Paper ID #25235Expanding and Evolving an Innovation ConcentrationDr. Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas Dr. Karl D. Schubert is a Research Professor and Director of Research for Innovation and Data Science Initiatives for the College of Engineering and the Sam M. Walton College of Business in the College of Engineering at the University of Arkansas. His academic research focuses on providing Innovation programs for STEM education; and, student, faculty and industry innovation engagement. Schubert also serves as a consultant specializing in innovation, entrepreneurship, technology and organizational opti
involving students in curriculum development and teaching through Peer Designed Instruction.Mr. Luis Miguel Procter, University of Texas, El Paso Luis M. Procter is currently pursuing a B.S. degree in engineering leadership with the University of Texas at El Paso, where he is an undergraduate Research Assistant.Anita D. Patrick, University of Texas, Austin Anita Patrick is a STEM Education Doctoral Student in the Department of Curriculum and Instruction, and Graduate Research Assistant in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at The University of Texas at Austin. She received her BS in Bioengineering from Clemson University where she tutored undergraduate mathematics and science courses, and mentored undergraduate
of education is likely tolead to a career in an engineering related field, there is a clear need to understand the factorswhich influence female students’ decisions to enroll in higher education engineering courses.There are many influences on students’ choices to pursue specific career paths. For example,how students conceive a particular discipline or career will influence this decision, as what theybelieve it to involve will likely affect their interest in engaging with it. In engineering, studentsoften have misconceptions regarding what it means to be an engineer and the Draw-an-EngineerTest (DAET) has frequently been used to investigate these misconceptions.Studies using DAET have found that young students typically conceive engineers
.” immediately upon graduation.”Placement and Structure in Formal CurriculumThe location of ESI in the formal curriculum can send certain messages in the hidden curriculum.ABET mandates that students in accredited programs demonstrate the attainment of ESIoutcomes [18], but departments and programs have significant autonomy over how thoseoutcomes are achieved. Decisions regarding how ESI is taught are the confluence of a range offactors such as curricular space, faculty expertise and teaching load, and university generaleducation requirements. These decisions have implications beyond the course setting in whichstudents receive formal exposure to these topics. An interviewee described his perspective on theimportance of placement in the curriculum. I
the Idea of a University [1]. In those discourses, he argued thatinteractions between students outside of the classroom are as important for learning as theclassroom. It is in the discussions they have that learning is accomplished. Newman was notreferring to engineering per se, but to mixed groups of students and he was concerned withlearning for life. The 1998 MIT task force report defined a community as a “…students,faculty members, staff and alumni who have come together on campus for the commonpurposes of developing the qualities that define an educated person” [27]. Such communitieshave the goal not only of learning but of helping the student to learn about himself/herself. Itshould be noted that Tacaks and Chambliss found that not all
tracked for five semestersbeyond.Foundationally, this engineering major discernment study is theoretically founded in SocialCognitive Career Theory (SCCT) to consider students decisions14-15. SCCT is used to evaluate thegoals, outcomes expectations, and self-efficacy beliefs14. An engineering education based studyon engineering major discernment used SCCT by VanDeGrift and Lao reported that courseprojects, faculty advisory interactions, and other laboratory experiences were influential inengineering major selection. The current study expects to reveal that other targeted courseexperiences would likewise influence students16.Research Questions: 1. How effective is the engineering informed decision making module at meeting its intended goals
2004-2008, and a Research Associate in the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology during 2003-2004. Dr. Fu is an Associate Editor of the Journal of Control Science and Engineering, and has been served as the International Program Committee Member and Organizer of several international conferences and workshops. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Trifecta of Engagement in an Online Engineering Management CourseAbstractThis paper focuses on how to engage students in an online environment. The Trifecta ofEngagement framework is introduced. In order for students to be fully engaged in
who are not studyingengineering, our majors also need to be considered. For students preparing for careers inengineering, stories can show the human side of engineering and technology along with elementsof engineering practice. They can be used to cover important elements of engineering that do notcome across in courses that emphasize engineering analysis or practical experience with a giventechnology. Stories that can be used to tell non-majors about engineering and technology canalso be used to show our majors why their course material is important and how it can be used.These accounts can be used to put the material in the larger systems context.In a traditional classroom setting, stories are often told in lectures. Faculty are currently
education.Today’s traditional-aged college students belong to Generation Z, which is the generationalcohort following the Millennial Generation. Generation Z begins with those born from 1995 to1998 depending on the reference consulted (Vision Critical, 2016; Patel, 2017; Beall, 2017;Tullier & Paris, 2018). They currently represent 25% of the population in the United States andare the fastest growing generation to be represented in the US workforce (Beall, 2017; Tullier &Paris, 2018).Generation Z’s career-related goals and aspirations do not immediately illuminate their desire topursue an entrepreneurial path. According to one study, when considering their future careers,members of Generation Z reported they care about work life balance, job
. Despite this, the nation still struggles to produce the ENG talent it needs. Given this, programs to increase the number of ENGs that graduate have been promoted across the nation [1]-[3]. Such programs focus on recruitment [4], retention principles [5], persistence [6], as well as practices that help students with critical thinking [7]-[8], academics [9]-[10] and professional development [11]-[12]. The latter includes mentoring by faculty [13]-[14], peer mentoring [15], project-based learning [16]- [26], research experiences for undergraduates (REUs) [27]-[28], internships [29], preparing for graduate school [30], career planning [31], etc. We at Arizona State University’s (ASU’s) Fulton Schools of Engineering, have
rewarding career path 4) Prepare students to make informed choices about their academic and career options by providing them with information regarding the vast number of engineering career paths 5) Help students identify “false positives”- that is, allow students who think they want to be engineers to explore the field and to figure out if engineering is for them within the safe environment of their high school classroom ENGR 102 HS benefits high school students by allowing them to: 1) Explore an introduction to engineering and the engineering profession without having to commit to a semester’s worth of engineering courses at the University
implications across time and within ict studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2):486 – 499, 2012. ISSN 0001-8791. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879111001126.[13] R. A. Ash, J. L. Rosenbloom, L. Coder, and B. Dupont. Personality characteristics of established IT professionals I: Big Five personality characteristics. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, 2006. pp. 983?989.[14] Nicole Zarrett, Oksana Malanchuk, Pamela Davis-Kean, and Jacquelynne Eccles. Examining the gender gap in it by race: Young adults decisions to pursue an it career. Women and information technology: Research on underrepresentation, pages 55–88, 02 2006.[15] S. Katz, J. Aronis, D. Allbritton
by President Obama as a Champion of Change for Women in STEM, and participates in a number of diversity-enhancement programs at the university including serving as the Deputy Chair of the Women’s Commission and as a member of the ADA Task Force.Miss Catherine McGough, Clemson University Catherine McGough is currently a graduate research assistant in Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University. She obtained her B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Clemson University in 2014. Her research interests are in undergraduate engineering student motivations and undergraduate engineer- ing problem solving skill development and strategies.Joseph Murphy, Clemson University Joseph Murphy is a Fall 2018 graduate of
student learning and success, and the impact of a flexible classroom space on faculty teaching and student learning. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan Trevion Henderson is a doctoral student in the Center for Higher and Postsecondary Education (CSHPE) at the University of Michigan. He recently earned his master’s degree in Higher Education and Student Affairs at The Ohio State University while serving as a graduate research associate with the Center for Higher Education Enterprise. Trevion also hold’s a Bachelor’s degree in
is to retain and graduate at least 95% of these scholars.To enhance the success of these scholars, a zero-credit six-week orientation course wasdeveloped in Fall 2017 focusing on four dimensions of student wellness: academic, financial,social, and personal. This paper describes the development of this course, its content, and themodifications that were made to the course for Fall 2018.The paper will also address the research conducted in order to generate knowledge about theprogram elements that will be essential for the success of vertical transfer programs at otheruniversities. Two research instruments are described: an online survey and a focus groupinterview that were developed, and administered to the transfer scholars in their first
provided by a team of fourgraduate student TAs. With the guidance of an experienced faculty member, TAs recorded video lectures,prepared and led in-class and lab-based sessions, and created online homework assessments that could beautomatically graded by the online course management system.Successful implementation of a flipped classroom model was achieved and although challenges wereencountered, the success of the course was based on course evaluations, student and teaching assistantfeedback, and improvements in biomechanics related knowledge as assessed by concept inventory assessments.Knowledge acquisition over the course of the semester was demonstrated by a 38% gain score demonstratingincreased knowledge using the Biomechanics Concept
undergraduate at Montana State University studying Industrial and Management Systems Engineering with a minor in Mathematics. Monika is the president of MSU’s Out in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (oSTEM) chapter, a cross-country ski coach, and an avid outdoors-person. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Do I Think I’m an Engineer? Understanding the Impact of Engineering Identity on RetentionAbstractPolicymakers, industry leaders, and educators have pointed to a need to graduate an increasingnumber of students with engineering degrees to fill anticipated job growth and maintain thenation's level of global economic competitiveness
members impact student success [21]. Further, studentretention in their major is impacted by the quality of academic advising received [22]. Thedisconnect between degree and employment for ET students perceive a lower career availabilityfor these students, causing them to switch majors, a suggestion backed up by a study showingthat career availability is closely linked to student retention [23].Peer mentoring has been shown to increase both retention and self-esteem among collegestudents [24]. Campus mentors provide students with helpful information that can equip studentswith skills to deal with academic challenges and can help students make decisions, as shown in astudy of first-generation college students [25]. Thus, in general, the support
environment more closelyresembling the workplace. (5) Students are looking for a professional social environment thatnurtures both their professional interests and personal relationships.While many, if not all, of the above motivating factors may be readily accomplished through moretraditional academics and instructor-led design courses, the availability of these are not alwayssufficient to meet the need of the student population. Schools without an existing aerospace degreegranting program may not be able to offer formal aerospace design course opportunities due to alack of faculty and resources. Funding additional faculty, even as adjunct, can easily prove cost-prohibitive unless sponsored by a long term grant or industry partner. Even in cases
oreven rewards for their contribution”4. Additionally, NSF encourages REU programs to includefreshmen and sophomore students, adding pressure to programs to prepare lower-level studentsthrough an apprenticeship model traditionally used for advanced-level graduate students.Although typical graduate students working in apprenticeship programs are surrounded by socialrelationships and activities through which the core practices of the engineering community aremade visible over long periods of time, the same may not be true for typical REU studentsworking under shortened timeframes and in more peripheral conditions. Typical REU studentsare legitimately involved in specific laboratory practices but their participation in the field atlarge remains
-Year Students Stephen Roberts, Fazil Najafi, Curtis TaylorAbstractAccording to the National Science Board, an increase in the admission of students fromunderrepresented populations will be needed to improve current enrollment trends at institutionsof higher education. In particular, studies show that enrollment, retention, and graduation rates ofengineering students from underrepresented populations (i.e., women, ethnic minorities) havehistorically been lower than those of other student populations. In addition, studies suggeststudents from underrepresented populations face unique and amplified issues that impede theirpersistence and degree completion. These impediments can include inadequate K-12 preparation,social
perspective to support equity-and inclusion-oriented initiatives in educa- tion. Damian is currently a graduate student participating in San Diego State University’s Master’s in Education Program specializing in Critical Literacy and Social Justice.Dr. Perla Lahana Myers, University of San Diego Perla Myers is Professor of Mathematics at the University of San Diego (USD), where she has been on the faculty since 1999. She earned her B.S. in Mathematics from the University of Houston, and her M.A. and Ph.D. in Mathematics from the University of CalDr. Odesma Onika Dalrymple, University of San Diego Dr. Odesma Dalrymple is an Associate Professor and Faculty Lead for the Engineering Exchange for Social Justice, in the Shiley
course that brings exciting, newtechnologies and skills to a first-year PBL course with the aim of enhancing engagement andproviding an authentic multidisciplinary, creative design process that includes student-proposedprojects. At the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, a large R1 research institution, an effort todevelop engagement, community and connections between freshmen and faculty began with thedevelopment of a required, one-credit first semester course. This course covers topics importantto all new university students – selecting a major, exploring extracurricular opportunities, writinga resume, appreciating diversity and understanding ethics – and for three years it was expandedto add a faculty co-instructor, who led a small
Paper ID #25949Why Don’t Commuter-school Students Pursue Start-ups?Dr. David G. Novick, University of Texas, El Paso David G. Novick, Mike Loya Distinguished Chair in Engineering and Professor of Engineering Education and Leadership, earned his J.D.at Harvard University in 1977 and his Ph.D. in Computer and Informa- tion Science at the University of Oregon in 1988. Before coming to UTEP he was on the faculty of the Department of Computer Science and Engineering at the Oregon Graduate Institute and then Director of Research at the European Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Engineering. At UTEP he has served in a number
the role of the faculty mentor [13],[15], [16]. Perez and Gong [17] found that the main factors impacting minority students’ accessto graduate school included cost, knowledge of available graduate programs, understanding ofgraduate study and research in general, and career relevance of the graduate degree options.B. Purpose of the StudyA main purpose of this study was to explore the impacts of undergraduate students' researchexperiences on their perceptions of career goals, graduate school, research knowledge and skills,and engineering career path at a Southwestern public research university in the United States(US). The following research questions guided this study. 1. How does the REU influence students’ career goals? 2. How does the
how a women’s support group in a computer science and engineeringdepartment can provide support for women in personal growth, social encouragement, andacademic exposure.Studies found that the top four influencing factors for whether or not young women decide topursue a Computer Science degree are: social encouragement, self-perception, academicexposure, and career perception [1]. Social encouragement can come from parents, friends,faculty/staff, or peer. It is a major factor in girls’ decision to explore and pursue career in STEMand computing. A support group provides an excellent vehicle for these factors by offeringworkshops, social events, outreach activities, and mentoring.In 2013, we started a support group WiCSE (Women in Computer
little training, students are allowed to use tools andmaterials to create objects and complete projects, both personal and for class. Theinformal learning space is the perfect place for students to explore, push themselves anddevelop their ability to struggle through ambiguity, persevere in the face of challenges,and drive towards an end result. Through active participation in the space, studentsbecome part of the SIL community and culture, allowing them to learn fromexperienced members of the space and share their work with others, as they engage in avariety of making projects.The Mobile Makerspace Redesign ChallengeThe IDC on which this study focused was to redesign and improve the university’s newlyacquired mobile makerspace, to better meet
program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.”Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty ofColor, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate Students of Color. She is past-VicePresident (2017) of the Pacific Sociological Association, and an appointed consultant to the AmericanSociological Association’s Departmental Resources Group. Fluent in both quantitative and qualitativeresearch methodologies, her research uses theories from interdisciplinary sources including cultural stud-ies, critical race, gender and feminist theories. Central to her work are questions of culture, power andinequality. She is affiliated faculty with the Department of
of Puerto Rican institutions. The rubric for the joint case study is given in Table 1. Student assessments from the joint case study provide evidence for the evaluation of ABET Student Outcome (3): An ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences. For each Student Outcome, we determine if 80% of students have reached the two highest levels (out of four total levels) of several performance indicators.4. Faculty hiring practices – LUC screens all faculty applicants for an understanding of and commitment to social justice. Faculty search committee members rank applicants on a number of variables including “Evidence of Commitment to Diversity and Social Justice.” To further embrace social justice, the Director
Mechanical Engineering at Florida Institute of Technology. Her research focuses on the impact of motivation on performance and persistence in mechanical engineering design courses under the guidance of Dr. Beshoy Morkos. She also serves as a graduate student advisor to senior design teams within the mechanical engineering department. Elisabeth is a member of ASME, ASEE, Tau Beta Pi Engineering Honor Society and Pi Tau Sigma International Mechanical Engineering Honor Society.Miss McKenzie Carol Clark, Florida Institute of TechnologyDr. Beshoy Morkos, Florida Institute of Technology Beshoy Morkos is an associate professor in the Department of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at the Florida Institute of Technology where he