with CUpretest scores of 30.9% compared to this cohort’s 16.8%. Comparison of the CU Physics degreeplan with this university’s Electrical Engineering degree plan reveals CU students have greaterexperience with electrostatics prior to
the average rating in the traditional classroom. The main reason for that is asfollows: Although the conventional teaching module is adopted in the first stage (the first sixweeks), the teaching contents are smaller but with a more comprehensive teaching syllabusthan the flipped one. Therefore, students have better commanding and application of theknowledge taught in the traditional classroom. In the flipped module, teaching chapters cover70% contents of the teaching plan. Because of the flipped module, the video content uses thefragmented form under dispersed teaching, leading to students' relatively weaker mastering ofknowledge than in the first stage, which explains the second phase of the test scores showinga slightly decreasing trend
]. Community partnerships continue to grow with a waiting list of partners and ahigh rate of partner retention that point to success of the program. A study of alumni showedthat participation in the program benefited graduates in their careers in industry [11]. Thenumber of people who have been impacted in the 22 years of the programs exceeds 3 millionpeople. The university consortium continues to increase nearly doubling over the last four yearsto 46. The K12 adaptation of the EPICS has grown to schools in 17 U.S. states. Challengesremain and are a challenge every year with the program. However the successes and value-added to the university has the administration planning for further expansion.References[1] E. Tsang, Projects that Matter: Concepts
accreditation processes. Electronic Engineer, Specialist in Quality Management with disciplinary and investigative training in project management, process op- timization through the integration of mobile technology solutions, Hand Held, information management, implementation of new technologies, maintenance, installation and debugging of electrical systems in production, planning and installation of electrical and data networks.Miguel Gonzalez, Universidad Minuto de Dios Director of Project Management Office at the Social Innovation Science Park. Master in Organizational Management. More than 5 years of experience working in social innovation projects related with green business, innovation in education and housing. Research
reconnect with their children in a positive way upon their release. We have some pre-planned assignments, such as a moon weight calculator which asks for auser’s weight on earth and calculates his or her weight on the moon. We also build flexibilityinto the curriculum, incorporating student ideas whenever possible. For example, after workingon the moon weight calculator program, a student said “I wonder if we could use the same ideato come up with a sentencing calculator?”. The sentencing calculator involved accepting as input(a) an initial sentence duaration, (b) eligibility for “half time” and (c) if you were good and gotyour 10% “kick”. This program was exciting to create because we hadn’t yet discussed “if”statements. We had to work around
after team-basedpresentations, which is applicable to any course involving development of visual or oralcommunication skills.Letter to Future SelfTargeting self-understanding and self-development in the senior honors seminar. Studentswrite a letter about current issues and problems they are facing, which is a general butappropriate topic for advanced students who are beginning to make post-graduation plans. In thefirst class meeting, students are given 15 minutes to write a private letter to their future self inwhich they address the following prompts, which are displayed on the classroom screen: 1. What are the pressing issues in your life at this moment? 2. What are a few specific questions/problems that you hope your future
improved 25%compared with the standardized car. All cars redesigned by students are shown in Figure 5. 8 Figure 4: comparisons of distance trial performances Figure 5: Cars redesigned by studentsSummaryThis report highlights efforts and outcomes of developing the supercapacitor powered car labmodule. In this case study, both indirect and direct assessments have indicated that the projectimproves the student learning outcomes. The module has since been run in multiple terms andhas shown its sustainability and has provided opportunity to assess the success of the three-termpilot program and appropriately plan the incorporation of the