the flowgraphs discussed in this paper. We briefly present an assessment surveyregarding student preferences for working with SDR systems. Finally, we conclude with asummary of our findings and recommendations for other communication experiments.PreliminariesRecommended Hardware and Development EnvironmentThere is a wide selection of SDR hardware available, with many good choices for the purposespresented herein10. Given the requirements of the projects, the recommended choice is theHackRF One open-source SDR, along with ANT500 antenna11. The HackRF One offers half-duplex transceiver capability, sampling rates up to 20 MSPS, operating frequency of 1 MHz to 6GHz, USB powered connection, SMA RF connection with programmable gain, and
Adolescence, Contemporary Educational Psychology, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #27418and Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. She received a Spencer Foundation Grant in 2007to examine academic prospects, interpersonal relationships, and social well-being of students in schooldistricts with a high concentration of students of Arab and Chaldean origins. Recently, she received in-ternal grants from the University of Toledo to conduct mindfulness intervention projects with elementaryschool students and preservice teachers. She is also the recipient of the Fulbright Specialist Fellowship
, Najran University I, Mohamed Khairi, my bachelor degree in computer science. I did my Masters in system science from University of Ottawa, Canada. My PH.D was in ”Master Data Management” from University of Phoenix. I have over 20 years of experience in IT industry - ten of them with Microsoft in Redmond, WA. Currently I’m assistant professor at University of Najran. In addition of teaching and Research I’m coordinator of graduation projects and field training for computer and information system college. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Global Marketplace and American Companies in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)Abstract In a
on co-ed groupprojects that showed that boys tend to take on more valued project roles and control access totools and materials, while girls end up in administrative roles [15], [16]. To evaluate the successof a single sex approach, researchers have examined single-sex after school programs and specialgirls-only programs within co-ed schools. For example, Fadigan and Hammrich [17] examined amuseum program for girls and showed that the program created a space for girls that supported apositive sense of self.On the other hand, there are practitioners and researchers that critique the idea of separating girlsby saying, for example, that girls need, eventually, to work in mixed spaces therefore it is best tofocus on their ability to navigate
are easily within the capability of a CAD system;however, the instructor did not have sufficient preparation time to create an efficient process toplace braille dimensions on drawings, and so these were not used.Class sessions and learning to sketchThe course goal was for the student to learn to communicate using standard conventions ofengineering graphics for 3D mechanical parts. This ability would enable the student tocommunicate ideas in subsequent design classes with peers on teams as well as contribute insome work settings. Learning to follow engineering graphic conventions was the base leveloutcome. Many of these conventions can be enacted algorithmically, much as a CAD systemcan automatically generate orthographic projections given
developed VR hardware and software to be used in undergraduate STEM curricula. Under his direction, his students have devel- oped over fourteen different software packages to be used in such educational fields as electromagnetics, vector calculus, statics, and materials science: all topics where students can benefit from a rich visual ex- perience. Will currently advises twelve undergraduates in scientific visualization projects. Additionally, Will is an avid collaborator with colleagues outside the engineering discipline and has demonstrated visu- alization and virtual reality applications in psychology, foreign languages, photography, drawing, music, and library science. He is co-author of the textbook ”Developing
favorable feedback.IntroductionFrom the experience of multiple instructors shared in course coordination meetings forMechanics of Materials and Machine Design, it was observed that students particularly struggledwith different stages of working with combined loading. This struggling included fundamentalprerequisite issues on drawing the correct free-body diagrams in three dimensions, connectingthe loads with their respective normal and shear stresses, and resolving the correct directions andstress distributions for combining the calculated stresses.The issue is particularly important because the topic is a fundamental building block for MachineDesign and any solid design project that engineers tackle. Furthermore, the issue was particularlydeemed
on incorporating life cycle assessment methods into geoenviron- mental and geotechnical engineering to provide decision-making tools for the environmental sustainabil- ity of infrastructure and remediation projects. She researches and implements evidence-based teaching strategies in engineering education and has extensive experience with recruitment and retention of under- represented students. Dr. Gallagher also participated in the development of the NSF ADVANCE funded Executive Leadership in Academic Technology and Engineering (ELATE) program at Drexel University. ELATE is a national leadership development program to advance senior women faculty into leadership.Dr. Andrea L. Welker, Villanova University Andrea L
a research project focusing on academic resilience as a psychological tool for improving student engagement. The ongoing research investigates the concur- rent validity of an instrument (ARS-30) with an existing instrument (CD-RISC), an academic resilience instrument posed to measure resilience in an educational context. Besides his interests in game-based ac- tivities around the scholarship of teaching and learning, he is also interested in evidence-based practices through systematic reviews, meta-analysis and empirical research on engineering education issues. In addition, he is interested in measuring inventories development by examining the psychometric properties of instruments in engineering education.Dr
. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. She has her doctorate in Engineering Education and her strengths include qualitative and mixed methods research study design and implementation. She is/was PI/Co-PI on 10 funded research projects including a CAREER grant. She has won several Virginia Tech awards including a Dean’s Award for Outstanding New Faculty. Her research expertise includes using motivation and related frameworks to study student engagement in learning, recruitment and retention in engineering programs and careers, faculty teaching practices and intersections of motivation and learning strategies.Prof. Tamara Knott, Virginia Tech Tamara Knott is Associate
, "The Fisk-Vanderbilt Master’s-to-Ph.D. Bridge Program: Recognizing, enlisting, and cultivating unrealized or unrecognized potential in underrepresented minority students," American Journal of Physics, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 374-379, 2011/04/01 2011.[4] R. Sowell, T. Zhang, B. N, and R. K, "PhD. Completion and Attrition: Analysis of Baseline Demographic Data from the Ph.D. Completion Project," Council of Graduate Schools2008.[5] (1/31/2019). National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, Survey of Earned Doctorates. Available: https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctorates/#tabs-1&sd[6] (1/31/2019). US News and World Reports 2019 Best Graduate School Rankings in
, male workforce that ignores systems of oppression.Our Proposed Use and Future WorkWithin the neighborhood context, we will attempt to use structural equation modeling to modelthe factors we have described prior into early measurement frameworks through: (1) the deliberatecreation of intersectional comparison groups, and (2) the weighting of variables based on genderedand racialized differences presented in various peer-reviewed literature and government reports.To create intersectional groups, we will follow the procedures outlined by Bahnson et al. [33] tocreate separate race-gender groups that go beyond controlling for race and gender (i.e. “Black-Women”, “Hispanic-Men, “White-Women”, etc). Within outside grant projects, we will thenassign
/64/papers/14871/view.[Accessed: March 29, 2018].[7] J. R. Rest, D. Navaez, S. J. Thoma, M. J. Bebeau, “DIT-2: Devising and testing a revisedinstrument of moral judgement,” J. Ed. Psych., vol. 91, pp. 644-659, Dec. 1999.[8] Q. Zhu, C. B. Zoltowski, M. Kenny Feister, P. M. Buzzanell, W. C. Oakes, A. D Mead, “Thedevelopment of an instrument for assessing individual ethical decision-making in project-baseddesign teams: Integrating quantitative and qualitative methods,” in 121st ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014, [Online]. Available:https://peer.asee.org/23130. [Accessed: Mar. 29, 2018].[9] L. Kohlberg, R. H. Hersh, “Stages of moral development,” Theory Pract., vol. 16, pp.53-59,Apr. 1977.[10
member, track chair, or senior program committee of several Data mining, Big Data, and Artificial Intelligence conferences, including ACM KDD, WWW, RecSys, IEEE Big Data, ICDM, SDM, AAAI, etc. In summer 2015, she served as Technical Mentor/Project Lead at the Data Science for Social Good Fellowship, in the Center for Data Science and Public Policy at the University of Chicago. She is a member of ACM, ACM SigKDD, senior member of IEEE and IEEE-WIE. She is also on the leadership team of the Kentucky Girls STEM collaborative network.Dr. Jeffrey Lloyd Hieb, University of Louisville Jeffrey L. Hieb is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Fundamentals at the Univer- sity of Louisville. He
levels of engagement.Objectives of the StudyThe purpose of this work-in-progress is to report a project that used the Chi and Wylie’s [7]Interactive, Constructive, Active, and Passive (ICAP) framework to survey the degree to whichLow-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LC-DLMs) helped foster different forms of cognitiveengagement as students learned about a venturi meter in a fluid mechanics and heat transfercourse.MethodParticipantsThe participants for this study were 67 undergraduate students of chemical engineering at a largepublic university in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Students were enrolled in juniorlevel Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer course, the only fluid mechanics course that chemicalengineering students in the
. In the second study, Reid et al., [4] focus on the course content in first yearengineering programs and found that objectives of engineering courses can be grouped into majorcategories (e.g., engineering skills, professional skills, orientation to the program from theviewpoint of the university, orientation to the engineering profession). These studies are criticalefforts that begin to tease out the differences in first-year engineering programs and courses, butthey do not provide insight into the direct experiential impact on students.This Work in Progress paper will give an overview of our interview procedures, recruitmentmethods, and selected participant. The larger project examines first-year engineering differences inthe context of the
University (2001). His past work experience includes eleven years at Delphi (formerly Delco Electronics) as an Advanced Project Engineer, eleven years at Whirlpool Corporation as a Lead Engineer/Solution Architect, and three years at Ivy Tech Community College as an Instructor/Program Chair of Pre-Engineering. Since 2015, he has been employed at the University of Southern Indiana as an Assistant Professor of Advanced Manu- facturing. He holds three patents, has served as an IEEE section officer since 2004, and has been a Licensed Profes- sional Engineer in the State of Indiana since 2005. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 It’s not a matter of time! (A
expected [10] for most situations. Rationalistic responseswere even found to questions that were supposed to elicit emotive responses. For example, afterbeing asked “In arriving at your decision, did you take into consideration the feelings orperspectives of anyone else? If so, how did this affect your decision making?”, Subject 155responded: “I took into consideration the kids who I guess ... who, who are LGBTQ+ or who have people in their lives who are close to them who are...then I looked at the perspective or I guess the, the benefits and downfalls of the class as a whole…”The emotive response was observed less often (39 out of 132 coded phrases or 30%), usually inone of two ways; first, subjects would project their own
perceptionsof doing engineering work, regardless of occupational title. We also believe that a sequentialregression model will show that engineering belief measures predict a significant proportion ofvariance in perceptions of having jobs “related to” engineering, over and above SCCT variables.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank the Purdue University Davidson School of Engineering, whosePipeline Center funded this project. This work was also supported by the NSF (DGE-1333468).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] E. Cech, “The Self-Expressive Edge of Occupational Sex Segregation
Abilitycultural differences and being able to 4.11 (0.905) 0.513conduct cross-cultural cooperationBeing able to organize and lead a team to 4.39 (0.849) 0.719expand the work Leadership andManaging one or more projects 4.38 (0.835) 0.749 Decision-Makingeffectively AbilityBeing able to make effective decisions in 4.41 (0.819) 0.661engineering and managementBeing equipped with good verbal ability 4.40 (0.825
officer 14%Dept Committee 9%Dean/Administrator 7%College Committee 4%University Administrator 2%External Entity 2%University Committee 0%Faculty members were selected by 93% of respondents. However, this response option is vague.For example, it could mean that they were solely responsible for approving a project proposed bystudents, or the faculty approval could be one step of a larger process. Faculty members werethe only approver indicated by 25 of 56 (45%) institutions. This implies no formal approvalprocess, yet it doesn’t rule out that they could be filing decisions with the department. This rateis 42% for doctoral
Paper ID #25506Student Perceptions of Interpersonal Skills Intertwined in an EngineeringClassroomMiss Carmen Angelica Carrion, Georgia Institute of Technology Doctoral studies in Science Education. Specifically in informal settings and through the application of problem based and project based learning.Prof. Joseph M. LeDoux, Georgia Institute of Technology Joe Le Doux is the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Learning and Experience in the Department of Biomedical Engineering at Georgia Tech and Emory University. Dr. Le Doux’s research interests in engineering education focus on problem-solving, diagrammatic reasoning, and on
in large-scale engineering classes have turned to using only onlinehomework-based systems such as Pearson’s Mastering, Wiley Plus, and/or McGraw Hill’sConnect to assess student learning. These systems provide content, grading and assessment ofstudent work, and feedback to students while solving problems. Previous research has shownthat students’ value both online and handwritten homework. Even students who disliked onlinehomework found it to be at least somewhat helpful. The current project investigates ifperformance on higher stake (e.g., more heavily weighted in overall grade) activities is betterthan on lower stake activities in a Dynamics class and a General Physics I class. In our researchonline homework, handwritten homework, and exams
mechanism for ensuring course consistency was the course andsubordinate lesson objectives, as approved by the department program director. In all cases, theseobjectives were not altered, either to increase or reduce content.Using lesson objectives as the guiding parameter, lesson restructuring followed a generallyconsistent pattern. First, any lessons under the 40 class format that were “drop periods” (used toprovide students with compensatory time) were eliminated from the schedule. Additionally,lessons used as working group sessions for larger projects and laboratories were rolled intoadjacent lessons that presented new material. It should be noted that this action reduced workinggroup session time from 55 minutes to a shortened period as allowed
in Journal of Educational Psychology, Contemporary Educational Psychology and Journal of Experimental Education, among other venues. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The influence of modeling on science self-efficacy among middle school students (evidence based practice paper: teaching approaches)Abstract Engineering lacks a presence in the k-12 classroom except through project or designbased curriculum, which is primarily used to teach science concepts. Educators often recommendincluding instructional strategies that create opportunities to increase a students’ self-efficacy toimprove student achievement in science
initially started the survey. After the surveys werecompleted and the responses were reviewed, the researcher noticed that several participants hadeither failed to identify their major or were in a non-engineering major. There were twenty-fourparticipants in twelve non-engineering majors that were deleted including project management,agricultural science, and criminal justice. There were seventeen participants who were deletedbecause they did not identify any major. This brought the number of participants down from 416to 375 for statistical analysis.The participants attended high school in twenty-four states, as well as, in foreign countries. Outof the respondents, 70.65% of the participants completed high school in Virginia. Sixty-sevenpercent of
location on the ambiguity spectrum.The National Science Foundation (NSF) has funded a three-year project to study this importantintellectual development of students in a typical STEM curriculum. Cross-sectional andlongitudinal studies of STEM students as well as non-STEM students at a Historically BlackCollege are being conducted to measure the influence of the current curriculum in context of theconstructs of tolerance of ambiguity, intellectual mental models, and STEM identity.This work-in-progress paper shares some preliminary results of the baseline data that has beencollected during the first year of the NSF-funded project.MethodThe participants of this within-subject and between-group quasi-experimental study are studentsof a Historically
design [25]. Table 1 outlines a list of validated creativityassessments and identifies them as measures of creative person, process or product.Attributes of assessment toolsThe intent of this project is not to judge assessment metrics, recognizing that differentapplications require different attributes and outcomes of assessment metrics. Instead, the intent isto provide guidelines for engineering educators and researchers interested in creativity forselecting appropriate metrics to be used in classrooms and research studies based on metricattributes. but rather to compile a These metrics are examined for applicability to science andengineering, ease of administration and completion, expertise required to score, cost toadminister, and time
the best fit to our students. Learning aspecific RTOS has the benefit of being able to utilize it immediately for projects. Nonetheless,the fast development and updates on the area of RTOS may cause the knowledge learned fromone specific RTOS outdated in some time and not applicable to another RTOS.Traditionally, teaching and learning RTOS are implemented in the following ways. First, weteach the students the design principles of RTOS and show them a ready-to use commercialRTOS. We call this a “top-down” approach. The benefit is that students will be able toimmediately deploy that specific RTOS [1]. However, without a thorough understanding of whyand how tasks are created and managed by the RTOS, students lack the skill set to pick up a
median full-time equivalent enrollment(approximately 2800 engineering undergraduates), our new policy and strategy lines up withsimilar institutions in their report (non-mandatory placement, department creation of test). Ourinstitution is unusual in that applied mathematics including calculus is taught within theengineering school and not by the university’s mathematics department. Therefore, ourplacement test can focus on those concepts and skills that are most needed by engineeringstudents.This paper reports on the development and implementation of a calculus placement test strategyfor engineering students as well as the results obtained and further plans.ObjectivesOur project was to create and deliver a placement test system that would