Chordsuses a computer program called Processingto run Code and Chords modules. Thesemodules can all be accessed on Github.Modules were meant to be interactive forusers, giving space to change the code and,in turn, change the presenting visual.2.) “takes in audio”: Code and Chords software can take in audio from one or more audioinputs. In our workshops, this often means singing into attached microphones that areconnected to a soundboard and then to a main laptop to be projected for a group. Itcould mean anything from singing into a laptop microphone to using many attachedmicrophones to connecting MIDI instruments.3.) “creates a real time visual display”: As the audio is being interpreted by Processing, itpresents itself on your laptop as a changing
semester. The final project requires students to design a space truss and test itusing a provided Matlab program.Table 2: Statics Sections taught by Author with Enrollments between Fall 2008 and Fall 2013 Section 1 Section 2 Section 3Fall 2008 Phase 2 (54) Phase 2 (100) Phase 2 (103)Spring 2009 Phase 2 (69) Phase 2 (76)Fall 2009 Phase 2 (56) Phase 2 (104) Phase 2 (109)Spring 2010 Phase 3 (65) Phase 2 (71)Fall 2010 Phase 2 (54) Phase 2 (96)Spring 2011 Phase 2 (53) Phase 3 (114)Fall 2011 Phase 2 (97
engineering education practitioners whohave identified issues in the discipline and are interested in enacting change in the higherinstitutional setting. Such work has implications for engineering education reform and organizingpossibilities toward enabling educators to seed the changes they seek.Background: Prior Research and Fields of InfluenceOne of the main fields of inquiry for this research project has been how to leverage and query thepossibility for social movement organizing in academia from the ground up while demanding forand advocating for change at the institutional level. For our analytical purchase andcontributions, we look to social movement studies in STS, our own prior research into organizingwork in higher academic institutional
in a style that should be interesting and accessible tostudents and is not overly long. However, it is somewhat dated. The paper could form the basisfor in-class discussion or a written reflection if an instructor generated appropriate prompts.There are also more detailed case studies related to privacy that would be good vehicles forinstruction, including Google Street View [40, 41] and “optimizing schools” [42]. These cases donot explicitly discuss a human rights perspective, so this framing would need to be added by theinstructor.Right to Property – Article 17Article 17 relates to the right to own and not “be arbitrarily deprived of [ ] property” [1]. Thisrelates to civil engineering and the use of eminent domain for projects, which is of
her role at University of North Carolina at Charlotte, she was employed as a project engineer at SKA Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the building solutions group for 7 years. Her job responsibilities included performing forensic investigations to determine condition of building structural components; including concrete, masonry, wood and steel; preparing remedial designs; and performing construction administration. She is currently a second year PhD student in Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.Dr. Sandra Loree Dika, University of North Carolina, Charlotte Dr. Sandra Dika is Associate Professor and Graduate Program Director of educational research, mea
-to- bioengineering-be-010j-spring-2006.[4] J. Craytib Oruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, "Introduction to Biomedical Engineering," Univeristy of Florida, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://www.bme.ufl.edu/course_listings/BME1008.[5] J. Knapp, J. Zeratsky and B. Kowitz, Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days, New York: Simon & Schuster, 2016.[6] R. Wagh, "Using Scrum for Software Engineering Class Projects," in AGILE India Conference(AGILEINDIA), Bengaluru, 2012.[7] V. Poliakova, "Using Google Ventures Design Sprint Framework for Software Product De- velopment in Startups," JAMK Univeristy of Applied Sciences, 2017.[8] Scrum.org, "Scrum.org The Home of SCRUM," 2019
Hegarty’s theoretical framework [22], students integrate both verbal and visuospatialinformation into a mental model of the concepts encoded within the representation. Thesefindings of the context-dependent nature of comprehension align well with the knowledge inpieces perspective of conceptual change, which posits that students’ conceptual knowledge is acollection of pieces that are cued depending on the context of the problem. While there is stillconsiderable debate about whether conceptual knowledge is in pieces or more monolithic [2],[7], [26], [27], we based our project on the knowledge-in-pieces perspective based on itsalignment with prior findings in the micro-level view of representations.The context-dependent nature of cognition has been
Engineering (BME) from The Ohio State University (OSU), before joining the OSU BME Department as an Assistant Professor of Practice in 2014. Her roles include designing and teaching undergraduate BME laboratory courses, and mentoring multidisciplinary senior capstone teams on rehabilitation engineering and medical device design projects. She also leads K-12 engineering outreach events, and is pursuing scholarship in student technical communication skills and preparing BME students for careers in industry. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress:Biomedical Engineering Students’ Perspectives on a Laboratory Technical Writing
of computer problemswhere the goal is to use computer tools (MathCad in this case) to set up a problem and examinethe effect of various parameters. These problems build on prior knowledge while providing adifferent context for learning. A sample computer analysis statement is also provided in theappendix. Approximately six computer projects are completed during the semester, alternatingweeks with the design problems.Specifications for Successful Submission: Students must submit a correct solution for eachproblem assigned. Computer problems often have their basis in either homework or designproblems, allowing students to cross-check portions of their solutions for correctness.Missing from the Process – ExamsOne item that is obviously missing
in technical areas, and still others suggest that women's departure islinked to a chilly climate.” When it comes to persisting, Fouad & Singh [1] asserted that whilesupport systems within organizations can influence the choice to stay, a decision to remain inengineering is best projected by a combination of organizational climate and psychologicalfactors.If the engineering education community understands the experiences faced by women inengineering careers, then they can help address underrepresentation and retention of this group.Engineering educators, engineering education programs, and engineering professional societiescan teach engineering students about the potential experiences that they may encounter andprovide them with the tools
and Evaluation Gale A. Mentzer, PhD, the owner and director of Acumen Research and Evaluation, has been a profes- sional program evaluator since 1998. She holds a PhD in Educational Research and Measurement from The University of Toledo and a Master of Arts in English Literature and Language—a unique combination of specializations that melds quantitative and qualitative methodologies. She and has extensive experience in the evaluation of projects focused on STEM education including evaluations of several multi-million dollar federally funded projects. Previously she taught graduate level courses for the College of Education at The University of Toledo in Statistics, Testing and Grading, Research Design, and Program
civil infrastructure; and (3) sustainabletransportation research. These projects are based in fundamental research, but in many cases,include field sites or testbeds located in rural communities. The objectives of this REU site are to(1) provide research experiences to undergraduate students from institutions with limitedresearch opportunities and from minority groups underrepresented in STEM; (2) provideparticipants with first-hand exposure to the engineering and infrastructure challenges facing therural United States through research and professional development opportunities in bothacademia and civil engineering industry; and (3) promote and sustain the interest ofundergraduate students in pursuing graduate education in STEM.Evaluation
who pursue different visions of the project outcomes, will tend to elaborate their arguments/ideas and may stumble across new, unexpected ways to solve their common problem.Figure 1. Social network with nodes color-coded for cliques. Four cliques emerge,shown as dark blue nodes, red nodes, teal nodes, and green nodes. The lines connectingeach agent represent social connections. For instance, agent 3 has social connectionswith agents 14, 9, and 20, but not with 25 or 15.
consider writing as a knowledgetransforming process, yet struggle with the “trifecta” of weak writing attitudes). As these data areanalyzed, we expect to highlight and unpack these tensions to better understand graduate studentsocialization processes and career trajectories.Future WorkThe future work for this project includes conducting the same survey and interview data from non-completers; in other words, those individuals who chose to depart from their doctoral programs atwhatever stage, for whatever reason. We expect that recruitment will be the most difficultchallenge in this stage. Likely, we will conduct interviews first, and then have our participantstake our survey, in order to develop rapport with sensitive populations. Most recruitment
of online modules infuture semesters. Students’ self-selected project topics indicate that in future semesters the topicsexplored in lecture should be expanded beyond cybersecurity issues to include social mediatopics, particularly cyberbullying body image issues.IntroductionCybersecurity is a growing concern for both the private sector and governments. It has enormousimplications for government security, economic prosperity and public safety. The number of databreaches in the education sector doubled during 2017, with only the financial and healthcaresectors having more breaches [3]. The cost of a data breach in U.S. education is higher than thecost in other sectors and countries [18]. Domains with “.edu” addresses are a high risk for
demonstrate the ways that these fourthreads are interwoven and interdependent.Research Approach: Systematic, Qualitative AnalysisThe biggest challenge of the research design for this project was the size and diversity of theLEES program in 2018: 13 technical sessions, 46 papers, 5 workshops and panels, and 2distinguished lectures. The complete program appears in Appendix A. The technical sessionsserved as the primary unit of analysis, which made the work more manageable but also requiredreading all of the papers associated with each session to discern each session’s unifying themes. 1 To capture at least some of what transpired in the
education. She has been involved in collaborative research projects focused on conceptual learning in chemistry, chemical engineering, seismology, and astronomy.Dr. Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University Dr. Michael Prince is a professor of chemical engineering at Bucknell University and co-director of the National Effective Teaching Institute. His research examines a range of engineering education topics, including how to assess and repair student misconceptions and how to increase the adoption of research- based instructional strategies by college instructors and corporate trainers. He is actively engaged in presenting workshops on instructional design to both academic and corporate instructors.Dr. Margot A. Vigeant
. The Chain Rule examples include: gaining weight,volume change, changing shadows, changing pendulum period, and inflating a balloon. TheProduct Rule examples include: changing number of apples, changing volume of a warehouse,and changing number of tiles. The Quotient Rule examples include: sharing lottery money, andchanging number of passengers in metropolitan area. To enhance understanding of the concepts, examples in this paper use discrete values thatcan help in developing good intuition for the different rules. Some examples are based on dailyexperiences while other examples are STEM-focused.The Bigger picture This work is part of a multi-modal integrated project aimed at visual, intuitive, andengaging understanding of
as a consulting engineer in Colorado and Texas. Prior to joining the UNL faculty, she was a faculty member at Union College in Schenectady, NY. Dr. Jones has been a principal investigator or co-principal investigator on over 25 research projects. She has authored or co-authored over 50 papers and served as committee chair for over 25 Masters and Doctoral students. Since 2008, she has served as one of the faculty advisors for the University of Nebraska’s Chapter of En- gineers Without Borders-USA. Dr. Jones has received numerous awards for her leadership, mentoring and teaching including most recently the 2015 Holling Family Distinguished Teaching / Advising / Mentoring Award from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
paired F/T-LEARN cohort (FTIC students only for F-LEARN comparisongroup, transfer students only for T-LEARN comparison group); 2) first academic term ofenrollment is similar to the paired F/T-LEARN cohort; 3) declared as STEM in their first term(see Appendix A for a list of CIP codes that map to STEM majors for this project); 4) have notparticipated in another Living-Learning Community or other Enriching Learning Experience(e.g. honors in the major, National Merit Scholars, mentoring programs, etc.); and 5) have acumulative GPA similar to the F/T-LEARN cohort (high school GPA for FTIC; previousinstitution GPA for transfer students), which was done by computing the minimum andmaximum high school GPA or previous institution GPA for the F/T-LEARN
facilitate this. Alearner-centered approach requires that students are engaged and become responsible for theirown learning process and that the instructor becomes a facilitator of their learning, instead ofbeing the center of their learning process. When I taught using the flipped-classroom learningenvironment, my students watched videos outside of the classroom and took online quizzes totest their understanding. In the classroom, students applied their learning by completingindividual or team activities and projects, with my guidance, on their own chosen topics ofinterest.The main problemThe main problem when you transition from one paradigm to another is that, as explained at thebeginning, your expertise and previous success in one paradigm, does
measurement schema. We set out to use the validated linkbetween overt behaviors and cognitive states to develop a tool that allowed students to report ontheir own cognitive engagement. As the ICAP theory suggests, cognitive engagement is influencedby the environment in which student learning takes place. Despite educators developingcurriculum (i.e. homework, projects, writing assignments, etc.) to influence student’s out-of-classenvironment, cognitive engagement outside the classroom is rarely addressed in the literature onSTEM students. One of the unique contributions of our instrument is the measurement of cognitiveengagement in two distinct environments: inside the classroom and outside the classroom. Wedeveloped a measurement schema that prompted
STEAM MachinesTM outreach camps across the Navajo Nation with the ambition to expand to Tohono O’odham Nation.Dr. Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus SHAWN JORDAN, Ph.D. is an Associate Professor of engineering in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of En- gineering at Arizona State University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER
Paper ID #27165Research Paper: Where Do We Meet? Understanding Conference Participa-tion in a Department of Engineering EducationMr. Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury, Virginia Tech Tahsin Mahmud Chowdhury is a PhD student at Virginia Tech in the department of Engineering Edu- cation. Tahsin holds a BSc. degree in Electrical and Electronics Engineering from IUT, Dhaka and has worked as a manufacturing professional at a Fortune 500. He is actively engaged in different projects at the department involving teamwork, communication and capstone design with a focus on industrial engineering practice.Ms. Ashley R. Taylor, Virginia Tech
professionals in STEM-related careers. 7. Increase student motivation to follow through with next steps to fulfill STEM career decisions. 8. Increase student interest in working on STEM projects in the future. 9. Increase student commitment to continue studies and/or professional development in a STEM area.Description of ProgramSISTEM was a grant-funded program that offered high school participants the opportunity tolearn about a variety of STEM careers. The program took place at a university in the southwestregion of the United States. SISTEM met once per week for five consecutive weeks. All of theparticipants arrived in the evening, ate a complimentary dinner, and then attended a briefinformation session or “lightning” talk on a
undergraduate engineering courses, such as a fluid mechanics course [2], a first-year introductory engineering course [3], a hybrid thermodynamics course [4], and project-baseddesign courses [5]. Best practices [1] have been established by educators from severaluniversities.Continuous-time signals and systems (CTSS) is a fundamental electrical and computerengineering course in which students are introduced to mathematical models for commonengineering signals and systems. The CTSS course is typically prerequisite to other ECEcourses, such as digital signal processing, control systems, and communication systems. Theconcepts found in a CTSS course are among the most conceptually difficult [7-8] in a typicalECE curriculum. To that end, many attempts have
serve as enhancement or replacement toconventional instruction. Hennessy et al. [13] concluded that instructors prefer computer-based technologies since they allow not only to replicate the real experiments, but also toexplore "what-if" scenarios. To that end, many scholars investigated the use of simulation-based instructional materials. For example, Montevechi et al. [14] examined the use ofdiscrete event simulation and how it can be used to increase students' understanding of thereal systems in conceptual models, where Lego Mindstorms' robot application was used asan example for the project. Skoogh et al. [8] examined ways to include simulation as partof learning objectives by including objectives to learn discrete event simulation.This
practice and reflection doing normal activities such as eating, moving, and journaling.MethodsOur participants in this study were undergraduate engineering students—mostly first- and second-year and from various demographic backgrounds—who took the course on engineering thrivingduring 2018. We examined changes in students’ scores on gratitude, meaning, and mindfulness atthree time-intervals: a pretest the first day of class (n = 12), a post-test the last day of class (n =12), and a follow-up six months later (n = 5). Part of a larger project (NSF #1626287), we measuredthese competencies using a previously validated survey [26] that examined the impact of variousnon-cognitive and affective factors on engineering student success. For gratitude
program includes up to 40 participants, rising juniors or seniors at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), who have interest in pursu- ing STEM disciplines at the graduate-level. Annually, Dean Vaughan supervises direction of the 4-week FAME/UD Summer Residential Program for 30-35 high school students, the RISE Summer Enrichment Program for incoming engineering freshmen and, in the past, the HEARD (Higher Education Awareness Response in Delaware) Project, a college awareness program, funded by the Department of Education through Philadelphia GEAR UP for College Network. Globally in the College, he manages academic programs and policies that impact the careers of all engineering students at both the
M.S. in operations research in 1973 and his Ph.D. in IE in 1975 from Stanford University, and his MCE from UAA in 1999.Dr. Jerome P. Lavelle, North Carolina State University Jerome P. Lavelle is Associate Dean of Academic Affairs in the College of Engineering at North Carolina State University. His teaching and research interests are in the areas of engineering economic analysis, decision analysis, project management, leadership, engineering management and engineering education.Dr. Neal A. Lewis, Fairfield University NEAL A. LEWIS, CPEM, received his Ph.D. in engineering management in 2004 and B.S. in chemical engineering in 1974 from the University of Missouri–Rolla and his MBA in 2000 from the University of New