and technology from Virginia Tech.Marlena McGlothlin Lester, Virginia Tech Marlena McGlothlin Lester is the Director of Advising for the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She leads the undergraduate advising team and oversees the advising process for all General Engineering students. She is responsible for the development of a hands-on, minds-on orien- tation model for all first-year engineering students, the creation of a comprehensive engineering major exploration tool, Explore Engineering, and enhancement of the academic planning resources available for first-year engineering students. Marlena strives to transform the advising experience for students and advisors through communication
activity requires students to use parts that have been fabricated on the 3-D printer to build a working solenoid. It is suggested that students use this task as an introduction to computer-aided design (CAD) and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) by designing and printing their own solenoid parts. However, the plans for the parts are available to download if the teacher prefers. Once the parts are completed, students coil wire around the solenoid frame. Lab 5: Investigating solenoids. The penultimate activity leads the students through putting all the related knowledge and skills together to use coiled wire connected to a battery on the 3-D printed solenoid tube to power a metal slug
customer service techniques.Instruction: Methods of instruction include audiovisual materials, classroom exercises,computer-based training, discussion, lecture, and practical exercises. General course topicsinclude intermodal freight transportation; routing and scheduling; transportation of hazardousmaterials; inventory control; customer service; cargo inspection, processing and stowing; andshipment clearance.Related Competencies: Introduction to logistics and supply chain management topics includeaircraft loading; basic storage; cargo documentation; communication; hazardous materialtransportation; intermodal transportation; material handling; movement and distribution;movement of personnel, equipment, and supplies (planning, organizing, and
-11].Each unit contained a lesson plan, in-class activities, an infographic fact sheet, and homeworkassignments (with answer keys for instructors). The in-class activities engaged students with oneof three data sets: • A student writing data set, which included 99 files of student technical and scientific writing, including abstracts, critical reviews, process explanations, progress reports, proposals, and white papers. All the texts earned a grade of “A” or B” from the instructors of record. • A professional writing data set, which included 240 files of published writing in cell biology, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, applied linguistics, marketing, philosophy, and physics. All of the
Paper ID #26746Board 28: Working with Business and Industry to Update Nationwide ITSkill StandardsMark Dempsey, Collin County Community College Mark Dempsey joined Collin College in 2012 as program manager for the National Convergence Tech- nology Center. In his current position as Assistant Director, he plans and manages the CTC’s special programs and events as well as provides administrative and operational support to the CTC’s Principal Investigator. Prior to Collin College, Mark worked for eight years at UCLA Extension, the continuing education division of UCLA. There, he worked first as an assistant to the director
: Relationships Among Expectancies, Values, Achievement, and Career Plans. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 319-336. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01066.x[15] Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive-validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. doi: 10.1177/0013164493053003024[16] Sheppard, S., Gilmartin, S., Chen, H. L., Donaldson, K., Lichtenstein, G., Eriş, Ö., Lande, M., & Toye, G. (2010). Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES) (CAEE-TR-10-01). Seattle, WA: Center for
February 2019)[3] CISE Strategic Plan for Broadening Participation. Available online:https://www.nsf.gov/cise/oad/cise_bp.jsp (accessed 30 January 2019).[4] AP Computer Science Principles. Available online:https://apcentral.collegeboard.org/courses/ap-computer-science-principles (accessed 30 January2019).[5] Decker, A., and McGill, M. (2017) “Pre-College Computing Outreach Research: TowardsImproving the Practice”, Proceedings of the 48th SIGCSE Technical Symposium of ComputerScience Education, March 8-11, 2017, Seattle, WA, pp. 153-158.[6] Decker A., McGill, M.M., and Settle, A. (2016) “Towards a Common Framework forEvaluating Computing Outreach Activities”, Proceedings of the 47th SIGCSE TechnicalSymposium of Computer Science Education, March 2-5
,Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Learning Environments” [1] through grantDRL-1825007 “Synthesis and Design Workshop: Digitally-Mediated Team Learning” [2]. Theobjective of this workshop was to determine one-year, three-year, and five-year plans for keyresearch and practice considerations related to the integration of highly-adaptable digital learningenvironments in STEM teaching and learning, as outlined in a White Paper commissioned byNSF on those topics. The White Paper provided a unifying roadmap for the future of the field,including the design, development, implementation, and evaluation of digitally-mediated team-based pedagogies, and was composed jointly by the organizers and participants of the workshop,to capture the essence
as a theme throughout thesemester [17]. We introduce these problems to students in a group problem-solving session eachweek and we had students coming to that class trying to guess what the Hyperloop problemwould be about. This means that, presumably, they were thinking about the Hyperloop as theywere reading about the week’s concepts; exactly the kind of engagement we hope for.We plan to do a more formal assessment of these ideas next fall after having completed this pilotrun this year. We did receive a number of positive student comments about the Hyperloopproblems such as: I loved the thought-provoking Hyperloop problems. Every day of physics is like solving a puzzle. I love it. I liked the Hyperloop questions. Kept me intrigued
at Urbana-Champaign.Dr. Nicole Johnson-Glauch, Nicole received her B.S. in Engineering Physics at the Colorado School of Mines (CSM) in May 2013. She is currently working towards a PhD in Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) under Professor Angus Rockett and Geoffrey Herman. Her research is a mixture between understanding defect behavior in solar cells and student learning in Materials Science. Outside of research she helps plan the Girls Learning About Materials (GLAM) summer camp for high school girls at UIUC. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students: NSF project summary
savemoney, Alex attended a community college first, then came to the university to complete hisdegree. This is his first year at the university. He feels that he has found a home in thedepartment but doesn’t have the time to be as involved as he’d like due to outside commitments.He hopes to become more involved as time goes on. Alex has found that time management is hisbiggest challenge; he helps his family out on weekends and whenever possible. He alsocontinues to work at the job he held before, working for a restaurant. Through the scholarship,Alex plans to cut back on hours at work and learn more about how to navigate the university. Healso hopes to take advantage of the internship preparation to get an internship before hegraduates.Student 3
collecting this data from students. Ourrationale and plans are summarized below: • Our project specifically works with a cohort of non-tenure track ranks (e.g., instructors, professors of practices, collegiate assistant professors) for whom quality of teaching is arguably even more critical than in the dossiers of tenure-track/tenured rank faculty. We feel it is important for us (as an institution) to understand these phenomena to put data in context and to continuously improve our measures of teaching quality. For example, it could be useful for an instructor and for departmental evaluators to know that some courses might be subject to systematic penalties because of the course itself (e.g., some of
focuses on policy and regulatory issues related to developing efficient and low-carbon energy sources [21]–[24].Future WorkAs we move into Year 2 of the project, we plan to develop the learning objectives and coursematerials for the energy course to be offered in Spring 2020. We will explore opportunities forhands-on student engagement with data analysis techniques, innovative homework problems, andlab activities. We will conduct assessment and evaluation to determine the impact of CSPs andmake improvements for the next offering of the course in Spring 2021.References[1] G. D. Hoople, J. A. Mejia, D. A. Chen, and S. M. Lord, “Reimagining Energy: Deconstructing Traditional Engineering Silos Using Culturally Sustaining Pedagogies
planning our second iteration, we are using conjecture mapping [17] toconnect embodiment of educational design with mediating processes towards interventionoutcomes. In terms of embodiment, we believe that formative assessment, metacognitivescaffolds, and team-based learning are key considerations towards promoting the affective,motivational, and cognitive processes in students. Formative assessment will help practitioners,researchers, and students identify prior knowledge, skills, and practices, which could act ingenerative or inhibitory ways [18]. Metacognitive scaffolds can improve transfer of learning[16], which could have averted Clara’s mishap with hashtag-style commenting. Team-basedlearning can improve attitude and motivation [14], as
traitendorsements leave ECE before their senior year? Or, does the ECE curriculum somehowchange these students’ perceptions about the prosocial affordance of the profession, andeven worse, diminish their empathy? These questions can only be answered by conductingthe longitudinal study of a neutral classroom condition as is planned in future work.4. Procedure – Video Production Intervention In order to force the students to make a connection between the course material and itsprosocial value, students were assigned a video production assignment. The students weregiven access to a screen recording tool (Camtasia Relay) that is provided to all students bythe university. This tool allows students to record their computer screen and associatedaudio and then
with the departmental leadership to manage the undergraduate program including: developing course offering plan, chairing the undergrad- uate curriculum committee, reviewing and approving course articulations for study abroad, serving as Chief Advisor, and representing the department at the college level meetings. She is also engaged with college recruiting and outreach; she coordinates three summer experiences for high school students visit- ing Bioengineering and co-coordinates a weeklong Bioengineering summer camp. She has worked with the Cancer Scholars Program since its inception and has supported events for researcHStart. Most re- cently, she was selected to be an Education Innovation Fellow (EIF) for the
Research Group (IRG). In addition to the Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Dr. Barrella holds a Master of City and Regional Planning (Transportation) from Georgia Institute of Technology and a B.S. in Civil Engineering from Bucknell University. Dr. Barrella has investigated best practices in engineering education since 2003 (at Bucknell University) and began collaborating on sus- tainable engineering design research while at Georgia Tech. Prior to joining the WFU faculty, she led the junior capstone design sequence at James Madison University, was the inaugural director of the NAE Grand Challenges Program at JMU, and developed first-year coursework.Dr. Mary Katherine Watson, The Citadel Dr. Mary Katherine Watson is currently
A leader who is unable to read social cues from a group. A person that is off Inept putting to the team or group. This person can be offensive unintentionally because of lack of social awareness and cultural norms. Managing A leader who only looks at deadlines and tasks assignment. This person focuses on meeting tasks without considering team needs, establishing higher goals, foreseeing problems before they arise, planning ahead, lacking vision, etc. This leader dictates work assignments without input of team or knowing/understanding the skills within a team. Quitting A leader who gives up on a goal when faced with
a commonpain point for faculty: despite providing copious feedback, student writing was not improving.Students complete four 1-credit laboratory courses in their junior and senior years. In this study,we report on changes to three of these courses. Each course included three complex experiments.To make our changes, we reduced this to two complex experiments, carefully considering whichexperiment to omit based on student feedback and outcomes. We then introduced variants offeedback and revision related to two short technical reports. Each lab includes a prelab with a jobsafety analysis (JSA) and experiment planning, as required by ABET. Students complete theexperiment as a team and turn in a draft of their methods during the experiment
and communication technologies have led to the development ofpowerful technological resources for teaching and learning. The 2017 Nation EducationTechnology Plan (NETP) of the U.S. Department of Education recommends that for every levelof education, institutions should utilize learning technologies to facilitate education anywhereand at any time [1]. Specifically, for the success of American postsecondary students includingstudents from diverse socioeconomic and ethnic backgrounds, genders, age-groups, and learningneeds, the supplement of the NETP report includes recommendations for using thesetechnologies to leverage student-centered approaches of teaching and learning [2]. Theseapproaches are beneficial to promote personalized learning
relates to the expandingemployment opportunities related to data analysis skills. Further, these results may help toinform potential programmatic evaluations and changes.BackgroundDuring the last three decades, there has been controversy about what data analysis knowledge isrequired by engineers in order to make sound decisions. An important precedent to the modernABET criteria asserted that engineers should appreciate five aspects of statistics [1]: • the omnipresence of variability, • the use of graphical tools such as histograms, scatterplots and control charts, • the concepts related to statistical inference, • the importance and elements of well-planned experimental designs, and • philosophies of data quality derived from
“there is a research consensus on themain features of professional development that have been associated with changes in knowledge,practice, and, to a lesser extent, student achievement” (p. 183). These features include: (1) afocus on subject matter content and how students learn that content; (2) opportunities forteachers to engage in active learning; (3) coherence, which includes consistency with bothteacher knowledge and beliefs, and school, district, and state policies; (4) sufficient duration, interms of number of hours and span of time; and (5) collective participation. The APRENDEProject professional development plan will address each of these five features using a researchdesign that privileges problem solving through iterative stages of
-year increase (M = 5.2%, S.D. = 9.4% vs. M =16.1%, SD = 21.6% percent of coding intervals) in the amount of time instructors use groupwork in the classroom [t(27) = 2.52, p =.02].Discussion. Gateways-ND will continue formally for one more year (through August 2020). At thistime, roughly 175 instructional faculty and staff will have completed the two-year program,which will, in turn, would have directly impacted the educational experiences of more than30,000 students during the five-year period. The ultimate goal of Gateways-ND is to maximizeinstructional effectiveness and student success in STEM disciplines.References.[1] Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, “Advancing diversity and inclusion in higher education
Frequency Problem Scoping – Teacher Teacher provides the context of the problem 9.9% Problem Scoping – Student Students define and/or identify problem context 1.4% Solution Formulation Students develop plans 12.7% Student Production and Students build their prototype 19.7% Performance Students test their prototype 8.5% Communication and Students evaluate their testing results 4.2% Documentation of Results Students communicate results with others 0% Optimization Students identify ways to improve their design 4.2% Engineering
componentsof the training before the first day of in-person professional development. The three primaryobjectives of the PLTW Launch Classroom Teacher Training are as follows: “Teachers will… 1) Develop an understanding of the activity-, project-, problem-based (APB) instructional approach, core to all 24 PLTW Launch modules. 2) Embrace their role as a facilitator of learning. 3) Gain familiarity with grade-level modules and experience how to plan and implement PLTW Launch modules in the classroom.”Teachers attain these objectives during by participating in collaborative discussions,experiencing hands-on activities from PLTW Launch Modules, and by answering reflectiveassignment questions, which are graded by the
% Unknown… 7% International 13% 0% 20% 40% 60% Figure 2: Race/Ethnicity of the Institution’s Students 4Data Collection and Analysis. The primary method for data collection consisted of open-endedsurvey items via the EGR_Math course management system. Survey items were developed in theform of one-minute papers, exam wrappers and midterm feedback (Angelo & Cross, 1993;Eberly Center, 2019a). Students were encouraged to complete electronic one-minute papersduring the final few minutes of each class and lab to help instructors plan for the following
final product was evaluated by peer teams at The Citadel. • Getting Started: Provides learner content and primers in how to use site resources, creating a profile, and registering student teams. Example successful project proposals are detailed, and students are asked to complete a resource checklist and then send all proposals to iFixit. • Milestone 1: Provides resources for the creation of a troubleshooting wiki for each device, with planned repair guides linked under appropriate sections. Troubleshooting wikis provide general device information, and require students to research known common repairs as well as anticipate repairs that are likely to be needed due to the normal wear of moving
Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE) - KEEN ICE Award and joined a KEEN Innovative Teaching (KIT) faculty member and become part of a unique cohort of faculty who are commit- ted to improving engineering education. The overall goal of her Ph.D. research is to improve healthcare operations through systems engineering and optimization while focusing on operations and health out- come metrics. Going forward, she plans to continue and broaden this research in support of two overall goals: maximizing the long-run average daily net profit of a medical system from business perspective as well as quality of life from human being aspect. She believes teaching is a very challenging and promising effort. At the end of each class, instructors
bydesigning smart systems and processes that will improve human welfare. One’s ability tomeaningfully contribute to this field requires her/him to acquire an interdisciplinary knowledgeof mechanical, electrical, computer, software, and systems engineering to oversee the entiredesign and development process of emerging MRE systems. There have been many educationalefforts around MRE, including courses, minors, and degree programs, but they have not beenwell integrated or widely adopted. Now is the time for MRE to coalesce as a distinct andidentifiable engineering discipline. To this end, and with support from the National ScienceFoundation, the authors have planned three workshops, the first of which has concluded, on thefuture of MRE education at the