Paper ID #25333Alumni Feedback and Reflections on Industrial Demands and Transdisci-plinary Engineering Design EducationMs. Alyona Sharunova, University of Alberta Alyona Sharunova, BSc., is an Education Consultant at the Faculty of Engineering and a former Research Assistant at the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Alberta. Her background is in Psychology, Design, and Educational Development. The scope of her work lies in Transdisciplinary Engi- neering Education, Design Processes, Teaching and Learning Methodologies, Cognitive and Educational Psychology, and Curriculum Design and Enhancement.Miss
practitioners haveshown interest in evidenced-based methods of developing student engineers, such asproject-based learning, experiential learning, peer to peer learning, and game-based learning. Thispaper describes an engineering education program that emphasizes technical, professional,creative design skills in our 3rd and 4th year student engineers. This program is continuouslyimproving. Faculty and staff meet each semester to reflect on the prior semester, address studentfeedback, and make specific changes to improve. Learning science tips are weaved into thedynamic program. Motives are pure, but execution can have some challenges. This program’sphilosophy allows faculty to try, get feedback, and pivot. Faculty exemplify iterative design andthe
summative surveys were distributed with each summative assessment(exams). The formative survey was distributed prior to the summative assessment and thesummative survey was distributed after the summative assessment. See Appendix A for the twosurveys. Questions are included in the figure captions, for convenient reference. Ample time wasgiven to complete the formative survey and the both surveys were generally returned with theexam. Students are informed to answer the formative survey questions reflecting on theformative assignments leading up to a summative assessment. For example, when filling outtheir second formative assessment students are asked to reflect on all homework leading up toExam 2 from the previous exam. Formative scores include the
, and to summarize thecombination model of university path selection. Specifically, the research questions in thisstudy are as follows: (1) What are the core paths of China's new engineering construction? (2) What is the selection model of the "new engineering" construction path for differenttypes of colleges and universities?2. Literature review2.1 The concept of new engineering conceptThe "new" of new engineering construction is reflected in five aspects [4]: (1) The newconcept of engineering education. With the new economy and new industries as thebackground, the new engineering construction needs to establish a new concept ofinnovative, integrated and full-cycle engineering education. (2) The new structure of thediscipline
identifies perceived benefits and challenges for the students engaged in thecompetition. Complementing the report of the team's experience at the 2018 RTZ, this studyemphasizes the importance of teamwork collaboration in the present context of the AEC industrywhile drawing upon concepts of sustainable construction. The study encompasses data collectedfrom: (1) a survey with all the 8 students, (2) interviews with the faculty leader and the studentteam leader, and (3) the reflections of two of the authors of this paper based on their ownexperiences and observations as participants in the 2018 RTZ competition team. Three categoriesemerged from the data and background literature analyzed: teamwork, education and knowledge,skills, and abilities (KSA
several department-specific Comm Labs, 2)Brandeis’s centralized Comm Lab for their Division of Science, and 3) Rose-Hulman’sundergraduate-only centralized Comm Lab for students using a multidisciplinary, co-curricularspace. We then discuss these adaptations with a focus on how our different institutional profilesshape our Comm Lab design. Specifically, we draw connections between institutional data andthe disciplinary focus, scale, and institutional fit of each Comm Lab. We conclude by sharingdata about the Comm Labs’ success, reflecting on the importance of continued data collection,and considering the value of cross-institutional collaboration. Our conclusion reflects both thelimitations of our study and the need for ongoing research. These
the software on exams). Generalcomments about the lecture also reflected that too much material is being covered, the lectureperiods feel rushed, and therefore the exam periods seem too short.Constraints, Challenges, OpportunitiesSome comments from the above section reflect some expected frustrations given the nature ofteaching statistics in a multidisciplinary environment [4]. The breadth of topics covered makes itnecessary to move quickly during lectures and the diversity of the student population makes itdifficult to design examples that will be relevant to all engineering disciplines. There alsoappears to be a lack of engagement with the topic of statistics itself that may stem simply fromthe growth of the lecture sections over the years
design project in only one senior design course; two of these programs had earlier courses in the senior design sequence that contained valuable information necessary for students’ professional success (see Table 1). Therefore, to enhance the usability of the course for all majors, the specific sequence of course substitution was added into the course description for the GEEN courses, as well as reflected on the college-wide form required for students to participate in the GEEN courses. This level of specificity was required to insure buy-in from all departments.Once the senior design faculty members were satisfied with respect to the intended content andstructure of the course, the proposal moved to a series
the aerospace company at the time of this study wereinterviewed remotely (the researcher and participants are bi-coastally located), and the industrialdesign undergraduate was interviewed in person when they returned to school to resume study.The interview questions and methods were approved by the university Institutional ReviewBoard (ID 18-401). The interviews were conducted 4 months after the summer 2018 internshipprogram concluded.The questions asked were open by design, to encourage the interviewee to reflect on theirexperiences. The questions were categorized as follows: (1) educational background, academicpreparation, and role in the company, (2) communication channels on projects, and (3) thoughtson improvements that could be made to
instructor hadnever taught a course in “Cognition and language,” which was ranked fourth in terms ofusefulness be respondents. While far from definitive, such factors might support the idea that theperceived usefulness of a workshop reflects its connection to the focus of the related REUprogram vs. instructor familiarity with teaching the related topic.Prospects for Future ResearchWhile the ideas noted here are interesting in terms of a pilot study, more work needs to be doneto determine how effective such workshops are within the context of an REU program. 9Similarly, collecting and analyzing more data over longer periods of time is essential
southernUnited States during the fall of 2018. In order to enroll in the course, participants completed anonline application and were approved by instructors. Active recruitment was done in the Collegeof Communications, College of Fine Arts, and School of Engineering in an effort of creating acohort that reflected a diverse set of design disciplines. Participants included 7 Theatre andDance (T&D) majors, 7 Engineering majors (4 mechanical and 3 electrical), 4 Arts,Entertainment, and Technology (AET) majors, 3 Radio, Television, and Film (RTF) majors, 1Studio Art major, and 1 double major in French and Design Arts & Media (see table 1). 12females and 11 males were enrolled in the course. Of the engineers, six were male (3 electrical, 3mechanical
Education. 2007.[6] Jouaneh, Musa, Ying Sun, and Robert Comerford. "Assistive Technology Devices: A Multidisciplinary Course." age 9 (2004): 1.[7] Davies, Claire, et al. "Building Better Together: Interprofessional reflections on educating students when designing assistive technology." Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) (2018).[8] Carroll, Ryan, et al. "Learning Assistive Device Design Through the Creation of 3D Printed Children's Prosthetics with Augmented Grip Diversity." 2018 ASEE Zone IV Conference. 2018.[9] Krivoniak, April, and Arif Sirinterlikci. "3D Printed Custom Orthotic Device Development: A Student-driven Project." 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2017.[10] Aazhang
the purpose of programmatic assessment. Eliot and Turns [12] investigated the useof professional statements, artifacts, and reflections in students' ability to identify as engineersand future engineering professionals. The authors discovered that students developed both anexternal frame of reference targeting the expectations of future employers and an internal framefocused on individual values and interests. Abdulaal and colleagues [13] explored theimplementation and deployment of a career orientation course originally piloted in a biologyprogram but later offered across several programs throughout the college. Findings from mockinterviews suggested an increase in confidence toward career preparation skills and ability toarticulate one’s
engineering design process English 3 Portfolio Proposals, Drafts, Individual Workshops, Final drafts/exhibits, Reflection Entrepreneurship 3 Pitch, Presentation Problem validation, Group evaluated by outside Business model experts generation, Team formation, and
potential benefitsand challenges of supporting multidiscipline teams in an academic curriculum. Whilemultidisciplinary project-based learning and multidisciplinary service-learning are not new ideas,rarely is the team composition considered in relation to the impacts to student learning andperception.This work examines the experiences of three multidisciplinary, sustainability focused teamsproviding solutions for use and education in communities considered food-deserts. The threeteam structures vary in degree of multidisciplinary composition, one of the EPICSdifferentiators. Students were asked to define multidisciplinary teams and then reflect on theirown team experiences and team compositions. Transcripts of focus group interviews with currentand
projects was also unable to provide the necessary time andfocus.Therefore at the end of academic year 2015, to better manage these increasingly large and diverseprojects, the discipline-specific course directors proposed several changes that resulted in theformation of XE401/402 from CS, EE, and IT 401/402. The development of the XE401/402sequence included several changes, including development of a hybrid “agile-waterfall” designprocess, a focus on reflection within the design process, and these faculty and stakeholder roles.This paper focuses on the implementation of the roles.Faculty model influences role assignmentThe faculty model at West Point includes a relatively large proportion of transient members.Approximately half our faculty consists
large design projects. Experience with the course has suggested thatgiving students more agency in their team selection has resulted in more ownership in the team’ssuccess/failure as reflected in student evaluations. Since teams were formed in the same way inboth groups, team formation does not play a role in the differences found in the results betweenthe groups that will be discussed in later sections.Research MethodThe goal of this research is to understand if the intervention of cohering Introduction toEngineering and Small Group Communication has resulted in better team dynamics. Theexperimental group involved in this study includes two sections of the cohered courses with 37and 20 students each. The control group consists of four sections
teaching assistant. The design project assignment wasworth 30% of the students’ final course grade.The Maryland Institute College of Art (MICA) is an art and design school, also located inBaltimore, Maryland. The design project assignment was part of two separate 3-credit FYEcourses: Body/World/Machine, in which students (2 male, 14 female) explore the role of thebody, social space, and the media through intensive studio production in a range of formats, andPrototype/Situate/Fabricate, in which students (6 male, 12 female) create, represent, respond,and reflect on form, function, and structures in space. Each course met on Thursdays from 9am-3pm, and each had one instructor and one teaching assistant.The buildings in which the JHU MechE Freshman
natural environment” [6, p. 21]. Theimpact that the studio course was perceived to have on the students may be one driver for facultyto continue to teach the course. Additionally, the multiple publications describing the courseshow how the faculty members used the interdisciplinary course for research [6], [15] [16].From the faculty reflections from course published by Sochacka and colleagues [6], theinstructors speak of their openness to learning more about each other’s fields as well as thediscomfort that came with it. Through the design studio, the authors state that in workingtogether, they questioned “the values, beliefs, and understandings [they] hold of [their]disciplinary selves and of each other” [6, p. 19]. From an institutional
reflected in one of the Program Education Objectives (PEOs): Within 3-5 years aftergraduation from the JI, the graduates should be able to apply their creativity and globalperspective in their engineering or non-engineering professions. We use this paper to report tothe community our thoughts, practices, and outcomes of the interdisciplinary engineeringeducation at the JI.Interdisciplinarity in Engineering CurriculaThe curricula of the engineering programs at the JI are enriched with elements beyond technicaltraining. There is a first-year Introduction to Engineering course that allows students to have ataste of engineering in an interesting subject area before they claim a major; the capstone designprojects allow the students to join each other