MethodsEvaluation of the REU Site was conducted by the Methodology and Evaluation Research CoreFacility (MERC) at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. The evaluation plan included surveysconducted with the students before and after their time in the program and focus group sessionsconducted with the students and interviews with their faculty mentors. The evaluation plan alsoincludes follow-up surveys with the participating undergraduate students one year after theircompletion of the program. The quantitative data collection (pretest, posttest) was conducted bythe University of Nebraska-Lincoln Office of Graduate Studies and the results were sent to theMERC for analysis and reporting. The qualitative data collection (i.e., interviews and focusgroup sessions
) from Carnegie Mellon University, and National Scholarship (2007; 2008) from China. Dr. Zhang has re- search interests in developing and leveraging advanced technologies to support construction engineering and management, construction automation, and sustainable infrastructure, including building information modeling (BIM), artificial intelligence (AI) [i.e., natural language processing (NLP), machine learning, and automated reasoning], virtual reality (VR), and construction robotics. His research has been sup- ported by Federal and State agencies such as Transportation Research Center for Livable Communities and Michigan Office of Highway Safety Planning. He has been awarded two National Science Founda- tion (NSF
that 52 percent of the supervisorsviewed the writing preparation of early career engineers as weak. This paper investigates a model for larger engineering departments that differssignificantly from the two common ones discussed above. This third model consists of a full-fledged writing course embedded within a large engineering design course that has 150 – 200students each semester. While small departments have attempted similar integrations with fewerthan 50 students [7, 8], this paper presents the second year of an experiment to do so at a largerscale with currently 75 students in the writing course and plans to scale to more than 100. Oneexample in the literature of such an effort has occurred at MIT [9]. Although this courseprovided
properly define the problemand formulate a plan [4].Kohl’s work on representations in Physics is related because it shows differences in how novicesand experts solve problems [1]. The difference is that novices tend to use more representationsand switch between them more often. Experts tend to use fewer representations and solve theproblem in a more straightforward way. This work will focus on the first representations used byexperts and novices.Previous work has been done in starting design problems. Yang et. al. studied the relationshipbetween early stage design activity and design outcome. Aspects of design such as sketching,dimensioned drawings, prototyping, designer experience, and time spent were correlated withdesign success [5] [6]. It was
questions: Likert scale, 6 2. Exam contribution to organizing research items ranging from strongly 3. Exam aiding to acquire information for research project disagree (1) to strongly 4. Exam broadening student knowledge agree (6) 5. Exam components well integrated with one another 6. Exam helping with PhD research plan 7. Exam instructions easy to follow 8. Exam being a worthwhile process Open-ended Your thoughts on the purpose of exam? Questions: Your suggestions for areas of improvement with the exam?Results and DiscussionA total of 56 doctoral candidates participated in
registered for the competition under a fictitious general contracting firm name. All thebidding documentation, addenda, and request for information (RFI) for a construction project, of$5-50M size, was managed through electronic Plan Rooms. Once registered, the bid committeeissued the Instructions to Bidders document to the teams, specifying all the biddingrequirements. Teams downloaded the documentation, from the Plan Room (web portal),including drawings, specifications, and contact documentation. Teams worked collaboratively toperform the quantity takeoffs for the project. To bring in the component of experiential learning,students were required to use Canadian Institute of Quantity Surveyors (CIQS) standards. Theywere also encouraged to use tools
to gather it, and substantial reflection on bothexpected and unexpected results. These problem-solving decisions are similar to the overarchingthemes identified by Polya: understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan andlooking back [8]. The results also agree with work on design problem solving by Jonassen,which emphasizes the importance of determining design requirements and creating constraints[9]. A detailed analysis of the interviews with unified terminology across the fields for the expertproblem-solving decisions is currently being developed and will be published elsewhere.The rest of this work described here focuses on the specific optics black box assessment, whichwas created based on common problem-solving
controller selection, 4) installation, and 5) cost analysis. Priorto departing, students participate in designing, prototyping and installing the system. These efforts haveproduced an open-source set of plans. The “Appalachian Street Lamp,” is an inexpensive system thatcan be deployed to remote locales that can access a cellular network but do not have grid power.These field courses emphasize key learning outcomes including: 1) use essential math and science skillsto solve applied science problems, 2) formulate, design, or develop a system, process, or program tomeet desired needs, 3) demonstrate the capacity to function in project teams, and 4) use thetechniques, skills, and technical tools necessary for professional practice in the discipline.A
, which focuses ondifferent tools and techniques commonly used in project management. The instructor observedthat a disconnect exists in his course between learning about the various project managementtools and techniques and how these are applied in engineering technology professions underconstraints such as cost, quality, safety, etc. Although the students learn how to create schedules,budgets, and risk management plans, they never learn if these management plans work becausethey don't get the opportunity to implement them. This type of exercise could be described ashalf learning. In order to close this gap, an innovative instructional module based on ProjectBased Virtual Simulation Tool was developed and implemented. It was anticipated that
Paper ID #27613Capstone Prepares Engineers for the Real World, Right? ABET Outcomesand Student PerceptionsDr. Kris Jaeger-Helton, Northeastern University Professor Beverly Kris Jaeger-Helton, Ph.D. is on the full-time faculty in the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering at Northeastern University (NU) teaching Simulation Modeling and Analy- sis, Human-Machine Systems, and Facilities Planning. She is the Director of the Galante Engineering Business Program as well as Coordinator of Senior Capstone Design in Industrial Engineering at NU. Dr. Jaeger-Helton has also been an active member of Northeastern’s Gateway
, international relations in the sphere of transport communications, iternational logistics and supply chain management, sustainable development and ecology.Mrs. Karalyn Clouser, Western Transportation Institute at Montana State University Karalyn Clouser is a GIS and planning specialist with the Western Transportation Institute. She has expe- rience editing and managing spatial data to support transportation planning and implementation projects, and offers skills with numerous GIS tools and platforms. At WTI, she has provided GIS and planning support to the Paul S. Sarbanes Transit in Parks Technical Assistance Center, which assists with the de- velopment of alternative transportation on federal lands. Her experience includes
learning in a senior/graduate mechatronics course. In [19], theauthors showed how virtual software and hardware environment can provide enhanced learningopportunities for mechatronics engineering technology majors. The project-based approach ofteaching mechatronics was presented in [20]. Development of a senior mechatronics course formechanical engineering students was described in [21]. In [22], the authors presented thedevelopment of an introductory mechatronics course for the students who had completed theirsecond year at the community college and planned on pursuing a bachelor’s degree in anengineering field. In [23], the authors investigated the use of agile methods enhancingmechatronics education through the experiences from a capstone
teaching plan to incorporate what they learned into their own teaching. Atthe end of the academic year, faculty participants are tasked with completing a final reflection. Inthis paper, we will report the content of the workshops as related to the overarching goals of theISE-2 program, along with how the coffee conversation topics complemented the workshopmaterial. Lastly, we will explore the role of the teaching plans and final reflections in changinginstructional practices.IntroductionImproving Student Experiences to Increase Student Engagement (ISE-2) focuses on a facultydevelopment program designed to reduce implicit bias and increase active learning in order toincrease underrepresented minority (URM), women, and first-generation students
, safety and quality management. His academic research and writings have been on concrete repairs, structural plastics and flash track project management were funded by the American Society of Civil Engineers and the Construction Industry Institute. Dr. Austin’s teaching and research interests cross the spectrum of the construction management, with a current focus on project management, construction equipment, planning and scheduling and research and teaching methodologies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #22689Tailoring Construction Management Instruction to the Emerging
and Technology(CET) at Northern New Mexico College (NNMC) has implemented a comprehensive strategyand work-plan to increase the retention rate and eventually the graduation rate of severelyunderprepared aspiring Engineering majors. The institute serves underrepresented minoritystudent population; nearly two-thirds of whom rely on Pell grants and more than 50% of themare first-generation college students. The institution’s struggle to retain general studentpopulation is evident from the following data: 78% retention from first to second semester, 66%retention from second to third semester, and the retention rate drops to 50% by the fourthsemester.The major goals of the project include: 1) Improve Engineering learning and learningenvironments
modules into courses was done gradually and 4 of the modules aredeployed in an elective course.“Business Principles and Entrepreneurship for Engineers and Scientists” is an elective course thataims to foster an entrepreneurial mindset and also introduce business, finance, and marketingknowledge and skills. This course incorporates 4 e-learning modules that cover business topics inrelation to entrepreneurial thinking, and provides experiences in identifying ideas that aredifferentiated from others, describing the potential for value creation, and communicating a visionthrough a business plan to stakeholders.The optional extracurricular activities consist of the following:• 24 Hour Imagination Quest: A two-day event, originally developed at
a four-year data sciencebachelor’s degree program that will include a data science decision-theater center and acurriculum that will utilize an active learning approach in most classes where students will workin teams with a faculty or mentor on real and relevant data science problems. Data science is anarea that utilizes competencies in computer science, statistics, research methods, and otherdomain focus areas (e.g., engineering, environment, and health) [11], [12]. Central to datascience is being able to work with and handle any forms of data (i.e., small, big, clean, messy,simple, and complex) using a lifecycle process of planning, collecting, processing, analyzing,preserving, sharing, and determining the course [13]–[18]. Because of
first months of the program, fellows are required to designate a faculty mentor. Thefellows must then meet with their mentor to develop a professional development plan (PDP) thatfocuses on areas of teaching, research, and/or outreach that have been identified as needingimprovement. As a part of their plan, fellows can interview faculty, shadow administrators,participate in faculty meetings, present a paper at a conference, or participate in predefinedactivities designed to teach them about the professoriate. Fellows submit a monthly report ofactivities completed as a part of the program. At the conclusion of the program, each fellow willhave completed an electronic portfolio detailing his or her work, developed separate teaching andresearch
. For example, the tool cabinet facing the pod that houses teams 1-4, hasfour distinct shelves labeled for each team; the shelve reserved for team 1 is shared amongstteam 1 members across all six classes, and so on for each additional team within each class.Some of the items supplied within these tool cabinets include hand tools, non-consumablesupplies for experimentation, and binders containing hard copies of lesson plans. Also locatedwithin the EG makerspace are team cabinets that store individual team totes. Team cabinets aresupplementary to the tool cabinets and respective totes store items that are not conducive tosharing amongst other teams, such as individual safety glasses, electronics components, and partsused to construct individual
career in information technology to developadditional cybersecurity skills to use in their current position or to prepare them for advancementinto a new position. Alternately, it could serve as a way to demonstrate the knowledge andexperience required to allow someone to switch from a career in a completely different field intoinformation technology and cybersecurity.The suggested completion plan for the certificate is: • CSCI 603 – Defensive Network Security • CSCI 604 – Ethical Hacking • CSCI 609 – Cybersecurity Law and Policy • One additional courseThere are a number of options for the final course. These include, at NDSU: • CSCI 610 – Computer Crime and Forensics • CSCI 669 – Network Security • A computer science
some even leavefor opportunities outside of school all together. As the field of engineering education researchgrows, more opportunities arise to examine what happens between the declaration of a major andthe planned graduation date that prompts so many students to exit the field. Much researchdiscusses how and why students initially choose a major (e.g., [1],[6]), but further discussion ofwhat happens between major declaration and planned graduation date is lacking in the existingliterature.Major selection is the focus of a large body of research involving higher education (e.g. [1], [2],[7], [8]). Research looking into major selection has been pursued from a variety of perspectives.Some research has focused on a broad range of college majors
metacognitive regulation, there is most agreement surrounding four specific actions:planning, monitoring, control, and evaluation. Planning involves actions taken to help the learnerplan out their learning and cognitive tasks. Planning encompasses everything from gatheringappropriate resources to creating a time schedule for learning to the selection of a specificenvironment used for learning. Monitoring involves all actions that are used to determine if thecognitive task engaged in is on track to meet the intended goal. Monitoring can involve (but isnot limited to) checking progress on a particular task, checking understanding on a particularconcept, and checking that the procedure currently being used will reach the intended outcome.When a monitoring
. During ourpresentations at ASEE—both in conference sessions and in the NSF poster sessions—we offerthe tipsheets to attendees who express interest. We have also begun to use the tipsheets as thebasis for workshops and presentations. For example, at the American Association of Collegesand Universities STEM conference in November 2018, we presented a workshop on the topic ofshared vision for change projects. The interactive workshop was developed with the tipsheet asthe source of content, and the tipsheet served as a resource for attendees to take away for use ontheir home campuses.ConclusionAs of this writing, we have plans for additional tipsheets on topics that have emerged from whatwe are learning about the work of the RED teams. For example
follows upon an NSF-WIDER(Widening Implementation & Demonstration of Evidence-Based Reforms) planning grant.University of South Florida (USF) has a student population of approximately 31,000undergraduate and 11,000 graduate students. About 35% of the undergraduate students major ina STEM discipline (Biology, Chemistry, Physics, Math, Geosciences, or Engineering).Approximately half of the undergraduate students have transferred from another institution andabout half of these have come from one of the five primary campuses of HillsboroughCommunity College (HCC).The leadership team for the project consists of twelve to fifteen people (some members rotate inand out) and includes deans, department chairs, faculty, professionals from the office of
Lab II course and the MICA FYE courseswere taught are slightly less than two (2) miles apart.Project PlanningWe began planning the design project in December of 2016. Collaborations between JHU andMICA were not uncommon, and the two institutions continue to work together on variousendeavors (e.g. the JHU-MICA Film Centre). However, this was the first time we, the facultyinvolved in the design project, worked together.We had several reasons for wanting to orchestrate a collaborative design project for our students.The opportunity for our students to work with others from outside of their discipline and culturewas a huge motivator, and we were confident the experience would improve their teamwork,communication, and social/empathic skills. Since
Polytechnic Researcher and educator in the fields of Molecular Biotechnology, Clinical medicines and Project based learning.Mr. Larry Keng tee Seow, Larry Seow researches, lectures and initiates methods of design and thinking for encouraging critical creative process to drive future readiness, forming new innovative mind-set for individuals and groups from different disciplines, to maximize their resourcefulness with clarity in having solutions, to seize opportunities and keep complex problems away in the ever changing volatile, uncertain, complex and ambiguous environment. Larry is one of four master trainers at the pre-planning meeting for the 2nd design thinking for Public Service Division, Prime Minister’s
a recruitment tool for graduate school.Community college students in the program showed an increase of 25% in interest for pursuing amaster’s degree and Ph.D. degree. Before the program, three participants were planning topursue their master’s degree, and two participants were planning to pursue their Ph.D.Following, all four participants were planning to pursue a master’s degree, and three participantswere planning to pursue a Ph.D. In Figure 2, students’ graduate school choice, the field, andacceptance rate were most influenced by the REU Program. All community college participantswere looking to complete STEM-related majors such as: Astrophysics, Structural Engineering,Computer Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering.TransitioningAll
security practitioners indicate that their organization doesnot invest enough in security awareness training. Professionals in the field consider it imperative foracademic institutions to increase course development in computer security to make students bothknowledgeable and technologically prepared for future challenges in this field. Knowledge aboutongoing and planned activities will help the institutions to design and develop effective programsindividually and in collaboration with others. Universities are only beginning to catch up.The objective of this paper is to describe our experiences in the design and development of cybersecuritycourses and laboratory exercises for a cybersecurity concentration for our computer science majors
research. The ACT club participated in designcompetitions in the past, and a number of members expressed their interest to volunteer in theresearch process, as the club seeks to engage in diverse architectural activities to gain experienceand knowledge in the industry.Figure 1.1 Volunteers building raised beds Figure 1.2 Volunteers building micro-hydroponic systemFigure 1.3 Volunteers building micro-farm system prototype Figure 1.4 Resident volunteers plantingThe planning of the project started by procuring startup funds through local grants. Theapplication included a detailed material list and cost analysis as exhibited in Table 1.1. Thisprocurement can serve as a point of reference for the multiple research funding opportunities
, Peru and providing seed funds to foster collaborations in research, teaching,and service between these institutions. In addition to addressing the UN SDGs, these engagementactivities seek to create and sustain and international collaboration in a platform known as thefourth age of research [2]. Following these initiatives at Penn State and recognizing the need toprepare our students to make a meaningful contribution to the implementation of the SDGs, wedeveloped a six-week long faculty-led program called: Global Engineering Culture and Society.This paper describes the overall vision of the program, and focus on the design, development,implementation, challenges, assessment plans, and what is next for the course: GlobalEngineering Culture and