Paper ID #25700Integrating Comics Into Engineering Education To Promote Student Inter-est, Confidence, and UnderstandingDr. Lucas James Landherr, Northeastern University Dr. Lucas Landherr is an associate teaching professor in the Department of Chemical Engineering at Northeastern University, conducting research in engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Integrating Comics Into Engineering Education To Promote Student Interest, Confidence, and UnderstandingAbstractThe use of comics as an educational teaching tool is a practice that has existed for
Paper ID #25778Multi-scale Characterization and Visualization of Metallic Structures to Im-prove Solid Mechanics EducationJingyu Wang, University of Oklahoma PhD candidate at OUNyree Mason, Tuskegee University Graduate research assistantDr. Firas Akasheh, Tuskegee University Dr. Akasheh has been with the Mechanical Engineering Department at Tuskegee University since 2008. His primary interest is in the area of solid mechanics and manufacturing as well as the integration of best practices in engineering education. ¨ E. Okudan-Kremer, Iowa State UniversityDr. Gul G¨ul E. Kremer received her PhD from the Department
for a new Associate-to-Fullpromotion policy, including new criteria; definitions of multiple forms of scholarship includingdiscovery, integration, application and practice, teaching and learning, and engagement;standards for quality, impact, and peer review, including a call to reviewers to be aware ofpotential for bias; and procedures for promotion nomination and review. Overall, much moreguidance is provided, with the new policy occupying about six pages compared to the prior four.A key change in the criteria was to replace the “leadership” criterion with the following: “arecord of scholarly contributions that demonstrates a positive external impact beyond MU….Contributions to MU may demonstrate an external impact if they are disseminated
students exhibit aslight to strong preference for this mode of learning [10]–[12], and further that the technique canbe used to free up valuable class time (contact hours) for more tailored and interactivetechniques, especially active learning [13].There have been a number of articles which present suggestions or even guidelines on producinginstructional videos of varying types (e.g., lecture material, example problems/solutions,software tutorials) [14-15], and some of their best practices have been incorporated by theauthors, as shown below in the Methods section, including: keeping individual videos as short aspossible, focusing a video on no more than 3-4 learning outcomes, recording high-quality audioat sufficient volume, and more.MethodsThis
Education at the University of Washington, Seat- tle. Her research interests focus on the potential roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and other political identifiers in determining undergraduate engagement across a variety of majors, including engineering.Joanna Wright, University of Washington Joanna Wright is an M.Ed. student in Learning Sciences and Human Development at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her education research interests span early childhood through higher education, with a focus on the impact of pedagogical practices and contexts on learning and development. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engagement Patterns Across Race, Gender
canvary both within and across organizations [7-10]. For some engineers, practice might entailconducting analysis and testing on components of a particular design; for others, it might lookmore like managing the range of tests that are conducted throughout product development [11].Nonetheless, engineering practice can comprise a wide range of activities and accompanyingskills, and these might be different from one organization—or job—to the next.The purpose of this paper is to explore the interaction between engineers’ experiences inauthentic practice and the way their organizations facilitate or hinder the development of skillsand dispositions noted as vital in reports and accreditation criteria. If engineering graduates havethe skills called
Paper ID #27426Connecting to the Physical Space through Funds of Knowledge: LessonsLearned from a STEM Summer Enrichment Program (Fundamental, Diver-sity)Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel Alejandro (Alex) Mejia is an assistant professor of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. His current research investigates how the integration of the historically and culturally accumulated wealth of knowledge, skills, and practices - also known as funds of knowledge - and engineering design can serve as a pathway to and through engineering. Dr. Mejia is particularly interested in how Latinx
of a Communication Lab (Comm Lab), a co-curricularintervention designed to provide peer-to-peer writing and communication support to engineeringand science students. At its core, the Comm Lab is a STEM-specific writing center wherestudents can meet face-to-face with a peer knowledgeable in their discipline to get feedback onSTEM writing and communication genres. On the organizational level, however, the Comm Labis distinguished by its emphasis on adaptation of structure and services to the desired institutionalcontext. Thus, our research asks which features of the Comm Lab can or should be adapted innew institutional contexts and which features must be retained across contexts to make iteffective. By answering this question for our specific
culture in which it is practiced. ○ If you believe that engineering reflects social and cultural values, explain why and how. Defend your answer with examples. ○ If you believe that engineering is universal, explain why and how. Defend your answer with examples. ● There is a variety of mobile phones commercially available in the market (e.g. iPhone, Galaxy, Huawei Mate, Nokia). Can there be a single best design for a smartphone? ○ If you believe that there is a single best design for a smartphone, please explain why. ○ If you believe that there is not a single best design for a smartphone, please explain why.Appendix C. NOE Aspects Scoring Rubric
, science, and technology to include new forms of communication and problem solving for emerging grand challenges. A second vein of Janet’s research seeks to identify the social and cultural impacts of technological choices made by engineers in the process of designing and creating new devices and systems. Her work considers the intentional and unintentional consequences of durable struc- tures, products, architectures, and standards in engineering education, to pinpoint areas for transformative change.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management
will be further advanced by obtaining the InstitutionalReview Board approval to carry out the research with human subjects. The researchers hope toquantify the value generated for the students by participating in the EIRC to further bolster thesupport for this program. The dissemination of the results may encourage participants to continuein their value creation after they leave the EIRC.Once the results from this study are obtained and analyzed, the future work of the researchersinvolves answering another research question: How do we translate the value proposition tostudents who are not part of a community of practice? Translating some of the best practices inthe EIRC to students who are not part of it will surely impact the recruitment and
progress paper discusses the Academy of Engineering Success (AcES), an NSF S-STEMsupported program, which employs known best practices to support and retain underrepresentedstudents in engineering through graduation. The goal is to graduate more students fromunderrepresented populations in an effort to ultimately diversify the engineering workforce.This paper describes this program’s unique implementation of a specific subset of retention bestpractices, such as facilitating (1) the development of both a feeling of institutional inclusion andengineering identity by providing opportunities for faculty-student and student-student interaction aswell as major and career exploration, (2) academic support, including support for the development ofbroader
Investigator, working to improve practices to recruit and retain women of color in STEM and enhance institutional climate at USD. Other current research grants support pathways for veterans in higher edu- cation, and the NSF program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.” Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty of Color, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate Students of Color. She is past-Vice President (2017) of the Pacific Sociological Association, and an appointed consultant to the American Sociological Association’s Departmental Resources Group. Fluent in both quantitative and qualitative research methodologies
Paper ID #27374Examining the Role of Parents in Promoting Computational Thinking in Chil-dren: A Case Study on one Homeschool Family (Fundamental)Ms. Hoda Ehsan, Purdue University, West Lafayette Hoda is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education, Purdue. She received her B.S. in me- chanical engineering in Iran, and obtained her M.S. in Childhood Education and New York teaching certification from City College of New York (CUNY-CCNY). She is now a graduate research assistant on STEM+C project. Her research interests include designing informal setting for engineering learning, and promoting engineering thinking in
funding from the National Science Foundation to examine and address inequities in higher education, specifically as they relate to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). She served the NSF ADVANCE grant initiatives as a co-Principal Investigator, working to improve practices to recruit and retain women of color in STEM and enhance institutional climate at USD. Other current research grants support pathways for veterans in higher edu- cation, and the NSF program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.” Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty of Color, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate
impact made to the students in their assigned classwas low, attributed to having no creativity within the rigid training structure [7]. A study byShannon [11] revealed that TAs who attend departmental training were more likely to havepositive ratings in the classroom, but the best UGTA training was viewed as prior experiencewith teaching. Small amounts of training (1 day or less) that often focus on university anddepartment policies do not provide enough time for UGTAs to learn and more importantlydevelop a comprehension of pedagogical skills, limiting the professional development achieved.From a small sample size of 6 graduate TAs at Texas Tech University, survey results suggestedthat graduate teaching assistants view preparedness, fair grading
working to createopportunities to foster analytical and problem solving abilities among its upper divisionengineering students. CET seeks to provide Junior and Senior-level students with undergraduateresearch and industry workforce experiences to better prepare them for graduate programs andfor highly evolving and technology-based labor market. The literature has reported for more thanthree decades the substantial benefits for underrepresented minorities (URM) when engaging inURE. A myriad of recent publications substantiates the importance of URE including increasedconfidence in research and professional skills, enhanced preparation for graduate school, andgreater clarity on future career pathways [4], [5]. Using grant-funded equipment and
quizand a survey immediately following the assignment. Following this, after a waiting period of twoweeks, all students will be given an unannounced pop quiz about the Dayanta, with the resultsbeing compared between the groups to look at the impact of the interactive system on both short-term and longer-term memory. Given this heuristic study, the authors believe this research willcontribute to a better understanding of the use of 3D models and interactive media containingthem in undergraduate instruction.7. AcknowledgmentsThis research is supported by the Construction Laboratory for Automation and SystemSimulation (CLASS) of The Ohio State University. The authors wish to thank the ASEEreviewers, whose comments have considerably improved this
Transformation (NEET) Living Machines (LM) thread and is also the instructor for 20.051, 20.052 and 20.053 which are the three classes entitled ’Living Machines’ required by all students participating in the LM thread. Dr. Kassis’ research interests lie at the convergence of engineering, biology, and computation. He is particularly interested in creating engineering tools to answer difficult biological questions. Dr. Kassis has worked on a variety of interdisciplinary research projects from elucidating the role of lymphatics in lipid transport to designing organ-on-chip microfluidic models to developing deep convolutional networks for biomedical image processing.Mr. William Dickson, General Motors Will graduated with a
theworkforce [6]. There are many explanations of individual excellence and entrepreneurialmindset [7,8, 9] and multiple studies about engineering students [10,11,12] with an emphasison a high need for achievement and potential for break-through innovation [13]. Since the late1990’s engineers and designers have been exploring moods and feelings and their connectionto better solutions [14]. And while research links entrepreneurial status to personality theory[15] and personality to leadership [16], few studies focus on the impact of emotion oninnovative success. This paper aims to begin filling that gap with a preliminary experiment toshow how students experience a story of innovation. The experiment is inspired by Radcliffe President Mattina
the position. Unfortunately, the lack of technicalskills and overall ability to perform the required duties of the position led to the dismissal of theemployee after a mere six months. The mathematical impact was: ~$28,000 between paying theindividual’s salary for six months and the 30% of the individual’s salary it cost the company toreplace this person. Having an individual in a role they were not qualified for over the course ofsix months also adversely impacts the employer’s projected profit margins. Privateorganizations generally do not view this as an acceptable standard practice where profits are thedriving force. Figure 3 displays a chart from Boushey and Glynn that shows the cost of replacingan employee [15
individual belongs toprofessionally, and/or voluntarily. Therefore, ethical conduct and practice is a traditional cornerstone ofeducation and the professional conduct and development of workforce in all industries.Today, engineers play a crucial role in the development of the direction of technology, research, economicgrowth and thereby impact on the safety, wellbeing, and lives of people. Engineers make decisions or areinvolved in the decision-making and operational processes of business, government, and/or non-profitorganizations at various levels (strategic, tactical, and operational). Since engineers’ design and makesolutions available to use for dealing with the societies’ complex problems, the direct and ripple effects ofthese decision-making
through the use of interview data from our research studyof engineering education innovation origin stories. This paper extends the process by furtherusing stories to recognize and take advantage of opportunities for change, highlightingcommonalities based on stories using qualitative research on the origin story of an innovativeengineering program.Why StoriesStories have long held power in human society. Stories are used as a way to construct,understand and communicate meaning around events and experiences [2, 3, and others]. Theact of telling a story is an effective way to disseminate a particular construct of meaning. Theact of responding to a story, or re-telling a version with personal commentary, further developthe communal understanding of
course, tenured or tenure-leading, and/ora professor of practice), reasons for conducting the research, and the procedures involved should they meetthe requirements of the program. The 11 instructors were affiliated with six academic departments in thecollege.B. Procedures Selected observers were invited to an informational orientation session. The session covered thepurpose of the study including a discussion on SETs, number of expected observations, required COPUStraining, and post-program commitments. Following the orientation, faculty and graduate student observersattended a 1.5-hour training on using the COPUS. The training included participant introductions, exerciserationale, protocol and code introductions. Several guided
. Lorelle A. Meadows, Michigan Technological University Dr. Lorelle Meadowsjoined Michigan Technological University in 2014 where she is leading the creation of a new honors college uniquely committed to inclusion and equity, and eliminating barriers to high impact educational practices. Prior to joining Michigan Tech, Dr. Meadows was Assistant Dean of Aca- demic Programs in the College of Engineering at the University of Michigan.Her primary responsibility in that role was to assure the delivery of a curriculum that addressed college-wide educational objectives in order to prepare students for the careers of the 21st century. This engagement led to her development as an educational researcher and she now conducts
dialogues. However, instructor facilitation may result in an instructor-centered discussion whichlimit students’ participation and voice [18], and student-facilitated discussions provide analternative approach. Peer facilitation can foster a sense of student ownership and help studentsfeel more at ease in expressing their opinions [19], and allow practical hands-on experience ofbeing a discussion facilitator [18]. Compared to instructor-facilitated discussions, research onstudent-facilitated discussions is still limited focusing more on the student facilitation techniques[11], [20]. This study aims to explore how overall design and management of student-facilitateddiscussions influence peer interaction and critical thinking in engineering
creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two areas: engineering education and design. Professor Hoople’s engineering education research examines the ways in which novel approaches can lead to better student outcomes. He is the principal investigator on the National Science Foundation Grant ”Reimagin- ing Energy: Exploring Inclusive Practices for Teaching Energy Concepts to Undergraduate Engineering Majors.” He has also co-developed a unique interdisciplinary course, Drones for Good, where engineer- ing students partner with peace studies students to design a quadcopter that will have a positive impact on society.Dr. Joel Alejandro Mejia, University of San Diego Dr. Joel
mechanization and post-harvest maize production in Wang’uru, Kenya and Iganga, Uganda. She also served for four years in the U.S. Navy aboard the USS Sacramento (AOE-1) as an Interior Communications Electrician.Dr. Melissa Vosen Callens, Melissa Vosen Callens is currently an assistant professor of practice in instructional design and commu- nication at North Dakota State University, Fargo. Her areas of research and teaching interest include Popular Culture and Online Education. Her writing can be found in The Ultimate Walking Dead and Phi- losophy, English Journal, Communication Teacher, Hollywood Heroines: The Most Influential Women in Film History, and A Sense of Community: Essays on the Television Series and Its Fandom
Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying how strategies of engagement and feedback with support from internet tools and resources affect conceptual change and associated impact on students’ attitude, achievement, and per- sistence. The other is on the factors that promote persistence and success in retention of undergraduate students in engineering. He was a coauthor for best paper award in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2013.Prof. James A. Middleton, Arizona State University James A. Middleton is Professor of Mechanical and
coordinating institution, a better understanding ofprogram logistics, and new and strengthened professional relationships. We discovered a numberof challenges associated with providing intensive professional development opportunities tograduate students, including timing of experiences relative to degree progress, loss of connectionto the home research community, and financial impact, especially as it relates to travel andhousing.While a search of existing literature in professional development in higher education hasprovided best practices for existing programs, there is little to no available research highlightingbarriers that exist to offering different types of professional development opportunities tograduate student populations. These barriers