application of ideas from complexity science to the challenges of engineering education.Mr. Mitchell Fajardo c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Designing and enacting weekly micro-reflection activities as a means of professional development of early career educators: Voices from the fieldIntroductionThis project is situated in the professional development challenge of helping practicing educatorsin higher education advance their teaching. Although teaching occupies a large percentage oftime for those employed in higher education, it is rare that educators have continued accessoutside of their everyday professional practice to advance their teaching
award.Ms. Sepideh Afkhami Goli, University of CalgaryDr. Ehsan Mohammadi, University of CalgaryMrs. Fatemeh Sharifi, University of Calgary Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Collaborative Autoethnographic Study of a Large-Scale Flipped Classroom Implementation with Multiple InstructorsAbstractThe flipped classroom model is being used in many engineering courses. By guiding students tostudy course material online or outside of scheduled class time, instructors can focus on hands-on assignments and projects during their interactions with students. The flipped classroom modelimplements
Paper ID #27072Improving Creative Thinking in Engineering Students Through Art Appre-ciationPatricia Caratozzolo, School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico Patricia Caratozzolo was born in Buenos Aires, Argentina. She received the Ph.D. degree from the Uni- versitat Polit´ecnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain, in 2003. Since 2005 she has been a member of the faculty of Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey, Campus Santa Fe, where she is Assistant Professor of Power Energy Systems in the Mechatronics and Sustainable Development Department. She is leading different projects in the area of educational
engineering FLCmembers were non-tenure track faculty with workloads that consisted primarily of teaching.Experience level ranged from a 2nd-year Assistant Professor of Instruction through mid-careerfaculty. Although service is also part of the workload of each member, participation in this groupwas voluntary, and each member was compensated $500 from the grant for their efforts.The GuidesAn initial list of guides was proposed at the beginning ofthe project (Figure 1) that grew into 12 total: InclusiveTeaching, Active Learning, Motivation & Engagement,Mindset, Rubrics, Learning Objectives, SyllabusCreation, Assessment, Inductive Teaching, DamageControl, Retrieval Practice, and Teams.This work is directly informed by both the scholarship ofteaching
facilitate this. Alearner-centered approach requires that students are engaged and become responsible for theirown learning process and that the instructor becomes a facilitator of their learning, instead ofbeing the center of their learning process. When I taught using the flipped-classroom learningenvironment, my students watched videos outside of the classroom and took online quizzes totest their understanding. In the classroom, students applied their learning by completingindividual or team activities and projects, with my guidance, on their own chosen topics ofinterest.The main problemThe main problem when you transition from one paradigm to another is that, as explained at thebeginning, your expertise and previous success in one paradigm, does
significant communityoutreach, the benefits of community service may also be smaller or at least less tangible to thefaculty member. The primary benefit to the faculty member of most profession-relatedcommunity service is increased visibility of the individual, program, and university. One neverknows where such increased visibility may lead, and so what might seem as a relatively minoractivity on the part of the faculty member may reap large rewards in the future. For example,someone who gives a talk on engineering at a local high school may inspire a student to studyengineering at their university and that student may want to work on a research project in thefuture with the faculty member who gave the talk. Answering a local reporter’s questions on
revisit strategies that are used to conduct such analysis. The study willcontinue to code more transcripts in the above methodology to improve and inform qualitativeanalysis in engineering education.FundingThis work was funded by National Science Foundation Grant DUE #1712195. The project isentitled “Collaborative Research: Bridging the gap between academia and industry in approachesfor solving ill-structured problems”. Data, findings, and conclusions or recommendations are thoseof the authors, only.References1. M. Meyer and N. Fang, “A qualitative case study of persistence of engineering undergraduates,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, 1, pp. 99-108, 2019.2. E. Douglas, “Beyond the interpretive: Finding meaning in
. A. Jones, and J. N. Moorhead, “Literate Programming for Authorship of Interactive Textbooks for Programming-centric Courses,” Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[28] C. Y. Yan, “Online Homework Assignments: Instructor’s Perspective and Students' Responses,” New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[29] J. W. Everett, K. E. Mallouk, J. F. Stanzione, III, and J. K. Morgan, “Strategies for Using Online Practice Problems,” Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014.[30] A. T. Koehler, “What's Wrong With My Code (WWWMC),” New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016.[31] S. Edwards, H. Vastani, and M. Perez-Quinones, “Supporting On Line Direct Markup And Evaluation Of Students' Projects,” Portland, Oregon, 2005.[32] J. M. R. Alamo, “A Study of Online
Paper ID #27138Adding the Extra 5 Percent: Undergraduate TA’s Creating Value in the Class-roomMrs. Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University Ali Baumann received her master’s degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Wyoming before working as senior systems engineer at General Dynamics C4 Systems. She is now part of the freshman engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State Uni- versity. Currently, she focuses on enhancing the curriculum for the freshman engineering program to incorporate industry standards into hands-on design projects. She is an instructor for the
ininstructional activity may influence these student perceptions, both through the quality withwhich the task is carried out and via the social influence of projected confidence [45]. Therefore,TSE can be instrumental in enabling TAs to meet student expectations and also in strengtheningthe beneficial outcomes that emerge from successful interactions with them.Our study focuses on the role of TSE in engineering classrooms that are managed by TAs anddiffers from existing studies in several ways. First, the research on TSE in higher educationdescribed above has relied on teachers’ self-report of their own sense of self-efficacy. Researchexamining links between teacher self-efficacy and student perceptions is limited [46] and to ourknowledge has not been