in Chemical Engineering - Can We Bolt-It On? James Campbell, Deesha Chadha* Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College, London SW7 2AZ, UK. E-mail:d.chadha@imperial.ac.uk; Tel: +44 20 7594 8958IntroductionIn a Chemical Engineering degree programme, teaching the core technical concepts takecentre stage, but in order to produce graduates that are prepared for a career in ChemicalEngineering, degree courses need to develop so-called transferable skills [1]. Transferableskills, including effective teamwork, communication (both written and verbal), problemsolving and leadership are typically gained via assessments such as group project work andpresentations. Hereby
Proterozoic and every Phanerozoic systemup to the present day. The country also has a long and complicated tectonic history, partly relatedto its position at the western end of the Himalayas [1].The above diverse geological foundation has resulted in significant mineral resources with over1,400 mineral deposits and occurrences recorded to date [1]. Historical mining focussed mostly onprecious stone production, with some of the oldest known mines in the world established inAfghanistan to produce lapis lazuli for the Egyptian Pharaohs [1].Recent exploration by Russian and Afghan geologists in the 1960s and 1970s resulted in thediscovery of significant resources of metallic minerals including iron, copper, cobalt, zinc, lead,chromium, gold, silver
how capstoneprepares students for their careers and makes recommendations to fortify that connection.The objectives of Northeastern University’s Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (IE) Capstone Designcourse map strongly to the new ABET student outcomes. The students’ progress in meeting thoseobjectives was evaluated from multiple perspectives. 1) Faculty advisor evaluations assessed technicalproblem-solving success, 2) a validated tool judged the completeness of the prototype solution andvalidation testing, and 3) a systematic examination of capstone teams’ final reports evaluated applicationand synthesis of knowledge obtained earlier in the curriculum. Additionally, students were askedindividually to reflect on and outline the skills and
thechallenges that are present during graduate training are common among graduate students. Thesesimilarities are more evident among graduate students that share certain backgrounds, and inparticular among members of minority groups. While much research has been devoted to theexperiences of gender and ethnic minorities [1]–[3], the experiences of English as SecondLanguage (ESL) students in graduate school has been poorly explored. The challenges of ESLstudents often interplay with those of gender and ethnic minorities because their identities areintersectional with such characteristics. Therefore, being an ESL student represents a dimensionthat would be valuable to explore in the context of graduate education.Supporting the development of graduate
effort” that can beadapted to individual engineering students or various engineering programs [1]. Records of theexperience occur in the form of auto-ethnographic reflections taken from the participant-observation standpoint, consistent with previous research [2], [3]. These auto-ethnographicreflections were recorded weekly, and after specific instances of major development or learning.The problem statement for the independent design study was as follows: “Develop a means of brewing coffee and other hot beverages that is cost effective, zero maintenance, and conducive to increased collaboration and socialization between Civil and Mechanical Engineering cadets, faculty, and staff [4].”This problem statement was developed through
their learning though hands-onexperimental flight tests, using a custom designed Unmanned Aerial System (UAS). Theenvisioned flight test experiments would include opportunities to address several crucial conceptsin flight dynamics, stability and control, including the determination of the aircraft’s aerodynamiccharacteristics, stability and control derivatives, validity of the small perturbation assumptions, aswell as the approximations to dynamics (short period, roll and Dutch roll for example). Uponimplementation, we anticipate to assess the educational outcome by asking the question “whetherthis approach (1) helps students think critically about aircraft stability and control and whether (2)students positively receive the field experience
guidelines have been followed for the past 12 years. Details of the assessment may befound in references [1 – 3]. An important difference of ESCC from traditional curriculaelsewhere is our program is student-centered. All difficulties in concepts have been researchedand presented below from a student’s learning point of view.Modern computational focus requires mastery of analytical thoughts to properly understand andimprove computational models. There are some mathematical bottlenecks in achieving this featwhich are discussed separately in another paper [4]. The approach requires reinforcingmathematical understanding in parallel with engineering applications. Many examples andattractive demonstrations are necessary before and during active learning
university and with industry partners.One way to achieve the desired outcome is to create an academic minor. An academic minor canbe used by the university for a number of purposes: (1) expose undergraduates to a related orgrowing field (2) gauge academic interest for development of a new academic major, (3) growthe university undergraduate student population by offering another major, (4) provide supportfor local or national industry needs, (5) provide essential experience to undergraduates inpreparation for the entry into the work environment (enhance their academic credentials or add totheir resume), and (6) provide faculty opportunities of professional development or conductresearch in an area of interest to them.At the Massachusetts Maritime
into their careers andlives after graduation. Such approaches are often referred to as high impact pedagogies [1].The American Association of Colleges and Universities classifies service-learning as a “highimpact pedagogy” [2]. While the roots of service-learning, also called community engagedlearning, date back to the 1860’s with the Morrill Act and the 1920’s with the work of JohnDewey, curricular integration took root in the U.S. in the 1970’s. In the 1990’s there was asignificant increase in the adoption of the pedagogy within many disciplines in higher education[3, 4]. Research has shown that service-learning, can have benefits on student persistence [4-12],learning of core disciplinary knowledge and the broader skills needed in today’s
key part in industrial engineering student knowledgeof manufacturing and the percentage of students completing internships and co-ops inmanufacturing. Data was collected across two campuses within the same U.S. University whereboth campuses offer B.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering. The enrollment at the two campusesand manufacturing footprint around the two campuses are significantly different and this isdiscussed with the results of the survey data.IntroductionThe Society of Manufacturing Engineers reports that a “Silver Tsunami” is occurring inmanufacturing as baby boomers continue to retire [1]. It is of utmost importance to attractMillennials and Generation Z to work in the manufacturing sector of the U.S. Economy. TheUnited States
American demographic realities, and, the heightened awareness of thesechanges and their implications on continuing professional development administrativeorganizations.Changing U.S. DemographicsThe U.S. population, on the whole, is expected to grow more slowly, age considerably and becomesignificantly more racially and ethnically diverse.It is expected the U.S. population will reach roughly 400 million people in the year 2058 [1, p. 2].At this writing, according to the U.S. Census Bureau’s World Population Clock, the U.S.population is 329 million; with one birth every eight seconds, one death every twelve seconds, oneinternational migrant every twenty-eight seconds, for a net gain of one person every twelveseconds. The U.S. population is
Post- doctoral Fellow and a 2018 NSF CAREER awardee in engineering education research. Dr. Svihla studies learning in authentic, real world conditions; this includes a two-strand research program focused on (1) authentic assessment, often aided by interactive technology, and (2) design learning, in which she studies engineers designing devices, scientists designing investigations, teachers designing learning experiences and students designing to learn.Dr. Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- principal investigator for the following National Science
major in one ofthe engineering specialty areas upon matriculation, or soon thereafter. Previous research hasshown that significant factors influencing choice of major for college students include (1)general interest subject; (2) family and peer influence; (3) assumptions about introductorycourses, (4) potential job characteristics, and (5) characteristics of the major. The student'sdecision on choice of major is often difficult because traditional university-aged students havelittle to no direct experience with the engineering profession or practicing engineers. Someuniversities confront this problem with a common first-year engineering experience, whereinengineering majors are given the opportunity to explore the specialty areas and make a
program name. As such, “Civil Engineering” and similarly named programsseeking accreditation by the EAC/ABET at the baccalaureate level must demonstrate that theprogram meets both the General Criteria for Baccalaureate Level Engineering Programs and theCivil Engineering Program Criteria (CEPC). A subset of curricular topics required by the CEPCincludes the following [1], [2]: apply knowledge of mathematics through differential equations, calculus-based physics, chemistry, and at least one additional area of basic science; and analyze and solve problems in at least four technical areas appropriate to civil engineering.This study was conducted to characterize current practices within EAC/ABET accredited civilengineering programs by
reflect the population as a whole. [1].The report continues to state that: While continuing to pursue increased knowledge and higher standards of excellence in teaching, research and innovation, two- and four-year colleges in Texas will need to consider more explicitly the primary reason most students attend college: to get a better job and achieve a better life. [1]A primary outcome of the 60x30TX initiative relevant to our discussion is the following: By 2030, all graduates from Texas public institutions of higher education will have completed programs with identified marketable skills: The marketable skills goal emphasizes the value of higher education in the workforce. Students need to
entering and working in storm drainagesystems, which are considered to be confined spaces, and step-by-step instructions are provided.Unlike the traditional training related to entering confined spaces, which is paper-based trainingin compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA’s) standard1910.146, the newly-developed, visual program allows learners to get involved safely with theactual process of entering and working in storm drainage systems through a 3D simulationmodel. The main purposes of the model are to educate learners by helping them (1) understandthe dangers of entering and working in storm drainage systems and any associated risks, (2)evaluate hazardous conditions, and (3) make safe and accurate decisions
topic. Assessment techniques include student-based surveys, pre- and post-tests, intervention vs. comparison group statistical analysis, andcourse evaluations. In this way, technical skills building, as well as attitude and perceptions areevaluated. Results indicate that while similar learning was achieved with the games vstraditional lecture, students’ perception was that the games were not worthwhile in replacinglecture. Details on the games and assessment techniques are included, to allow others to easilyadapt this work.IntroductionIt is now generally accepted that active learning methods can help students learn material at adeeper level [1], and that students enjoy game-based learning. Research has indicated that game-based activities
appreciative email was also received from a parent who acknowledgedthe effectiveness of the technique on his son’s skill to communicate and to engage in an effectivediscussion. This paper assessed, compared and documented the impacts of clustering fromgrouping teaching technique on students’ classroom engagement.Keywords: Engagement, clustering, cognitive, behavioral, affirmative.1. Introduction:Technology increase in our society had greatly impact students’ interaction in various classroomsdiscussions and had in one way or another, degraded student classroom engagement. Although,student low engagement has been attributed to instructor inability to motivate students in theclassroom. Notwithstanding, student classroom engagement is a complex issue
engineering from MIT (2007) and a master’s degree in systems engineering from the University of Virginia (2010). Alexandra comes to FIU after completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the En- hancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL) and three years as a faculty member at Olin College of En- gineering in Massachusetts. Alexandra’s research aims to improve the design of educational experiences for students by critically examining the work and learning environments of practitioners. Specifically, she focuses on (1) how to design and change educational and work systems through studies of practicing engineers and educators and (2) how to help students transition into, through and out of educational and
innovation in fields, such as business orteaching [1]. The steps include awareness or knowledge, persuasion or interest, evaluation anddecision, implementation and trial, and finally confirmation or adoption. This theory of changewas used to develop a comprehensive faculty development program that included monthlygroup workshops promoting the EM and evidence-based pedagogical best practice and regularindividualized coaching sessions with a peer team comprised of two “experts” – one in the EMand the other in pedagogical practices.While professional development programs for faculty in higher education are relativelycommon, coaching, or targeted one-on-one discussions about teaching strategies and practices,is still quite rare. However, coaching has
semester. Overall the experimental groupoutperformed the control group for the majority of the questions in all three evaluations. Lesspersonal conflict was found in the control group from the first evaluation where differences inresults between the two groups were of statistical significance. Other statistically significantdifferences with better performance from the experimental group were found in results fromareas of healthy, fact-driven conflict (first evaluation); coordination (final evaluation); andcontribution equity (final evaluation).IntroductionTeamwork has long been recognized as an essential skill for engineering graduates to besuccessful in today’s workplace [1, 2]. It is very common for engineering programs to useexperiential
collaborationbrings value but can be challenging.Overall, the results from this qualitative collaborative ethnography provide insight into theexperience of four instructors team teaching using a flipped classroom model. These findings canbe useful to others who are looking at implementing flipped classrooms when there are multiplesections. Future research can further look into other perspectives, including bringing in studentperspective to the instructor experience.IntroductionBlended learning models and flipped classrooms offer opportunities for exploratory, hands-onapplication of technical material during instructor-led class time [1], [2]. While these modelshave been implemented in many engineering programs, large-scale enrollment courses
Kasley, Ph.D, Emeritus Professor, College of Engineering, Colorado Technical UniversityIntroductionTo accommodate the diverse student population of adult-learners, the College of Engineering(CoE) at Colorado Technical University (CTU) offer both evening and daytime classes, themajority of students in CoE work full-time in civilian or military sectors, or are military veterans.The CoE successfully implemented an eleven-week program curriculum, designed for these non-traditional students who are dealing with many distractions. The active-learning approach andflipped-classroom better engages these students and also targets higher-levels of thinking [1].The flipped-classroom helps students determining knowledge, stimulates
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 COMBINING SIMULATION AND EXPERIMENT TO DETERMINE FLUID FORCES IN THE FLUID MECHANICS LABORATORYAbstract: The Fluid & Hydraulic Mechanics course in our Mechanical Engineering TechnologyProgram is the first of the two courses our students take in our ET Department. The course is anintroductory class in Fluid Mechanics and it is structured as a four credit hour course, consistingof a 3 credit hour lecture and a 1 credit hour laboratory component. During the spring 2018 term,a new laboratory exercise was introduced in our curriculum to cover buoyancy and momentumtheory. The exercise consists of two parts: an online simulation using the PhET
in projects andextracurricular activities completed outside the classroom, than those completed within thetransdisciplinary classroom. This information has proved beneficial for program staff as theycontinue to make programmatic improvements.1. IntroductionMultidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary engineering and technology programsare growing in popularity and prior studies have identified advantages to students whoparticipate in these innovative, boundary-crossing programs. Students develop higher levels ofcognitive processing and critical thinking [1], report positive attitudes toward literacy [2],improve research skills [3] and display high levels of teamwork and leadership skills [4]. Thesefindings are by no means
qualitative approach, representing both colleges as case studies.Literature ReviewIn June 2018, Weiner, Lande, and Jordan [1] presented their research of the existing literature, asit related to makerspaces and engineering education. While the focus of that research was onhow makerspaces are used for engineering education, their methodology identified the overallbody of makerspace-related literature that existed at that time, and broke the results into 12primary topics. They also found that, since 2013, only one article related to makerspaces hadbeen published by the Journal of Engineering Education, and 68 had been published asconference proceedings. Furthermore, they also noted that only 26% of the total articles werefocused on makerspaces as
included in the communitypartnerships with two main foci: middle school robotics leagues and a community makerspace.Two surveys (Pre and Post course) helped to identify initial impressions and changes in students’(1) understanding of community partner’s geographic location, (2) impressions of location, (3)propensity to frequent a business in that location, and (4) knowledge of actual persons residing inthe community. Students were asked to write reflections after S-L site visits which acted asassessments of their growth in understanding of course concepts. The reflections were also usefulto see the students’ perception of professional growth and their perception of the community andtheir impact on it.Initial surveys indicated that news and word of
teaching focused professor where he is heavily involved in design education and diversity studies.Dr. Steffen Foss Hansen Steffen Foss Hansen currently is Associate Professor in Regulatory Engineering at the Technical Univer- sity of Denmark (DTU), Department of Environmental Engineering and NanoDTU. He has a Master of Techn. Soc. from Roskilde University, a PhD degree in environmental engineering from DTU and a Doc- tor Technices (dr.techn.) from DTU. He conducts research into 1) how science and engineering can best be used in regulatory settings in situations pervaded by scientific uncertainty and complexity and 2) risk analysis, regulation and governance of nanotechnologies, and the applicability of decision-making
-term study abroad course through Mon- tana State University and an introduction to engineering education course at the Central New Mexico Community College. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Comparative Approaches to Accessibility Education in the United States and RussiaAbstractDifferences in national contexts have led to uneven global development of transportation systemsthat are accessible to people with disabilities. The World Health Organization promotes theworldwide implementation of education and professional training programs to foster a mindsetsupportive of accessibility [1]. The education of future engineers is an essential component inthis
(ordinary) teaching. The results can guide the educators and education decision makersto adopt appropriate technologies especially robotics as pedagogical tools to enhance the teachingand learning outcomes and effectiveness. The limitations and future directions of the research arealso discussed.1. IntroductionBased on years of teaching experiences of undergraduate mechanical engineering courses, it isrealized that there are many mechanical engineering concepts that are fully or partly abstract innature. For example, torque, moment, pneumatics, hydraulics, etc. It is experienced that studentsusually feel difficulty to comprehend such concepts when they are taught such concepts intraditional classroom settings. The difficulty level becomes higher