Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS.Dr. Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is CATME Managing Director and the recipient of several NSF awards for research in engineering education and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-Professional Studies Program [IPRO] and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes and interven- tions aimed at improving learning objective attainment. Prior to his University assignments he
products continues to increase;providing additional motivations for including entrepreneurial training in highereducation. As a result, entrepreneurship education has spread laterally to non-businessdisciplines such as engineering, technology, science, and arts [10]. This expansion has ledto an evolution of entrepreneurship education from the business school model of venturecreation to focus on developing skills in graduates that foster innovation in their careerpursuits which may or may not involve self-employment [11]. Particularly inengineering, several curricular and co-curricular entrepreneurship programs have beeninitiated which typically use student-centered, experiential learning approaches to impartcontent knowledge and more importantly
. Thissentiment is one that has resonated with me. It drives me to find ways to connect the nextgeneration to STEM and higher education. Therefore, the prospect of supporting andstrengthening Native connections and engagement to science, technology, engineering, arts, andmathematics (STEAM) is a powerful motivator for me.My involvement in an ongoing study titled, CAREER: Engineering Design Across NavajoCulture, Community, and Society [20] inspired me to explore Tohono O’odham culturalconnections to engineering. Although I will draw from my CAREER research experience, I mustallow any Tohono O’odham connections to emerge without imposing results from myinvolvement in Dr. Jordan’s study.The relationship I would like to foster between community and
Paper ID #25231Work in Progress: The Impacts of Scholarships on Engineering Students’MotivationMs. Emily Bovee, Michigan State University Emily A. Bovee is a doctoral candidate in Educational Psychology and Educational Technology at Michi- gan State University. Her current research is focused on understanding and supporting college student success, particularly in engineering disciplines.Ms. Amalia Krystal Lira, Michigan State University Amalia (Krystal) Lira is a doctoral student in Educational Psychology and Educational Technology at Michigan State University. She is interested in addressing STEM attrition among
capstone. Her degrees in counseling, English and psychology complement her varied research interests in teaching and learning which are currently focused on introversion and collaborative learning, blended learning, technology, and APA style. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Perception versus Reality: Skill Perceptions in First-Year Engineering StudentsThis Research study is predicated on the fact that engineering students often enter the field notfully understanding the reality of the roles and responsibilities of an engineering professional.Not coincidentally, engineering is oft-cited as a major that students do not remain in. Koenig [1
Brass, St. Paul Academy and Summit School Director of Instructional Technology, St Paul Academy and Summit School K12 Collaboration Liaison, Center for Engineering Education, St. Thomas University c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Cross Cutting Concepts in an Informal Engineering Setting (Fundamental)AbstractThe participation gap between men and women in the E - Engineering component of STEMsectors is persistent. This gap may be traced back to several complex issues including perceivedcultural concerns in engineering and young women self-selecting out of engineering career pathsearly in the middle school years [1]. Informal education settings may allow for a countermeasureto the
diversity in certainindustries, including high technology and engineering, as well as a more critical eye towardgender-based differences in pay, status, promotion, and other imbalances in American societyand in many other countries around the world. Not unexpectedly, the movement has led tobacklash, as some accusations inevitably have been inadequately fact-checked, exaggerated, ormisunderstood. As both men and women seek to adjust to the post #MeToo workplace, men haveoften withdrawn in confusion as to what remains appropriate and what might be construed asinappropriate behavior in the workplace. Many avoid conversations on the topic for fear ofnegative consequences. Yet, silence and withdrawal are the enemies of productive forward-looking change
. She served as a postdoctoral associate at Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico while holding a postdoctoral fellowship at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, USA. Currently, she is Director of Writing Lab in the Center for Educational Innovation at Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico. She also holds the position of research professor at the School of Engineering and Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico. She is the author/co-author of more than 25 scientific publications, 19 book chapters and is the inventor/co-inventor of 4 intellectual properties. She is a member of the Mexican National Academy of Researchers (level one) and is on the Editorial Board of various international journals
Paper ID #26451Instructional Profiles: Exploring Peer-Observation at an Engineering CollegeDr. Tareq Daher, University of Nebraska-Lincoln Tareq Daher earned his Bachelors in Computer Science from Mutah University in Jordan. He pursued a Master’s of Instructional Technology at the University of Nebraska –Lincoln while working as the co- ordinator for the Student Technology Program on the UNL campus. Currently, Dr. Daher works as the Director for the Engineering and Computing Education Core at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln. Dr. Daher collaborates with engineering faculty to document and research the integration of
engineering from the University of Louisville. Dr. Ralston teaches undergraduate engineering mathematics and is currently involved in educational research on the effective use of technology in engineering education, the incorpo- ration of critical thinking in undergraduate engineering education, and retention of engineering students. She leads a research group whose goal is to foster active interdisciplinary research which investigates learning and motivation and whose findings will inform the development of evidence-based interventions to promote retention and student success in engineering. Her fields of technical expertise include process modeling, simulation, and process control.Dr. Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb
Paper ID #25238Engineering Design Instruction Using Slack for Project Support and Team-workDr. Jonathan Elliot Gaines, University of South Florida Jonathan E. Gaines is faculty in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of South Florida. He is the Director of First Year Experiential Education and Learning. Through this position, he develops and implements the curriculum for USF’s Foundations of Engineering Lab course. He is also the Principle Investigator for Bulls Engineering Youth Experience (Bulls-EYE Mentoring) a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math based outreach program that uses undergraduate
Paper ID #27214Professional Expectations and Program Climate Affect the Professional For-mation of EngineersDr. Manuel Alejandro Figueroa, The College of New Jersey Dr. Manuel Figueroa is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at The College of New Jersey. He teaches in the Department of Integrative STEM Education and prepares pre-service teachers to become K-12 technology and engineering educators. His research involves engaging college students in human centered design and improving creativity. He also develops biotechnology and nanotechnology inspired lessons that naturally integrate the STEM disciplines
well documented, nor are tools toevaluate individual student performance [2].Fundamental engineering, very applied and hands-on, is a stated need by industry. The ASMEVision 2030 [3] states that the problems that mechanical engineers work on often includeelements of other engineering disciplines, require systems thinking in problem formulation andsolution, and asserts that we must educate engineering students for a technological era ofincreased scope, scale, and complexity. However, this directive requires greater sophistication incurricular design, providing an interface between basic science and engineering at the systemslevel, and leadership for innovation. As industry relationships continue to inform curricularneeds, expertise related to
, no. 1, pp. 453–462, 2017.[29] S. Y. Yoon, M. Dyehouse, A. M. Lucietto, H. A. Diefes-Dux, and B. M. Capobianco, “The Effects of Integrated Science, Technology, and Engineering Education on Elementary Students’ Knowledge and Identity Development,” Sch. Sci. Math., vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 380–391, 2014.[30] K. A. Douglas, B. P. Mihalec-Adkins, and H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Boys and girls engineering identity development in early elementary before and after hands-on engineering learning classroom experiences,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2014.[31] B. M. Capobianco, J. H. Yu, and B. F. French, “Effects of Engineering Design-Based Science on Elementary School Science Students’ Engineering Identity Development across
Richard T. Stone PhD is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Sys- tems Engineering at Iowa State University. He received his Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo in 2008. He also has an MS in Information Technology, a BS in Management Information Systems as well as university certificates in Robotics and Environmental Man- agement Science. His current research focuses primarily in the area of human performance engineering, particularly applied biomedical, biomechanical and cognitive engineering. Dr. Stone focuses on the hu- man aspect of work across a wide range of domains (from welding to surgical operations and many things in between). Dr
the University of Georgia. He teaches mechanics and numerical methods courses such as Statics, Fluid Mechanics, Programming, Numerical Methods for Engineers and Finite Element Analysis. In addition to traditional face-to-face classes, he has designed and taught courses in fully online and completely flipped formats.Dr. Kyle Johnsen, University of Georgia Kyle Johnsen is an Associate Professor in the College of Engineering at the University of Georgia. Dr. Johnsen joined the University of Georgia in 2008 after earning his PhD in Computer Engineering from the University of Florida. His research focuses on emerging human-computer interaction technologies for health, education, and the environment
research.Literature reviewWhile there are many factors that contribute to gender and racial inequality in science,technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) settings, the following research focused onsocial marginalization and the intersectionality of women of color in engineering [5]. As womenenter engineering programs in pursuit of degree attainment, they may feel unwelcome, lackprogram support, and encounter negative gender stereotypes. Women of color face additionalchallenges outside of gender such as experiences with prejudice, discrimination, and differencesin cultural values and socialization [3] that may hinder their confidence and effect their pursuit ofan engineering degree [7].Women of color attending predominantly White institutions (PWIs
Classes to Measure Artificial Material Parameters Arun Kumar Saha Department of Chemistry & Forensic Science Albany State University, Albany GA 31705AbstractRecently artificial material has attracted the attention of physicists and engineers because of thepotential in creating exotic materials with extraordinary functionalities not available in nature. Itis now foreseeable that this area of research will dominate the science and technology fordecades to come. Therefore, it is critical for academic physicists and engineers to educate futuregenerations of students in these areas to better prepare themselves for next level of opportunities.To understand the
considerations in engineeringproblem-solving, what “real” engineering entails, and what tasks and areas of expertise are mostvaluable [10].The professional culture of engineering exists across the many sectors and industries in whichengineers are employed, but it is particularly potent within higher education. It is here where thenext generation of profession members—engineering students—are socialized into this cultureand learn to “become” engineers, “think like” engineers, and to problem solve in an “engineeringway” [11-12].At first blush, abstract beliefs within the professional culture may seem a degree removed fromthe day-to-day processes of inequality within engineering departments. Why would abstractbeliefs about technological objectivity or
, and engineering teach- ing to frame his research on STEM teaching and learning. Nadelson brings a unique perspective of research, bridging experience with practice and theory to explore a range of interests in STEM teaching and learning.Dr. Idalis Villanueva, Utah State University Dr. Villanueva is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best
Paper ID #25266Graduate Engineering Peer Review Groups: Developing Communicators andCommunityKelly J. Cunningham, University of Virginia Kelly Cunningham is the director of the Graduate Writing Lab in the School of Engineering and Ap- plied Science at the University of Virginia. She holds a PhD in applied linguistics & technology and human-computer interaction (co-majors) from Iowa State University of Science & Technology and an MA in intercultural studies/TESOL. She has worked with ESL students since 2007 and in graduate com- munication support since 2014. Her research draws from qualitative methods, appraisal
(Bloomington) and a bachelor’s degree from Duke University. She specializes in eval- uation and research in engineering education, computer science education, and technology education. Dr. Brawner is a founding member and former treasurer of Research Triangle Park Evaluators, an Ameri- can Evaluation Association affiliate organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active
Education, v ol. 9, no. 2, October 13, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.09-08-0057 [Accessed Nov 1, 2018].[4] B. Stappenbelt, “Action learning in undergraduate engineering thesis supervision,” Journal of Technology and Science Education, vol. 7, no. 1, 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.jotse.org/index.php/jotse/article/view/224 [Accessed January 4, 2019].[5] S. Dutra, “Across engineering departments, undergraduate summer researchers push boundaries,” University Wire; Carlsbad, August 24, 2018. [Online]. Available: ProQuest, https://search-proquest-com.libproxy.uwyo.edu/docview/2092460117/fulltext/191DB368 56474DE7PQ/1?accountid=14793. [Accessed October
context to the underlying fundamentals, using digital learning objects.Ms. Darlee Gerrard, University of Toronto Darlee Gerrard is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education at the University of Toronto. She received her Hon. B.Sc. from the University of Toronto, B.Ed. from Brock University, and Masters degree from Memorial University. She coordinates leadership and community outreach programs in the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering at the University of Toronto. Her research interests include STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) education, co-curricular and experiential learning, and the equity and accessibility of education.Dr. Deborah Tihanyi, University of Toronto Deborah Tihanyi is an
container to the construction site, where it can produce the panels fromlocally sourced supplies. The design of a self-contained collection of wood-working equipmentwas discussed as a possibility of a student-team design competition, but has not been pursuedyet.Within the Engineering Department, a degree in Advanced Manufacturing is offered,specializing in manufacturing technologies and techniques. A team of three seniors, twoAdvanced Manufacturing students and one Industrial Engineering student, took for theircapstone project the design of a work cell that could easily and economically produce theassemblies for these houses. The team observed the construction site several times throughoutthe semester in order to identify the sizes of the parts
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2014, after which he served as a postdoctoral research fellow at the Tufts University Center for Engineering Education and Outreach. Aaron also obtained a master’s degree from MIT in 2010 and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Michigan in 2008, both in aerospace engineering.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Associate Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michigan (U-M). Dr. Finelli is a fellow in the American Society of Engineering Education, a Deputy Editor of the Journal for
students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(2), 227-243. 2014.[36] S. Stevens, S., R. Andrade, and M. Page. Motivating young native American students to pursue STEM learning through a culturally relevant science program. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(6), 947-960. 2016.[37] S. S Jordan. CAREER: Engineering design across Navajo culture, community, and society. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition Seattle, WA: ASEE Conferences. 2017.[38] J. L., Smith, et al. Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Cultural Diversity and
Hispanic students. Architecture, engineering, and technology students make upbetween 10% and 30% of the entering first year students. There was an application process forthe program. Students who were accepted, would be a part of a cohort of students who met witha lead instructor weekly, with the program being run as a 1-credit course. Additional instructorsfrom the student life side were also available to help facilitate activities, and connect students toco-curricular and extra-curricular aspects of college life. The present paper will describe some ofthe programming and assignments of this pilot program, and discuss some of the relatedstrengths, weaknesses, challenges, and successes. A primary focus of the programming was tohelp students
Assistant Professor in the Department of Bioengineering at Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU). She earned a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (RPI) in 2004 with the Rensselaer Medal award and as a member of the inaugural class of Gates Mil- lennium Scholars. In 2011, she earned a Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Rice University. Before joining FGCU in 2015, she was a visiting Assistant Professor of Biotechnology in the Division of Science and Technology at the United International College (UIC) in Zhuhai China. She has been exploring and applying evidence-based strategies for instruction since her training with ASCE’s Excellence in Civil En- gineering Education (ExCEEd) initiative in 2016
University. She received her M.S. in Management of Technology from Fairfield University in 2015 and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Universidad Mayor de San Andres in La Paz, Bolivia.Dr. Michael Zabinski, Fairfield UniversityDr. Ryan Munden, Fairfield University Dr. Ryan Munden teaches engineering at Fairfield University. He received his PhD in Applied Physics from Yale University and a BS in Physics from Stetson University. His areas of interest include semicon- ductor nanowires, nanotechnology education, first-year engineering initiatives, and engineering service, outreach, and education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Use of the Arduino Platform