outcome of theBologna process. However, it can also be found well outside the EU (Hahn & Teichler 2015).Subsequently, this has set the scene for international understanding, as well as creating newarenas for international misunderstanding.In this educational context, it is not surprising that the notion of intercultural or globalcompetence (i.e., intercultural understanding and the ability to communicate, work and functioneffectively and ethically in environments characterized by cultural and social diversity), hasbecome more relevant for European HEIs, whereas a decade ago the calls were mainly comingfrom North America (e.g., Parkinson 2009). Going further back in time, to the mid-20th century,the explicit call for intercultural or global
team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Development of a Coding Scheme Analyzing Formative Assessment in Undergraduate Engineering Science CoursesAbstractThis research paper addresses responsive teaching, which is a particular form of formativeassessment that instructors use to understand and respond to the “disciplinary engagement” ofstudents in real-time during instruction While ideas about what constitutes “disciplinaryengagement” are established in science education where responsive teaching has receivedconsiderably study, the field of engineering has not yet established a clear idea of what“disciplinary
talent cultivation model for industrial needs. Improve the quality ofengineering talents based on industry standards. Cultivated engineering talents should bejudged as "products" based on industry standards. Promote the deep integration of scienceand education between universities and enterprises. (2) Emphasize on the main functions ofcollege educators, and build an innovative engineering talent support system. Deepen thecurriculum and teaching reform in colleges and universities, attach importance to thedevelopment of students' abilities, qualities, engineering ethics, and stratify and classifytalents. (3)Increase the supply of engineering education talents and the funding of trainingfunds. Strengthen research support in the field of
any adversities you have had to overcome. State how the awarding of a NSF S-STEM Scholarship would assist you in achieving your academic and professional goals. Your Personal Statement should not exceed three double-spaced pages. (maximum of 35 points) Reference Letters – Consider appropriateness, level of work ethics, dedication, and academic ability as demonstrated in letter for reference (maximum of 35 points.) TOTAL POINTSComments:Assessment and Evaluation ObjectivesA number of specific objectives were stated in the initial proposal that were used as yardsticks toassess the success of the program. The first was academic success and retention as measured bythe participants maintaining a grade point average of at least 3.0 on a 4.0
thedesign cycle [4]. However, few studies have explicitly examined student learning through thelens of the knowledge and practice expectations of a 21st century engineer [14]. Yet, 21st centuryskills have been embraced by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET)and are included in the standards for engineering programs [15]. The 21st century skills includecollaboration and teamwork, creativity, communication, emotional competency, culturalcompetency, ethics, leadership and management, critical thinking, and content knowledge. Afundamental shift in the ABET engineer paradigm with the adoption of the 21st centuryframework reflects a focus on engineers as being at the service to society. The ABET standardssuggest that there is
8 Project Management 15 Ethical ResponsibilityThe undergraduate curriculum focuses on application of rigorous analysis methods,comprehensive evaluation of equitable societal needs, adherence to relevant guidelines andstandards, and determination of optimal solutions to complex engineering problems. Table 2depicts an undergraduate student’s design experience across the undergraduate curriculum.Obviously, a student’s exposure to design complexities increases as the student advancestowards graduation. Typically, the freshmanexperience is limited in scope, but open-endedenough to create a context where students can begin developing an understanding of what the“design process” entails. Students undertake disciplinary
practitioners argue that further improvements are necessary. One of the definingcharacteristics of design is that there is rarely a single correct answer to an engineering problembut, rather, an optimal or acceptable solution leading to a final design, presented as the bestpossible balance between technical as well as non-technical constraints. These non-technicalconstraints, typically involve: economics, politics, social and environmental issues, ethics, etc.And, while professional practitioners generally accept this understanding of design, students, byenlarge, tend to interpret the engineering design process as an unambiguous and clearly definedprocess supported by rigidly applied principles and processes of “the scientific method.”Students’ vision
justice work is by practicing an ethic of care [31]. According to Hill Collins, “theethic of caring suggests that personal expressiveness, emotions, and empathy are central to theknowledge-validation process” [p.766, 31]. Our caring responses to targeted harassment - thosethat acknowledge the emotional toll on colleagues, that do the empathic work of repair - are infact ways of building new knowledge and contributing to the scholarship of engineeringeducation.Conclusion: Counting the Stakes, Calling for ActionThe NAE Report “The Engineer of 2020” [22] emphasized the importance of social context ofengineering practice: “Attention to intellectual property, project management, multilingualinfluences and cultural diversity, moral/religious
andTechnology (ABET), “engineering design is the process of devising a system, component, orprocess to meet desired needs.” The aim is to optimize time and materials while still producing aquality product through “establishment of objectives and criteria, synthesis, analysis,construction, testing and evaluation.” Engineers must be aware of the realistic constraints of theirproject, such as, “economic factors, safety, reliability, aesthetics, ethics and social impact.” Adiagram showing the details of the process is shown on Figure 3. Following the engineeringdesign process is crucial to finishing a project successfully.Schools with ABET accreditation, such as CSULA, include the engineering design process invarious courses throughout the curriculum
stringsrather than cubic units. Since there is no other polymer to compare this with, and we have notgone over crystallinity in my university classes yet, I fear I am unqualified to determine the typeor crystallinity of this polymer, and this task would be better suited to someone more qualified.”Emotional appeals are well received in some genres like essays; however, engineers mostly relyon logical or ethical appeals in the technical report genres. The student tries to convey hisarguments emotionally, so the report has “makes sense” and “I fear”. In addition, this exampleproves a lack of conventional knowledge in technical writing on referencing. The webpage linksare attached in the parenthesis on the report.All OIT student samples show knowledge of
increase thequantity and quality of construction graduates towards a more competent and diverse workforcefor the development of 21st century built environments.Professional identity is a combination of professional (roles, decisions, ethics) and personalselves (values, morals, perceptions) [7]. Professional identity development (PID) in students is adynamic process as a novice student compares new inputs from training and professionalassociations with previous views; and upon, various levels of internalizations, the professionalidentity may be accepted or rejected [7][8]). PID in students involve students’ beliefs of theirown performance / competence, interests in the profession, and feelings of recognition bysignificant others. It is the
offerings were as follows: Figure 1: Project Based Learning Core of CoursesBy starting in the Junior year and culminating with a year-long senior capstone, participants wereable to progressively build their professional skills over several semesters. Detail PBL coursedescriptions may be found after the following titles: ENGR 350 - Engineering Practices and Principles III - Engineering project-based learning (open-ended) with emphasis on project control and engineering design processes. Special emphasis will be placed on professional, ethical, global, environmental, and contemporary issues. Contact Hours: 2 Lecture, 2 Lab. ENGR 400 - Engineering Capstone I - Senior engineering project
, and gender and 2) engineering education, with a focus on socioeconomic class and social responsibility. She is currently completing a book manuscript on the intersection of engineering and corporate social responsibility. She is the author of Mining Coal and Un- dermining Gender: Rhythms of Work and Family in the American West (Rutgers University Press, 2014), which was funded by the National Science Foundation and National Endowment for the Humanities. In 2016 the National Academy of Engineering recognized her Corporate Social Responsibility course as a national exemplar in teaching engineering ethics. Professor Smith holds a PhD in Anthropology and a certificate in Women’s Studies from the University of Michigan
are encouraged; however, smaller teams can be accepted if the students demonstrate theyhave the appropriate discipline, work ethic and accountability to be successful. A faculty/staffselection committee will then evaluate the proposals in terms of quality, research interest, andresources required (e.g., expertise, time, supplies, equipment, funding, faculty advisor). Theselection committee is usually comprised of the MESA Center coordinator, grant directorsfunding the projects and an additional STEM faculty. Once selections are made, teams arenotified and required to attend an orientation where students sign agreements, liability waiversand other requisite paperwork. They also interact with other student researchers through team-building
discriminated, too.” (P8) “I think the first thing is not to make this so awkward because I find myself often not sure of when to disclose to people that I am hard of hearing. If I am at a phone interview, I know that I have to be in a quiet space. Also, I can't use a speakerphone because it sometimes was not clear. I have an experience where I am on a phone call with the call quality is really bad. I have to ask them to repeat. You know it makes the interview not go very well.” (P5) “I did have an interview with the Department of Defense. They made a conditional job offer but withdrew, because of ethical concerns. They encouraged me to apply to different departments within the Department of Defense. I turned it down
, dominant, and autonomous (9).Bradley and Lang claim that valance and arousal responses to most words is strong, while thedominance emotional response is “less-strongly related”. ANEW2017 does not specify how theoverall sentiment is calculated. ANEW2017 is simply a lexicon for use with other algorithms.Typically, the ANEW2017 lexicon is used in a simple average methods like AFINN andTextBlob.APPROACHThe authors teach an introductory course in electrical and computer engineering which wascreated to specifically address (1) provide an orientation and early success skills for universitylife, (2) introduce ethical considerations in engineering, (3) introduce the profession ofengineering, and specifically, electrical engineering and computer engineering
program structure andoverhauling the late freshman- and sophomore-level curriculum to better address today’s studentneeds. Over the past 18 months of the grant-based work, the grant PI and department facultyteams have collaborated to develop this vision through a base set of eight courses for all studentsto complete by the end of their second year. Consequently, the base courses must providestudents with a broad enough view of the field that they can make a satisfactory choice for theirpathway to a degree, while also providing them with basic knowledge that will be required ofany of those pathways.The program goals for the base courses are to 1) strengthen the integration of both electrical andcomputer engineering and ethics topics across the
. His research interests are in the areas of problem-solving, cultures of inclusion in engineering, engineering ethics, and environmental justice.Erica D. McCray, University of Florida Dr. Erica D. McCray is an Associate Professor of Special Education at the University of Florida. Prior to joining the faculty, she served as a special educator for students with behavioral and learning disabilities in Title I elementary and middle school settings. Dr. McCray has been recognized on multiple levels for her teaching and research, which focuses on diversity issues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Critical Theories for Unmasking Individual and Structural Racialized
characteristics, meaning that the pedagogicalpractices are unique to students’ cultural, religious, demographic, and gender differences. Thesecharacteristics set students apart from one another and their educators. Therefore, when ateacher’s instructions reflect characteristics of only one group of students, the other students aredenied an equal opportunity to learn [16]. Using CRP takes into consideration a student’straditions, linguistics, value and ethical systems. CRP provides teachers with empirical andtheoretical constructs that support their efforts to lower existing barriers and opportunity gaps [17]- [19] for the increasingly diverse public-school student population in all educational platforms.CRP’s objective is to support students in obtaining
which offer inclusive learning opportunities for all participants. Whilechallenges exist, the class will continue to evolve and hopefully the partnerships will continue tobe meaningful to all involved.I. IntroductionOne primary purpose of higher education in engineering is to prepare engineering students fortheir future world of engineering practice. Recently, this purpose has required engineeringeducators to shift our thinking towards preparing students specifically as engineers who emergefrom college ready to participate as active and effective members of a global society [1], [2].Haag, et al. [3] observe that the “current work environment requires engineers to be globalcitizens, as well as aspirational, ethical leaders” and mimics
6 7 Construction skills (building, tinkering) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cultural awareness/understanding 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Ethics 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Please rate the level to which you agree/disagree with the following statements on a scale from 1 to 7 with 1 indicating strongly disagree to 7 indicating strongly agree: 1=Strongly Disagree 7=Strongly Agree It is important to me to learn how to make the world more 1 2 3
fundraising strategy and action plan according to the target budget. [IDENTIFY unexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value] (3/4) Illustrate the impact of the triple bottom line on the design project. [EXAMINE societal and individual needs, DISCERN and PURSUE ethical practices]The subset of learning objectives for Competition Projects 2 (Spring) associated with anentrepreneurial mindset are as follows with Bloom’s taxonomy levels in parentheses. Eachlearning objective is also matched to associated entrepreneurial mindset example behaviors asdefined in the KEEN framework. (6) Justify through presentation the value of the vehicle. [EVALUATE technical feasibility and economic drivers, CONVEY engineering
ethically, and helping to contribute to a commongood. These goals are used as a framework throughout the discussion, but rather thandeconstruct engineering education to the SLEM framework this work focuses oncommonalities or intersections. We begin with a general note on such research and thenconsider a more recently published case study on “How College Works” [8]. In this study weassume that lecture-based styles of teaching closely reflect material that is in course texts andwhich may just as well learned through properly designed digital courses without the aid of ahuman tutor.How college affects students“How College Affects Students” is the title given to two books that have critically reviewedthe vast body of research on how college impacts on
have strong work ethics and that in general want to do things such as working with a professor or start an entrepreneurship. (Faculty member, UAI)PUC students feature similar characteristics of those at UAI. Some students enroll in engineeringwith the idea of continuing the family business. However, the school strongly encourages theteaching of entrepreneurship skills to their students so they can develop it in their professionallife, either by launching their own project or in a public or private organization. When theyengage in entrepreneurship they see it as a way of generating social impact.What are the main strategies the selected engineering schools use for the promotion ofentrepreneurship education?As a synthesis of these
course that brings exciting, newtechnologies and skills to a first-year PBL course with the aim of enhancing engagement andproviding an authentic multidisciplinary, creative design process that includes student-proposedprojects. At the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, a large R1 research institution, an effort todevelop engagement, community and connections between freshmen and faculty began with thedevelopment of a required, one-credit first semester course. This course covers topics importantto all new university students – selecting a major, exploring extracurricular opportunities, writinga resume, appreciating diversity and understanding ethics – and for three years it was expandedto add a faculty co-instructor, who led a small
were collected from 120 first-year engineering students in a requiredengineering course at a large midwestern university. The main topics taught in the course includedata visualization and analysis, ethics, engineering design, application of computer programmingby using Matlab software, and development of mathematical models to solve engineeringproblems in a collaborative teamwork manner. Students were divided into teams, where eachteam had 3 to 4 students. We designed a semester-long study, where students submitted theirreflection after each lecture individually. Further, students evaluated themselves and their teammembers at four-time points for the teamwork. In addition, students provided their gender andrace information as shown in Table
. On-campus housing is provided to the Scholars. A resident coordinator is present at all times to handle logistical, operational, and emergency matters. Multifaceted daily activities are administered, including lectures on mathematics, science, communications, social justice and ethics (e.g., construction of racial identity, identifying inequalities), workshops on technical writing, coding, robotics, and resume building, hands-on team challenges (projects), professional tours, social and shopping trips, and personal time. All projects are team-based where two to three Scholars collaborate under the guidance of ambassadors. Each project is a challenge for which each team must
of Research ethics, the MIT Kaufman Teaching Certificate Program (KTCP) course, and un- dergraduate genetics. She believes in the power of peer-coaching as a method of improving an entire community’s ability to communicate effectively.Dr. Marina Dang, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Dr. Marina Dang holds a PhD in Chemistry from Brandeis University, where she also served as an instructor for the Science Posse Boot Camp program. She taught chemistry at Emmanuel College and later became a STEM curriculum developer for an educational startup. In 2014, she joined the MIT Department of Nuclear Science & Engineering to serve as its first Communication Lab manager. As the Communication Lab model spread to new
Florida-Georgia Louis Stokes Alliance for Minority Participation (FGLSAMP). She is a past adviser of the Women in Computer Science (WICS) student club. From 2008 to 2010, Ms. Solis was a programmer analyst at the Department of the Attorney General in Hawaii, a member of the team revamping the State Juvenile Justice Information System. Her research and instructional Interests include programming languages, computer ethics and student success and development.Dr. Deepa Chari, Florida International UniversityZahra Taheri Zahra Taheri has studied psychology and her interests focus on human development, women and minori- ties in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Exploring