Asee peer logo
Displaying all 3 results
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
Paper ID #281022018 Best PIC IV Paper: Engineering Ethics Division: Faculty Perceptions ofChallenges to Educating Engineering and Computing Students About Ethicsand Societal ImpactsMs. Madeline Polmear, University of Colorado, Boulder Madeline Polmear is a PhD student in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engi- neering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. Her research interests include ethics education and the societal impacts of engineering and technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
Conference Session
ASEE TUESDAY PLENARY FEATURING BEST PAPERS & INDUSTRY DAY SPEAKER Sponsored by University of South Florida & University of Maryland
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors, Corporate Member Council
Paper ID #281052018 BEST OVERALL ZONE PAPER, Best Zone I Paper: Assessment ofProgressive Learning of Ethics in Engineering Students Based on the Modelof Domain LearningDr. Sadan Kulturel-Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Sadan KulturelKonak is a Professor of Management Information Systems at Penn State Berks where she is also the Coordinator of Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ENTI) Minor and the Director of the Center for Entrepreneurship and Economic Development (CEED). She received her Ph.D. in Industrial and Systems Engineering from Auburn University. Her research interests are in modeling and
Conference Session
DISTINGUISHED LECTURE: 2018 Best PIC and Zone Paper Presentations
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Diane Constance Aloisio, Indiana-Purdue University
Tagged Topics
ASEE Board of Directors
drug [Topol, 2004].Using these back stories, we created a series of scenarios along with questions. We framed eachquestion so as to obscure its origin while potentially allowing the student to draw out and discussa decision error of systems engineering. Why not simply give students descriptions of the failuresand the findings we discussed and have the students evaluate them? First, we wanted to eliminatebias due to students being familiar with a particular failure. For example, the Space ShuttleChallenger accident is a frequent topic in engineering ethics lectures. A learned, in-context,response from a previous exposure would not give us an indication of their abilities in systemsengineering. Second, the point of framing a question around a