integratedinstitutional network of supports that increases students’ self-efficacy, sense of belonging to theirmajor, and belief in the importance of their contributions to society. These are key factors thataffect retention in STEM fields [1]-[7]. The FS2 program is funded by the National ScienceFoundation, is focused on engineering and computer science (CS) majors and is designed toimprove retention and graduation rates. The FS2 program is currently in the fourth and finalacademic year and has engaged 470 first-year engineering and computer science students. Thepaper describes the main challenges in implementing these retention initiatives in a small collegesetting and outlines approaches to overcome these challenges.GoalsThe primary goals of this five year
regarding engineering? RQ 3: How can strategic collaboration between K12 and industry promote a shift in teacher’s conceptions of engineers and increased self-efficacy in building and delivering engineering curriculum? RQ 4: How do stakeholder characteristics, perceptions, and dynamics affect the likelihood of sustainability in strategic collaborations between K12 and industry stakeholders? How do prevailing institutional and collaborative conditions mediate sustainability?To answer these questions, we will collect a variety of qualitative and quantitative data over thelife of the project. In this paper, we present preliminary findings of the first semester of lessonand activity implementation
andengineering. One study explored the relationship between mindfulness and innovation inengineering and found that dispositional mindfulness significantly correlated with innovationself-efficacy among students (Rieken et al, 2017). This study defined innovation self-efficacy asone’s confidence in their ability to innovate. There was another study that demonstratedmindfulness correlated with business skills self-efficacy (i.e. students’ confidence in performingbusiness skills) and the intent to pursue a career in a start-up or entrepreneurship (Rieken, Schar,and Sheppard, 2016). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether engineering studentswould be receptive to potentially integrating contemplative practices such as mindfulnessmeditation to
details, gave us only a limited understanding ofhow our general GSI and IA population define and learn to practice inclusive teaching. To gainfurther insights into the instructor experience, our larger study includes analyzing survey datathat will provide us with information regarding new instructors’ expectations about theorientation, their initial definitions of inclusive teaching, and their confidence associated withparticular teaching skills as identified by the Teaching Self-Efficacy Inventory [17]. To gain abetter understanding of the instructors’ development of inclusive teaching practices, we willanalyze surveys administered at the start of the term, one week after orientation, and at thebeginning of the following semester. This analysis
audience that may not be peers or colleagues.References:[1] I. Direito, A. Pereira, and A. M. de Oliveira Duarte, “Engineering Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Soft Skills: Relations with Self-Efficacy and Learning Styles,” Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 55, pp. 843–851, Oct. 2012. [2] M. M. Robles, “Executive Perceptions of the Top 10 Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace,” Business Communication Quarterly, vol. 75.4, pp. 453–465, Oct. 2012.[3] J. C. Bean, “How Writing is Related to Critical Thinking,” in Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom, Ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2011, pp. 17-38.[4] D. Murray, “Teach
-regulated learning, self-efficacy,and general well-being [5]. In our study, we explored whether we could help students persist inengineering by encouraging such positive learning dispositions and behaviors.In this work-in-progress paper, we report preliminary results from a one-credit course called“Engineering the Mind.” We used design-based research and the Transtheoretical Model (TTM)of Health Behavior Change to design the course and assess the outcomes. The goal of the coursewas to encourage students to adopt positive learning dispositions and behaviors by teaching themhow the brain works.BackgroundDesign-based research (DBR) is a research method that evaluates theory-based interventions(that were developed in laboratory conditions) in complex
of the assessment. While self-reflections are important components of experiential learning [4-6], positive self-reflections are significant components of the self-efficacy theory [19]. Here are some student comments: “That was such a good course offered. It was amazing,” “I loved getting hands on experience programming VR applications and doing the project as an individual, not in a group,” and “I liked the integration of VR and mechatronics and how we can combine the two to create applications that can help in that regard.” Question 8 was assessing the challenges students had in the course. Students did not have any problems with the VR concepts, only the implementation. Most comments addressing challenges were dealing with the EON
. Levesque-Bristol, “Service-Learning’s Impact on College Students’ Commitment to Future Civic Engagement, Self-Efficacy, and Social Empowerment,” J. Community Pract., vol. 18, no. 2–3, pp. 233–251, Aug. 2010.[6] C. Levesque-Bristol, T. D. Knapp, and B. J. Fisher, “The Effectiveness of Service- Learning: It’s Not Always what you Think,” J. Exp. Educ., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 208–224, Mar. 2011.[7] O. S. Hoilett, A. F. Aboelzahab, E. A. Layow, J. C. Linnes, and C. H. Lee, “Board # 8 :#FunTimesWithTheTA—A Series of Fun Supplementary Lessons for Introductory Level Biomedical Instrumentation Students (Work in Progress),” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2017.[8] J. Sibthorp, K. Paisley, J. Gookin
value of exerting effort. Construction Management faculty can supportstudents’ motivational beliefs and academic achievement through the use of instructionalpractices that remind students about the important role that effort plays in success [37].There are three main cognitive motivational theories: goal theory, expectancy value theory, andattribution theory that apply to students.In goal theory, motivation is induced by the discrepancy between their current condition asstudents and their future condition (i.e., goal) of being a practicing professional. Self-efficacy, orone’s ability to succeed in a specific situation, plays a significant role in goal theory. A student’sgoals should be challenging but not be perceived as beyond their capability
. 2. 2006.[8] A. Godwin, “The Development of a Measure of Engineering Identity,” 123rd Am. Soc. Eng. Educ. Annu. Conf. Expo., p. 15, 2016.[9] Z. Hazari, G. Sonnert, P. M. Sadler, and M.-C. Shanahan, “Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 47, no. 8, p. n/a-n/a, 2010.[10] R. M. Marra, K. A. Rodgers, D. Shen, and B. Bogue, “Women Engineering Students and Self-Efficacy: A Multi-Year, Multi-Institution Study of Women Engineering Student Self- Efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2009.[11] E. Seymour and N. M. Hewitt, Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Westview
increase diversityand inclusion, the researchers were motivated to conduct this study to improve the belonging ofengineering pre-major students in STEM classrooms and their intended majors. This researchexplores the effect of embedding small interventions designed to improve engineering pre-majorstudents’ sense of belonging and self-efficacy into traditionally taught Introduction to Engineeringand Introduction to Engineering Physics classes. In addition, this study investigates the effect ofthe interventions on different student groups (women, first generation, students of color or ethnicbackground, community college vs. technical college vs. university students, etc.). This study hasthe potential to benefit first-year engineering education
sources for the secondobjective, teacher professional development includes teacher professional development evaluationquestionnaires, classroom observations, and teacher interviews. Finally, the third objectivefocusing on student development measures from pre- and post- surveys explore students’ intrinsicmotivation, science and math content knowledge, career interests, and self-efficacy. In addition,student interviews and student work associated with MEAs also assist to corroborate objective oneand three. Data is collected over the duration of the project.Anticipated ResultsThe anticipated results of this research project will be four field-tested CR MEAs that can beimplemented to foster students’ career exploration, STEM learning, and community
involvement in the REU project. o e. Providing new experiences and expanding personal horizons. o f. Skill development. o g. Improving academic and professional qualifications. o h. Receiving mentoring. o i. Developing self-efficacy.4. ConclusionThe IR-SEED REU site supported by the National Science Foundation's Division of EngineeringEducation and Centers is designed to develop and implement a model environment formultidisciplinary collaborative efforts where research and education are tightly integrated aroundthe different facets of energy research. The IR-SEED REU site is structured to teach studentshow to formulate research questions as well as how to develop and modify research plans
nature, “communitas,” and personal growth. This “magic” allows for a strongsense of connectedness with people and place, and opens doors for new forms of learning.Powell, Kellert and Ham [3] published a study evaluating the knowledge gains and change inenvironmental behavioral intentions, prior to and following a multi-day whitewater rafting tripdown the Grand Canyon’s Colorado River. Their research suggested that knowledge gained onthe trip was mostly retained one year later, and that behavioral intentions changed immediatelyafter a trip, but were rarely implemented one year later.Others have paid close attention to informal learning environments and their impacts onknowledge retention, self-efficacy, and interest in STEM topics. For example
recipients, improved self-efficacy, and the retention and graduation rate for scholarship recipients as well as studentsenrolled in the three ET programs in general.2. Transformation of the ET Department Coincide with the Timeline of Seeking NSF S-STEM FundingUniversity of Houston was established as institution of high education (IHE) for working classkids in early twentieth century [5]. Almost a century later, the UH system [6] has grown toinclude four IHEs serving one of the largest metropolitan area in the United States. The flag-shipcampus – University of Houston (UH) – where the ET department locates, identified studentsuccess as one of the four pillars in its mission [7]. In Fall 2017, a new record of 45,000 studentenrolled at UH, with about
become the “fixed” and “growth”mindsets. The authors explain the implications for learning based on which self-concept anindividual possesses and how that affects that individual’s motivation. Understanding a person’spsychological concept of self is very important when considering a person’s motivation for andsuccess in education. Several studies which use interventions based on students’ psychologies,including their mindsets, have proven to be effective in affecting educational outcomes [5-9],especially in at-risk and underrepresented groups.The literature includes few studies wherein the growth mindset has been applied in engineeringsettings. However, numerous papers have looked at how engineering students’ motivation [10,11] and self-efficacy
effort which involved early (summer semester sophomore year)internships are outlined in Sriraman, et al. [3]. However, research indicates that retention inengineering is connected to the development of engineering identity [4]. Thus, while earlyinternships contribute to student retention, the underlying mechanism that is at work resulting inimproved retention is engineering or professional identity development that occurs during theinternship experience. More broadly speaking, Bandura [2] has argued that an individual’s levelof motivation and actions are more closely based to what they believe than on what is objectivelythe case [5]. Thus, cognitive factors such as self-efficacy share a connection with identitydevelopment.Definitions of
designed to help preparestudents for university life. In order to facilitate the program and help students get involved inthe campus community, they are placed on a “pack” with five of their peers. Each pack is guidedby a “pack leader” who is a successful engineering student that acts as a mentor to the newstudents throughout their freshmen year. Having a peer mentor can aid in new students adjustingto campus life [9], [17]. Additionally, studies have shown that positive role models and socialsupport can impact the level of confidence and self-efficacy that students have in their ability tocomplete an engineering degree [18].MethodsParticipantsBoot camp participants were recruited through the Provost’s office and at various College ofEngineering
area of drug discovery, therapeutics and nanomaterials.Dr. Armando Dominguez SolisDr. Sandie Han, New York City College of Technology Sandie Han is a Professor of Mathematics at New York City College of Technology. She has extensive experience in program design and administration, including administrative responsibilities as the chair of the math department, Computer Science program coordinator, high school program coordinator, as well as PI on the U.S. Department of Education MSEIP grant and Co-PI on the NSF-S-STEM grants. She has several publications on the theory and practice of Self-Regulated Learning, Mathematics Self-Efficacy, PLTL. Her work in Self-Regulated Learning and self-efficacy has won the 2013 CUNY
microcontroller board.More details on the Introduction to Engineering curriculum and the results of its implementationare described by Langhoff, et al. [4]. The curriculum has been successful in enhancing students’identity as engineers as indicated by pre- and post-program surveys. The course also showssuccess in increasing students’ self-efficacy and skills needed to succeed in college, as well asprovide insight into the university transfer process and academic pathway post-transfer. As aresult, students expressed increased self-efficacy in succeeding in their courses and increasedability to cope with and overcome doing poorly on a math exam.Engineering GraphicsThe online Engineering Graphics course developed through CALSTEP is a four-unit course
United States National Science Foundation (NSF) because the problems of the future weredeemed to be complex and required interdisciplinary study. Others think STEM was coined byNASA as SEM with the “T” added because it sounds better.Because this complexity is pervasive at every stage, most STEM research is focused on oneaffective construct (such as motivation, attitude, interest, self-efficacy) in a single STEM area[12]-[15]. And consequently, few if any instruments exist to capture STEM as multi-constructsand none in multiple STEM areas [16]. Currently few existing instruments fully capture thebreadth and complexity of the STEM disciplines. For example, in 2012, Minner, Ericson, Wuand Martinez [17] reported half of the cognitive assessment
community and occupational college personnel and students. For ourresearch forty-one interviews were conducted with approximately ten at each community collegesite during the first semester of our research. These data, along with a careful review ofdocuments and websites available from each community college and applicable higher educationliterature as a comparison informed the refinement of the CPPI which was developed, and testedin our previously described STEM community college study.5The Refined College Pedagogical Practice Inventory (CPPI-R): Refinement, testing, and use ofthe CPPI has been informed by measurement research of educational psychologicalresearchers.33 Specifically, the inventory was initially designed with the intent of enabling
leadership role Extent to which leadership role contributed to skills in speaking, critical thinking, problem- solving, interacting with diverse groups, and becoming a leaderThe HERI dataset is being used to address Research Question 2, and analysis on this dataset iscurrently at a preliminary stage. Using leadership self-efficacy and social self-concept as proxiesfor leadership identity, the longitudinal dataset will be analyzed using multi-level regressiontechniques to isolate the specific effect of engineering identity, and activities intended to enhanceengineering identity, on leadership identity. Engineering identity will be derived from exploratoryand confirmatory factor analyses on three specific items measured on both TFS and
interpersonalcommunication and conflict resolution strategies that encourage peripheral participation acrosssectors and help formulate the T-shaped individual [8,9]. Teams may be self-selected and self-managed, enhancing motivation and instilling a sense ownership over the project, whichultimately contributes to self- efficacy as an outcome [10,11,12].However, professionalization in today’s global market has taken on new meaning in an industrymore focused on dynamic change, innovation and entrepreneurship. The National Academy ofEngineering predicted the joint roles of globalization and technological diversity in shaping theengineer of 2020, themes that are also reflected in the 2018-2019 ABET student outcomes[13,14]. There is greater emphasis placed on creative
toperform online collaborative learning, in which students were engaged in deep discussion withtheir peers and each student was provided with a specific task through e-mail with expectationfor improving their students’ technical and conceptual knowledge [7]. Bohorquez and Toft-Nielsen designed a problem-oriented medical electronics laboratory, where collaborativelearning was adopted with the intentions of improving the expertise, self-efficacy andcraftsmanship skills of biomedical engineering students. Their implementation yieldedsatisfactory results and demonstrated the effectiveness of their collaborative learning strategies[8]. Dong and Guo incorporated Collaborative Project-Based Learning (CPBL) into theirComputer Networking course for
, March 10, 2018.10. A. Hofstein, and V. N. Lunetta, “The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century,” Science Education, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 28-54, 2004.11. O. Odubunmi, and T. A. Balogun, “The effect of laboratory and lecture teaching methods on cognitive achievement in integrated science,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 213-224, 1991.12. R. Gurvitch, and M. W. Metzler, “The effects of laboratory-based and field-based practicum experience on pre-service teachers' self-efficacy,” Teaching and Teacher Education, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 437-443, 2009.13. R. Felder, D. R. Woods, J. E. Stice, and A. Rugarcia, “The Future Of Engineering Education II. Teaching Methods That Work
education over the past several years.Active learning methods have proven to be an effective way to increase engineering self-efficacy (Carini RM,2006), academic performance(Freeman,2014), feelings of responsibility to complete futuretasks(Daniel,2016), and recently retention in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM)(Elgin,2016).Even authors in the cognitive science discipline suggest that classrooms with an active learning approachcan increase student motivation, knowledge retention, and content transferability (Michael, 2006; Norman andSchmidt, 1992; Vosniadou, Loannides, Dimitrakopoulous, & Papademetriou, 2001). The core elements of activelearning are student‟s activity and engagement in the learning
and team performance. Appraisers’perceptions of potential aversive consequences to them as a result of giving negative as well aspositive feedback (Napier & Latham, 1986) can also impact the ratings given. Whether or notappraisers are in a low self-efficacy or high self-efficacy environment may impact the behaviourof the appraiser as they determine if the appraisal is going to make a difference to their courseoutcome. “Students are, however, willing to penalize peers who do not contribute but often failto differentiate between higher levels of effort.” (Pond, Rehan, &Wade, 1995) At times,instructors require deeper insight into the team environment in order to mentor the team and tounderstand the peer ratings.CATME tools provide
, not unlike distillation. Byunderstanding these specific experiences, we can make chemical engineering more relatable tothe students who are least likely to persist.This approach has been shown to be effective in engineering education. For instance, Mejiaidentified Latinx high school students’ funds of knowledge tied to the engineering design process[2], [41], [42], [43]. He found that students were able to build on their everyday experiences toaddress community problems. He also showed that students used professional skills, such ascommunication, collaboration and project management to reach design solutions. This approachalso enhanced students’ self-efficacy [44]. Our own work has built on this approach, finding thatdiverse undergraduate
, inclusion and self-efficacy from thelearning sciences in a suite of program components designed to advance students into STEMcareers. Unlike many research experience programs, Akamai accepts students from diversebackgrounds with a wide range of GPAs and early in their college years, when they are most atrisk of leaving STEM - 56% are lower division students upon acceptance. Akamai also providessupport for mentors to instill inclusive, collaborative mentoring practices and to ensure mentorscan effectively prepare interns for integration into the 21st century workplace. To date, Akamaihas paired over 350 STEM undergraduates representing the full diversity of the islands includingmany groups traditionally underrepresented in the STEM workforce such as