Organizational Leadership (OL). She is also the Director of Graduate Studies in OL. She is an attorney, licensed to practice law in the state of Indiana, and she teaches law courses in both the undergraduate and Master’s degree programs in OL. Her primary research areas are employment law and cyber law, specifically related to the legal implications of social media use, data privacy, and sexting laws.Dr. S. Scott Moor P.E., Indiana University Purdue University, Fort Wayne Scott Moor is an Associate Professor of engineering and Coordinator of First-year Engineering at Indi- ana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne. He received a B.S. and M.S. in chemical engineering from MIT. After more than a decade in industry, he returned
engineering.References[1] R. S. Adams, J. Turns, and C. J. Atman, “Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice,” in Design Studies, 2003, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 275–294.[2] G. Lemons, A. Carberry, C. Swan, L. Jarvin, and C. Rogers, “The benefits of model building in teaching engineering design,” Des. Stud., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 288–309, 2010.[3] D. Tolbert and S. R. Daly, “First-year engineering student perceptions of creative opportunities in design,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 879–890, 2013.[4] S. R. Daly, E. A. Mosyjowski, and C. M. Seifert, “Teaching Creativity in Engineering Courses,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 417–449, Jul. 2014.[5] L. A. Liikkanen and M. Perttula, “Exploring problem
. Matthews, and D. R. Kelly, “Grit: Perseverance andPassion for Long-Term Goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 92, no. 6, pp.1087-1101, 2007.[2] A. L. Duckworth and P. E. Quinn, “Development and Validation of the Short Grit Scale(Grit-S),” Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 166-174, 2009.[3] A. L. Duckworth and D. S. Yeager, “Measurement Matters: Assessing Personal QualitiesOther Than Cognitive Ability for Educational Purposes,” Educational Researcher, vol. 44, no. 4,pp. 237-251, May 2015.[4] A. L. Duckworth, R. E. White, A. J. Matteucci, A. Shearer, and J. J. Gross, “A Stitch inTime: Strategic Self-Control in High School and College Students,” Journal of EducationalPsychology, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 329-341
. One possibility is to have multiple stations. Another is to write or display results in real time and make it a competition.Readers are encouraged to contact the authors if they would like further details about the project,including assignments, PCB files, and bill of materials.References [1] J. W. Dally and G. M. Zhang, “A freshman engineering design course,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 82, Apr. 1993. [2] J. Kellar, W. Hovey, M. Langerman, S. Howard, L. Simonson, L. Kjerengtroen, L. Sttler, H. Heilhecker, L. Ameson-Meyer, and S. Kellogg, “A problem based learning approach for freshman engineering,” in 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Feb. 2000. [3] H. Lei, F. Ganjeizadeh, D. Nordmeyer, and J
]: −∆P 150μ (1 − ε)2 1.75 ρ (1 − ε) 2 = 2 v ̅s + v̅s ∆L Dp ε3 Dp ε3is introduced and compared, term by term, with the qualitative expression obtained previously. Inthe Ergun equation, Dp is the packing particle diameter, is the void space fraction, and ρ and μare the fluid density and viscosity, respectively.Finally, students work on the complete design and construction of the flow system to satisfy theoverall requirements. To validate their design, they take pressure drop measurements as afunction of air and water flow rates, perform analyses of the experimental data, and compare theaverage values of
design. A second pilot is planned for Fall 2018 in which lessonsDesign projects in other categories tended to be either learned from this project will be incorporated.variations on existing designs or were underdeveloped. Students completed an on-line survey at the end of the REFERENCEScourse regarding the entrepreneurial design project and the [1] Besterfield-Scre, M., Zappe, S., Shartrand, A., Hochstedt, K.,design thinking methodology. They appreciated the “Faculty and Student Perceptions of the Content of Entrepreneurshipopportunity to be creative and enjoyed the project. One Courses in Engineering Education”, Advances in Engineering
engineering education at UC Irvine.the end of W15. As shown in Figure 3, both groups exhibited REFERENCESconsistent decrease across F14, W15 and W16. Furtherstudies are needed to examine the cause. [1] M. Borrego, J. E. Froyd, and T. S. Hall, “Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments,” Journal of Engineering
2004,” National Science Board, May 2004 [Online].Available: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/, last accessed May 25, 2009.[3] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer and J. Coleman, "Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K–12Students to Engineering Fields," in IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144-151,Feb. 2010.[4] S. Coffman-Wolph and K. Gray, “Women in STEM: What Experiences Influence Decisions”Paper to be presented at 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah. 10.June 2018.
meaningful project skills andlearning which might be significant when considering the lower amount of effort required.References1. Gelmon, S. B. (2001). Assessing service-learning and civic engagement: Principles and techniques. Campus Compact, Brown University.2. Lima, M., Oakes, W. C., & Gruender, J. L. (2006). Service-learning: Engineering in your community. Wildwood, MO: Great Lakes Press.3. Ropers-Huilman, B., Carwile, L., & Lima, M. (2005). Service-learning in engineering: A valuable pedagogy for meeting learning objectives. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(2), 155-165.4. Coyle, E. J., Jamieson, L. H., & Sommers, L. S. (1997). EPICS: A model for integrating service-learning into the engineering curriculum
2017 and 2018. In addition, two student teams presented their work at the 2017ASEE Zone II Conference and one team, composed of engineering students and an art student,presented a design solution at the spring 2018 ASEE SE Conference.Project Substantiation and ImportanceIn the 1980’s, research introduced that disability is socially created rather than rooted in theindividual [1]. More recent studies indicate that persons with disabilities may move through aprocess of seven types of identities: isolated affirmation, apathy, resignation, situationalidentification, affirmation, crusadership, and normalization [2]. Studies also indicate that the arts,including the visual arts, can be a tool to aid transition through these identities to enhance
science and technology as well as students approach to the technological designprocess. These areas will be explored more fully in future papers. References[1] X. Chen, “STEM Attrition: College Students’ Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001.,” Natl. Cent. Educ. Stat., 2013.[2] C. Dweck, Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House, 2006.[3] D. S. Yeager and C. S. Dweck, “Mindsets That Promote Resilience: When Students Believe That Personal Characteristics Can Be Developed,” Educ. Psychol., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 302– 314, Oct. 2012.[4] A. Rattan, K. Savani, D. Chugh, and C. S. Dweck, “Leveraging Mindsets to Promote Academic Achievement Policy
://peer.asee.org/18001. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[6] D. D. Burkey, M. F. Young, “Work-in-Progress: A 'Cards Against Humanity'-style card gamefor increasing engineering students' awareness of ethical issues in the profession,” in 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OH, USA, June 24-28, 2017, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/29190 . [Accessed: Mar 29, 2018].[7] Gulotta, J., Parisi, N., Bodnar, C. A., “Leveling Up by Gamifying Freshman EngineeringClinic” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, June 26-29, 2016,[Online]. Available at https://www.asee.org/public/conferences/64/papers/14871/view.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[8] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a
thestandard deviation values decreased at the end of the term – thereby suggesting that the scatterwas more clustered at the end of the term. Whereas, the scatter was more varied at the begging ofthe term – suggesting that the incoming students had disparate skill sets.end of term student commentsStudent end-of-term comments in written evaluations were very positive - with the studentsindicating that the greatest benefit to them came from exposure to the Instructional TeamTeaching effort, which provided effective, supportive weekly monitoring and mentoring.references[1] Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2008). “Product Design and Development”. 2004. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.
for their success at the university and after. In the 50’s US Navy developed the project management technique, PERT to identify, organize, schedule and coordinate the tasks within a project. Also known as, the Critical Path Method (CPM), meticulous application of PERT will impart full control of a project and help complete a project in a timely manner. Figure 1 represents the PERT chart for the