report 4.03 write a scientific report 3.97 ask good questions related to the scientific process 3.97 set up a scientific experiment 3.56 work with others to plan and conduct scientific experiments 4.09 talk to professors about science 4.00 think like a scientist 4.03 * = statistically significantResult of the pre- and post-program surveys on student perceptions of their skills and knowledgeneeded for research and academic success are shown in Table 3. Of the 21 items in the survey,statistically significant gains
. Construction by Contour Crafting BuildingHouses for Everyone. Urban Initiative policy Brief. USC-University of Southern California.[9] Balinski, B. (2014). Chinese company 3D prints 10 houses in a day from recycled material.Architecture & Design; 22 April, 2014.[10] Zhang, J., & Khoshnevis, B. (2013). Optimal machine operation planning for constructionby Contour Crafting. Automation in Construction, 29(0), 50-67.[11] Buswell, R. A., Gibb, A. G., Soar, R., & Thorpe, A. (2007). Freeform construction:Megascale rapid manufacturing for construction. Automation in Construction, 16(2), 224-231.[12] Cesaretti, G., Dini, E., De Kestelier, X., Colla, V., & Pambaguian, L. (2014). Buildingcomponents for an outpost on the lunar soil by means of a
counting terms when the student is on professional internship or co-opemployment; terms when students studied abroad are included. The outlined MEcurriculum at Georgia Tech institution suggests that a student should graduate with 129credit hours in 8 terms, or 4 years. The average time to graduation was 9.8 terms, whichis roughly 5 years. As seen in the figure, time to graduation tends to increase as the gradethat they received in these foundational classes decreases. For all courses, ‘A’ studentsgraduated on average in 9.4 terms, which is more than a term longer than Georgia Tech’sME curriculum plan. In general, ‘F’ students graduate on average two terms (1 year) laterthan ‘A’ students- however, due to small sample sizes and high variances, there
student explained: “They are always willing to answer any questionsthat we might have and give us ideas on how to solve problems. They sit down with us and reallycontribute to our discussion and planning.” Another student noted: “They are engineers like us,and so it helps when we don’t know the answer to something.” BME/AIS: Peer-Assisted Learning (N=35) 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Very useful Useful Somewhat Not useful UsefulFigure 2. BME/AIS student survey: Peer-Assisted Learning.Peer mentors. The majority of students (68%) found peer mentors to be convenient,knowledgeable, and useful for learning BME/AIS material (Fig. 3). According to one BME/AISstudent
effects on students the authors seek tocontinue to map student self-efficacy on a broader scale. In order to do this, they plan toconstruct an instrument to quantify the self-efficacy of undergraduate engineering studentstoward their future employment in engineering. This research will then be used to improvementoring and undergraduate research opportunities to aid more students in the development ofself-efficacy. Findings from this and previous work will enable us to find relevant and pertinentconstructs to target with a self-efficacy instrument for engineering professional practice. Sinceaccording to Bandura, “there is no all-purpose measure of self-efficacy [13],” it is important thatthe instrument be tailored specifically to one area of self
can promote multiple engineeringprograms, add relevance, and connect industry to academia. Connecting industry partners to theinstitution has helped in organizations meeting their community service project goals, fillingboth internship and full-time employment needs, adding academic expertise to solve sometechnical problems, and can be an effective part of a college recruiting plan. Students benefitfrom seeing the relevance of their academic work to real world problems, exposure to industryprofessionals and employment opportunities, and exposure to equipment the institution does nothave. The industry benefits from access to the pipeline of future employees and great marketing.This paper presents how one university develops and uses industry
all of those aero classes on top of each other.Miguel goes on to describe how financial obligations forced him to work during undergradinstead of getting recommended volunteer experience in his field: Once I determined that it was going to be my major I knew what classes I needed to take, I knew what courses I needed to pass and what grades I needed to get to graduate really – that was the plan. The only kind of confusion that I had which I am currently figuring out now is the route of medical school versus graduate school. That’s the big decision as an undergrad I didn’t make right away and after I graduated I worked for a couple of years, now I’m back deciding really what I want to do for the rest of my
Benedictine College and 33 students and 4 faculty from The CatholicUniversity of America. In 2018, this paper reports on the 96 responses gathered to date: 59students and 6 faculty responded from East Carolina University, and 25 students responded fromBenedictine College. (Note that administrative delays have impacted distribution of theinstrument at all planned locations for the 2017-2018 academic year.)Method: Participating InstitutionsEast Carolina University is a public institution with a population of 29,000 students and has noformal university or department honor code. This university is in a city of about 100,000residents. The facility offers an undergraduate degree in general engineering, and the engineeringprogram has a faculty of 30 and
the community, includingfaculty and peers, was welcoming and supportive, which helped them deal with the difficulty ofthe curriculum and the program workload. In contrast, several negative responses from women,people of color, and/or international students about the social climate demonstrated that there isstill work to be done to make the community in the program more inclusive to traditionallyunderrepresented students. This is in line with the finding in the quantitative analysis that womenrated their peer relations somewhat lower than men; those that rated their peer groups moresupportive were more likely to report identification with engineering and plans to persist.Peer relationships was the largest sub-category within the community
allocative efficiency [42]. And yet, aprimary reason we have taken this conversation up in the first place is that the proverbial cat isalready out of the bag; implicit market assumptions, whether helpful or unhelpful, accurate orinaccurate, are already informing everyday decision-making and long-term planning in highereducation and engineering education worldwide. On a basic level, some type of market treatment may be correct in that a financialtransaction (or series of transactions) occurs between the student and the university at the end ofwhich the student usually receives a diploma indicating their qualifications. On the other hand,one might easily argue that this simplified, unidimensional analysis falters in at least two ways.First
critical component to successfully managing a design.Malcolm explained this more broadly by saying “We have to have a structure in place to makesure that ultimately we fully meet these requirements that we signed up to deliver.” Describingan important design decision that needed to be made, Malcolm said “We ended up workingclosely with my [company3] team… we sat down with my team… We developed a plan ofrecovery”.Ronald explained a noteworthy design experience where he worked with “…a relatively smallgroup… with a few design engineers familiar with that area.” Ronald also said that in hisexperience with his company he was part of “an integrated team,” with individuals havingvarious responsibilities within the team, “you’d have one person that was
describe the relevant background and literature that informed survey itemdevelopment. Next, we provide an overview of the Spring 2017 distribution, statistical analyses,and measurement issues identified by the research team as a result of that distribution andanalysis. Finally, we present the revised version of the instrument and explicate implementedchanges as well as outline plans for the next round of survey distribution.Because we describe the development and validation of a research instrument, and the not theresults of an existing or valid instrument, the format for this particular paper differs slightly fromthat of a traditional research paper. Here, our methods are presented as the process of instrumentdevelopment, while the results are
for graduates planning towork in industry in biomedical design and innovation. At the University of Virginia we offer anadvanced design elective in Biomedical Engineering in which students focus on observation andneeds identification, followed by the development of initial concepts and prototypes. For the pasttwo years, we taught two different versions of the course: a spring semester clinic-focusedoffering in which students identified needs based on immersion within one of the divisions of ouracademic medical center, and an accelerated “January term” patient-focused version in whichstudent teams worked directly with specific patients and their healthcare teams to identify needsand develop concepts. The primary learning objective for this
significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Dr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, and Lafayette’s introductory first year engineering course. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt serves on the American Society of Civil Engineers’ Committees on Education and Faculty Development and the
team member contribution or guidance from a facilitator. Overt activities include: connect or link, reflect and self-monitor, planning, predicting outcomes, and generating hypotheses [20]. Collaborative Students’ dialogue substantively on the same self-constructed idea vocalized to the team. They engagement can accept the ideas presented to the team, little conflict is caused, and dialogue serves to continue the current course of discussion. Or, ideas are questioned or misunderstood, disequilibrium leads to students trying to bring the course of discussion to their understanding. Overt activities include: building on a team member’s contribution, argue, defend
the usefulness of these cartoons was an afterthought, so an important lesson learnedwas to plan out a way to evaluate the benefits before the semester ended and the studentsdispersed. The end-of-course survey could have been modified to include questions about thecartoons which would have provided more student feedback data.The author changed universities in Fall of 2017 and as of the writing of this article is midwaythrough teaching Dynamics at the new school. Newtdog and Wormy are featured prominently,and a renewed focus on using the cartoons as catalysts for discussion has led to improvedengagement, especially helpful with a new faculty member. There has been more cartoondiscussion at the introduction of each new topic, and images such as
used for department wide planning and improvement activities. Thismethod engages the learners and the teachers in a cycle that allows real and sustainable labimprovement to be made.References[1] Feisel, L. D., & Rosa, A. J. “The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineeringeducation.”, Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 2005, pp 121-130.[2] Domin, D. S., “A review of laboratory instruction styles.” Journal of Chemical Education,76(4), 1999, pp 543-547.[3] Abdulwahed, Mahmoud, and Zoltan K. Nagy. "Applying Kolb's experiential learning cyclefor laboratory education." Journal of engineering education, 98.3, 2009, pp 283-294.[4] Wankat, P. C., & Oreovicz, F. S. Teaching engineering. Purdue University Press, 1993, 99292-294[5
should be given, and equations should be applied consistently using the convention indicated in your diagram. All symbols need to be defined, including those given as initial conditions in the problem statement or new ones that are needed for the problem solution. A free body diagram will be included when appropriate. You may need more than a single figure for more complicated problems.5) Algebraic solution. Start by stating the general equations you plan to use for the solution, which should also clearly relate to your stated known and unknown variables listed from your problem statement and diagrams. An algebraic solution of the problem (i.e. in symbolic format, no numbers plugged in) should be given
keep the focus of the changes on students’backgrounds and desires. The new program structure consists of a base of six courses for allstudents in the program, followed by primary and secondary concentrations (seven courses andthree courses respectively) from a variety of technical specialties in ECE. Students will also havethe option defining their own secondary concentrations rather than choosing one of the definedsecondary concentrations. At the time of this writing (January 2018), the new program structurehas been approved by the faculty, the paperwork for university approval of the structure is beingprepared, and planning is underway for implementing the changes in the fall semester of 2018.More information about this project is available
yourself make you like an engineer? and, (4) What characteristics ofyourself make you unlike an engineer? These questions were developed to explore students’feelings of belongingness within the field of engineering and how they conceptualized theiralignment with the role of an engineer in their communities of practice. Due to the semi-structured nature of the interviews, the order of presentation varied and each of these fourbelongingness questions were not asked in every interview. For this analysis, only the directresponses to these four belongingness questions were investigated. Table 1—Participant Information Institution Pseudonym Gender Race/Ethnicity Planned major at time
well-being, health, and quality oflife,” 2 forward-thinking innovators who “make a world of difference,” 3 and agents of technicalsolutions that can “ensure the sustainability of civilization and the health of its citizens, whilereducing individual and societal vulnerabilities and enhancing the joy of living in the modernworld” 4. Similarly, most engineering professional societies market themselves with statementscentered on their contribution to society like “Advancing Technology for Humanity” 5 and“ASCE stands at the forefront of a profession that plans, designs, constructs, and operatessociety’s economic and social engine…” 6. The relationship between engineers and “the public”sits at the very core of engineers’ professional identity and
implementation of a strategic plan for Texas A&M in South America. While at the Office for Latin America Programs, Maria was also responsible for the opening of the Soltis Center in Costa Rica. Maria speaks three languages fluently (Spanish, Portuguese and English) as well as intermediate French. Maria is originally from Brazil and completed her undergrad- uate studies at Lynn University in Florida, where she graduated with honors in Business Administration in 2002. She was part of the tennis team and was the team captain for two years, including the year the team was NCAA National Champion in 2001. She is a December 2003 graduate of the MS-Marketing program at Texas A&M University. And in the Fall of 2009, Maria
that you… • .. intend to set up a company in the future? • ... search for business start-up opportunities? • ... are saving money to start a business? • ... do not read books on how to set up a firm? • ... have no plans to launch your own business? • ... spend time learning about starting a firm? The following quote describes why it is a reasonable choice: “This measure was selected fortwo reasons: (1) it was developed following thorough scale development procedures, asopposed to the Gaicomin et al. (2010) and Wilson et al. (2007) single-item measures, each ofwhich involved no substantive validation; and (2) it offered parsimony over other existingmeasures of EI (cf., Liñán & Chen
the pros and cons of several possible designs. I learned that things often times don't work out, and you have to be able to adapt and change rapidly. Presentation was good for skill... It taught us teamwork... Unfortunately our cycle failed somewhat but that's part of the process as well We learned a lot about brainstorming, but did not really get a chance to prototype and learn from our mistakes through repetition. I had so much fun and learned so much from foam core. Going into this process I knew that it was essential to plan out our build time, and even with all the planning we did, we still basically ran out of time, which was definitely
understand what was required in technical Deleted: ¶ terms, including the scope of what was being planned The BCS Task Force drew 3. Organizational Skill #1: How to get about the business, and this implied that they knew the Deleted: of the business and the people well 4. Organizational Skill #2: How to get things done, possessing a set of excellent social skills—to listen, understand, negotiate and persuadePalmer emphasizes that “the hybrids were not operating in isolation” (p. 232), a nuance that was Deleted: isnot captured in the article in The Independent, which focuses on the hybrid or T-shape as a kindof person/individual
VirtualReality/computer based games will be collected as control variables. In addition to experiments,cross-sectional and longitudinal studies are planned to be conducted that investigate therelationships between the game and various learning and behavioral outcomes, academicperformance, environmental activism/advocacy, etc. among campus students. By observingsustainability outcomes of the Attack of the Recyclops (as well as any curricular or extra-curricular activities that incorporate the game) in more natural educational settings, thesecorrelational studies will allow the research team to observe the longer-term effects, identifymore potential facilitators or inhibitors, and conduct additional experiments in the future.6. Conclusions and Expected