Conference Session

Engineering and Public Policy Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rylan C. Chong, Chaminade University; Helen Turner, Chaminade University; Mark Speck, Chaminade University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering and Public Policy

, Eds. New York, NY: Springer, 2008, pp. 303–307.[3] National Research Council of the National Academies, Using science as evidence in public policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2012.[4] R. Chong, D. Depew, I. Ngambeki, and M. Dark, “Teaching social topics in engineering: The case of energy policy and social goals,” presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA, 2013, pp. 1–16.[5] J. Mendoza-Garcia, I. B. Ngambeki, L. J. Behbehani, D. Evangelou, S. C. Rao, and M. F. Cox, “Defining the knowledge and skills that enable engineers to participate in public policy,” presented at the American Society for Engineering Education, 2012, pp. 1–12.[6] WASC Senior College and University Commission

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eleazar Marquez, Rice University; Samuel Garcia Jr., Texas State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

and organize focus group interviews withunderrepresented students conducting undergraduate research in general. The objective is to assessthe process of attaining their research position. In this regard, focus group interviews will beutilized to facilitate collective reflection and dialogue by providing students opportunities toopenly discuss their learning experiences with fellow peers.Resultantly, Phase 3 of this long-term project involves developing communication channels withfaculty in the school of engineering who have underrepresented minorities conducting researchunder their supervision in order to assist each other in identifying and recruiting more students.REFERENCES[1] Russell, S. H. (2006). Evaluation of NSF support for

Conference Session

Bridge Programs Connecting to First-Year Engineering

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amanda Simson, The Cooper Union; Laura C. Broughton, City University of New York, Bronx Community; Elizabeth J. Biddinger, City College of the City University of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs, Pre-College Engineering Education

was jointly supported by the CollegeNow City University of New York program and NSF ATE Project #1601636 - Chemical andBioEnergy Technology for Sustainability (CBETS). Thank you to Ms. Susana Rivera forproviding the demographic information for the program and for her support of the College Nowprogram at BCC.References[1] J. C. Chang, "Women and minorities in the science, mathematics and engineering pipeline," ERIC Digest, p. ED467855, 2002.[2] J. Jones, A. Williams, S. Whitaker, S. Yingling, K. Inkelas, and J. Gates, "Call to action: Data, diversity, and STEM education," Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 40-47, 2018/03/04 2018.[3] "Federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zareena Gani, Higher Colleges of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

knowledge ofindustrial practice are required to facilitate learning through PBL approach. Such real-worldexperience could be attained by collaborating with industries to get an insight of the currentpractices and requirements. Experts from industrial partners could also train the faculties duringthe program’s professional development sessions in order to combat the issue.7. References[1] S. S. S. K. H. B. Zareena Gani, "Teaching Manufacturing Technology through ’Learning by Doing’ Approach," American Society for Engineering Education, 2018.[2] H. A. H. a. S. K. Esche, "ENHANCING THE ENGINEERING CURRICULUM THROUGH PROJECT-BASED LEARNING," in 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston, MA, 2002.[3] D. F. T. Julie E. Mills

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Design Methodology

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa A. Shay PE, U.S. Military Academy; Tanya Thais Estes, United States Military Academy; David Paul Harvie, United States Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

relationships with team members, and demonstrate deeper understanding of theirproduct and how it satisfies customer requirements.References [1] Plato, “Apology,” in The Dialogues of Plato, J.Kaplan, Ed. Pocket Library, 1950. [2] S. L. Shapiro, K. E. Lyons, R. C. Miller, B. Butler, C. Vieten, and P. D. Zelazo, “Contemplation in the classroom: A new direction for improving childhood education,” Educational Psychology Review, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2015. [3] B. Bern´ardez, A. Dur´an, J. A. Parejo et al., “A controlled experiment to evaluate the effects of mindfulness in software engineering,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. ACM, 2014, p. 17. [4] B. Rieken

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University; John M. Santiago Jr., Freedom Institute of Technology; Pamela Allison Phillips, Colorado Technical University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

skills.References[1] J. M. Santiago and J. Guo, "Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Courses Using the Online Flipped Classroom Approach," in 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, OHIO, 2017.[2] K. M. S.-L. J. R. Y. Andrea L. Welker, "Weaving Entrepreneurially Minded Learning Throughout a Civil Engineering Curriculum," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, 2017.[3] S. E. Zappe, R. M. Leicht, J. Messner, T. Litzinger and H. W. Lee, "flipping" the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2009.[4] B. Kerr, "The flipped classroom in engineering eductation: A survey of research," in Internation Conerence on

Conference Session

STEM Issues

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony E. Sparkling, Purdue University; Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Aayushi Sinha, Purdue University; Trenton Thomas Hasser, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

, “Developmental trajectories of math anxiety during adolescence: Associations with STEM career choice,” J. Adolesc., vol. 67, no. August 2017, pp. 158–166, 2018.[7] L. Farrell and L. McHugh, “Examining gender-STEM bias among STEM and non-STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP),” J. Context. Behav. Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2017.[8] M. Te Wang and J. L. Degol, “Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions,” Educ. Psychol. Rev., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 119–140, 2017.[9] M. Te Wang, J. S. Eccles, and S. Kenny, “Not Lack of Ability but More Choice: Individual and Gender Differences

Conference Session

Architectural Division Technical Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed ElZomor, Florida International University; Omar Youssef, University of Arizona

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering

seated mode to change the time of dayand thus change the shadow perceptions of the space and ultimately be able to visuallyexperience the expected full shading result (Figure 5).Figure 5: Understand fenestrations, building shading and their effect/s on energy use and comfortModule Five Procedures: 1. Students will investigate the most effective way to reduce solarradiation on building fenestrations and to intercept direct radiation from the sun. This processwill overlook both building shading and precise window shading; 2. Use a 3d software (to beselected by students) to generate preselected model by instructors. (Based on theoreticalinformation provided in class, students to design preliminary shading devices, they expect toprovide complete

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Deciding on a Major

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame; Victoria E. Goodrich, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

university and into first careers. In addition, thisstudy will be repeated with additional cohorts to better understand year-to-year variability in studentperception, major choices, and certainty levels.References: 1. Meyers, K. (2016). A Course to Promote Informed Selection of an Engineering Major using a Partially Flipped Classroom Model. Journal of STEM Education, 17(3). 2. Meyers, K., & Brozina, S. (2017). Supporting an Informed Selection of an Engineering Major. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. 3. Seymour, E., Hewitt, N. M., & Friend, C. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences (Vol. 12). Boulder, CO

Conference Session

A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anne M. Lucietto, Purdue Polytechnic Institute; Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Elaine M. Cooney, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis; Liza Ann Russell, Purdue University; Emily Schott, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

theirprofession is also reviewed.History of SMET, STEM & STEAMIn 2001, the acronym formally known as SMET turned into STEM (Science, Engineering,Technology, and Mathematics)[2]. However, this grouping has been recognized in educationalreports since the 1980’s [2]. STEM had been developed by the National Science Foundation(NSF) to group together these disciplines based on the common use of critical thinking andproblem-solving skills [2, 3]. The disciplines that make up STEM are distinct but linked, withthose in engineering also studying physics, chemistry and other sciences and math being studiedin all disciplines [4]. Noticeably absent from this group is the arts, which is not recognized to bepart of STEM.In order to compare ET students to their

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 9: Persistence and Retention

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Johnny C. Woods, Jr., Virginia Tech; Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Tech; Homero Murzi, Virginia Tech; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech, Ateneo de Davao University; David B. Knight, Virginia Tech; Jacob R. Grohs, Virginia Tech; Scott W. Case, Virginia Tech; Natasha Smith, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

teaching, learning, and retention of first-year students,” Journal of Faculty Development, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 5–21. 2007[5] E. Bettinger, C. Doss, S. Loeb, A. Rogers, and E. Taylor, “The effects of class size in online college courses: Experimental evidence,” Economics of Education Review, vol. 58, pp. 68–85, Jun. 2017.[6] R. Zaurin, “Preparing the Engineering Student for Success with IDEAS: A Second Year Experiential Learning Activity for Large-size Classes,” in 2015 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Camino Real El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA, 2015 p. 21.[7] S. Huang and E. Pierce, “The impact of a peer learning strategy on student academic performance in a fundamental engineering course,” in 2015

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Work in Progress Postcard Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kamau Wright, University of Hartford

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

re-writing their goals using the technique. Some of these pre andpost goals were written on the board and as a class, the instructors, peer mentors, and studentsgot to discuss whether they thought the post-goals were better and why. This was effective athelping students to better define and enhance their own individual goals in practical ways, and inconsideration of academic excellence, and the upcoming year(s) in general, as appropriate. Thetentative assignment was to use the “S.M.A.R.T.” technique to form goal(s) for the semester andyear. Further, students were to continue to update their BP notebooks and complete select G4.0activities.Weeks 4 -5 By week 4, upon conferring with the instructors and Peer Mentors, it was decided

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yen-Lin Han, Seattle University; Kathleen E. Cook, Seattle University; Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University; Teodora Rutar Shuman, Seattle University; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

an Associate Professor in and Chair of the Psychology Department at Seattle University. Dr. Cook received her doctorate in Social and Personality Psychology from the University of Washington, with a minor in quantitative methods and emphases in cognitive and educational psychology. Her research has included classroom learning, person perception, identity, and health perceptions.Dr. Gregory Mason P.E., Seattle University Gregory S. Mason was born and raised in Spokane Washington. He received the B.S.M.E. degree from Gonzaga University in 1983, the M.S.M.E. degree in manufacturing automation from Georgia Institute of Technology in 1984 and the Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering, specializing in multi-rate digital

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division - WIP Poster Session

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Soheil Fatehiboroujeni, Indiana-Purdue University; Atsushi Akera, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Donna M. Riley, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Jennifer Karlin, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany; Thomas De Pree, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

Education, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 2001. [5] J. L. Hess and G. Fore, “A systematic literature review of us engineering ethics interventions,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 24, pp. 551–583, Apr 2018. [6] S. Sheppard, K. Macatangay, A. Colby, W. Sullivan, and L. Shulman, Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. Jossey-Bass/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Wiley, 2008. [7] B. E. Barry and M. W. Ohland, “Abet criterion 3.f: How much curriculum content is enough?,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 18, pp. 369–392, Jun 2012. [8] S. M. Culver, I. K. Puri, R. E. Wokutch, and V. Lohani, “Comparison of engagement with ethics between an engineering and a business program,” Science and

Conference Session

Transfer and Transitions

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dan G. Dimitriu, San Antonio College; Said Fariabi, San Antonio College; Simona Dana Dimitriu, Northside ISD; Lisa Marie Baker, Northside ISD

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Two-Year College

field.References[1]. National Science Board, “Science and Engineering Indicators 2018”. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Available at https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/indicators/.[2]. J. McFarland, B. Hussar, X. Wang, J. Zhang, K. Wang, A. Rathbun, A. Barmer, E. Forrest Cataldi, and F. Bullock Mann, “The Condition of Education 2018” (NCES 2018-144). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2018144.[3]. V. Lundy-Wagner, “Developmental Mathematics and the Community College STEM pipeline”, ASEE Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June, 2014.[4]. L. Jimenez, S. Sargrad, J. Morales

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lisa Bosman, Purdue University; Sandhya Arumugam, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

narrow theirscope as they traverse the design challenge. Future research should investigate this approachacross different design challenges, using a larger subset of students, and incorporatequantitative and explanatory data analysis.6. References[1] L. Bosman and S. Fernhaber, Teaching the entrepreneurial mindset to engineers. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2018.[2] J. Seddon and S. Caulkin, "Systems thinking, lean production and action learning," Action Learning: Research and Practice, vol. 4, pp. 9-24, 2007.[3] T. Brown, Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation New York, NY: Harper Collins, 2009.[4] A. Osterwalder, Y. Pigneur, G

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Krupczak Jr., Hope College; A. Mehran Shahhosseini, Indiana State University

Tagged Divisions

Technological and Engineering Literacy/Philosophy of Engineering

: Morgan James Publishing, 2017. 8. K. Stave and M. Hopper, “What Constitutes Systems Thinking: A Proposed Taxonomy.” 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Jul. 1, 2007. https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/sea_fac_articles/201. 9. J. Froyd, L. Pchenitchnaia, D. Fowler, and N. Simpson, Systems Thinking and Integrative Learning Outcomes paper presented at 2007 Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, Hawaii. 10. D.V. Behl, and S. Ferreira, “Systems Thinking: An Analysis of Key Factors and Relationships.” Procedia Computer Science, Complex Adaptive Systems, Philadelphia, PA Nov. 3-5, 2014, vol. 36, pp. 104–9, Jan 1, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.045. 11. F

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Education Division: Postcard and Student Essays

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lee Allen Dosse, University of Pittsburgh; Irene B. Mena, University of Pittsburgh; William W. Clark, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

university. The collected data also helped determine what practices could beimproved. Although the study was done on a specific makerspace, the setup and operation of thefacility are well-defined, and may potentially aid other colleges and universities in creating andmaintaining their own makerspaces.References[1] U. S. National Academy of Engineering, "The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century," National Academies Press, Washington, D. C., 2004.[2] M. Itani and I. Srour, "Engineering Students’ Perceptions of Soft Skills," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, vol. 142, no. 1, p. 04015005, 2015.[3] U. S. Department of Commerce, "The Innovative and Entrepreneurial University: Higher

Conference Session

Computing Research II

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mysore Narayanan, Miami University

Tagged Divisions

Computing and Information Technology

VeryDissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied 1 2 3 4 5 Very Neutral VeryDissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied 1 2 3 4 5 6 Extremely Very Somewhat Somewhat Very ExtremelyDissatisfied Dissatisfied Dissatisfied Satisfied Satisfied SatisfiedAPPENDIX B: Five–Point Likert Scale. Rubrics courtesy of W. S. U., Pullman, WA. 5 Has demonstrated excellence. Has analyzed important data precisely. Has provided documentation. Has answered key questions correctly. Evidence of

Conference Session

Assessment of Learning in ECE Courses

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kristen Booth, North Carolina State University; Megan Patberg Morin, North Carolina State University; Alireza Dayerizadeh, North Carolina State University; Pam Page Carpenter, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

engineering, and civil engineering were represented amongthe cohort.Based on their survey responses, 100% of the students’ goals for the experience were metthrough the program as a transformative experience for students in professional, technical, andpersonal areas. The most common expectations, chosen by more than 80% of the participants inthe pre-survey, were  Collect and/or analyze data or information to answer a research question,  Understand how my work contributes to the “bigger picture” of research in the field,  Go on research-related field trip(s) (to other labs, etc.),  Attend student conference(s) that include(s) students from other colleges,  Prepare/present a poster presentation describing my research and results

Conference Session

Innovative Course Structures and Learning Environments

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Neda Melanie Bassir Kazeruni, Columbia University; Henry Hess, Columbia University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

most interesting research direction to followknowing the material that was taught in the previous lecture. The next question consisted ininvestigating the feasibility or the implementation of the research ideas the groups came up with;and the next question would go in a more in-depth analysis of the economical or societal pay-offof that research. For instance, the questions that were asked during the “Reproducing macroscalebonds at the nanoscale” were: 1. What are the different mechanisms that are used at the macroscale to create a bond? Name and describe as many of them as you can. 2. What are some nanoscale bonding mechanisms? To what macroscale mechanism(s) are they similar? 3. If you had to reproduce a macroscale

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Renee M. Desing, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Deborah M. Grzybowski, Ohio State University; Monica Farmer Cox, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

enhancements to come in our engineeringcurriculum.References[1] A. J. Dutson, R. H. Todd, S. P. Magleby, and C. D. Sorensen, “A review of literature on teaching engineering design through project-oriented capstone courses,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 1997.[2] C. L. Dym, A. M. Agogino, O. Eris, D. D. Frey, and L. J. Leifer, “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” J. Eng. Educ., no. January, pp. 103–120, 2005.[3] C. Charyton and J. A. Merrill, “Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2009.[4] S. P. Nichols and N. E. Armstrong, “Engineering entrepreneurship: Does entrepreneurship have a role

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Iowa State University; Justin L. Hess, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

on three criteria, per established guidelines of critical incident technique [27]: 1. Detailed description of an experience or series of experiences that are directly attributable to the aspect(s) of their way of understanding or approaching innovation. 2. Description or demonstration of one or more aspects of understanding or approaching innovation. (Note: Direct connections to innovation were preferred, but this connection could be inferred from a participant’s way of experiencing innovation (as seen in the previous study [9]) or contextual cues in the excerpt or elsewhere in the interview.) 3. A clear change, refinement, or crystallization in one’s view of innovation, especially as it addressed aspects of

Conference Session

Engineering Design Process Activities with Secondary Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica D. Gale, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

occur incidentally rather than as purposeful engagement in the EDP. Clear Evidence Clear evidence that students engaged in particular stage of EDP. Student behaviors clearly indicative of EDP engagement.Figure 3. Matrix Illustrating EDP Engagement During Elephant Task by GroupTable 2. Illustrative Examples: EDP Engagement During the Elephant Performance Task EDP Stage Code Definition Illustrative Example Identify Student(s) review and/or discuss the problem When one student in Group 6 begins using materials to build a model of the box car, statement. Includes any statements students another student re-focuses

Conference Session

Improvements in ECE Circuit Analysis

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Breanne Przestrzelski, University of San Diego; Elizabeth Reddy, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

- 380, 2006.[9] H. Zandvoort, “Preparing engineers for social responsibility,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 133-140, 2008.[10] H. Zandvoort, T. Børsen, M, Deneke, and S. J. Bird, “Editors’ Overview: Perspectives on teaching social responsibility to science and engineering majors,” Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 19, pp. 1413 – 1438, 2013. DOI 10.1007/s11948-013-9495-7[11] N. Canney and A. Bielefeldt, “A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 31, no. 1B, pp. 414- 424, 2015.[12] J. A. Mejia, D. Chen, O. Dalrymple, and S. M. Lord, “Revealing the Invisible: Conversations about –Isms

Conference Session

Mechanics Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Danesh-Yazdi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Yi Wu, Penn State Erie, The Behrend College; Oladipo Onipede Jr., Penn State Erie, The Behrend College

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

with Coulomb frictionData collection methodology: All the ISMs were posted on the online course managementsystem, which is Canvas at this institution, at the beginning of the semester to allow the studentsto download and run any of the ISMs at their time of choosing. When the lecture arrived at atopic that is animated in an ISM, the instructor would run that ISM in class to explain keyconcept(s). The students were told that the ISM was developed by one of the authors.The surveys, which were deemed to be IRB-exempt at the institution where the course is taughtsince they fall under the category of “anonymous surveys or interviews”, were developed withthe intent of covering the key concepts that each ISM demonstrates. Students were told that

Conference Session

ET Pedagogy I

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohammad Moin Uddin P.E., East Tennessee State University; Peter D. Rogers, Georgia Southern University; Christopher David Leblanc, University of New Hampshire; Keith V. Johnson, East Tennessee State University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

both semesters, except thatstudents played the SimulTrain game before the final exam in Fall 2018. The figure shows a 4%increase in average final exam score between semesters. Overall, student impressions about thegame were overwhelmingly positive. The game helped them translate the knowledge they Average Fi n al E xam S core 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 SUMMER 2017 FALL 2018 Figure 1: Comparison of Student Performancelearned in the class with a realistic portrayal of a project manager facing common issuesimpacting

Conference Session

Connecting Theory and Practice in a Change Project - And What I Wish I Knew Before I Started

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy B. Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana; John Ray Morelock, University of Georgia; Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Tris Utschig, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Constituent Committee

high need for assessment in change projects is often paired with a low prevalenceof formal assessment activity (Beach et al., 2016). To avoid this, a structured approach toassessment should be used from the very beginning, and conducted as an integral component ofthe entire project. During planning, assessment of “readiness for change” is critical (Reeves,2009; Lehman, Greener, and Simpson, 2002; Combe, 2014; Lynch & Smith, 2016). Movingthrough the project, assessment plans should be mindful of Banta et al.’s (1996) principle ofassessment stating that “Assessment requires attention to outcomes, but also and equally to theexperiences that lead to those outcomes”. To do this, Hall (2013) argues that direct assessment ofthe extent of

Conference Session

A Technology Potpourri III

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve C. Hsiung, Old Dominion University; Lijian Xu, State University of New York, Farmingdale; Feng Jao, Ohio Northern University; Yonghui Wang, Prairie View A&M University; Suxia Cui, Prairie View A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

enhance the students’ understanding of microcontrollers andmicroprocessors, and (3) add one or two EET251 lab(s) with C programming experiences canhelp student better transition from PIC16F84A to ARM M4 which is covered in EET 418. With the help of this new curriculum and the common hardware platform, CPET studentsat PVAMU had the opportunity to practice embedded system hands-on experiments withoutundue stress in connecting basic peripheral interfacing circuits. The problem that we perceivedwas that it was difficult for students to write C program code for the ARM microcontrollerbecause of the complexity of ARM technology. It will be helpful to introduce simplemicrocontroller, such as PIC16FXXX, in both ASM and C coding in some previous

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 15: Perspectives on Engineering Careers and Workplaces

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gretchen A. Dietz, University of Florida; Elliot P. Douglas, University of Florida; Erica D. McCray, University of Florida

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

for example [40]–[43]). This line of research couldbenefit from the use of Faulkner’s and Kendi’s frameworks to investigate specific instances ofindividual and structural racism. To illustrate, we look to Murphy et al.’s assessment of GeorgiaTech’s summer bridge program, the Challenge Program, and its role in the higher likelihood ofgraduation for underrepresented minority students involved [42]. Georgia Tech is aPredominantly White Institution (PWI). Murphy et al. found that there was a significantrelationship between participation in the Challenge Program and increased retention/graduationrate [42]. Quantitatively, they recognized the need for summer bridge programs and theprogram’s importance in retention. What their study was not designed