Paper ID #25067Board 66: Reimagining Energy Year 1: Identifying Non-Canonical Examplesof Energy in EngineeringProf. Gordon D Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is an assistant professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. He is passionate about creating engaging experiences for his students. His work is primarily focused on two areas: engineering education and design. Professor Hoople’s engineering education research examines the ways in which novel approaches can lead to better student outcomes. He is the principal investigator on the
a whole and EE, CpE, and ME inparticular, our transformative mixed-methods project responds to calls for more cross-institutional qualitative and longitudinal studies of minorities in engineering education. Thestudy will investigate the following overarching research questions: 1. Why do Black men and women choose and persist in, or leave, EE, CpE, and ME? 2. What are the academic trajectories of Black men and women in EE, CpE, and ME? 3. In what ways do these pathways vary by gender or institution? 4. What institutional policies and practices promote greater retention of Black engineering students?Our mixed-methods approach combines the quantitative power of large sample sizes availablefrom the Multi-Institution
gasproduction) are highly dependent on major engineering fields. However, the mentality of some inthe Arab society, especially in Qatar, strongly disapproves the idea of females entering field ofengineering. While the Middle East and North Africa region have fairly high numbers of femaleengineering students, many females do not go on to the workforce [1].As a young woman living in Qatar, I’ve received many disapprovals from my parents regardingthe idea of me studying engineering. Therefore, to create a community of practice thatencourages young Qatari females to study engineering, I chose to study the Qatari society andthe factors that contribute to females becoming engineers. My objective in this study is todevelop strategies for empowering other
worked for nine years in the manufacturing and service industry as an Industrial Engineer prior to her academic career. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Understanding competencies transfer during internships in undergraduate industrial engineering students: a case study at the [blinded]IntroductionDespite engineering programs designing curriculum with the goal of preparing students forindustry demands, there is still a disconnection between industry expectations of the workforceand the preparation of engineering graduates [1-3]. One way to prepare engineering students tomeet industry expectations is by involving them in real world experiences where they cantransfer some of the knowledge
programming and other course assignments such as homework. The survey wasdistributed in the same junior-year materials kinetics class in subsequent years, with differingresults. In study 1, students were significantly less motivated to complete programmingassignments than other course assignments. However, the following year, Study 2 found thatthere was no significant difference; students were equally motivated to complete programmingand other course assignments. Furthermore, students articulated that programming skills areessential for engineers to be efficient at their jobs. The contrasting results are discussed,presenting several hypotheses for the dissimilar attitudes.IntroductionComputational materials science and engineering (CMSE) is vital to
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Novel University-Industry Engineering Education Cooperation Program: Open Summer School co-organized by SEU, Xilinx and ICisCAuthors: Yongming Tang1, Joshua Lu2, Yanfang Deng3, Susan M. Lord4Author Affiliation:1. School of Electronic Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, tym@seu.edu.cn; 2. Xilinx co., Shanghai, China, joshua.lu@xilinx.com; 3. ICisC, Nanjing, China; 4. University of San Diego, slord@sandiego.edu;AbstractPartnerships between universities and industry can help provide engineering students witheducation, hands-on experiences, and skills needed to become successful professionals. Thispaper describes a summer school
Engineering Education, 2019 Work in Progress: Predictors for Success in Calculus 1 Rebecca George University of Houston A BSTRACT:“What are the factors for success for students in calculus 1?” Because calculus 1 is consid-ered a gateway course in most STEM majors, this is a common question among universitiesas attrition rates of students in these majors is considered high.This paper explores the use of different statistical approaches to analyzing data on studentswho have taken calculus 1 at a large research extensive university. Hierarchal Linear Mod-eling (HLM) analysis will be used in
research, we report the framework and anticipated outcomes ofa pilot study on NOE understanding of Vietnamese faculty.Keywords: Nature of Engineering, Engineering Education, Environmental Engineering,International Collaboration, NOE Instrument, Engineering Faculty 1Introduction For the last 10 years, there is a continuous increase in the number of research attempts inengineering education, and a relatively increased growth in emphasis on Nature of Engineering(NOE) research [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Although still a developing area, a handful of NOEresearch findings demonstrate that instructors and students hold an inadequate understanding ofNOE
. Implicit bias on student teams is often theorized to influence the prioritization of ideasexpressed by white male students over those expressed by their female counterparts orteammates of color [1]. In addition, a gender-correlated division of work often occurs onstudent-teams, with men doing the more technical tasks of the project, leaving women to oftenfill the remaining organizational and managerial positions on the team [2], [3], [4]. Reasoning forthis type of behavior is often linked to differences in student learning goals for a course, whetherthat be mastery orientation (motivation to understand the material), performance orientation(motivation to earn grades or favor) or performance-avoidance orientation (motivation to avoidappearing less
was decided that the students study freshmen and junior years at ITUand sophomore and senior years at SIUE. This implementation required ITU to openadditional sections of Industrial Engineering courses to be taught in English in the junioryear. Faculty who were assigned to teach these classes received substantial overloadpayments.It is noted that SIUE required completion of 128 credit hours for graduation, whereasITU required 142. It was agreed that ITU would teach 37 credit hours in freshmen and39 in junior year for a total of 76 hours, whereas SIUE would teach 32 credit hours insophomore year and 34 hours in senior year for a total of 66 hours.The enrollment and graduation statistics over the years are shown in Table 1. Enrollmentnumbers
knowledgeand skills that are crucial to succeed in creating high quality online learning environmentsbecause, as the famous quote from Joel Barker says, “When a paradigm shifts, everyone goesback to zero” and then “your past success guarantees nothing [1].”This is a reflective paper, in which I, the instructor (the first author), will narrate my experienceon transitioning from teaching in a face-to-face classroom to teach fully in an onlineenvironment. It will also explain how the support of an instructional designer (the second author)can make this transition smoother.About me, “the instructor”Before becoming an online instructor, I taught in face-to-face classrooms using teacher-centeredpractices and more recently the learner-centered (flipped
therelationship between social responsibility and Veteran students’ core beliefs. Results of thisstudy showed that both Veteran and first-year non-Veteran engineering students strongly valuethe tenants of social responsibility. The results of this study indicate the potential for curriculumand policy changes to increase Veteran retention in engineering programs.IntroductionThe National Science Foundation [1] indicated that approximately 6.1% of students in the USselect engineering as a field of study. An important aspect for engineering programs across thecountry is to retain these students. In 2007 it was found that the retention rate continues tosteadily increase from 70 years ago from 28% to 56% in 2007 [2]. This increase in retention islikely due to
. Ronald W. Welch, The Citadel Ron Welch (P.E.) received his B.S. degree in Engineering Mechanics from the United States Military Academy in 1982. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana in 1990 and 1999, respectively. He became the Dean of Engineering at The Citadel on 1 July 2011. Prior to his current position, he was the Department Head of Civil Engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler from Jan 2007 to June 2011 as well as served in the Corps of Engineers for over 24 years including eleven years on the faculty at the United States Military Academy.Dr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is Dept. Head & D. Graham Copeland
startups [1] [2]. In recent years, institutions across the nation have beeninvesting resources in developing maker spaces plus curricular and extracurricular programs toprovide opportunities for students to acquire knowledge, skills, and pursue innovative ideaswhile still in college. In 2011, the National Science Foundation (NSF) [3] launched theInnovation Corps (I-Corps) program focused on accelerating economic and societal benefits ofNSF funded research projects. Today, there are almost 100 institutions participating in theprogram with an I-Corps Site program on their campus. While each institution utilizes similarapproaches, including an I-Corps team formation, knowledge and skills training, customerdiscovery and guidance from experienced
, where historically underrepresentedstudents (URM, def: non-white, non-Asian) compose approximately 12-16% of the student body(1). Lack of diversity limits the talent base and creative capital of the entire engineeringprofession (2). For this reason, institutions have been investing in Minority EngineeringPrograms (MEPs) within their undergraduate engineering colleges (3,4). MEPs serve as umbrellaorganizations that offer financial, academic, and social support, with overarching objectives ofimproving representation and retention of URM undergraduate students in engineering programs(3-7). Although programmatic elements and administrative infrastructure may vary byinstitution, there is no question that MEPs in general are effective in URM
-STEM Program at Purdue University Northwest (a unification of Purdue UniversityCalumet and Purdue University North Central) provided educational opportunities for financiallyneedy but academically talented STEM students. Services and activities were designed to: 1)improve the undergraduate educational experiences, 2) increase the number of studentscompleting the first stage of baccalaureate study, and those receiving degrees, and 3) increase thelikelihood that a Scholar will be employed or enrolled in a graduate program. Initially, 26students were chosen, divided between those in the beginning stages of a STEM major (15) andthose at the upper level (11). Additional Scholars were added as Scholars graduated or left, with59 total participants
Research, Quantitative Methodology.Shelby G. Roberts, University of Memphis Shelby G. Roberts is a doctoral student in the Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology and Research at the University of Memphis. Her interests focus on higher education retention efforts for underrepresented populations in STEM fields. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Role of Empathy in Choosing Majors Eddie L. Jacobs ∗1 , Amy L. DeJongh Curry2 , Yonghong Jade Xu 4 , Carmen Astorne-Figari3 , Wesam M. Salem4 , Shelby G. Roberts4 , and Russell Deaton1 1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Memphis 2
American,and Pacific Islander engineering graduates remain significantly underrepresented in engineering[1]. Progress in increasing the retention and persistence of underrepresented populations inengineering degree programs and the engineering workforce has been slow [2]. Furthermore,even less progress has been made in diversifying the engineering workforce, with marginalchange in the proportion of underrepresented minority engineers in the workforce in recentdecades [3], [4]. To address problems of diversification and retention in the STEM workforce,we must explore potential mechanisms to support these aims.The transition from college to the workforce is a critical period for retaining a diverse STEMworkforce. Early retention in STEM careers is
within amajor that may not fit their interests or goals, or to migrate to other majors (either withinengineering or outside the field), which may be difficult due to required courses 1, 2 or could havenegative consequences on their time to degree 3 . As such, students may feel pressure to choose the‘right’ major early on.Research shows that the perceived fit of a student’s major is correlated with their self-efficacy 4 andthat interest/major fit is an important factor in major persistence 5 . Optimism with a major, closelyrelated to perceptions and confidence, has also been shown to predict satisfaction with a major 6 .Therefore, the magnitude of a student’s belief that they are in the right major, as well as theiroptimism toward that major
provide a series of project-basedexercises as educational activities for a facade course. These modules complement educationalactivities in a design course by introducing pattern modeling along with its contemporaryapplications in advanced facade systems such as responsive facades.The proposed modules consist of activities on pattern identification, mathematical modeling,shading function development, and simulation of the mechanism and facade system. Therelationship between the modules and the activities is demonstrated in figure 1. The goals of the activities are: To enable students to understand the geometric principles of a pattern with an emphasis on Persian geometric patterns. To introduce use
foundcommon themes across their stories. These themes include the perception of gender bias, as wellas an intimidating, hostile, and non-inclusive environment. Although the results of this studydemonstrate gender bias and marginalization occur in makerspaces, female engineering studentsstill find value in the makerspace through access to resources, opportunities to learn, increasedconfidence, and female makerspace staff.IntroductionEngineering has been historically dominated and accepted as a masculine field [1]. This publicperception has led women, among other underrepresented groups, to encounter resistance whenentering the discipline [2]. Gender bias within the field of engineering has ongoingconsequences; namely, women continue to hold a
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Military-Bound and Veteran Student Views on Socially Responsible EngineeringAbstractThis research explored the perspectives of engineering students on the relationship betweenservice in the military and views of social responsibility as engineers, in particular professionalconnectedness or the obligation that an engineer has to help solve social problems or help othersusing their professional skills. Three research questions (RQs) were examined: (1) How does theprofessional connectedness of engineering students attending a military academy compare tostudents at other institutions? (2) How do engineering students with military aspirations
microsensors for in situ investigation of physical and chemical dynamics in microenvironments (e.g., biofilm, corrosion, emulsions, or plant) by combining with nano and biotechnology. His other research interest is to develop renewable (bio)energy processes for environmental sustainability. He is currently a registered professional engineer. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Promoting Undergraduate Research and Education through Extracurricular EPA P3 ProjectsIntroduction and ObjectivesThe importance of multi-interdisciplinary design experiences is well-highlighted in the ASCEBody of Knowledge [1] and the ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission [2]. However
method used tocarry out the research. After that it provides a summary of the results. The paper concludes witha discussion of the key findings and provide directions for future development.MethodThis paper uses a case-study approach. During workforce development meetings across multiplecommunity and technical colleges in Louisiana, there was a discussion to determine whatadditional program offerings are needed; both on the credit side (i.e., degrees), and the non-creditside (i.e., industry-based certificates). To address this need, and through collaboration with amanufacturing-extension program, a set of Competitiveness Review© (CR) assessments8 wereperformed. Figure 1 describes the assessment process. Each assessment involved: • The company
casestudy. The three to four case studies change every year. Students from diverse disciplines, includingengineering, planning, economics, hydrology, biology, architecture, geography, communications, andcomputational hydraulics, interested in flood risk reduction can apply. Those accepted into the Programare placed in interdisciplinary research teams composed of 5-6 students: 1-2 PhD, 2-3 Masters, and 2-3undergraduate students. The teams are guided by project faculty mentors from both U.S. and Dutchpartner institutions. A two-week long research trip to the Netherlands provides transformativeeducation and an authentic learning environment through field trips, meetings with Dutch flood experts,lectures, and participation in design workshops. Students
reality (VR) and computer graphics (CG) are highly interrelated. The evolution of VRhas been aided by the advancements in 3D graphics, visualization, and interactive user interfaces.Evidently, CG has tools and techniques tremendously influence and impact the capabilities ofVR and also considerably define the limitations as well. However, in this study, multiple modesare used to overcome space and cost limitations. Figure 1: Multiple VR-based modes of Interaction; Clockwise from top-left Using Head Mounted Displays, Using Controllers on Desktop, Using Touchpad, StylusOne of the most important advantages of using VR is the ability to engage students to facilitateactive learning and problem-based learning. Active learning and project-based
on their interests and the availability of the courses that are offered during their senior year.These courses are offered such that graduate students can also take them and therefore provide abroad mixture of undergrad and graduate students from different concentrations within thedepartment and sometimes among various majors in college of engineering. One of the greatadvantage of these courses is the potential diversity among the students which can offer muchwider level of insights and discussions in the class which if guided appropriately can lead tocollaborative learning environment and have the potential to incorporate the concepts of industry4.0 [1] in curriculum. These technical elective courses also provide opportunity for
evaluator on numerous, large-scale, federally funded programs. She has played a pivotal role in the development and successful funding of various programs, as recognized in comments from review panels.Randi Mendes, University of Connecticut c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Entrepreneurial Engineering Education – A Research Experience for Undergraduates focused on Entrepreneurship and Technical InnovationBackground and Motivation:In the summer of 2013, a report in The Bridge, published by the National Academy ofEngineering, stated that entrepreneurship or entrepreneurial thinking are some of the mostcritical skills to be taught to engineering undergraduates [1]. While there has been
who pursue, andgraduate with Baccalaureate Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics(STEM). Since its inception in November 1992, over 17,500 baccalaureate degrees have beenawarded to underrepresented minority students at CUNY. International Research (IR)experiences are increasingly seen as important components of the High Impact undergraduateactivities that lead to graduation, and continuation to graduate study. This paper will emphasize 1) how elements of the approach integrate into the NYCLSAMP program operations, 2) the university sites research facilities/activities 3) participantrecruitment, 4) pre-departure activities and 5) models for campus wide participation. Thepartnerships were formed over a ten year span
Ethnic Studies, Women’s and Gender Studies,and Latin American Studies. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 How the “Needs of the Force” Impact Navy and Marine Corps Veterans’ Decision to Major in EngineeringAbstractThe Navy and Marine Corps are both branches of the US Department of the Navy. However,they have different missions in support of national defense and thus sailors and Marines havevery different job responsibilities during their service. This study investigates how these differentroles impact their future choice to major in engineering. We explore three research questions. 1)What reasons did student veterans in engineering give for first enlisting in the Navy or