; Most engineering students lack exposure to social justice in their coursework> Attract students to engineering through social justice theme: – Interdisciplinary field, may attract students from all majors – Appealing to underrepresented students, who are more likely to make educational and career choices based on opportunities for service to their communitiesNational Academy of Engineering (2008). Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering.Hess, J.L. and Fore, G. (2017) “A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions.” Science and Engineering Ethics. DOI:10.1007/s11948-017-9910-6.Herkert, J.R. (2010) “Engineering ethics education in the
Paper ID #24843Helping Engineering Student Organization Members ”Break the Bias Habit”Dr. Jennifer Sheridan, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Sheridan is the Executive and Research Director of the Women in Science & Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI) at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.Dr. Manuela Romero, University of Wisconsin, Madison Dr. Manuela Romero is the Associate Dean for Undergraduate Affairs in the College of Engineering at UW-Madison. Dr. Romero oversees undergraduate student services, including student services centers (advising), engineering student development (career services, cooperative
appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.”Maya Rucks, Clemson University Maya Rucks is an engineering education doctoral student at Clemson University. She received her bache- lor’s degree in mathematics from the University of Louisiana at Monroe and her master’s degree in indus- trial engineering from Louisiana Tech University. Her areas of interest include, minorities in engineering, K-12 engineering, and engineering curriculum
Paper ID #24803Summer Bridge Design: Purposely Fostering Engineering Expertise and Suc-cess with the Redshirting in Engineering Program ScholarsMs. Tanya D Ennis, University of Colorado Boulder TANYA D. ENNIS is the current Engineering GoldShirt Program Director at the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. She received her M.S. in Computer Engineering from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Southern University in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. Her career in the telecommunications industry included positions in software and
strategies workshops (27% versus 9%), and to seek assistance from disability services (33% versus 16%). LGBTQ+ students were more likely than straight students to reach out to family members or close friends about difficulties with school (64% versus 43%), to get advice from a mentor outside of the university (64% versus 32%), to receive tutoring (43% versus 21%), to seek help from the career center (43% versus 29%), and to seek assistance from disability services (29% versus 12%).Students with disabilities were also more likely to reach out to family members or close friends about difficulties with school (69%). While students with disabilities were also more likely than other students to seek assistance from disability services (44%), the majority
program and their or their grad student’s or postdoc’s time commitments, which they appreciate. They can select from a variety of grade levels so that they can work with an age group with whom they feel comfortable. Furthermore, some opportunities require no budget such as providing a special lecture to our summer engineering program students while others may require substantial funding such as a recent CAREER grant which started a new summer environmental program for elementary school students. 6The center has made a point of attending all new faculty orientations and introducing themselves as the center to contact if faculty want to do K‐12 STEM
, Steven described a desire to “travel more as itis my main goal in life on top of pursuing a career in engineering.”Concluding Discussion Although literature suggests that experiential global learning programs positively impactstudent outcomes, not all student groups are equally represented in global programs. As we havediscussed, some student groups remain systematically excluded from global programs inengineering, including prospective transfer students and students from low SES or first-generation backgrounds. Experiences of these students are underexplored largely because of theminimal representation of these groups in global programs. Thus, this paper illuminated theexperiences of prospective transfer students from low SES backgrounds
Physics and Astronomy and Director of the CASTLE Center for Advancing STEM Teaching, Learning & Evaluation at Rochester Institute of Technology. His educa- tion research includes projects on the development of identity and affiliation in physics majors throughout their undergraduate career, and, separately, how physicists express conceptual meaning in mathemati- cal formalism. He has co-directed the PEER faculty development program for four years, integrating emerging research projects into ongoing programmatic activities that seek to improve the retention of first-generation and deaf/hard-of hearing students in STEM disciplines. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Improving
. Dr. Bernstein is Principal Investigator of the CareerWISE research program, supported by the National Science Foundation since 2006. Her over 250 publications and presentations and over $4 M in external support have focused on the application of psychological science to the career advancement of women and underrepresented minorities and the development of effective learning environments for graduate education.She is a fellow of the American Psychological Association and American Association for the Advancement of Science and has won a number of awards for her work on equity, inclusiveness and mentoring of students and faculty. Dr. Bern- stein holds a bachelor’s in psychology from the University of California at
comes out or begins transitioning between the ages of 18 and 24[14]. This itself is a process with additional social and material support needs which canovershadow the demands of the classroom.Resiliency and social support Resiliency refers to the processes used to overcome challenging situations and adapt tothe demands of life, with particular attention on the unique strategies employed by marginalizedgroups [16, 17]. Transgender and gender nonconforming students are often written about throughdeficit framing which define their lives in terms of their trauma or perceived academic failure[13, 18]. In contrast, resilience is “reflected by achievement in career development, happiness,relationships, and physical well-being in the presence
Carlisle, Oregon State University, School of Chemical Biological and Environmental Engineer-ingDr. Natasha Mallette P.E., Oregon State University Dr. Mallette worked as a design, process and research engineer before obtaining her PhD in Chemical and Biological Engineering. She uses her engineering experience to enrich undergraduate education and has chosen to focus on teamwork as a research area. Natasha experienced the successes and failures that go along with functional and dysfunctional teaming, so hopes to help students learn skills to function effec- tively on multi-disciplinary and cross-departmental teams during their careers. She started her teaching career at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she was lucky
strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding international engineering doctoral students’ sense of belonging through their interpersonal interactions in the academic communityIntroduction and Background This study explores the ‘sense of belonging’ from the
, it’s kind of funny, ‘cause sometimes I say amen atthe end, ‘cause I feel like it’s kinda like a prayer. Because sometimes I feel that NSBE really islike that kind of organization. It means so much to me because I've gotten so much from it. I'veseen so many people benefit and thrive through it, that you know, it kind of means justeverything. Everything about being a Black engineer. So everything about my career, and myfuture, the people I've met. The people who have impacted me and pulled me forward. Thepeople that I've brought along with me and every single person that they've touched.So NSBE is an organization…for me, the NSBE mission statement really means how can you bebetter than the person before you and how can the person after you be
several NSF- and NIH-funded projects, primarily working with national professional development programs for early-career academics from groups underrepresented in STEM. She is also currently serving as a Virtual Visiting Scholar of the AD- VANCE Research and Coordination Network. Her research is grounded in critical race and feminist theories, and her research interests include community cultural wealth, counterspaces, intersectionality, and institutional change.Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran, Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE), University of Wash-ington Emily Knaphus-Soran is a Senior Research Scientist at the Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity (CERSE) at the University of
note: Full details of this study have been submitted for publication to the Journal ofWomen & Minorities in Science and Engineering.We expect that most in this audience are well aware that the middle school years are a criticallyimportant time for identity development and career planning for girls, particularly with regardto supporting interests in engineering.Some would argue that offering engineering programming for middle school girls is importantand valuable regardless of long-term outcomes. But program funders and host universitiestypically want to see more than that, such as entry into STEM majors or recruitment to theuniversity. This study captures our effort to track long term outcomes of a program that’s beenrunning at WPI for the
Paper ID #25014Seeding a Strategic Campaign to Address Root Causes of Inequity in Engi-neering EducationDr. Ellen Foster, Purdue University Dr. Ellen K Foster currently holds a post-doctoral appointment in the engineering education department at Purdue University. She received her doctorate in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechninc Institute in 2017, and holds her BA in Astronomy and Physics from Vassar College.Dr. Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato Jennifer Karlin spent the first half of her career at the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, where she was a professor of
learning [15][16]. Virtual embodiment hasbeen shown to influence agency, ownership and interpersonal attitudes through experiences thatenable the possibility of experiencing another person’s perspective first-hand. It is quite plausiblethat similar transformations could occur in IVR for engineering faculty to temporarily transferinto the student—veteran, person with a disability, woman, woman of color, LGBTQ individual,low socioeconomic status or first-generation perspectives—to live firsthand some of themarginalized experiences that ‘inclusion privilege’, power and implicit bias commonlycircumvent. IVR shows promise as a tool to influence the development of empathy towardspeople, careers and identities that are not our own.IVR has this potential
and recently tenured faculty to support each other in navigating academic careers; and a three-year reform effort in which Finnish engineers and architects engaged in participatory approaches topromoting sustainable development in engineering education countrywide [7]. Other approaches seekingto draw on collective expertise and participatory action have been used in Adams et al.’s Design ThinkingResearch Symposium, featuring a shared data-set analyzed by an interdisciplinary group of participants[8], Walther’s early formulation of interpretive research methods [9], and Paretti and McNair’sparticipatory panel sessions for the 2012 NSF EEC Grantees meeting [10]. Each of these applications ofthe unconference model have focused on areas of
Latinx students, engineering educators have a unique opportunity toapply their engineering design expertise to innovate the educational experience of their students. InDesign Thinking, one key feature is the emphasis on user engagement and developing a deepunderstanding of a user’s needs, environment, and assets [7]. Educators, as educational designers, shouldfirst seek to understand the unique characteristics of the students in their programs. This process ofdeveloping a deeper understanding of one’s students can result in educational experiences that supportstudent learning by meeting students where they are [8] and connecting to themes, ideas, and topics thatare relevant to the student and their desired career trajectory [9].While the
overlap between being aveteran and being a minority and encourages the integration of scholarship on student veteransand on under-represented minority students. Our study aims to add to this literature on theexperience of Black student veterans, with a particular focus on BSVEs.Our prior research on veteran subpopulations and identity has shown that for First GenerationStudent Veterans in Engineering (FGSVEs) military and engineering identities were more centralto their current experiences than their first-generation status [30]. The decision to pursueengineering was primarily to pursue a career that offers financial stability [12]. For womenStudent Veterans in Engineering (WSVEs), we found that the decision to pursue engineering wasoften related
successfully transitioned to student-centered teaching strategies. She co-designed the environmental engineering synthesis and design studios and the design spine for the mechanical engineering program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her univer- sity and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Dr. Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Brooke Coley, PhD is an Assistant Professor in Engineering at the Polytechnic School of the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Dr. Coley is Principal Investigator of the Shifting Perceptions